logo
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to permit product safety agency firings

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to permit product safety agency firings

The Hill2 days ago
The Justice Department asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to allow President Trump to fire three Democratic appointees at the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC).
It's the administration's latest emergency bid at the high court to greenlight the president's efforts to remake agencies that have traditionally operated with a degree of independence from the White House.
In May, the Supreme Court issued an emergency ruling paving the way for Trump to fire leaders at the National Labor Relations Board and Merit Systems Protection Board as litigation proceeds.
Court watchers took it as the latest sign that the justices are prepared to overrule its precedent that for decades has allowed certain independent agency leaders to be protected from termination without cause.
Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the justices that the district judge overseeing the CPSC case 'chose a different path' when he weeks later blocked Trump's CPSC firings.
Arguing that the ruling has 'sown chaos and dysfunction,' Sauer told the justices they should not only issue an emergency ruling, but they should also go ahead and take up the issue in full for their next term.
'This Court should step in to stop lower courts from treating Wilcox like the proverbial excursion ticket—good for one day and trip only,' Sauer wrote, referring to the earlier case.
It marks the Trump administration's 20th emergency appeal at the high court since taking office.
Trump purported to fire the three commissioners appointed by former President Biden, Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric and Richard Trumka Jr., in May despite federal law protecting them from removal without cause
Represented by consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, the commissioners soon sued.
U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox, a Biden appointee who serves in Baltimore, agreed their terminations were unlawful and blocked them in a ruling last month.
The administration's effort at the highest court comes after a three-judge panel on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday declined to halt Maddox' ruling.
'The district court's order effectively transfers control of the CPSC from President Trump to three Commissioners who had been appointed by President Biden,' Sauer wrote.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump Accused Of 'Blatant And Vile Anti-Semitism' With 'Deeply Dangerous' Trope
Donald Trump Accused Of 'Blatant And Vile Anti-Semitism' With 'Deeply Dangerous' Trope

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Donald Trump Accused Of 'Blatant And Vile Anti-Semitism' With 'Deeply Dangerous' Trope

President Donald Trump drew fierce criticism and was accused of anti-Semitism for a comment he made during a speech celebrating the passing in Congress of his so-called 'Big, Beautiful Bill' on Thursday. Trump was boasting to supporters in Des Moines, Iowa, about how they would now benefit from various parts of his signature, controversial taxation and spending bill when he said: 'No death tax. No estate tax. No going through the banks and borrowing from, in some cases a fine banker, and in some cases, Shylocks and bad people.' TRUMP: No estate tax, no going through the banks and borrowing from—in some cases a fine banker— and in some cases a shylocks and bad people. — Acyn (@Acyn) July 4, 2025 The term 'Shylock,' a reference to the name of the Jewish moneylender in William Shakespeare's 'The Merchant of Venice,' is now considered to be an anti-Semitic slur, playing as it does on anti-Semitic stereotypes. Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.) led the criticism of the president on social media. The congressman accused Trump of 'blatant and vile antisemitism' and claimed the president 'knows exactly what he's doing.' This is blatant and vile antisemitism, and Trump knows exactly what he's doing. Anyone who truly opposes antisemitism calls it out wherever it occurs — on both extremes — as I do. Where is @EliseStefanik and the GOP now that antisemitism is coming from Trump? — Daniel Goldman (@danielsgoldman) July 4, 2025 'Shylock is among the most quintessential antisemitic stereotypes,' added Amy Spitalnick, of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs. 'This is not an accident' by Trump and is 'deeply dangerous,' she added. Shylock is among the most quintessential antisemitic stereotypes. This is not an accident. It follows years in which Trump has normalized antisemitic tropes and conspiracy theories — and it's deeply dangerous. — Amy Spitalnick (@amyspitalnick) July 4, 2025 Trump was reportedly confronted over his use of the term when flying back to the White House on board Air Force One. 'I've never heard it that way,' the president reportedly said. 'The meaning of Shylock is somebody that's a money lender at high rates. You view it differently. I've never heard that.' A 'Shylock' comes from Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice—a Jewish moneylender who demands a 'pound of flesh.' The term later became a slur for a greedy or ruthless lender. ⚠️ It's widely seen as antisemitic and offensive today. — Molly Ploofkins (@Mollyploofkins) July 4, 2025 Repugnant. — OB (@OhBe_Won) July 4, 2025 Shylock is an antisemitic trope. — Dr. Brian Goldman (@NightShiftMD) July 4, 2025 The bigotry just slips out sometimes... — Lib Dunk (@libdunkmedia) July 4, 2025 Trump has those old slurs ready to go — PatriotTakes 🇺🇸 (@patriottakes) July 4, 2025 Maybe instead of going after universities for allegedly not doing enough to fight anti-semitism the president should police his own words and actions. — Pam Fessler (@pamelafessler) July 4, 2025 A disgusting antisemitic smear from a president who dines with Holocaust deniers and called Neo Nazis 'fine people.'Said at a time when antisemitism is rising around the world. — Andrew Bates (@AndrewBatesNC) July 4, 2025 This is an antisemitic slur. An old one — Jennifer Mascia (@JenniferMascia) July 4, 2025 He's busting out the 40s antisemitism — evan loves worf (@esjesjesj) July 4, 2025 So slurs are what's making America great again? — Melissa Nold, Esq. (@savage_esquire) July 4, 2025 Today, at a rally in Iowa, Trump said this:"No death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing from, in some cases, a fine banker. And in some cases, shylocks and bad people."For those unaware, "shylock" is an antisemitic comes from Shakespeare's The… — Charlotte Clymer 🇺🇦 (@cmclymer) July 4, 2025 Marjorie Taylor Greene Rolls Out Gun Giveaway With Trigger-Happy MAGA Rant Biden Casually Drops Bombshell About Who's Still Seeking His Advice, And Trump Will Hate It Big, Blundering Typo Kicked Off Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Meeting With GOP Rep

China navigates delicate US truce while affirming trade consensus
China navigates delicate US truce while affirming trade consensus

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China navigates delicate US truce while affirming trade consensus

BEIJING (Reuters) -The Chinese commerce ministry said on Friday that Beijing and Washington had stepped up efforts to implement what they had agreed during recent trade talks but cautioned the U.S. against destabilising their "hard-won" consensus. China hopes the U.S. can continue to meet it half way and maintain the stability of bilateral trade and economic relations, the commerce ministry said, as the two economic super-powers seek a resolution to their trade tensions. "We hope the U.S. side will deeply understand the mutually beneficial and win-win nature of China-U.S. economic and trade relations," it said in a statement. In three separate statements released in the past week about U.S. trade talks, the ministry called on Washington to preserve the positive momentum while also warning other countries against "making a deal at the expanse of China's interests" with the U.S. Thanks to its trade truce with the U.S., China is not at risk of being slammed by higher tariffs when the 90-day pause on Liberation Day tariffs ends next week, but Trump's trade deals with Britain and Vietnam suggest China may remain an indirect target, said Julian Evans-Pritchard, head of China Economics. "It seems that Trump is keen to crack down on the rerouting of Chinese exports via third countries, which has diminished the effectiveness of U.S. tariffs," Evans-Pritchard said. As a July 9 trade deadline for countries to negotiate trade deals with the U.S. nears, Beijing is keen to remind Washington that the success of their trade talks in London did not come about easily. Earlier this year, China retaliated against U.S. tariffs by suspending exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets. During U.S.-China trade talks in Geneva in May, Beijing committed to removing the measures imposed since April 2, but the U.S. said those critical materials were not moving as fast as agreed. The breakthrough came during the London talks in June, with both sides agreeing for a framework to implement the Geneva agreement that involved expediting rare earth shipments to the U.S. "China is currently reviewing and approving eligible export licence applications for controlled items," the commerce ministry said in the statement, referring to its own rare earth export curbs. The U.S. has also taken actions "to lift a series of restrictive measures against China, and has informed China about the relevant situation," the ministry said, confirming reports that Washington resumed China-bound exports of chip design software, ethane and jet engines. "Teams on both sides are stepping up efforts to implement relevant outcomes of the London Framework," the Chinese ministry said, calling the framework "hard-won". Earlier this week, the U.S. sent letters to ethane producers to rescind a restrictive licensing requirement on exports to China imposed in late May and June, after its official confirmed concessions from Beijing over rare earths. Some chip design software developers have restored access to their software and technology for customers in China after Washington lifted similar restrictions. GE Aerospace was also cleared to resume jet engine shipments to China.

Donald Trump Shares Warning for Thomas Massie in Kentucky
Donald Trump Shares Warning for Thomas Massie in Kentucky

Newsweek

time25 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Shares Warning for Thomas Massie in Kentucky

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump shared a poll indicating Rep. Thomas Massie would lose a GOP primary contest to a candidate he backed after the House Republican was one of just two who voted against his Big Beautiful Bill when it passed the House of Representatives on Thursday. Newsweek contacted Massie for comment via email on Friday outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters On Thursday the House passed the latest version of Trump's One Big Beautiful Act by 218 votes against 214. Massie was one of two House Republicans who voted against the package, along with Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania. He was also one of two GOP rebels who voted against an earlier version which the House passed in May, along with Ohio's Warren Davidson. Trump's targeting of Kentucky representative Massie, who has opposed him over a number of issues including airstrikes on Iran and the U.S. debt ceiling, show's the president's determination to keep his own party in line. Trump branded Massie a "pathetic LOSER" after he opposed Trump's Iran strikes in June. What To Know After the House vote on Thursday Trump shared a document emailed out by pollster McLaughlin & Associates on June 11 titled "Kentucky 4th Congressional District – Republican Primary Poll Summary" on his Truth Social website. McLaughlin & Associates, a firm that has previously worked for Trump and was described as his "most trusted pollsters" by The Hill, said it surveyed 600 likely Republican primary voters between June 9 and 11 with a margin of error of plus or minus four percent. The company said the "geographic and demographic voter segments" reflected "a Republican primary universe." The poll found 54 percent of Republican primary voters had a favorable view of Massie, compared with 40 percent who viewed him unfavorably. Similarly 52 percent approved of his actions in Congress while 41 percent disapproved. Left, Rep. Thomas Massie speaks to reporters following a series of votes at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on March 11, 2025. Right, President Donald Trump arrives for a rally to kick off the... Left, Rep. Thomas Massie speaks to reporters following a series of votes at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on March 11, 2025. Right, President Donald Trump arrives for a rally to kick off the July Fourth holiday weekend at the Iowa State Fairgrounds in Des Moines, Iowa, on July 3, 2025. More Anna Moneymaker/Scott Olson/GETTY The survey found Massie would lose in a Republican primary to a Trump endorsed candidate, with just 23 percent of the vote to their 52 percent. Overall 85 percent of those polled said they had a favorable view of Trump while 15 percent viewed him unfavorably. Respondents were told that "Thomas Massie was the only Republican in the House of Representatives who sided with the Democrats and voted against President Trump's tax cut bill" after which 59 percent of the GOP primary voters said they would be less likely to vote for Massie, against 19 percent who stated they would be more likely. Trump's "big, beautiful bill" contains an array of tax and spending measures. Tax cuts Trump introduced in 2017 would be made permanent, while state and local tax deductions would increase from $10,000 to $40,000—primarily benefiting those living in high-tax states. The bill also includes additional funding for border security and the military and cuts to Medicaid and food stamps. It passed the Senate on Tuesday thanks to Vice President JD Vance's tie-breaking vote. What People Are Saying McLaughlin & Associates wrote: "In the Republican primary Congressman Massie has made himself very vulnerable by his opposition to the President's tax cut bill and has destroyed his Republican base of support." In a post on X, formerly Twitter, Massie said: "Although there were some conservative wins in the budget reconciliation bill (OBBBA), I voted No on final passage because it will significantly increase U.S. budget deficits in the near term, negatively impacting all Americans through sustained inflation and high interest rates." What Happens Next Having been narrowly approved by both chambers of Congress Trump will now be able to sign the Big Beautiful Bill into law.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store