Another Big IPO Headed to Investors!

Yahoo

08-07-2025

In this podcast, Motley Fool analyst Jason Moser and contributor Lou Whiteman discuss:
Figma's IPO filing and what investors should be watching.
Amazon's robotics aspirations.
Apple's AI strategy: Buy it or build it?
To catch full episodes of all The Motley Fool's free podcasts, check out our podcast center. When you're ready to invest, check out this top 10 list of stocks to buy.
A full transcript is below.
Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $695,481!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $969,935!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,053% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 179% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025
This podcast was recorded on July 02, 2025.
Jason Moser: Another big IPO on the horizon, you're listening to Motley Fool Money.
Welcome to Motley Fool Money, I'm Jason Moser, and joining me today it's Motley Fool Analyst, Lou Whiteman. Lou, thanks for being here.
Lou Whiteman: Happy to be here. Good to see you, Jason.
Jason Moser: Good to see you. On today's show we're going to dig into Amazon's robotic future and Apple's AI foibles. But we begin today with latest in IPOs. Digital content creator Figma has filed for its initial public offering. The company plans to sell shares of its Class A stock under the ticker FIG, F-I-G. I think it's worth noting too, Lou, this is a three-class share structure with this company, A, B, and C. Lou, if listeners feel like Figma is a familiar name, well, it should be. Adobe tried to acquire it for $20 billion back in 2023. That acquisition didn't work out. Recently, Figma garnered a $12.5 billion valuation in a tender offer just last year. That's big Delta there. How do you think the market's going to receive this?
Lou Whiteman: I'm going to take the over. I don't know what the over is, but I'm thinking much closer to Adobe, if not beyond. Look, we've all been talking about all of these huge private companies that investors want to get their hands on, but are remaining private. It's a pretty impressive business just on its own right. If you take just pent-up demand for these just big trophy assets, and hey, a pretty good business doesn't hurt, I think there's going to be a lot of interest here.
Jason Moser: When a company files to go public, obviously, they filed the S-1 document with the SEC, and that's where we can go as investors and really get all of the information that we want to know about, for the most part, regarding the company, and Figma, to be sure, has filed that S-1. When a company goes public, when they file that S-1, what are some of the high-priority things, just a couple of high-priority items, that you look for in that document?
Lou Whiteman: Well, obviously, the financials. We start right revenue growth, cash position, but for especially these young growth companies, I want to dive deep on customers. You don't want to buy a one-trick pony or an idea in search of a market or something like that. Figma's case, look, it looks pretty impressive. Nearly half a million customers, a global reach, 85% of its users outside of the US. I'm curious what do you look for there, but I think customers are so important for these young companies.
Jason Moser: I love that getting a beat on the customers and understanding the growth and the opportunity that's there as well. I like to look additionally just really quickly for the use of proceeds. I think, if you just search that term, use of proceeds, then you get an idea of what the company intends to do with the money it raises from that offering, and you would think, in most cases, they're all just, well, we're going to use it to grow the company. It's not always the case. They do use that money to pay off debt, pay off shareholders that are looking for an exit strategy. To be sure, that is something that is in this particular S-1. It does say that they're going to facilitate an orderly distribution of shares for the selling stockholders. I'm not saying that this is a bad reason to go public, but I just think understanding the use of proceeds is always helpful. Then ultimately, just how does the company make money? At its very core, the very simplest level, how does business have money in it? It looks like Figma, very much like Adobe, it's a subscription business. They have monthly and annual subscription offerings. Those are a couple of things that I certainly like to look at.
Now, Figma was founded in 2012 by CEO Dylan Field and Evan Wallace. Field said in this letter, and I know you have some opinions on this founder's letter in there, but as a public company, investors should "expect us to take big swings", including through things like acquisitions. Now, growth via acquisition is, of course, a risky strategy. It can work, but it is definitely risky. Do you think this type of language implies potential growth challenges, and then further, what were some of your takeaways from that letter?
Lou Whiteman: I will say the founder letter, I don't know if it was the first thing I used to look for, but I feel like last years we're upping the game here, and it has become something to see. If you look at Field, he does not lack for confidence. It reminds me of Alex Karp's S-1 when Palantir went public, and of course, both Field and Karp, they were both backed by Peter Thiel, so maybe that makes sense. Look, this is a management team. They are already showing they are willing to try different things. Back in 2024, Figma apparently began investing in digital currencies. They own Bitcoin now. Look, I think, if nothing else is a takeaway, I think as investors, we need to take Field at his word and expect experimentation. If you buy in, you're accepting the added risk that comes with all this M&A, and it comes with experimenting, and you're taking on that risk in hopes that they get it right, and there's really big upside if these big swings if they actually connect, right?
Jason Moser: Yeah. You're right. If you buy in, you're buying into ultimately Field's vision here. He's the biggest individual owner of the company. He owns 51.1% of the voting power going into this IPO. If you buy in, you're buying in on his vision. Is this a company ultimately that you're interested in? Is this something that investors you feel like should take more of a wait-and-see approach?
Lou Whiteman: I don't know how you feel. I almost never buy into an IPO. I like to give things time to simmer, but look, this is an intriguing company. For now, at this point in its life, it seems to be onto something, and you have a CEO with a real big vision. There's a lot to like, but I think I'll watch it play out for a couple of quarters and then see what I think.
Jason Moser: I'm with you. I think there's a lot of promise with this business. Clearly, digital content creation is a massive market opportunity, but I'm going to give them a few quarters to see how they behave as a publicly traded company. Well, next up, Amazon's autonomous future. Lou, it was a matter of when not if, but Amazon has ushered in a new level of automation. It has deployed more than one million robots in its workplaces. Now, Amazon has just a little bit over 1.5 million employees in total. We're getting close to parity there, Lou. The rise of the machines is really something. Does this ultimately meaningfully reduce Amazon's payroll over the course of the next 10 years, or is this more about Amazon growing into this workforce, and ultimately, humans migrating to other jobs within the organization and using technology to ultimately make them better?
Lou Whiteman: I think I'm going to cheat and answer both questions yes. Amazon CEO, Andy Jassy, he has been pretty blunt about this. He's been saying, they want to use tech to cut the size of the company's workforce in the years to come. Look, a majority of those 1.5 million employees, they work in fulfillment. That is the warehouses, a lot of them. I do think we need to take him at his word, and the plan is to use this tech to meaningfully get at employee costs in fulfillment. That said, robots need babysitters. They need programmers. I am a believer that innovation opens windows when it closes doors, so to speak. I don't want to be too doom and gloom, but I think the goal is to replace some of at least these human tasks with robots as they can.
Jason Moser: It makes sense to a degree. Those are dangerous jobs oftentimes. Take it to the nth degree there, we're talking about a military. Rather be [OVERLAPPING] able to send a bunch of robots to war as opposed to actually having to put human lives in danger. They're absolutely use cases for all of this stuff across the world. Now, I was talking about this a couple of weeks back, but this is both fascinating and a little scary, I think, but Amazon is reportedly close to beginning testing human-like autonomous delivery methods, or in simpler terms, robots that deliver packages to your door. Now, I don't know about you, but I've got this vision of a robot walking down my street or wheeling down my street, however, coming up and dropping them, and now you multiply that to the scale where virtually every house in our neighborhood is being serviced by Amazon at some point or another. I'm not sure I necessarily feel so good about that. Now, some 75% of Amazon's global deliveries are already assisted in some way by robotics, but this isn't just an Amazon story. Who are some of the big names we should be watching in warehouse automation?
Lou Whiteman: With those robot delivery people, all I can think about is what a pain it would be to walk your dog. My dog would flip, but anyway, more to the point. Amazon was really forward-looking here, which shouldn't surprise us. They bought Kiva back in 2012, I think it was, and that's a lot of what they're doing now. But there is the rest of the world outside of Amazon. I don't know if anybody has the scale to do that themselves, the way Amazon has done in-house, but if you look at a company like Honeywell, they are spinning off their automation. I'm really intrigued when that business gets spun out, because I think that's a real play on this for the rest of the world. One of my favorites, I got to point to GXO, the logistics company that runs warehouses for Nike, for Whirlpool, for Apple, and just we will be the experts on this, we'll take care of it. I think there's a ton of opportunities here, not just for Amazon, but for everyone as we get smarter about this.
Jason Moser: Well, speaking of opportunities, let's play armchair CEO for just a second here or not. Amazon already does a lot, and they do a lot of things really well. But if you're Andy Jassy, what are you looking at as Amazon's next great growth frontier? What should he be pursuing next?
Lou Whiteman: I look at the two that they seem to be pursuing and advertising in healthcare. Healthcare scares me because it's going to take someone smarter, but advertising, I'm really interested. We saw just a few weeks ago, Amazon and Roku announcing a partnership to integrate Amazon ads on a Roku's network. As a Trade Desk shareholder, I'm watching that intrigue, but, man, don't mess with Amazon. I do think there's probably multiple winners, but that's a huge market, and Amazon, it seems to fit into their playbook already, and they've done so well when they've just expanded from their strengths. What about you? What do you see?
Jason Moser: The healthcare one is a little bit that scares me. That's a difficult one to navigate to, but I always wondered if they were just going to get into banking, bank of Amazon at some point, something that just scales out and they can just tie it to those prime relationships, but I guess we shall see the advertising opportunity. I think you're spot on there. It's a massive one, and they're already working on about an $80 billion annual revenue run rate there.
Lou Whiteman: I cheated. I gave him something he already knew.
Jason Moser: Nothing wrong. Well, next up, Apple's having a little trouble figuring out its AI strategy. Lou, AI continues to dominate the conversation here in the markets this year. However, one of the companies that traditionally has dominated a lot of our conversations, Apple is facing a dilemma right now in regard to its AI strategy. I guess the question is, should they continue to try to build their own AI capabilities or should they partner up instead? Reports out there state that the state of the company's AI division is in chaos right now, just lost one of its most senior large language model researchers, continues to have a tough time retaining talent to work on AI projects. We've seen the money that Zuckerberg is throwing around there at Meta to recruit AI talent. Not to mention what they're doing at OpenAI, Alphabet, and on. Apple now considering partnering up with OpenAI or Amazon-backed Anthropic in order to help power its new version of Siri. Now, whatever leadership decides to do here, I don't think time is their buddy, Lou. What's the level of urgency here?
Lou Whiteman: I don't want to hit chicken little level of urgency because that implies some dire risk to Apple, and look, Apple's going to be fine. I don't think it's run for the exit, but look, the story for the last few years has been that AI would spark this next great iPhone refreshed super-cycle, and well, we're still waiting. I don't know how urgent, but it would certainly just check an important box and give Tim Cook a chance to relax a little more if they can find a way to get this right. Definitely some urgency, right?
Jason Moser: I would think. Like you said, it's Apple. They're going to be fine. We got to give them a lot of credit where credit's due, particularly with Tim Cook, I think. It starts making you wonder, they've always taken this position. We don't necessarily need to be first. We just want to be best. They've done that all throughout their history and just looking where the puck is heading and following along until they can come up with that vision to execute. On the surface, it really does feel like they've lost the AI narrative, but do you think this was even maybe a little deliberate on their part? Do you think they've been taking a bit more of a wait-and-see attitude in regard to AI and exactly how they should incorporate that into their hardware?
Lou Whiteman: I personally don't think it was deliberate. I think that all of the evidence suggests that, yes, they really did try and it hasn't gone as they hoped. Look, even Babe Ruth struck out sometimes. Hey, the thing is, though, that's OK. All of the headlines were piling on like, look, Apple needs to rethink it, Apple screwed this up, but look, there are dozens of companies out there working on these large language models. They all dream of having what Apple already has locked in, the consumer. Look, say AI hasn't gone as planned, say it wasn't deliberate, but Apple now has the opportunity to partner up, bring a wow product to Siri, spark that refresh cycle, and when it happens, and if it all goes to plan, I don't think anyone is going to be harping, well, this wasn't plan A. They screwed up plan A. I think shareholders will be pretty OK with plan B. Maybe not deliberate, but it's OK.
Jason Moser: You mentioned it. They've partnered up well before. Google and Search. In that case, Google was paying Apple. I wonder, in regard to a partnership here with whichever provider it is, if it'll be one where Apple is paying the partner or the partner is paying Apple for the presence on that massive installed hardware base. Given all of that and given where Apple is today, what do you make of this stock over the next five years?
Lou Whiteman: I look at this in what? About 29 times projected earnings. That doesn't strike me as scary. It doesn't strike me as really an opportunity. I do think that at some point, this next big thing question, they have to answer it. It's not going to be the car, it's not going to be the TV. I think that even if not for the business, just for the narrative. I'm not really excited to buy in right now, but if those are to hold it, you got to hold on here, I think, just because it's Apple. Worst case is, it's just going to be a money printing machine for a long time, and that's pretty good downside in my mind.
Jason Moser: I'll leave it there. Lou Whiteman, thanks again for being here.
Lou Whiteman: It's a pleasure.
Jason Moser: As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and the Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against. Don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows Motley Fool editorial standards and are not approved by advertisers. Advertisements or sponsored content are provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. I'm Jason Moser. Thanks for listening. We'll see you.
Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Jason Moser has positions in Adobe, Alphabet, Amazon, and Nike. Lou Whiteman has positions in GXO Logistics and Nike. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Adobe, Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Bitcoin, Nike, Palantir Technologies, and Roku. The Motley Fool recommends Delta Air Lines and GXO Logistics. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Another Big IPO Headed to Investors! was originally published by The Motley Fool