logo
Children with poor mental health less likely to work as adults

Children with poor mental health less likely to work as adults

Glasgow Times19-05-2025
The Institute For Public Policy Research (IPPR) said investing in children's mental health is 'crucial to reducing long-term barriers to work'.
One in five children in England are currently having a probable mental health issue, while Government figures suggest the number of workers aged 16 to 34 who say mental ill health limits the work they can do has increased more than fourfold over the past decade.
Poor mental health is now the leading work-limiting health condition among people aged 44 and younger.
For its research, the IPPR calculated that children with severe mental or behavioural issues are much more likely to be depressed adults and suffer a physical or mental condition which impacts their chances of working.
The think tank drew on a new analysis of the 1970 British Cohort Study, which is following the lives of around 17,000 people born in England, Scotland and Wales in a single week of 1970.
The latest findings show that mental health problems at age 10 have significant implications 40 years on.
Children with severe mental and behavioural problems are 85% more likely to have symptoms of depression at age 51 and 68% more likely to have a long-term condition that impacts their ability to work, the report showed.
A long-term condition is defined as any physical or mental condition that people are expecting to last 12 months or more.
The correlation also extended to poor physical health, with children with a physical health problem being 38% more likely to have limited capacity for work later in life.
Furthermore, for every four children developing a long-term health condition, one of their mothers is likely to leave the workforce altogether, the IPPR said.
With rising rates of poor mental health impacting the NHS, council services and social security system, action is needed now, the think tank added.
'Improving children's health is not just morally right – it is a social and economic necessity,' the study said.
'A healthier generation of children is essential to delivering this government's core missions: improving the nation's health, spreading opportunity, and securing sustainable economic growth…
'Poor childhood health casts a 'long shadow'. Children who grow up in poor health are likely to experience worse health outcomes in adulthood, achieve less at school, earn less and rely more heavily on public services throughout their lives.'
The team called for targeted investment on 'high-impact, cost-saving interventions that can deliver early wins', such as mental health support for 14 to 19-year-olds soon to enter the labour market.
Spending on children's mental health needs to be ringfenced, it suggested, while preventative spending should be 'hardwired' in the NHS and other public services.
Dr Jamie O'Halloran, senior research fellow at IPPR, said: 'The earlier we address both physical and mental health challenges children, the more likely we can prevent costly health conditions and worklessness later in life.
'This is not just a matter of improving individual lives, but also of alleviating long-term pressures on the state.'
Amy Gandon, IPPR associate fellow and former senior Department of Health official on children's health, said: 'Successive governments have failed to face up to the long-term consequences of poor child health.
'If this Government is serious about building a preventative state, it must act decisively to improve the prospects of our children and young people.
'What's more, the dividends from doing so need not be decades away; the right action now, for example, for those joining the workforce within a few years, can deliver better health, opportunity and growth within this Parliament.'
Figures show that the number of working-age adults in England claiming disability benefits has risen 41%, from 1.9 million in November 2019 to 2.7 million in May 2024.
Meanwhile, the number of people claiming incapacity benefits increased 40% over the same period, from two million to 2.9 million.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Medics issue patient safety warning over union's approach to strikes
Medics issue patient safety warning over union's approach to strikes

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Medics issue patient safety warning over union's approach to strikes

Top medics have urged the British Medical Association (BMA) to suspend its guidance advising doctors not to disclose strike plans to employers. The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges said that withholding this information risks patient safety as it makes it extremely difficult for health service leaders to maintain adequate patient care. Resident doctors are set to begin a five-day strike on Friday after pay talks with the government broke down, with the BMA seeking a 29 per cent pay rise. Hospital leaders anticipate having to cancel some operations and appointments, despite NHS England 's mandate to continue routine care, with one A&E in Cheltenham considering reducing services. The health secretary, Wes Streeting, described the strike action as 'completely unjustified', while the BMA argues the government's pay offer is insufficient.

NHS investigation ‘bent the rules' in favour of trans doctor
NHS investigation ‘bent the rules' in favour of trans doctor

Telegraph

time23 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

NHS investigation ‘bent the rules' in favour of trans doctor

The NHS investigation into a nurse who complained about a transgender doctor using a female hospital changing room repeatedly 'bent' impartiality rules, an employment tribunal has heard. Naomi Cunningham KC, barrister for nurse Sandie Peggie, said there was a 'pattern' of 'rules being bent and the usual boundaries transgressed' to favour trans medic Dr Beth Upton. She challenged Dr Kate Searle, an emergency medicine consultant at the Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, Fife, that the 'usual rules don't apply when dealing with Dr Upton, do they?'. Dr Searle disagreed but Ms Cunningham pointed to an email she sent to Dr Upton, passing on a message of support from Jamie Doyle, the hospital's head of nursing. The barrister said Mr Doyle was involved in the investigation and 'shouldn't it have been obvious to both you and Jamie that that was a wholly improper message from him.' Dr Searle replied: 'In hindsight, yes.' Ms Cunningham highlighted that Dr Searle was allowed to be present during Dr Upton's interview for the investigation, despite also being a witness in the case. She read an email from Angela Glancey, a clinical nurse manager, in which it was stated that Dr Searle would be interviewed first as 'that way there's no conflict once we speak to Dr Upton'. Dr Searle replied that she did not know the rules but Ms Cunningham said: 'Once again, this is a situation where we see rules being bent and the usual boundaries transgressed for Dr Upton. That's what you want and Angela indulges you.' She disagreed but then admitted she had committed a 'flagrant breach' of an instruction not to discuss the case with others, by speaking with another witness. The tribunal had previously heard how Dr Searle had emailed 19 of the hospital's consultants shortly after the incident to state that Dr Upton 'knows we all support her, and that we condemn the actions of Sandie'. The row centres on an encounter between Ms Peggie and Dr Upton on Dec 24 2023. The nurse experienced a sudden and heavy period and feared that it had bled through to her scrubs. Ms Peggie entered the female hospital changing room to find Dr Upton and challenged the medic's presence. Within hours, a bullying complaint was lodged by Dr Upton and the nurse was then suspended. In May last year Ms Peggie submitted a formal claim to an employment tribunal against NHS Fife and Dr Upton for sexual harassment, belief discrimination and victimisation. The nurse complained of being required to share a single-sex space with someone she believed to be male and being victimised for holding a gender-critical belief that biological sex is immutable. It emerged last week that Ms Peggie had been cleared of gross misconduct by an NHS Fife disciplinary hearing. However, the employment tribunal continues. Dr Searle spoke with Dr Upton on the night of the changing room incident and helped the medic fill out an official report into the matter. 'Flagrant breach' After Dr Searle was questioned about her email to the other consultants, and being present at Dr Upton's interview, Ms Cunningham said: 'Usual boundaries (are) transgressed because it's Doctor Upton, because it's about Doctor Upton. That's right, isn't it? This is becoming a pattern, isn't it?' Dr Searle disagreed but Ms Cunningham highlighted her invitation to an investigation meeting that stated 'you should avoid discussing the case with anyone other than your representative to ensure your confidentiality and that of the other parties involved'. The doctor said she had taken that instruction 'seriously' but she said she had not told Ms Glancey about her email to the other consultants, or passing on good wishes from Mr Doyle to Dr Upton. Ms Cunningham highlighted that Dr Searle had also spoken with the only third-party witness who could substantiate a claim that Ms Peggie had refused to communicate with Dr Upton over a patient. The barrister said the conversation was a 'flagrant breach' of the warning not to discuss the case with others. Dr Searle replied: 'In hindsight now, yes.' The doctor also agreed that a large man in men's clothes should not be allowed to use the female changing room if he self-identified as a woman. But she denied that Dr Upton was 'obviously male', saying she would not have known what sex the medic was 'assigned at birth' unless she had been told. The tribunal continues.

NHS consultant spoke to trans row witness despite warnings
NHS consultant spoke to trans row witness despite warnings

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

NHS consultant spoke to trans row witness despite warnings

An NHS consultant has admitted that she spoke to a potential witness despite being warned not to do so during an investigation into an altercation between a transgender doctor and a nurse.A healthcare assistant was alleged to have witnessed a separate incident involving nurse Sandie Peggie and Dr Beth Upton, days before they were involved in an encounter in a changing room at the Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy on Christmas Eve questioning from Ms Peggie's lawyer at a tribunal, Dr Kate Searle admitted that talking to the witness had been a "flagrant breach" of previous warnings not to discuss the she denied claims that she "left confidentiality in ruins" with her actions. Ms Peggie was suspended from work with NHS Fife after she told Dr Upton - a trans woman - not to be in the women's changing rooms. Dr Searle, who was Dr Upton's line manager, became involved with the case on 29 December and helped file a report on the NHS's datex complaints this period Dr Upton also accused Ms Peggie of walking out on treating a patient earlier in December due to the junior doctor's Searle later spoke to a healthcare assistant who was alleged to have witnessed this incident. However, the woman could not remember details of a conversation between Ms Peggie and Dr Upton. Dr Searle said she could not recall whether she had this conversation before or after Angela Glancy - a senior charge nurse involved in the investigation - had spoken to the Peggie's lawyer Naomi Cunningham said if Dr Searle had spoken to the witness before investigators it would be "grossly improper" added: "What possible business did you have making contact with the witness, who was a witness to a live investigation or pending employment tribunal proceedings?"Dr Searle replied "no business".The consultant said she "probably" spoke to the healthcare assistant after Dr Glancy had done so, but could not be sure as "times have blurred into one" during the later admitted that speaking to the witness was a "flagrant breach" of previous warnings not to discuss the case. Dr Searle became emotional after Ms Cunningham named the healthcare worker, saying that the person involved was desperate to avoid any media had to leave the stand at that point, which Ms Cunningham later dubbed "an outburst". The lawyer suggested the emotion was not to do with any concern for the healthcare assistant but out of "a desire to protect yourself."Dr Searle denied this, and NHS Fife's lawyer Jane Russell said Ms Cunningham's questions on the matter "left a little to be desired". Timeline of the Sandie Peggie tribunal Giving evidence for a second day, Dr Searle was again quizzed regarding emails exchanged between senior staff in the aftermath of the Christmas Eve Cunningham focused on one message said to mention avoiding "foot in mouth syndrome" and that not all messages had been provided to the added Dr Searle's search for emails related to the case had either been "surprisingly incompetent or deliberately withholding" the Searle said she rejected the latter Cunningham accused Dr Searle of "turning up the emotional heat" with how she reported the incident in the replied that she had reported the incident as she saw it, with a junior doctor upset about something that had happened at Searle had told the tribunal on Tuesday she considered reporting the matter to Police Scotland as it could be considered a hate Cunningham asked Dr Searle if she would have recognised Dr Upton as trans if she had not been told, and claimed the junior doctor was "obviously male".The lawyer added that the Christmas Eve incident could have been resolved by Dr Upton leaving the changing room, rather than telling Ms Peggie to speak to management about Searle said she disagreed this would have been a suitable way to end the tribunal continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store