logo
Who asked for population of Greater Manchester to flood UK in just 4 years? Politicians are so out of touch with public

Who asked for population of Greater Manchester to flood UK in just 4 years? Politicians are so out of touch with public

The Sun2 days ago
WHAT holds a country together? It's one of the most important questions a nation can ask.
Yet, today, were you to quiz ­anybody in Westminster, they would probably stare back at you with a blank expression, unable to give you a convincing answer.
11
This was not the case in the most ancient civilisations, such as Greece and Rome, of course, where this question was always on the minds of leaders.
In Ancient Greece, the writer ­Pericles warned that leaders will only hold their state together so long as they listen to the people they lead, 'for only then can leaders rule with their trust'.
And in Ancient Rome, too, the statesman Cicero reached the same conclusion, warning the leaders of the city state that unless they look after their own people first — which he considered their 'highest duty' — then their civilisation will rapidly crumble from within and become vulnerable to external invaders.
Why, you are probably asking ­yourself, am I rewinding the clock to these ancient thinkers?
Because what they understood is what far too many of our politicians in Westminster today fail to understand — that once this sacred bond between the rulers and the ruled breaks, there is no going back.
Once leaders become so out of touch, so adrift from the people they claim to represent, then their civilisation will plunge into chaos, carnage and darkness.
And is this not what is happening in Britain today? A political class, a ruling class, that increasingly looks utterly adrift from the hard-working, tax-paying, law-abiding majority?
Take another issue some of those ancient philosophers alluded to: The influx of outsiders and foreigners through the deliberate policy of mass uncontrolled immigration.
Who voted for this?
Only this week, shockingly, we learned that the population of England and Wales is growing at the fastest rate in history, with some 707,000 people added last year and some 2.5million since the outbreak of the Covid pandemic.
Who voted for this? Seriously?
Who voted for this population explosion, for a pace and scale of change that is now leaving many of our communities and our country unrecognisable?
Who asked for their leaders to add the equivalent of the entire Greater Manchester area in only four years?
And just look at how dramatic and historically unprecedented this is.
Between the election of Margaret Thatcher, in 1979, and Tony Blair, in 1997, the annual rate of population increase in England and Wales never surpassed a peak of 188,000 people in a single year, and averaged roughly 111,000 people over each 12-month period.
11
But since Covid? Well, thanks to policies introduced by the hapless 'Uniparty', by politicians on both the Left and Right who are now openly ignoring what the people want, if not treating them with total contempt, these numbers have rocketed.
Some 618,000 people were added to our population in the year to June 2022. Another 821,000 in the following 12 months. And now, in the year to June 2024, as we learned this week, another 707,000.
What is the main reason for this? Well, it's definitely not what's called 'natural growth' among the native English and Welsh people — the kind of growth that ensures a country grows and evolves at a natural pace, where change is manageable.
No. Far from it. Almost all of our population growth today is because of mass immigration, with 1.1million people migrating into England and Wales in the 12 months to June 2024, and 452,200 leaving.
Think about that. Around 1.1million people in just one year — equivalent to adding a city the size of Liverpool, comprised entirely of migrants, in just 12 months. This is insane.
Claims are nonsense
And on top of that we can add another fact we discovered this week, which is that the number of small boat crossings this year alone has now surged above 25,000, up 51 per cent on the same point last year, and taking the total to more than 170,000 illegal migrants since 2018.
The foreign-born and their ­descen­dants will emerge as a majority by the early 2070s. And roughly one in every four people on these islands will be following Islam by the end of the current century.
What would those ancient thinkers have made of this, too, I wonder? A nation-state that cannot even control its own borders, where mainly young men of fighting age from distant lands are flooding freely into our country on a daily basis?
In Westminster, our completely hapless politicians will try to distract you and downplay all this by blabbering something like 'we have always had an asylum problem', or, even worse, 'we have always been a nation of immigrants'.
Both of these claims are nonsense.
If you want to get a sense of just how historic and unprecedented this population explosion really is then consider just one astonishing fact, shared this week by an expert on the topic, Dr Paul Morland.
In every single year since Tony Blair came to power, since 1997, there has been more immigration into these islands than there was throughout the entire period between the Anglo-Saxon era in the 5th and 6th Centuries and World War Two.
At least until the last quarter-century, in other words, this country was defined by what those ancient thinkers thought was essential to maintaining the unity and survival of a state — a stable population with manageable rates of change, and where, on the whole, the people did trust their leaders because those leaders did make an attempt to listen and respond to the people.
But today all that is long gone.
Today, in sharp contrast, we are living in a much more fragile and febrile civilisation where, as the likes of Pericles and Cicero warned, our leaders are no longer fulfilling their first duty of keeping their own people safe.
Far from it. Our borders are completely and utterly out of control.
We do not know who is coming in and who is going out of the country.
Bound by shared history
We have even discovered that our own leaders have been importing members of the Taliban, alongside thousands of other Afghans, while gagging the Press and refusing to tell their own people.
And now, because of this policy of mass uncontrolled immigration — a policy that nobody in this country ever voted for — we have a sense of what is about to unfold. White Britons are now forecast to become a minority in this country by the year 2063, and much sooner for the under-40s.
11
11
The foreign-born and their ­descen­dants will emerge as a majority by the early 2070s.
And roughly one in every four people on these islands will be following Islam by the end of the current century.
Unless something changes, and changes soon, then all these trends will only accelerate in the years ahead, completely transforming our comm­unities and nation, and ushering in enough people to fill six cities the size of Birmingham in the next 12 years alone.
The English philosopher Sir Roger Scruton once said that a nation is held together by something deeper than a contract — it is bound by a shared history, a shared culture and the sense we belong to one another.
Is it even possible to maintain things like a shared sense of history and culture when millions of people are being added to the population, more than 80 per cent of whom are today coming from outside Europe.
But how on Earth can we ever hope to hold a nation together that is experienc­ing this scale of population change?
That is imposing policies and broken borders on a people who never voted for this, and never asked for it.
And how, we might also ask, is it even possible to maintain things like a shared sense of history and culture when millions of people are being added to the population, more than 80 per cent of whom are today coming from outside Europe?
I do not know for certain what those ancient thinkers Pericles and Cicero would make of it were they to come back to life and assess the state of Britain today.
I suspect that, like thousands of years ago, they'd warn we are living in a civilisation that looks set to crumble from within — a place where our leaders no longer appear all that interested in fulfilling their responsibility to the people and where mass immigration is blowing apart that once sacred bond between the rulers and the ruled.
And for these reasons alone, they would probably conclude that unless we can somehow find our way to a radical change of direction then our civilisation, as we currently know it, will most likely not survive.
11
11
11
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ALEX BRUMMER: Bank under populist siege
ALEX BRUMMER: Bank under populist siege

Daily Mail​

time3 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

ALEX BRUMMER: Bank under populist siege

Running in parallel with Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff horror has been the President's furious and uncouth attacks on America's independent central bank. Trump makes little secret of his contempt for current chairman of the Federal Reserve, Jay Powell, even though he nominated him for the job in his first term. Powell has refused to be a White House cipher, standing firm against Trump's unrelenting campaign to cut the US's key federal funds interest rate from the current 4.25 per cent to 4.5 per cent range. The Fed chairman's obduracy remains intact despite last week's dissent by two Trumpian choices as Fed interest rate-setters. Events across the Atlantic appear to have little relevance to the UK, where Chancellor Rachel Reeves started her illustrious rise to the nation's top economic post at the Bank of England. Governor Andrew Bailey is a friend, even though the Chancellor and Governor are currently at odds over lifting the burden of City regulation. A more important clash between the Bank and the Government is on the horizon. Bailey is known to be dismissive of the short-lived administration of Liz Truss. In her memoir, Truss was unforgiving of the role that she claims Bailey played in her downfall. Dangerously for the Bank, critics on the Left and the Right are targeting its credibility and independence. The Leftist New Economics Foundation has consistently campaigned against the Bank's approach to 'quantitative tightening'. This process involves running down the £895billion of gilt holdings the Bank acquired between 2009 and 2021 as it injected cash into the banking system with the aim of averting recession and calming markets. The Treasury agreed to indemnify the Bank against losses at a potential cost of £130billion over the current decade. The UK approach is seen as meeting standards of fiscal probity but imposes an extraordinary burden on public finances at a time when the debt to national output (GDP) ratio is close to 100 per cent. The Fed, in contrast to the UK, decided to continue to hold Treasuries (the equivalent of gilts), bought in the post-financial crisis era, on its books and hold them to maturity. So there are no paper losses. Neil Collins (a former colleague) pointed to the daftness of Bank policy in a recent letter to The Spectator magazine. He noted that in May 2020 the Bank bought a long-gilt, dated 2061, for £101. It recently sold the very same stock at a price as low as £28! Few people pay much attention to 'Reform-onomics', even though Nigel Farage leads in the opinion polls. The main criticism of Reform is that the party's big-spending, populist policies are costly and could trigger a fresh Truss-like crisis. Less debated is the dispute between Reform apparatchik Richard Tice MP and Bailey over monetary policy. Tice suggests that the Bank's approach to quantitative tightening has enriched high street banks and is costing the taxpayer money. But Bailey points out the Bank booked an earlier £124billion profit on its gilt purchases and, for the moment, the Government is £34billion up. Details of the dispute are obscure. The more sinister point for Threadneedle Street is that Tice and Reform see Bank independence as potentially a soft target. Echoes of Donald Trump's attacks on the Fed can be heard loudly.

Pro-Palestine demonstrators 'plan to flout terror laws en-masse' to overwhelm the police during mass protest next weekend
Pro-Palestine demonstrators 'plan to flout terror laws en-masse' to overwhelm the police during mass protest next weekend

Daily Mail​

time3 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Pro-Palestine demonstrators 'plan to flout terror laws en-masse' to overwhelm the police during mass protest next weekend

Pro-Palestine demonstrators are reportedly planning 'to flout terror laws en-masse' to overwhelm the police during a mass protest next weekend. Protesters have been urged to turn up in towns and cities, including London, next Saturday and write on blank placards with marker pens their support for banned terror group Palestine Action. The ban on Palestine Action means membership of or support for the direct action group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. Due to the ban, inviting or expressing support for the organisation - through chanting, clothing or displaying articles like flags, signs or logos - is a criminal offence. A briefing document handed out to supporters, seen by The Telegraph, boasts that 'it would be practically and politically difficult for the state to respond to an action on this scale'. 'Our assessment is that an action on this scale could be enough for the ban to be lifted. 'Charging and prosecuting at least 500 more people, in addition to the 200 people already arrested, is likely to be beyond the capacity of the state, given the current situation in the criminal justice system.' The plan is the brainchild of a number of groups, including Cage International and Defend Our Juries. Former Guantanamo Bay detainee, Moazzam Begg, has urged the Muslim community in Birmingham to join in 'the resistance'. He told a Cage International meeting attended by 30 to 40 people, some wearing Palestinian keffiyeh scarves and flags, to 'stop being cowards, cowards never win battles'. Meanwhile, Angie Zelter, from Defend Our Juries, urged supporters during the meeting to 'face down the rising tide of fascism in Britain'. Last Saturday, police failed to arrest supporters of the banned group Palestine Action as 11 activists sat holding signs for 60 minutes without being detained. Protests were held in both Totnes and Edinburgh as part of a campaign opposing the proscription of the direct action organisation where demonstrators held signs saying 'I Oppose Genocide. I Support Palestine Action'. At least 500 radical activists are preparing to sit in London for 60 minutes or 'until arrest' on August 9th while holding signs which state: 'I oppose Genocide. I support Palestine Action'. Palestine Action was proscribed by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper after its members caused an estimated seven million pounds worth of damage to RAF Brize Norton planes on June 20. Ms Cooper also claimed '[the group's] activity has increased in frequency and severity since the start of 2024 and its methods have become more aggressive, with its members demonstrating a willingness to use violence'. The 15-page document, titled 'Lift the ban, De-proscribe Palestine Action' details the group's extensive plot to overwhelm the police and the justice system until - it claims - the Government is forced to U- turn and reverse the ban. Their protest would be the largest escalation in a series of similar protests that have taken place across the UK since the ban. Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick last week told the Daily Mail: 'The Government simply cannot allow a proscribed group to overwhelm our justice system. 'Anyone assisting the group must face immediate justice. 'There can be no doubt in people's minds: if they support a terrorist group, they will be punished.' Lord Walney, the former government extremism adviser, added: 'People shouldn't be duped - this stunt will do nothing to help Palestine but it will land you with a criminal record that could ruin your life. 'The police are doing their job but now need to act quickly to show there are serious consequences for supporting a proscribed group.' Under the heading 'The Action', the document explains: '[The protest on August 9] will be a conditional commitment action, which means it will only go ahead if 500 people have committed to taking action on the same day. It continues: 'The intention is for a mass action on a scale that makes it almost impossible for the police to intervene. A supporter of Palestine Action gives a 'V' sign as they are arrested and put in a police van after holding up a sign supporting a proscribed group on July 19, 2025 in London 'Although there's a substantial risk of arrest, and all taking part should be prepared for that, the indications from the past three Saturdays are that the stakes for action-takers are relatively low, in comparison to the worst-case scenarios. 'No-one has yet been charged with an offence, and no-one has been remanded.' The document also advises supporters what to do 'in case of arrest' and how to respond to house raids from police. It also links to a pre-prepared statement which activists are encouraged to read during police interviews and information about 'Preparing For Prison' which includes advice about ordering vegan meals and how to receive books behind bars.

Starmer must find REAL ways to solve migrant crisis – not pathetic sticking plaster ‘solutions' voters will see through
Starmer must find REAL ways to solve migrant crisis – not pathetic sticking plaster ‘solutions' voters will see through

The Sun

time3 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Starmer must find REAL ways to solve migrant crisis – not pathetic sticking plaster ‘solutions' voters will see through

THE Home Secretary's plans to fast-track the ­asylum appeals process are, on the face of it, a welcome development. Because asylum seekers awaiting the results of appeal are ­entitled to state support, including both a weekly allowance and accommodation in the infamous hotels, it means any delay in processing claims is a direct cost on the taxpayer. 4 Yet there are good reasons to doubt that it will provide anything more than a short-term palliative to a chronic, structural problem with the asylum regime – and perhaps not even that. One of the biggest challenges facing the Home Office has long been deporting people whose claims are rejected. Even if their country of ­origin is deemed 'predominantly safe', as Yvette Cooper put it, some governments make it very difficult to return their citizens. In other cases, ­deportation is made extremely difficult because asylum seekers often destroy their ­passports. Rejected asylum seekers have to be housed and supported by the state, just like those awaiting appeal. This creates a very obvious incentive for politicians to turn any fast-track scheme into a rubber-stamping exercise, 'clearing the backlog' by waving people into the country. It wouldn't be the first time politicians and campaigners have resorted to interpreting a problem over-literally in order to pretend to have solved it. Just a few months ago, the Labour Government proposed to fix the problem of putting asylum seekers up in hotels . . . by having the Home Office buy up private rented housing instead. Then there are those who suggest 'safe and legal routes' as a solution to Channel crossings — a proposal that hinges on the idea that the problem is people coming here in boats rather than their ­coming at all. If that were the case, we could simply stop searching the lorries at the Channel Tunnel! Moment bus full of asylum seekers are 'snuck into' 4-star London hotel under cover of darkness despite UK-wide protests I don't want to sound like a partisan Tory here. The previous government's efforts to tackle the crisis were in much the same spirit. Whatever the merits of the Rwanda scheme, it was never going to accommodate more than a small fraction of the volume of illegal arrivals (although it nonetheless did seem to have some impact on the number of people trying to cross). Left or Right, when it comes to illegal immigration the motto seems to be: 'look busy'. Ministers keep tinkering around the edges of the ­problem, but nobody seems willing to confront the deep, structural pull factors which make Britain such an attractive target for migrants. Some of these, such as our language being so ­widely ­spoken, cannot be helped. But others, especially our non-contributory welfare system and the ease with which people can work in the black economy, could be tackled. That, however, would require fundamental and far-reaching reform, not least of the welfare state. We could also legislate to make deportations easier. The Home Secretary has pledged to tighten the rules around 'exceptional circumstances', which is a good start. TIED IN KNOTS But the Government could go a lot further, in particular on restricting appeals under ­Article 8 of the ECHR — the ' right to family life ' — which underpins many of the most egregious decisions made by ­asylum tribunals. For all the debate around whether or not the UK should quit the European Convention on Human Rights, we don't actually need to. Under the British constitution, the ECHR only applies if given effect by domestic law, and Parliament can legislate as it pleases. Labour should know this well: it was none other than Tony Blair who defied ­Strasbourg to refuse prisoners the vote. Sir Keir Starmer is unlikely to be enthusiastic about such measures. Lord Hermer, his friend and hand-picked Attorney General, has written to ministers ­rejecting the very idea that Parliament could legislate in any way that breached ­international law. But the Prime Minister should learn from the fate of his predecessor. 4 Like Starmer, Rishi Sunak promised the nation he would stop the crossings. He and his team were also — again like Starmer — unwilling to change or challenge any of Britain's existing legal or treaty commitments. The result was that they tied themselves in knots trying to make the Rwanda scheme compliant with the ECHR, only to fail — and paid a historically heavy price at the ballot box the following year. Labour MPs are already ­worried the same fate may befall them. They are right to worry: while the Government's majority is huge, this is ­actually the most marginal parliament since 1945 in terms of seat majorities. It would not take a big shift in public opinion to unseat dozens, or even hundreds, of Labour MPs at the next ­election. So which is more important to Sir Keir: the future of his government or the good ­opinion of the Attorney General? For so long as Hermer remains in post, the odds of this Government finding a ­lasting solution to the crisis are very small indeed. MY Conservative Home colleague Tali Fraser opened our editorial meeting yesterday with the claim that 'too many HENRYs are leaving the UK'. Now I quite agree that you can never have enough of us, but this wasn't merely an effort to please the boss. 4 'HENRY' apparently stands for 'high net worth, not rich yet' (I wish) and according to new research by the Adam Smith Institute and Onward, this country is developing a serious problem persuading young, well-educated Brits that they have a future here. No fewer than 28 per cent of 18- to 30-year-olds are either actively planning a move overseas or seriously considering emigrating, according to the report The Prosperity Package. That's very bad news. At present, only about a third of British adults are net contributors to the Exchequer. If the next generation of high earners are driven off by stagnant wages and a sky-high cost of living, that will only deepen our dependence on immigration. It also raises important questions about our focus on 'net immigration'. Yes, subtracting emigration gives a better picture of the raw numbers being added to our population – but it has perhaps made us too complacent about who is leaving.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store