Canton plans public education initiative before property revaluation starts
According to Canton Town Supervisor Mary Ann Ashley, the revaluation project has been five years in the making and stems from significant tax roll inequities that have not been addressed since a 2008 assessment.
The COVID-19 pandemic initially stalled efforts, but the town has since committed to a $180,000, two-year evaluation process.
"This is about fundamental fairness," Ashley said at the Town Board meeting May 14.
The committee aims to create and distribute easily understandable materials explaining the revaluation process, increase outreach efforts to aid resident comprehension, and emphasize the importance of responding to official notices.
Educational materials will also clarify the revaluation's significance and timeline, while addressing common misconceptions about property assessments.
At the meeting, Deputy Village Mayor Anna Sorenson said that the collective decision was to collaborate on a public education project concerning the property revaluation. The aim is to create accessible and comprehensive materials to educate the public on this matter.
The material will be developed in June by the committee working alongside GAR Associates and will be available online and in the village and town offices later in the summer when GAR starts reaching out to property owners.
GAR Associates is in the data collection phase and is relying on publicly available data and the work of town assessor Cindy Brand. Brand has collected information from every property in the town by visiting each one, taking a photo from the road and updating the information.
There are more than 4,000 properties in the town.
GAR will compile its information and mail it to each property owner to verify its accuracy sometime around the end of the summer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
Shock jobs report stirs recession fears: 5 takeaways
The disappointing July jobs report threw a bucket of cold water on an economic outlook that appeared to be holding up surprisingly well despite President Donald Trump's high import tariffs, immigration crackdown and widespread federal layoffs. Not only did employers add a disappointing 73,000 jobs – well below the 105,000 expected – but payroll gains for May and June were revised downward by a whopping 258,000. That left May's additions at 19,000 and June's at 14,000, the weakest performance since the nation was climbing out of the COVID-19 recession in December 2020. In early afternoon trading, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was down about 607 points and the benchmark S&P 500 index was off 1.5% Over the past three months, the economy has averaged just 35,000 employment gains. Here are a few takeaways: This was no blip The poor showing likely wasn't an outlier that will be followed by a resumption of healthy job gains in the months ahead, economists said. Consumers have reined in their spending somewhat, amid worries about Trump's tariffs pushing up prices, and are pulling back on travel and recreational activities. As more of the import charges hit store shelves, Americans will likely restrain their outlays further, Pantheon Macroeconomics wrote in a note to clients. That should translate into weaker job gains, especially in sectors such as manufacturing, retail, trucking and warehousing, the research firm said. And on July 31, Trump escalated his global trade fight with a sweeping new round of import levies. Meanwhile, executives' confidence in the business outlook has been shaken in recent months by the tariffs – which are squeezing profit margins – and that's expected to spell a more pronounced decline in business investment, Pantheon said. 'Sadly, employment appears set for a further summer slowdown as firms, facing renewed cost volatility from escalating trade tensions, remain focused on managing labor costs through reduced hiring, performance-based layoffs, restrained wage growth, and lower entry-level wages,' Gregory Daco, chief economist of EY-Parthenon, wrote to clients. Also, after the Supreme Court recently lifted a stay on mass federal layoffs, 'the decline in federal employment likely will gather more momentum over the coming months,' Pantheon said. The Labor Department has tracked 84,000 federal job losses this year, but the number of buyouts and job cuts announced was much larger. Hiring across the economy hit a 12-month low in June, Labor Department figures show. Will there be a recession in 2025? The dreaded word has slipped back into the conversation after fading the past couple of months as Trump delayed many tariffs and reached deals with several countries. 'To me, today's jobs report is what entering a recession looks like,' Josh Bivens, chief economist of the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute, said in a statement. 'Could we pull up? Sure. But if we look back and end up dating an official recession that starts 3-6 months from now, this is what it would look like today – rapid softening/deterioration in the labor market.' A recession now appears 'very, very likely' unless Trump lowers the tariffs by Labor Day, said Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Analytics. Could a skidding economy and stock market lead Trump to reverse course? A darkening economic outlook and tumbling stock market could well prompt Trump to try to soften the import fees, Zandi said. 'He's going to try to pull it back,' he said. But if he doesn't act before Labor Day, 'It will be too late,' Zandi said, adding the duties will start to ripple too dramatically into retail prices and consumer and business sentiment for the effects to be undone. A September fed rate cut likely At a July 30 news conference following the Fed's decision to hold rates steady for a fifth straight meeting, Fed Chair Jerome Powell described the labor market as solid and balanced. He also said officials would focus primarily on the unemployment rate as they decide whether to lower rates in September. The jobless rate edged up to 4.2% in July. It's still historically low even as Trump's immigration constraints, particularly deportations, shrank the labor force – the pool of people working or looking for jobs. Still, employer demand for employees has waned. But Morgan Stanley suggested the feeble job gains of the past three months would spur the Fed to act in September despite stable unemployment. 'The slower payroll pace keeps downside risks elevated and a September cut on the table,' Morgan Stanley said in a research note. Fed fund futures markets are now putting the chances of a September rate decrease at 85%, up from 45% after Powell's July 30 remarks. AI is starting to crimp job gains Professional and business services shed 14,000 jobs in July and payroll gains in the sprawling white-collar sector have been stagnant for more than two years. July's showing included job losses in computer and technical roles. Staffing executives say companies are replacing many entry-level information technology workers with artificial intelligence. 'It is happening,' Goldman Sachs chief economist Jan Hatzius said on CNBC after the release of the July jobs report. 'This is not the main thing driving the labor market... But we're seeing early signs.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
This week in Trumponomics: The Trump slowdown is here
Economists have been warning that President Trump's trade wars will depress growth and hiring. Trump and his defenders say pshaw. But the Trump economy is suddenly looking shaky. Hiring slowed dramatically in July, and downward revisions for the two prior months reveal the weakest job market since the COVID recession in 2020. Employers added just 73,000 jobs in July, with the average for the past three months an anemic 35,000. In 2024, job growth averaged 168,000 new jobs per month. Up till now, Trump has waged his trade war with impunity. His tariffs have raised the average tax on imports from 2.5% to about 18%. That's a hefty tax on some $3 trillion worth of goods, paid by American businesses and consumers. Yet inflation is still below 3%. The stock market flinched in April and May but has since hit a series of new record highs. The second quarter of 2025, however, is now looking like it may have been the last respite before Trump's disruptive policies take their it's not just hiring. Second quarter GDP rose by 3%, which would be solid in normal times. But the numbers are distorted by a surge of imports in the first quarter and a corresponding plunge in the second. Even it out, and GDP growth in the first half of 2025 was a weak 1.2%. That's less than half the growth rate in the first half of 2024, which was a more robust 2.8%. Many companies are beginning to say Trump's tariffs are harming profits, including bellwethers Ford (F), General Motors (GM), and Procter & Gamble (PG). The US manufacturing sector has contracted for five months in a row, and manufacturing employment has dropped for three months straight. Tariff-related inflation might also be materializing. The inflation rate inched up from 2.4% in May to 2.7% in June. There were notable month-to-month price hikes in product categories dominated by tariffs, including clothing, appliances, sporting goods, and toys. Consumers don't normally notice small monthly price hikes, but they notice for sure if price hikes persist and stuff continually gets more expensive. All of these trends are exactly what the many critics of Trump's trade wars have predicted. Tariffs raise costs for any firm or household dependent on imports. Higher costs reduce spending and investment. Trump's episodic tariff announcements also create uncertainty because affected businesses can't predict future costs. That creates an incentive to wait instead of investing, expanding, or hiring. The net effect is lower growth, lower employment, and possibly stagflation. Read More: What is stagflation, and how does it impact you? It's possible that Trump will get the message and wind down his trade wars. But not before more chaos. Just as Trump was inking trade deals with Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, and the European Union, he upped the ante on some five dozen other countries by threatening tariffs on their imports as high as 40%, including a new 35% rate — up from 25% — on some Canadian imports. The US stock market had been hovering near record levels on the hope that the worst of Trump's tariff fulminations were over. But stocks sank anew on Aug. 1 on the latest tariff shock, plus the lousy job numbers. There's yet another tariff deadline, Aug. 7, when the latest barrage of tariffs will go into effect unless those 60-odd countries make trade deals with Trump. Some of them probably will. But the new regime of higher tariffs is here to stay, and whether the average tariff rate is 18% or 20% or 22%, everybody's going to have to deal with Trump's new import taxes. Read more: 5 ways to tariff-proof your finances The consolation prize is that the weakening economy makes the Federal Reserve much more likely to cut interest rates in the fall. Odds of a quarter-point rate cut in September jumped from 38% to 81% after the latest job and tariff news, according to the CME Group's FedWatch tool. Trump, of course, has been hectoring the Fed to cut rates, and the weakening Trump economy now gives it a reason to. Most economists think the economy will slow from 2.8% GDP growth in 2024 to around 1% in 2025 and 2026. That's not a recession, but weak growth will make jobs more scarce, keep a lid on wages, and intensify the economic blahs many people feel. It's probably happening now. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Colleges must speak up for their Chinese students
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said all the right things last week after Hong Kong issued arrest warrants for 19 pro-democracy activists in other countries, including in the U.S. 'The extraterritorial targeting of Hong Kongers who are exercising their fundamental freedoms is a form of transnational oppression,' Rubio declared in a statement. 'We will not tolerate the Hong Kong government's attempts to apply its national security laws to silence or intimidate Americans or anyone on U.S. soil.' But we already tolerate the transnational oppression of one large group on our soil: Chinese students. And for the most part, our universities have kept silent about that. That's because of the billions of dollars that Chinese students bring to American colleges, of course. We're already facing an expected decline in Chinese enrollment because of the Trump administration's threats against international students, which higher-education leaders have rightly condemned. But if we really cared about those students — and not just their tuition fees — we would also speak out against the Chinese government's extraterritorial targeting of their fundamental freedoms. Anything less makes us look petty, scared and small. In a report issued last year — titled 'On my campus, I am afraid' — Amnesty International showed how Chinese and Hong Kong students in the U.S. and Europe faced surveillance and intimidation from Chinese authorities. Students reported being photographed and followed at protests, and that their families back home had been harassed. At Georgetown, for example, a Chinese law student who handed out pamphlets denouncing China's 'zero-COVID' policies was videotaped by members of the Chinese Students and Scholars Association, an organization sponsored by the Chinese government. They told him that the pictures would be sent to security officials in China. And soon after that, his family was interrogated and warned that they could face penalties if he continued to speak out. None of this is news, unfortunately. In 2021, ProPublica reported that Chinese intelligence agents were using local informants to threaten and harass students in America. Some Chinese students said they avoided taking courses with other students from their country, because they did not know who was working for the government — and who might report on them. And in 2020, when COVID forced universities to move online, the Wall Street Journal revealed that some professors had told Chinese students that they wouldn't be evaluated on class participation. The faculty didn't want their students to feel the need to speak up and risk getting on the wrong side of Chinese security officials, who were likely monitoring them on Zoom. 'There is no way I can say to my students, 'You can say whatever you want on the phone call and you are totally free and safe,'' one Harvard professor admitted. But most of our university leaders are keeping quiet about the matter. They don't want to take any risks, either, with so much money at stake. A welcome exception is Purdue University, which denounced Chinese spying after ProPublica revealed that one of its students was harassed by security agents for posting a letter about the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. That's a taboo topic in China, which has prohibited public discussion and commemoration of the event. 'Any student found to have reported another student to any foreign entity for exercising their freedom of speech or belief will be subject to significant sanction,' declared Mitch Daniels, Purdue's president at the time. 'We regret that we were unaware at the time of these events and had to learn of them from national sources,' Daniels added, referring to the 2021 ProPublica report. The rest of us have no excuse, especially now. Everything we have learned over the last four years confirms the same fact: China is intimidating students at our institutions. And so is the Trump administration, of course. It has arrested and deported international students who made pro-Palestinian comments. And it has been screening the social media accounts of student visa applicants to find 'any indications of hostility toward the citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles of the United States.' Nobody knows what that means, so applicants have been scrubbing their accounts of material about Barack Obama, Kamala Harris and anything else that might put them in the administration's crosshairs. To me, that sounds more like China than America. Our most important founding principle is freedom of expression. And we are flouting it by harassing our international students, even as we accuse them of being hostile to it. But we can't make a persuasive case against Trump's assault on freedom if we ignore the Chinese attacks on it. Anticipating that many international students won't be allowed to come here, some universities — including my own — are creating online courses and programs to serve them. That's a great gesture, but it also leaves the students even more vulnerable to harassment by internet snoops back home. And that's why we have to speak up for the students and make it clear that we won't tolerate intimidation of them, just as Rubio said. Thomas Jefferson — who knew something about America's founding principles — swore 'eternal hostility against every form of tyranny.' He didn't care where it came from. Neither should we.
