
Saoi O'Connor: As the UN talks shop, no food or water enters Gaza
There is a wire mesh fence between me and the fire exit, another between me and the Rhine. The World Conference Center used by the UN for the intersessional climate negotiations each June is superior to the majority of venues in which the Conference of the Parties (or COP) has been hosted, for this reason; where I write from, you can see the river.
It's often been speculated that the outcomes of climate negotiations would be better if said negotiations took place in rooms with windows, instead of dark little prefabricated boxes that might just as well be shipping containers for the amount of light that gets in.
I am not sure that the outcomes of the intersessional meetings validate this theory - I suspect closing plenary outputs will be just as dismal as those of COPs gone by - but at least here, in this venue, one is less disconnected from the world outside.
The lawn that I write from is a little sterile, one can be certain here that, unlike other parts of the city, no dog has marked its territory on the grass, and though the stench of cigarette smoke is as dense as anywhere else, this lawn lacks the distinctive scent of German beer.
In this place the full spectrum of attendees, from negotiators in their pressed suits and lapel pins to radical youth activists, those who have fled death to their would-be murderers, sit alike in the grass, and the shade of the trees holds the weight of history. The outcome of every COP is shaped here.
Every November, all of us pack up and head out to the Conference of the Parties to negotiate on humanity's collective future, and every June, like a salmon returning to the river that spawned it, we return to the Rhine.
In 20, 30 years maybe there will be some kind of memorial here, maybe we will say, this was a place where we all came together, a kind of no man's land, where the elders of our climate justice movements held council with their cigarettes and the party delegates argued in urgent, hushed tones over overpriced filter coffee.
I imagine the future will refer to this lawn in the same way that historians refer to the Christmas Truce of 1914, this is a place where we were all human together, and it changed nothing.
Gaza and the climate
The topic of rivers has been a source of contention in these conferences for some time now.
Since the Dubai COP in 2023, civil society groups have been banned from using the phrase 'from the river to the sea' during protests inside the conference. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is the only UN agency which allows protest inside the venue during the negotiations, a fact which the agency's secretariat is extremely proud of.
However, in recent years censorship of civil society during these protests has made organising and partaking in these actions feel relatively pointless. This June at Subsidiary Bodies (SB62), the secretariat informed us that we would also not be allowed to use the phrase 'end the siege' during these actions, an action which has been echoed by human rights organizations and other UN agencies alike, the absolute bare minimum demand of humanity.
As we sit here in our talking shop, no food or water enters Gaza. Israel kidnaps humanitarians from aid ships and Egypt stops activist convoys on its borders. Their contraband consists of food and water, medicine, crutches, a prosthetic arm for a child.
The fist of empire closes around itself and the light of conscience grows dim. Millions of Gazans continue to starve, and within the halls of the United Nations we are not allowed to condemn this.
Maybe for those who have not walked these halls this comes as a surprise, though the last several years of ongoing genocide with little intervention from the multilateral system will have relieved many people of notions they may previously have had about the supreme benevolence of the United Nations.
This same distance, this discussion and negotiation and condemnation in the abstract, where human rights and justice exist only in the realms of lapel pins and SDG-themed (Sustainable Development Goals) merchandising, is another common thread which binds the Palestinian struggle and the struggle for climate justice together.
What has changed?
To return to my original hypothetical - I don't know that the outcomes of this conference would be improved if they were held in a nature reserve or a forest or on the coast of my home in West Cork, but I know that they are defined by what we see out the window.
If it was not the Rhine on the other side of this fence, but the Jordan, if we stood in Congo where children are forced to mine lithium for our promised 'just transition' (a phrase which has its roots in the climate justice movement, but has been largely misappropriated in this space), or in the pacific islands, where already the ocean begins to creep up to people's doors, if we stood in the midst of fire or flood or airstrike, I know that this conversation would be different.
Many of my peers here will return home to these places, many of them on flight paths that have been disrupted due to US and Israeli aggression. It is currently precarious to transit through Qatar, and they - like me - will try to explain what they have seen.
To explain what it is to press your face up to the glass and see the individuals responsible for our global suffering — for the radical, irreversible damage to life on this planet which will define humanity's future until we as a species cease to walk upon the Earth — to feel the weight of history and the grief of knowing you can do nothing, nothing, about it.
Saoi O'Connor: 'This place where I sit now is not in Germany, it is not in Europe, it is not even truly on Earth, I write to you now from another place.' Photo: Pamela EA
This place where I sit now is not in Germany, it is not in Europe, it is not even truly on Earth, I write to you now from another place. Abstracted, isolated from context, this wire mesh fence between us and the world, it protects us from realities that might interfere with our nitpicking over documents that nobody anywhere else in the world will ever read.
I have been attending these climate negotiations since I was 17 years old. I'm now 22, and as myself and many others have been remarking this week, the biggest change that we have seen in that time is that the coffee machine in this building now offers oat milk.
We do not gather here because we believe that the United Nations or the neoliberal world order can save us, or has any intention of saving us. We do this because it is a gathering place in which we exchange notes about how we are saving ourselves. Beneath my feet in this lawn the seeds of a new world are already planted.
As the eyes of the world turn to COP30 this November, a conference which will undoubtedly be the most critical climate negotiation since Paris, remember that we were already here, that we have been here before.
Cork students taking part in the Fridays for Future strikes in front of City Hall. When history comes to take down this fence and walk upon the lawn of the United Nations, we will not forgive, and we will not forget. Picture: Saoi O'Connor
That the preparatory session for COP30 was defined by the twin injustices of the banning of a phrase which called for humanitarian aid to enter Gaza, and the EU blocking the discussion of finance for the Global South, for adaptation to and mitigation of climate change.
We are six months into 2025 and so far the theme from the UN is that whether you deserve to live, to eat, to drink clean water, depends on where you were born. When history comes to take down this fence and walk upon the lawn of the United Nations, we will not forgive, and we will not forget.
Saoi O'Connor is a climate campaigner who has been attending the climate negotiations since they were 17 years old. They continue to be active on climate all over Europe; travelling most recently to Sapmi to protest logging with the Sami people

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
6 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Iran has 'serious doubts' over Israel's commitment to ceasefire
Iran's armed forces chief of staff Abdolrahim Mousavi has said that Tehran was not convinced Israel would abide by a ceasefire that ended their 12-day war earlier this month. "We did not start the war, but we have responded to the aggressor with all our power, and as we have serious doubts over the enemy's compliance with its commitments including the ceasefire, we are ready to respond with force" if attacked again, Mousavi was quoted as saying by state TV, six days into the ceasefire which US President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday. He was speaking after Iran's judiciary said that an Israeli strike on Tehran's Evin prison during this month's 12-day war killed at least 71 people, days after the ceasefire as announced. The strike on Monday destroyed part of the administrative building at Evin, a large, heavily fortified complex in the north of Tehran, which rights groups say holds political prisoners and foreign nationals. "According to official figures, 71 people were killed in the attack on Evin prison," said judiciary spokesman Asghar Jahangir of the attack, part of the bombardment campaign Israel launched on 13 June. According to Mr Jahangir, the victims at Evin included administrative staff, guards, prisoners and visiting relatives as well as people living nearby. Images shared by the judiciary showed destroyed walls, collapsed ceilings, scattered debris, and broken surfaces across waiting areas at the facility. The judiciary said that Evin's medical centre and visiting rooms had been targeted. On Tuesday, a day after the strike, the judiciary said that the Iranian prison authority had transferred inmates out of Evin prison, without specifying their number or identifying them. The inmates at Evin have included Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi as well as several French nationals and other foreigners. Meanwhile, the chief executive of the UN's nulear watchdog has said it is likely that Iran will be able to produce enriched uranium "in a matter of months". His assessment conflicts with that of US President Donald Trump who maintains that Iran's nuclear programme was set back decades by US bombing raids last weekend. In an interview with US media network CBS, Mr Grossi said the raids by US stealth bombers had inflicted some but not total damage on Iran's nuclear facilities. Speaking earlier this week Mr Grossi also said his inspectors' top priority was to return to Iran's nuclear facilities to assess the impact of recent military strikes on Tehran's nuclear programme. Germany backs Israel after Iran war in first high-level visit Separately, German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt has expressed support for Israel during a visit to the site of an Iranian missile strike near Tel Aviv. It was the first visit by a senior foreign official since the war between Iran and Israel. "We must deepen our support for Israel," Mr Dobrindt said, speaking amid the rubble in Bat Yam, south of the coastal hub of Tel Aviv, where an Iranian strike killed nine people including three children. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar called the German visit a gesture of "solidarity" and urged the international community to reimpose sanctions on Iran. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on 17 June, on the sidelines of a G7 summit in Canada, said Israel was doing the "dirty work... for all of us" by targeting Iran's nuclear infrastructure. Israel has acknowledged being hit by more than 50 missiles during the 12-day war with Iran, resulting in 28 deaths, but the true extent of the damage may never be known due to stringent media restrictions.


RTÉ News
8 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Israel orders evacuations in northern Gaza as Trump calls for war to end
The Israeli military has ordered Palestinians to evacuate areas in northern Gaza as US President Donald Trump called for an end to the war amid renewed efforts to broker a ceasefire. "Make the deal in Gaza, get the hostages back," Mr Trump posted on his Truth Social platform early. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was due to hold talks later in the day on the progress of Israel's offensive. A senior security official said the military will tell him the campaign is close to reaching its objectives, and warn that expanding fighting to new areas in Gaza may endanger the remaining Israeli hostages. But in a statement posted on X and text messages sent to many residents, the military urged people in northern parts of the enclave to head south towards the Al-Mawasi area in Khan Younis, which Israel designated as a humanitarian area. Palestinian and UN officials say nowhere in Gaza is safe. "The (Israeli) Defense Forces is operating with extreme force in these areas, and these military operations will escalate, intensify, and extend westward to the city center to destroy the capabilities of terrorist organisations," the military said. The evacuation order covered the Jabalia area and most Gaza City districts. Medics and residents said the Israeli army's bombardments escalated in the early hours in Jabalia, destroying several houses and killing at least six people. In Khan Younis in the south, five people were killed in an airstrike on a tent encampment near Mawasi, medics said. New ceasefire push The escalation comes as Arab mediators, Egypt and Qatar, backed by the United States, begin a new ceasefire effort to halt the 20-month-old conflict and secure the release of Israeli and foreign hostages still being held by Hamas. Interest in resolving the Gaza conflict has heightened in the wake of US and Israeli bombings of Iran's nuclear facilities. A Hamas official told Reuters the group had informed the mediators it was ready to resume ceasefire talks, but reaffirmed the group's outstanding demands that any deal must end the war and secure an Israeli withdrawal from the coastal territory. Hamas has said it is willing to free remaining hostages in Gaza, 20 of whom are believed to still be alive, only in a deal that will end the war. Israel says it can only end it if Hamas is disarmed and dismantled. Hamas refuses to lay down its arms. The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered in October 2023 when Hamas attacked Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, Israeli tallies show. Israel's subsequent military assault has killed more than 56,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza health ministry, displaced almost the entire 2.3 million population, plunged the enclave into a humanitarian crisis and left much of it in ruins.


RTÉ News
10 hours ago
- RTÉ News
'Die trying to live' - Survivor on Srebrenica genocide
A commemoration will be held in Dublin today to mark the 30th anniversary of the genocide at Srebrenica, eastern Bosnia Herzegovina, where more than 8,000 men and boys were massacred by Bosnian Serb forces. The murderous rampage happened within an area which had been designated by the United Nations to be a "safe haven". Paul Cunningham, who first reported from the war in Bosnia Herzegovina in 1993, tells the story of one man who survived the genocide, but whose four brothers were killed. The moment Hajrudin Mesić realised the genocidal intention of the Bosnian Serb Army, and its feared militias, was late one night as he hid in bushes, exhausted and starving, in the middle of nowhere. This was July 1995. Hajrudin was part of a column of men who were trying to flee from Srebrenica, which had just fallen to Bosnian Serb forces, and reach the safety of government-controlled territory roughly 70km away. The men were mostly Bosnian Muslims, but who defined themselves as Bosniaks - people who believed in a multi-ethnic state. Their column was being pursued relentlessly by their enemy through the forests. Sometimes the Bosnian Serb forces donned UN uniforms in order to trick those fleeing into coming out of hiding. Other times the Bosnian Serb forces pretended to be government officers and used loudhailers to appeal for people to come into the open. One man in Hajrudin's column - maybe believing the appeals or just exhausted from the trek - walked down to a Bosnian Serb militia and begged for his life. As Hajrudin looked on in horror, one militia member took out his knife and said, just before killing him: "We didn't come here to negotiate with you - we came here to end things with you, once and for all." Hajrudin did not need to think anymore. He recounted: "This is when I realised that they would kill everyone. At about 2 or 3am, I decided to run. "I felt it was better to die trying to live, than await execution." Hajrudin's grim hunch proved to be right. Back in Srebrenica and its surrounding villages, and with UN peacekeepers having scuttled back to their barracks, the head of Bosnian Serb forces General Ratko Mladić was unleashing his murderous plans. As women and children were handed sweets and bread for the cameras, before being bussed out, his troops shot dead thousands upon thousands of Bosnian Muslim men and boys over 10 blood-soaked days. Mladić had a pathological hatred of Bosnian Muslims and had been ethnically cleansing them from the territory he controlled - a tactic he was only able to implement with the covert support of President of Serbia Slobodan Milošević. Hajrudin had ended up in Srebrenica because his village had been shelled by Bosnian Serb forces and the surviving members of his family were compelled to flee. "On the worst day of bombardment, 76 people - almost a quarter of the population - were killed in one day," he said. Video taken at Srebrenica, on the day the town fell, later became public. It showed General Mladić walking triumphantly through the streets and he could be heard describing the local population as "Turks" - an insult he regularly used. It was a reference that many Bosnian Muslims were descendants of the Ottoman Empire, which had occupied much of the territory in the 15th century. The context of Mladić's video was chilling, he said directly to the camera that "the time has come to take revenge on the Turks in this region". Srebrenica – named after its ancient silver mines - was a strategic town in eastern Bosnia Herzegovina. It was held by Bosniaks loyal to the government in Sarajevo, but quickly surrounded by Bosnian Serb forces when war broke out in 1992. It had been designated as a "safe haven" by the United Nations Security Council in April 1993, but the lightly armed and continuously undersupplied Dutch peacekeepers could not prevent the tightening of the Bosnian Serb siege. The truth was that the "safe haven" was never safe, just like the other towns and cities, given the designation the following month. This included Sarajevo, Žepa, Goražde and Bihać. By July 1995, after NATO bombers had been called back to their bases without having taken any military action, General Mladić decided to deploy the necessary forces to take over Srebrenica and take his genocidal "revenge". The world sat on its hands and looked on. Hajrudin was just 21-years-old when he fled Srebrenica and made his onerous bid for survival. "It got to the point where I just didn't trust anyone and the paranoia was intense," he said. Small wonder given that over the previous three years, one of his brothers had been shot dead by a Bosnian Serb sniper while another had been eviscerated by a Bosnian Serb artillery shell. Hajrudin had fled Srebrenica in the company of another brother, but they lost each other in the forest. Hajrudin learned later that he had died from a rocket or an artillery shell - his third brother to be killed at the hands of the marauding Bosnian Serb forces. He said: "I was [now] in a specific state of mind where I was living from one minute to the next. "I didn't think about anything beyond that … I'm an optimist by nature and faith that I would get through it." His 17-day escape to safety was slow and tortuous. "We were exhausted and the pain from hunger was horrible. If I sat down, I would dream of food," he said. Bosnian Serb forces deployed dogs to try and locate the Bosniaks. Hajrudin could hear their barks as the search teams got closer and closer but, thankfully, they faded away. His lowest ebb came when his group thought they had crossed into government-held territory but, in reality, they had had walked into the hell of an ambush. Gripping two precious pears he had found, Hajrudin came under fire at a destroyed village and he jumped into a trench, somehow managing to accidentally slash his throat in the process. They were being targeted from multiple directions. He recalled: "I managed to crawl out of the trench, but three of my friends were trapped inside. "One was a 17-year-old boy who was wounded and could not get out. The second asked for a gun to kill himself. "The third was wounded and clearly dying. The [Bosnian] Serb soldiers started approaching, but my dying friend created a distraction, giving me the chance to escape." Hajrudin's final hurdle involved passing through two Serb lines and evading a mobile patrol before finally making it to safety. "My parents treated my arrival like a gift from heaven," he said, adding "I will never forget the moment I saw my mum again and my father was seriously ill at the time, but seeing he had at least one son gave him a reason to live". Hajrudin's fourth brother, who also fled Srebrenica, did not make it to safety. He was buried in 2003 after his remains were located finally in a minefield. Apart from the anguish of losing four brothers, Hajruddin also was also gripped by an unquenchable rage. He told me that Bosniaks initially placed "great hopes" that the international community would protect them but, he added, they were "ultimately betrayed". "The actions of the international community helped the executioners, encouraged them," he said. It took another massacre, a mortar attack on a Sarajevo market which killed more than 40 people, before NATO-led airstrikes commenced on Bosnian Serb positions encircling the capital. The delayed military action is something Hajrudin still does not understand today. He said: "One cannot help but wonder why it took so long for international intervention to take place shortly after the fall of Srebrenica." When NATO planes undertook their bombing missions, Bosnian Serb commander Ratko Mladić went into hiding - in Serbia. For years, he was protected and concealed by the Serbian military but, ultimately, his power waned. In 2011, it all came crashing down when he was arrested in Lazarevo, northern Serbia, and transferred to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague. In 2017, Mladić was convicted of genocide, crimes against humanity and violations of the laws of war. He remains in jail. It was an outcome which, Hajrudin feels, was of "little consolation for the victims of genocide". That is in no small part due to the fact that Bosnian Serb forces killed four of his brothers. He said: "I was the only one who survived the genocide, although my survival is a miracle, namely that they intended to kill me too, but they failed. "I guess someone had to survive and spread the truth. "Srebrenica is my open wound that will never heal. Often, I dream and relive those nightmarish scenes. "The hardest thing is when July comes, and the commemorations begin. "Afterwards, I don't know if I'm better or worse. Every time I tell my personal story, I relive it all over again." He credits his religious beliefs for helping him withstand the horror inflicted on him, his family and wider community. Hajrudin feels he "must not lose optimism because that would be capitulation, which the perpetrators of genocide would be very happy about". He also feels there is an obligation on him to speak and commemorate. "As one of the rare survivors, I must be supportive of all those who might give up and giving up is never an option," he said. "Today, many of the survivors are successful athletes, doctors, professors - scattered across the world's meridians and parallels - always trying to make the world around them better," he added. To an extent, Hajrudin has fulfilled his own dream – he is the teacher he always wanted to be and lives in Sarajevo with his wife and children. But the anger has not dissipated. "After Srebrenica, the world said 'never again'. Unfortunately, as so many times, that 'never again' has been forgotten," he said. He cites Gaza as an example of that. "Today we live in a world that is rushing towards moral collapse by closing both eyes to the genocide in Gaza, the suffering in Sudan and many other places," he said. It also hurts that Srebrenica, today, remains under the control of the Bosnian Serb entity, called Republika Srpska, which has been led by its ultra-nationalist leader Milorad Dodik - a person who falsely claims there was not a genocide. Hajrudin said: "The peace agreement rewarded the aggressors and the policy of apartheid, sacrificing the Republic of Bosnia Herzegovina. "The consequences of such an approach are still felt today. "So, the victim was punished again and the perpetrators of genocide were rewarded." Last year, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution on the Srebrenica genocide, designating 11 July as the "International Day of Reflection and Commemoration of the 1995 Genocide in Srebrenica". It also declared that it should be observed annually. But the vote was not straight forward - Serbia's President Aleksandar Vučić opposed the motion. The man whose political career began in 1993 with the far-right Serbian Radical Party, called on "everyone" in the UN General Assembly to oppose the designation, claiming it was "highly politicised". However, the resolution was adopted. It includes a provision which condemns any denial of the Srebrenica genocide as a historical event and any actions that glorify those convicted of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. The Dáil will commemorate the Srebrenica genocide, with TDs observing a minute's silence on 10 July 10.