Researchers create AI-based tool that restores age-damaged artworks in hours
Repairing the damage can take conservators years, so the effort is reserved for the most valuable works, but a fresh approach promises to transform the process by restoring aged artworks in hours.
The technique draws on artificial intelligence and other computer tools to create a digital reconstruction of the damaged painting. This is then printed on to a transparent polymer sheet that is carefully laid over the work.
To demonstrate the technique, Alex Kachkine, a graduate researcher at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, restored a damaged oil-on-panel work attributed to the Master of the Prado Adoration, a Dutch painter whose name has been lost, as a late 15th-century painting after Martin Schongauer.
The painting is extremely detailed but visibly split into four panels, covered in fine cracks and dotted with thousands of tiny patches where paint has fallen off.
'A lot of the damage is to small, intricate features,' said Kachkine, who estimated it would have taken about 200 hours to restore the painting with traditional conservation techniques. 'It has undergone centuries of degradation.'
Kachkine started with a scan of the painting to determine the size, shape and position of the damaged areas. This identified 5,612 separate sections that needed repair.
A digital mask was then constructed in Adobe Photoshop. To restore missing specks of paint, spots were added and colour-matched to surrounding pigments. Damage to patterned areas was corrected by copying similar patterns from elsewhere in the painting. The missing face of an infant was copied from another work by the same artist.
Once finished, the mask was printed on to a polymer sheet, varnished to prevent the ink from running and overlaid on the painting.
In all, 57,314 colours were used to infill damaged areas. The corrections are designed to improve the painting, even if they are not perfectly aligned.
On seeing the result, Kachkine was delighted. 'It followed years of effort to try to get the method working,' he said. 'There was a fair bit of relief that finally this method was able to reconstruct and stitch together the surviving parts of the painting.'
The approach, described in Nature, can only be used on varnished paintings that are smooth enough for the sheet to lie flat on. The mask can be peeled off or removed using conservators' solvents, leaving no traces on the original artwork.
Kachkine hopes the method will allow galleries to restore and display scores of damaged paintings that are not deemed valuable enough to warrant traditional restoration.
But he acknowledges there are ethical issues to consider, such as whether having a film covering a painting is acceptable, whether it hampers the viewing experience, and whether particular corrections, such as copied features, are appropriate.
In an accompanying article, Prof Hartmut Kutzke at the University of Oslo's Museum of Cultural History, said the approach provided a way to restore damaged paintings faster and more cheaply than was possible with conventional techniques.
'The method is likely to be most applicable to paintings of relatively low value that would otherwise be housed behind closed doors, and might not be suitable for famous, valuable artworks,' he said. 'However, it could widen public access to art, bringing damaged paintings out of storage and in front of a new audience.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
I'm a relationships expert: these are the commonly missed signs that your female friends are TOXIC (and how to cut them off)
I have gone through more friendship break-ups than I care to admit and, controversially, I believe that makes me a better friend. It might even keep me younger too. A study last week revealed that toxic friendships cause premature biological ageing, comparable to that triggered by smoking. New York University found that social exchanges with so-called frenemies can cause chemical changes to DNA by keeping the body in a state of high stress.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Boeing and Airbus ground green plane projects
Two years ago, Boeing pulled an airliner out of the Victorville 'boneyard' in California — one of the giant desert storage lots for unwanted aircraft — and flew it 50 miles west to a classified plant for some radical surgery. The 25-year-old MD-90, which in its former life carried passengers for Delta Air Lines and China Southern, was to be the test bed for technology that would cut the greenhouse gases emitted by future aircraft. Its existing wings were to be cut off and replaced with long, thin versions supported by struts projecting from the bottom of a new, deeper fuselage. Boeing and Nasa, which was funding the work, had high hopes for the X-66A, as the plane was renamed. Or they did until four months ago, when the project was abruptly put on ice. Two months earlier, something similar happened to one of Europe's big environmental projects. In February, Airbus said it would 'pause' development of the ZEROe hydrogen plane, an aircraft with no carbon emissions that it had planned to have in service by 2035. The two manufacturers enjoy a near-duopoly in the airliner market, and delays to their flagship green programmes have sounded an alarm on airlines' plans to get to net zero — adding no additional carbon to the atmosphere — by 2050. 'The airline industry does in my view have a serious intent to meet net-zero targets but faces increased challenges in doing so', John Strickland, an independent aviation consultant, said. 'Alternative technologies are being pushed further out, which means an increased emphasis on the use of sustainable aviation fuel, which is still in limited supply.' The delays may also create another obstacle to the planned expansion of Heathrow. The airport said on August 1 that it would 'only deliver expansion in a way that is consistent with net zero 2050'. And some analysts believe the hold-up increases the chances of a challenge to Boeing and Airbus from new entrants more eager to take up the environmental mantle. Aviation is estimated by the International Energy Agency to account for 2.5 per cent of the world's greenhouse gas emissions, with a slightly greater — 4 per cent — contribution to global warming thanks to the creation of vapour trails. In the UK, it has a greater share of direct emissions: 9 per cent this year, according to the Climate Change Committee, the government's independent advisers. That share is forecast to grow to 11 per cent by 2030 and 16 per cent by 2035. That global emissions share is also likely to increase. After a severe decline during the pandemic, flights are now increasing fast. Iata, the airline trade body, has said passenger numbers will grow nearly 6 per cent this year to just under 5 billion and could hit 16 billion by 2050. As other energy-intensive industries find ways to cut their carbon emissions — electricity replacing blast furnaces in steel, new technology for making cement, and electric vehicles for land transport — aviation's share of total CO₂ could, by some estimates, rise to 20 per cent by 2050. Carbon-cutting technology for aviation is proving slow to arrive. Most experts think battery-power will be limited to small commuter aircraft, but there are high hopes for hydrogen. Airbus had invested significantly, including a plan to test a hydrogen fuel-cell engine on a modified A380 superjumbo. But it paused work in February, saying progress on 'key enablers', in particular the production of large amounts of hydrogen from renewable energy, was 'slower than anticipated'. Boeing has been less interested in hydrogen, but said the X-66A could lead to a 10 per cent reduction in emissions. When it cancelled the project it said it would instead concentrate on other designs for thinner, more efficient wings. Neither manufacturer appears in any rush to bring out radical designs. Airbus's plan to replace its bestselling A320 family of aircraft envisages something familiar to passengers today, albeit with engines that can be powered by conventional fuels or 'sustainable' replacements. That plane is unlikely to enter service until 2035 at the earliest, and probably much later. Boeing, which has been beset by a series of crises in the past year, also appears to be in no hurry. At its quarterly results on July 29, chief executive Kelly Ortberg said: 'I don't think the market is ready yet for a new airplane.' • Boeing 737 Max 8: which airlines use the plane and is it safe? Slow progress on alternative technology means airlines' hopes rest on the rapid introduction of sustainable fuels — hydrocarbons not pumped from the ground, but made from plants or re-used oils, or directly synthesised. However, the current supply is tiny — a mere 0.53 per cent of total aviation fuel worldwide last year, according to Air Transport Action Group (Atag), which brings together airlines, airports and aerospace manufacturers. Atag's Waypoint 2050 report concluded that making enough sustainable fuel to hit net zero would require the construction of 5,000 refineries, costing $1.45 trillion over the next 25 years. IBA, the aviation consultancy, has forecast production of sustainable fuels will hit 18 million tonnes a year by 2035 — but that will be 23 million tonnes short of demand. Environmental campaigners are scornful. 'The only serious remedy [to increasing CO₂ emissions] is demand restraint,' Dr Douglas Parr, policy director at Greenpeace UK, said. 'Everything else — the nonsensical offset schemes, the utopian technology forecasts and now the implausible optimism surrounding 'sustainable' aviation fuel — is primarily a collection of elaborate misdirection techniques.' If aviation's emissions do grow as a proportion of the total, Airbus and Boeing could face societal pressure to do more. Nick Cunningham, managing partner at Agency Partners, an aerospace analysis firm, recently published a note on how 'complacency' on decarbonisation posed an 'existential risk' to the companies. Cunningham said planemakers were understandably reluctant to make large investments in new technology. 'Boeing does not at the moment have the financial resources to develop an all-new aircraft. Airbus has reason to be wary because some of its development programmes — the A380 and the A400M for example — ended up way over budget.' • Net zero by 2050 struggles with reality The Chinese aerospace industry could be a potential challenger. There are now 16 Comac C919s, the first modern Chinese airliner, in service, with a second, larger aircraft, the C929, expected to begin commercial flights towards the end of the decade. Cunningham said, however, that carbon reduction is not China's main goal. 'There could be a challenge from China, but for the moment it is concentrating on replacing imports of western aerospace equipment,' he said. One potential rival to the Airbus-Boeing hegemony is JetZero, a California-based company set up in 2021. It has ambitious plans to build a radical new type of passenger aircraft: a blended wing body, where the wings and fuselage are one smooth shape. The Northrop Grumman B-2 stealth bomber, used by the US Air Force in the recent attacks against Iran, is such a design. JetZero claims its design could cut emissions in half compared to conventional designs. It has secured backing from two big US carriers, United Airlines and Alaska Airlines, including a commitment from them to buy aircraft. The USAF has awarded it a development contract for a potential new transport aircraft. 'JetZero is extremely interesting,' Cunningham said. 'The backing it has from airlines and the air force give it credibility, and it has very ambitious production plans. Its design would be more efficient than conventional aircraft, and crucially it would lend itself to a switch to hydrogen fuel when that is adopted.'
Geeky Gadgets
2 hours ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Gemini Deep Think : Solving Complex Applications in Math and Beyond
What if a machine could think as deeply as a human mathematician, solving problems so intricate they stump even the brightest minds? Enter Gemini Deep Think, an advanced AI model that has not only redefined what artificial intelligence can achieve but also challenged our understanding of reasoning itself. With its new performance at the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO)—a stage traditionally dominated by human brilliance—this AI has proven it can rival the sharpest intellects in tackling complex algebra, geometry, and number theory. Yet, this achievement raises a pressing question: can such computational power ever balance its brilliance with real-world practicality? In this overview Sam Witteveen explores how Gemini Deep Think is reshaping the boundaries of AI reasoning, from its innovative use of parallel reasoning chains to its potential applications in fields like 3D modeling and algorithm design. But this isn't just a story of triumph; it's also one of trade-offs. While the model's ability to solve intricate problems with precision is unparalleled, its high computational demands and extended processing times reveal the challenges of scaling such technology. As we delve deeper, you'll discover not only the promise of this AI marvel but also the hurdles it must overcome to truly transform industries and redefine intelligence itself. What does this mean for the future of human and machine collaboration? Let's explore. Gemini Deep Think Overview The International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) is widely regarded as one of the most prestigious global competitions, challenging high school students to solve intricate problems in algebra, geometry, and number theory. For the first time in history, an AI model—Gemini Deep Think—has matched the performance of top human participants, scoring an impressive 35 out of 42 points. This achievement is a testament to the model's ability to engage in logical problem-solving and advanced mathematical reasoning, areas traditionally dominated by human intelligence. By excelling in such a rigorous competition, Gemini Deep Think has not only proven its technical capabilities but also highlighted the potential for AI to complement human expertise in solving complex problems. This milestone reflects a significant step forward in AI's evolution, showcasing its capacity to operate in domains that require deep analytical thinking. How Gemini Deep Think Pushes AI Boundaries Gemini Deep Think represents a significant advancement in AI reasoning by introducing innovative methodologies that set it apart from earlier models. One of its most notable features is the use of parallel reasoning chains, which allow the model to evaluate multiple solutions simultaneously and select the most effective one. This capability enables it to excel in tasks such as solving complex algebraic equations, generating structured outputs like 3D models, and addressing intricate coding challenges. The model's advanced reasoning capabilities, however, come with a trade-off. Solving complex problems can take between 10 to 20 minutes, reflecting its substantial computational demands. While this processing time underscores the sophistication of its algorithms, it also highlights the need for optimization to improve efficiency. The balance between computational power and practical usability remains a key area for development as AI continues to evolve. Gemini Deep Think Challenges Human Brilliance Watch this video on YouTube. Check out more relevant guides from our extensive collection on advanced AI models that you might find useful. Advancing Beyond Previous AI Models Gemini Deep Think builds upon and surpasses the capabilities of its predecessors, such as AlphaProof and AlphaGeometry. Unlike these earlier models, which relied heavily on specialized mathematical languages like Lean, Gemini Deep Think processes problems directly, offering greater flexibility and adaptability. This advancement allows it to handle a broader range of tasks, from solving mathematical benchmarks to tackling logical reasoning challenges across diverse domains. Despite its superior performance, the model's computational intensity presents a significant limitation. Its extended processing times make it less practical for applications where speed is critical, such as real-time decision-making or dynamic problem-solving environments. Addressing these limitations will be essential for making sure its broader applicability and integration into various industries. Potential Applications and Current Limitations The versatility of Gemini Deep Think opens up a wide range of potential applications across multiple fields. Some of the most promising use cases include: Generating structured outputs for industries like 3D modeling, animation, and game development. Solving complex mathematical benchmarks with a high degree of accuracy, aiding academic research and education. Enhancing logical reasoning in specialized domains such as coding, algorithm design, and software development. However, the model's limitations cannot be ignored. Its long processing times and high computational requirements pose challenges for industries that rely on rapid decision-making or real-time solutions. These constraints highlight the need for further refinement to make the model more practical and accessible for real-world applications. Without addressing these issues, its adoption may remain limited to niche areas where processing time is less critical. Future Directions and Integration As AI technology continues to advance, Gemini Deep Think is poised for broader integration into platforms such as AI Studio and Google Cloud. Through API access, developers could use its reasoning capabilities for specialized applications, ranging from academic research to industrial problem-solving. This integration would enable organizations to harness the model's advanced capabilities in a more streamlined and accessible manner. The future of AI development, however, depends on addressing key trade-offs. Balancing intelligence, speed, and cost will be essential to making models like Gemini Deep Think scalable and efficient. Achieving this balance will determine the extent to which such technologies can be adopted across diverse industries, from education and healthcare to engineering and finance. By refining its computational efficiency and reducing processing times, Gemini Deep Think could unlock new possibilities for AI applications. Its ability to perform high-level reasoning tasks with remarkable accuracy positions it as a valuable tool for solving some of the most complex challenges in science, technology, and beyond. Shaping the Future of Artificial Intelligence Gemini Deep Think represents a significant milestone in the evolution of artificial intelligence, showcasing its ability to perform advanced reasoning tasks with precision and accuracy. Its performance at the IMO underscores the potential of AI to rival human intelligence in domains that demand deep analytical thinking. However, the model's computational demands and extended processing times highlight areas that require improvement to ensure its practicality and scalability. As the field of AI continues to evolve, the focus will remain on optimizing efficiency, usability, and accessibility. By addressing these challenges, models like Gemini Deep Think could pave the way for fantastic advancements across a wide range of industries, shaping the future of artificial intelligence and its role in solving the world's most complex problems. Media Credit: Sam Witteveen Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
