logo
Don't issue new licences to street vendors: Andhra Pradesh HC

Don't issue new licences to street vendors: Andhra Pradesh HC

VIJAYAWADA: Expressing concern over road encroachments by street vendors, the AP High Court on Wednesday directed the State government not to issue new licences to street vendors across all civic bodies until proper planning is in place.
The court observed that indiscriminate issuance of licences could turn cities into slums. While acknowledging the importance of street vendors' livelihood, the court emphasised that their activities should not inconvenience residents or obstruct public movement.
The directive came during the hearing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Besant Road Building Owners Welfare Association president M Venkata Vijaya Prasad, who alleged that officials failed to act against street vendors occupying Besant Road, causing severe traffic disruptions during peak hours. The court noted that such encroachments hinder emergency services like ambulances and fire tenders.
The bench, comprising Chief Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Justice Cheemalapati Ravi, also raised concerns about the possible involvement of organised middlemen in the street vending business, and questioned the civic officials' inaction.
The court instructed authorities to assess the viability of roads for vending before granting approvals, and provide necessary infrastructure.
The bench directed the government to initiate the process of creating vending zones in accordance with the Street Vendors Act. Later, the hearing was adjourned to August 13.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HC junks petitions challenging Maharashtra's farm procurement scheme, imposes ₹1 lakh cost
HC junks petitions challenging Maharashtra's farm procurement scheme, imposes ₹1 lakh cost

Hindustan Times

time18 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

HC junks petitions challenging Maharashtra's farm procurement scheme, imposes ₹1 lakh cost

Mumbai, The Bombay High Court has dismissed petitions challenging a Maharashtra Government Resolution on the procurement and supply of certain agricultural items, terming them 'totally baseless'. HC junks petitions challenging Maharashtra's farm procurement scheme, imposes ₹ 1 lakh cost Finding no merit in the Public Interest Litigation and a writ petition filed against GR of March 12, 2024, the court also imposed a cost of one lakh on the petitioners. The pleas were dismissed by a division bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne on July 22. As per the detailed order, made available on Friday, the bench ruled that the challenge to the government's decision was 'totally baseless and deserves rejection'. The court said it did not find any error in the GR concerning the procurement of five items under a special action plan for productivity enhancement and value chain development of cotton, soybean and other oilseeds. 'Thus, no interference was warranted in the tender process implemented for procurement of the said items,' it said. The March 12, 2024, GR details the procurement and supply of five items – battery-operated sprayers, nano urea, nano D, metaldehyde pesticide, and cotton storage bags – to farmers. 'The said petition is filed by an association of manufacturers of sprayers, who have no locus standi to challenge implementation of special action plan by the state government,' the bench said. The court said that to protect their private interest, manufacturers and traders cannot be permitted to challenge the broader scheme to facilitate the productivity enhancement of the listed crop. The petitioners had contended that the five items were removed from an earlier GR dated December 5, 2016, which allowed farm subsidies through the Direct Benefit Transfer scheme and were included in the new GR, which provides for their procurement through state agencies. The state agencies, including Maharashtra Agro Industries Development Corporation Limited and Maharashtra State Powerloom Corporation Limited, procured these items at 'exorbitant' rates, claimed the PIL. Senior advocate, Nikhil Sakhardande, who represented the petitioners, told the court that the DBT scheme was more beneficial to farmers, allowing them to purchase items at cheaper rates from local traders. The new system favoured large contractors, he argued. Appearing for the state government, senior advocate V R Dhond contended that the earlier GR operated under different objectives. He stated that the March 2024 GR was aimed at enhancing productivity and value chain development of cotton, soybean and other oilseed crops, which he called a broader programme not limited to just product procurement. The HC accepted the state's arguments and said the two GRs operate in 'completely different and independent spheres' with distinct objectives. The petitioners had 'erroneously mixed up the two GRs which have no nexus with each other', it held. Further, the bench held that these 'baseless' petitions created hurdles in the effective implementation of the plan, aimed at giving impetus to the cultivation of specified crops and benefiting farmers. 'For this reason also, while dismissing the petitions, we are inclined to impose costs on the petitioners,' the court said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Government bans ULLU, ALTBalaji, other OTT platforms over obscene content
Government bans ULLU, ALTBalaji, other OTT platforms over obscene content

Hindustan Times

time19 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Government bans ULLU, ALTBalaji, other OTT platforms over obscene content

The central government has banned multiple apps and websites for allegedly hosting obscene, vulgar, and adult content. Among those targeted in the crackdown are ALTBalaji, ULLU, Big Shots App, Desiflix, Boomex, Navarasa Lite, and Gulab App, officials said. Platforms such as ALTBalaji, ULLU, Big Shots App, Desiflix are targeted under government's ;atest crackdown on OTT platforms allegedly hosting obscene contents. The action is part of an ongoing effort to regulate digital platforms and prevent the circulation of explicit material online. This is not the first time these platforms have come under scrutiny, in April this year, the Supreme Court issued notices to the Centre and major digital platforms in response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking action against the streaming of sexually explicit content on OTT and social media platforms. The notice was served to the Centre, Netflix, Amazon Prime, ULLU, ALTT, X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and others. According to news agency PTI, the bench comprising Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih acknowledged that the petition raised a significant concern but emphasised that the matter fell under the purview of the executive or the legislature. "It's not our domain, you do something," the Supreme Court observed, as quoted by PTI. NCW, political leaders flag ULLU series In May, OTT platform ULLU came under fire after a clip from its web series House Arrest, hosted by former Bigg Boss contestant Ajaz Khan, went viral for its allegedly vulgar content. Several leaders condemned the video, including Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi, she wrote on X, 'I have raised this in the standing committee that apps such as this, namely, Ullu App and Alt Balaji have managed to escape the ban by I&B ministry on apps for obscene content. I am still awaiting their reply.' Soon after the outrage, the National Commission for Women (NCW) also took suo moto cognizance of the series, criticising its portrayal of women and warning of possible regulatory action, including a complete ban.

More Green zones to help street vendors
More Green zones to help street vendors

Hans India

time3 days ago

  • Hans India

More Green zones to help street vendors

Rajamahendravaram: The Rajamahendravaram Municipal Corporation has identified and classified all city streets into vending zones, said Additional Commissioner PV Ramalingeswar. He said this exercise is done to ensure that no street vendor in the city faces injustice. Speaking at the Town Vending Committee meeting held at the municipal office on Tuesday, he said the classification was done based on the decision taken in the first Town Vending Committee meeting and following the Street Vendors Act. As part of the exercise, city planning officials conducted a detailed field survey and categorised the streets into red, amber, and green zones. He explained that areas such as educational institutions, hospitals, government offices, junctions, and high-traffic zones have been declared as red zones where street vending is prohibited. Areas where vending is allowed only during specific times or on particular days have been marked as amber zones. All other areas where vending is permitted without such restrictions have been declared green zones. In total, 68 green zones, 17 amber zones, and 63 red zones have been identified across the city. He asked committee members to raise any doubts or concerns regarding the zonal classifications. He said the entire Pushkar Ghat Circle has been marked as a red zone, while the stretch from Kotagummam Shiva Statue to the end of Pushkar Ghat Circle has been designated as an amber zone. Ramalingeswar said that while there were around 16,000 street vendors previously, a recent survey has identified 1,500 new vendors. In view of the growing number of vendors, the number of green zones is being increased to ensure that their livelihoods are not affected. He added that the civic body is moving forward with a clear and thoughtful plan to support the street vendors while maintaining civic order. Assistant City Planners B Nagalakshmi and V Kondalarao, Traffic SI Adapa Sivaji, CMM Ramalakshmi, Food Licence Inspector Rukaiah, and members of the Town Vending Committee attended the meeting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store