Canada will feel the impact ‘severely' if NASA cuts funding: expert
As NASA faces the threat of US$6 billion in cuts under U.S. President Donald Trump's budget request, one astronomy expert says Canada will certainly feel the impact if the drastic financial reductions go through.
Paul Delaney, former director of the Allan I. Carswell Astronomical Observatory, told CTV Your Morning on Thursday the budget cuts will severely impact every single program in NASA, making it the largest financial assault on the space agency in history.
In turn, it could position other countries, namely China, to take the lead in space exploration. China is swiftly pushing forward in space exploration, with plans to put humans on the moon by early 2030.
'There is little doubt that…(NASA) will take second place,' Delaney said.
He also expects that the financial threat to the space agency will lead to more privatization in the sector.
Delaney said the cuts to NASA's budget will directly impact not just the Canadian Space Agency, but all researchers that are involved in space science.
One item that Delaney says may be on the chopping block is the latest version of the Canada Arm, or Canadarm3, which is the country's contribution to the U.S.-led Gateway project, a space station in lunar orbit.
'The impact on Canada, in terms of both hardware generation, as well as research, could be extremely significant, forcing us of course to go elsewhere to lend our expertise,' he said.
Delaney adds that the fall out from the budget cuts will run deeper than putting 'boots on Mars'.
'Your cellphone technology has been powered in very large measure by the types of activities we've developed going into space,' he said. 'The spin-offs are almost incalculable.'
CNN reported on Thursday that more than 2,000 agency employees are set to voluntarily leave NASA in the coming months under the Trump administration's 'deferred resignation' program, introduced by former Trump ally Elon Musk, who is CEO of NASA's largest contractor, SpaceX.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
6 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trade top of mind as Canada's premiers are set to hold three-day meeting in Ontario
TORONTO – Tariffs and trade are top of the agenda as the country's premiers arrive in Ontario's cottage country for a three-day meeting that comes at a pivotal time for both Canada-U.S. and domestic relations. The premiers' summer gathering in Muskoka will also feature a Tuesday meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney, as trade talks with the United States are expected to intensify. Most of what the premiers are likely to discuss stems from U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs: trade negotiations, the direct impact on industries such as steel and aluminum, the increased pushes to remove interprovincial trade barriers and speed up major infrastructure and natural resource projects to counteract the effects of tariffs, as well as Indigenous communities' concerns about them. Day 1 of the premiers' meeting involves discussions with Indigenous leaders including the Assembly of First Nations, the Métis National Council and the Native Women's Association of Canada. Carney himself is fresh off a meeting with hundreds of First Nations chiefs, many of whom have expressed concerns about their rights being sidelined as the prime minister looks to accelerate projects in the 'national interest.' Some of the top priorities premiers are pushing include pipelines and mining in Ontario's Ring of Fire region, and chiefs have said that must not happen by governments skirting their duty to consult. Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who has served for the past year as head of the Council of the Federation, is host of the meeting and said in a statement that protecting national interests will be top of mind. 'This meeting will be an opportunity to work together on how to respond to President Trump's latest threat and how we can unleash the full potential of Canada's economy,' Ford wrote. Trump and Carney agreed in June at the G7 summit to try and reach a trade deal by July 21 but Trump recently moved that deadline to Aug. 1, while telling Carney he intends to impose 35 per cent across-the-board tariffs on Canada that same day. Carney has said Canada is trying to get an agreement on softwood lumber exports included in the negotiations with the United States. British Columbia Premier David Eby said he intends to raise the issue and others of particular importance to B.C. at the meeting. '(We want to) get access to the same level of attention, for example, on the softwood lumber as Ontario gets on the auto parts sector, (and) that we get the same amount of attention on capital projects as Alberta is currently getting in relation to their proposals,' Eby said last week in Victoria. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has been making a big push for new pipelines, but said during a press conference Friday that her focus would also be on premiers working together to address the tariff threat, including interprovincial trade. 'I was really pleased to sign (a memorandum of understanding) with Doug Ford during the time he was here in during Stampede, and other provinces are working on those same kind of collaborative agreements,' she said. 'We need to do more to trade with each other, and I hope that that's the spirit of the discussion.' Smith and Ford signed an MOU earlier this month to study new pipelines and rail lines between provinces, and both premiers also talked about wanting Carney to repeal a number of energy regulations like net-zero targets, the West Coast tanker ban and a proposed emissions cap. Ford has also taken a lead role on increasing interprovincial trade, signing MOUs with several provinces and enacting a law to remove all of Ontario's exceptions to free trade between the provinces and territories. Nova Scotia's Tim Houston is another premier banging the drum of interprovincial trade, saying the trade war is forcing action on it. 'We're seeing the benefit of working together to respond to economic threats from the U.S. by breaking down internal trade barriers and opportunities to expand in other international markets,' he wrote in a statement. Ford has said the premiers will also talk about emergency management, energy security, sovereignty and national security, health, and public safety. The premiers have also been pushing the federal government to reform bail laws and Carney said last week that legislation will be introduced in the fall and he expects to discuss the issue with the premiers on Tuesday. The premiers' summer meeting also signals a changing of the guard, with the role of chair of Council of the Federation moving between provinces annually. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. But after Ford is no longer chair, he's not expected to take too much of a back seat on all of the aforementioned issues. He is still premier of the most populous province, has built a strong relationship with Carney, often singing the prime minister's praises, and has done frequent American TV interviews making the case for increased trade over tariffs. Those network appearances, in part, earned him a nickname of 'Captain Canada' — a persona he used to massive political benefit. Ford made the fight against tariffs and Trump the central part of his re-election campaign and voters returned him to government with a third consecutive majority. — With files from Wolfgang Depner in Victoria, Keith Doucette in Halifax and Lisa Johnson in Edmonton This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 20, 2025.
National Post
6 minutes ago
- National Post
Amy Hamm: Trudeau may be gone, but the gender craziness continues
Unlike his predecessor, Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister Mark Carney isn't known for making flamboyant declarations of allyship to Canada's 2SLGBTQIA+ community. But don't be deceived: our national fealty to gender ideology remains the same as it was during the Trudeau years. Canada is no less woke under Carney. Article content Some may believe that Trudeau's departure, coupled with international blows to the excesses of this ideology, marked the end of Canada's struggle with the more absurd, anti-reality aspects of trans activism. Unfortunately, that is untrue. Article content Article content Fighting gender ideology in Canada is a war of attrition. And more than ever, those on the front lines need armaments and sustenance. Article content Article content Remember the case of Jessica Yaniv? The transgender-identifying Yaniv filed numerous human rights complaints against female immigrant estheticians for declining to wax male genitalia. Yaniv lost the cases at the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal (on a technicality) and has largely fallen out of the public's eye. Until now. Article content The pageant is open to girls as young as six and contestants undress together backstage. Canada Galaxy Pageants' policy rightly prohibits people with intact male genitalia from competing. Article content The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) has been representing the company in what it describes as 'a human rights case … that (deals) with whether children's emotional, mental and physical safety should take precedence over a transwoman's desire to access a female changeroom.' Article content Article content The JCCF recently asked the tribunal to dismiss the case and expects a decision in the coming weeks. Article content Article content According to the JCCF, Matt and Nicole Alexander's teenage son began to vocally oppose his school's gender self-identification policy. His parents did not teach at his school, or even in his school district. However, they soon came under direct attack from gender activists. Article content First, Matt Alexander was suspended from his teaching job in April 2023, over social media posts that members of the public made about him. A month later, Nicole Alexander removed a progress Pride flag that someone taped to the door of her kindergarten classroom. She was placed on suspension that same day.
National Post
6 minutes ago
- National Post
Adam Pankratz: Roberts and McAfee are right — no one cares what sports personalities think about politics
Major League Baseball rolled into Atlanta, Ga., this past week for the playing of the 2025 All-Star Game. Amid the usual fanfare that accompanies the game and the Home Run Derby, there was a slightly awkward moment on Media Day when ESPN personality Pat McAfee was asked by a reporter why the game was in Atlanta at all, after it had been pulled from the city in 2021 due to voter suppression laws that president Joe Biden had described as 'Jim Crow in the 21st century.' Further adding to the awkward nature of the question was the fact that Dave Roberts, the National League manager for the game, had said in 2021 that he might boycott the game if it remained in Atlanta. Article content Article content Neither McAfee nor Roberts wanted to answer the question this year however, with McAfee's initial reply being, 'I don't know if any of us are the experts or the ones that should be giving the answers on that.' Roberts followed with, 'I'm not a politician … but right now I really choose to just focus on the players and the game …' Article content Article content How times have changed since 2021, and probably for the better. It would be a positive step if the incident reminded us that not everything has to be about politics and, in general, we should not expect in-depth and expert social commentary from sports personalities on all that ails society. Article content It is indeed a curious thing that we even look to a baseball manager or a sports reporter for their views on newly implemented state voting laws. Consider the reverse: asking a politician to explain the infield fly rule or what pitch to throw a batter in a 2-2 count with a man on second and two outs when the last pitch you threw was a cutter. It would be theatre of the most absurd kind. 'I don't know,' would a refreshing answer, although most politicians would likely take a blind stab at it for fear of being caught out for not knowing everything. Article content Article content For this reason, McAfee and Roberts deserve a certain kind of credit for their avoidance of the question. While it is easy to be cynical and say they simply toed the company line (they probably did, by the way), McAfee's assertion that 'I don't know if any of us are the experts …' is nonetheless a refreshingly honest admission that he and his fellow sports experts wouldn't have any idea what they were talking about if they began discussing Georgia's voting laws. Society would be better off if more people could boldly make that statement. Article content Article content Article content In our world today, self-identifying as a non-expert is rare. Rarer still is saying you don't have a political opinion on any given issue. Much of this is likely due to our ability to access second-hand information online or via social media. If someone is not an expert, they can likely find enough information to form a strongly held opinion by quickly brushing up on a few facts for their five minutes in the spotlight, when their true grasp of an issue is actually rather tenuous. Kudos to McAfee and Roberts for not doing that.
