logo
Indiana call to amend congressional term limits into Constitution gains ground

Indiana call to amend congressional term limits into Constitution gains ground

Yahoo27-02-2025
Just nine states have approved identically worded applications to convene. (Getty Images)
A national movement to launch a convention and amend congressional term limits into the Constitution is gaining momentum in Indiana.
Consecutive legislative attempts failed to get past the committee stage. Last year, the Indiana House passed a resolution but it didn't get a Senate hearing. This year, the Senate has jumped into the fray, passing a resolution despite bipartisan opposition.
Critics fear a 'runaway' convention could jeopardize rights already enshrined in the Constitution, while supporters maintain there are enough safeguards in state law and point to legislation that would further strengthen them. Senate Joint Resolution 21's author, meanwhile, hopes to pressure Congress into limiting itself.
Article V of the Constitution reads, in part, 'The Congress … on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments …'
Hoosier lawmakers in 2016 approved a multi-topic take featuring language on term limits, fiscal restraint and more. But the nationwide campaign hinges on identically worded applications — exclusively about term limits — for a convention under Article V of the Constitution.
That year, the District of Columbia-based U.S. Term Limits (USTL) launched its convention-based push. If Indiana approves its latest attempt, the state would join nine others who've adopted USTL's language. Two-thirds of the states — 34 — are needed to trigger the convention.
A convention to amend the Constitution has never before been held. All of the nation's existing amendments began in Congress and later went to the states for ratification.
Throughout the decades, Americans have unsuccessfully pushed to trigger conventions on topics like desegregation busing, abortion and a balanced federal budget.
USTL's effort is among the latest campaigns.
Hoosier lawmakers, all of them Republicans, have repeatedly filed joint resolutions housing USTL language five times since 2016.
But attempts introduced in 2018, 2021, 2022 and 2023 didn't get committee votes and died. Some were even sent to their respective chambers' rules committee, where legislation dead on arrival is often sent to fail.
Indiana House approves congressional ask for term limits in Constitution
In 2024, a House-filed version passed on a 63-32 tally featuring 'no' votes from both sides of the aisle. It got no consideration from a Senate committee and died.
This legislative session, Senate Joint Resolution 21 earned Senate approval in a 31-18 vote — in January, well ahead of deadlines. Now, it's back at the House for consideration.
The USTL application specifies that the convention should be a 'limited' one, just for amendments restricting the number of times U.S. House and Senate members can be elected to their posts. It describes how it should be aggregated only with same-subject applications and separately, sent to other state legislatures as an 'invitation to join in this call.'
Indiana's top two leaders have indicated support for USTL.
Gov. Mike Braun signed the organization's Article V convention pledge last March while campaigning for his current office. So did Lt. Gov. Micah Beckwith, weeks earlier. Beckwith also chaired USTL's Indiana chapter until he ascended to his present role.
Ahead of the Senate's vote, Democrats and Republicans alike feared there's no way to limit a convention to any single topic.
Sen. Jim Tomes, R-Wadesville, dubbed the effort a 'mistake.'
'I don't think for a minute … that these other states that we're going to be in the mix with on this won't find some way to open that Constitution up and dice around on it, make changes to it,' he said. 'I think it's risky. I think the odds are against us.'
Tomes argued that voters can already term limit lawmakers at the ballot box.
The week before the vote, Sen. J.D. Ford introduced an unsuccessful edit adding redistricting to the convention call.
'If you read Article V, it does not have any other rules about the convention. It doesn't say who presides. It doesn't talk about who pays for it,' Ford said at the time. '… Our application says U.S. term limits, but once we get in there, it could be a runway convention. It could be any topic on the chopping block.'
A study by the Congressional Research Service, updated in 2016, found that the Constitution is silent on Congress' role in the convention, the president's role, how many delegates states can send — equal numbers, by population or just as many as they wish — and other open questions.
Resolution author Sen. Andy Zay, R-Huntington, said a runaway convention 'simply won't happen' — and that he didn't even intend to launch a limited one.
He asserted 'history has shown' that when the applications near the two-thirds requirement, Congress will take action.
An early 1900s campaign to amend direct election of U.S. senators into the Constitution ultimately yielded the 17th Amendment — not because states racked up enough applications, but because Congress itself took up the topic.
Zay described his resolution as a 'nudge.'
Senators expressed other concerns.
Several criticized the effort to restrict congressional service while leaving the Statehouse unaffected. Numerous attempts to limit state-level tenures have died through the years.
'What message do we send to the public when we say … 'We're limiting your (congressional) offices, we don't want you to take advantage of being a career politician, but the moment that it touches my seat — my position, my influence, my power — then I'm opposed to it?'' Sen. Fady Qaddoura asked fellow lawmakers.
The Indianapolis Democrat said he did support term limits but would vote against the resolution until he saw a more 'comprehensive' version with other election fixes.
Sen. Aaron Freeman echoed that argument of hypocrisy. The Indianapolis Republican also asserted that term limits would afford staffers and lobbyists more power and push 'the swamp to get a whole lot swampier.'
Author Zay said the Indiana General Assembly doesn't need term limits.
'Why? Because we go home on Thursday — every Thursday — and we are out of here at the end of April this year and mid-March in in-between years. We are the embodiment of a part-time legislature,' Zay said. 'We are public servants that … face our people every day of the week.'
Sen. Jim Buck, R-Kokomo, described the professional and financial costs lawmakers at all levels pay to serve the public. Forcing them out of office early, he argued, would bring in 'a completely different class of elected officials' instead of a government 'of the people.'
Sen. Travis Holdman, who led the Senate's successful multi-topic resolution that included congressional term limits, said that's fine.
'We've heard about how this may disrupt the lives of members of Congress — good, because our lives are disrupted and our businesses are disrupted by what we do here as part-time legislators,' Holdman, R-Markle, said. '… I think the framers intended, originally, with the Constitution and the federal government, that they be part-time legislators.'
Indiana Code already requires delegates to an Article V convention to swear to support the state and federal constitutions, plus 'faithfully' perform their duties and follow any legislative instructions.
Convention votes cast outside that scope are 'void,' according to the law, and someone who purposefully casts such a vote commits a Level 6 felony.
Congressional term limits advocates want to add more guardrails.
Senate Bill 450, authored by Holdman, would require the Indiana General Assembly to adopt another joint resolution banning a delegate — or commissioner, as it renames the role — from voting to amend certain parts of the Constitution. Those include the storied document's first seven articles, the first 10 amendments collectively known as the Bill of Rights, and a list of other amendments dealing with the abolition of slavery, voting rights, the Electoral College and more.
Sen. Sue Glick, R-LaGrange, argued that's ineffective.
'We can pass all these resolutions that say an Indiana delegate (is) … guilty of a felony if they don't do what they're told; we can bring them home,' she said. 'And 49 other states are going to laugh because they get to decide what the Constitution of the United States looks like, because Indiana took its Tinker toys and went home.'
She urged lawmakers to consider the 'dangers' of an Article V convention within the nation's current political atmosphere.
'This is not a vacuum. Do you think the First Amendment is going to survive? Do you think the Second Amendment is going to survive? Do you think you will have the same freedoms that were guaranteed to you?' Glick asked. 'I don't see all the same kind of intellects who will be attending this convention that attended the first one.'
Holdman's bill also would narrow who can serve as a commissioner using stricter residency, anti-lobbying and anti-criminal history provisions. Commissioners would also be barred from accepting gratuities — with exceptions for gifts valued under $200, 'primarily ceremonial or commemorative' items, properly reported political contributions and work-related compensation.
'This isn't the end of our democracy,' Zay said of his resolution. 'This is simply a statement to our friends in Washington … that maybe 50 years is a little too long.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill': Here's when key tax laws go into effect
Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill': Here's when key tax laws go into effect

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill': Here's when key tax laws go into effect

Americans may soon see a wave of tax changes — some as early as this year, others rolling out in future tax seasons. These updates stem from the massive tax bill recently signed into law by President Donald Trump. The new legislation includes several key tax rules: an extension of many of the provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), an expanded child tax credit, a larger standard deduction for seniors, tax breaks for workers who receive tips and overtime pay, and more. But not all of these provisions will take effect at the same time — and some are permanent while others are temporary. Learn more: Trump's tax law: 5 'big, beautiful bill' tax breaks that won't last long Here's a summary of when some of the key tax provisions go into effect — and expire. A timeline of key tax breaks Tax provision Effective date Temporary orpermanent SALT deduction cap raised to $40,000 2025 through 2029 Temporary(cap drops to $10,000 in 2030) Auto loan interest deduction of up to $10,000 2025 through 2028 Temporary Bonus deduction of $6,000 for people aged 65 and older 2025 through 2028 Temporary No tax on tips and overtime pay 2025 through 2028 Temporary New charitable contribution deduction for people who don't itemize 2026 Permanent Elimination of electric vehicle tax credits Sept. 30, 2025 Permanent Elimination of residential clean energy and energy efficient tax credits Dec. 31, 2025 Permanent Higher child tax credit of $2,200, with annual inflation adjustments 2025 Permanent Increased standard deduction (TCJA amounts made permanent, plus new inflation adjustment for 2025) 2025 Permanent Reduced income tax rates (TCJA rates made permanent, plus new inflation adjustment added) 2026 Permanent Qualified business income deduction of up to 20% made permanent (otherwise would have expired after 2025) 2026 Permanent 2025: Tax changes that could put more money in your pocket Beginning in 2025, millions of Americans could begin benefiting from a wide range of new tax breaks. One of the most notable changes is the expanded state and local tax (SALT) deduction, which increases the cap from $10,000 to $40,000. The change will provide meaningful relief to taxpayers in high-tax states such as New York, California, and New Jersey. The increased SALT cap will be adjusted annually for inflation but is set to drop back to $10,000 in 2030 unless extended by Congress. Another provision beginning in 2025 allows taxpayers to deduct up to $10,000 in auto loan interest for qualifying vehicles — new cars purchased for personal use and with final assembly in the U.S. The deduction applies to loans issued from 2025 through 2028. Seniors will be eligible for a bonus deduction of up to $6,000. Meanwhile, service workers could benefit from a new exclusion of up to $25,000 in reported tip income, while employees who work overtime may qualify for a deduction of up to $12,500, or up to $25,000 for married couples filing jointly. 'These new tax provisions could bring about meaningful changes for taxpayers starting in 2025,' says Tracey Carney, a certified public accountant in New Orleans. 'Now is the time to review how these updates might impact your finances and consider meeting with a qualified tax professional to plan ahead.' 2026: More changes ahead, including health care impacts Several tax changes, including extensions of TCJA provisions, are set to begin in 2026. That said, taxpayers may not notice some of these changes that much, because many of these new provisions are simply continuing what is already in effect for 2025. The 2017 TCJA, passed during Trump's first term, made sweeping changes to the tax code. However, many of its provisions were set to expire after 2025. The new law makes several of those provisions permanent and extends them beyond Dec. 31 of this year. Some of those tax rules include reduced income tax rates, the limit on deducting mortgage interest on debt up to $750,000 and the qualified business income deduction. The new law also makes two significant changes related to health care and taxes beginning in 2026. 'There are two overlooked elements of the big beautiful bill that can have major tax implications for your health care,' says Whitney Stidom, vice president of consumer enablement at eHealth, an independent insurance advisor. 'One impacts how health insurance subsidies are calculated, and the other changes who qualifies to use a health savings account.' The law modifies rules for Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies, which help reduce premiums for lower-income Americans. Under the new rules, individuals who earn more than 400 percent of the federal poverty level may still qualify for subsidies, but any excess subsidies received must be repaid in full when filing taxes. 'In the past, there was a cap on how much of the overpaid subsidies you had to return,' Stidom says. 'Now, you may have to repay the full amount.' The law also expands eligibility for health savings accounts (HSAs), allowing more health insurance plans — specifically, catastrophic and bronze-tier ACA marketplace plans — to qualify. An HSA allows people to stash money into a tax-advantaged account for qualified medical expenses, but you can only have an HSA if you also have a qualified high-deductible health plan. For 2025, people can contribute up to $4,300 for themselves into an HSA and the amount increases to $8,550 for families. People aged 55 or older can add a $1,000 catch-up contribution to those amounts. 'There are about 7 million Americans currently enrolled in bronze plans who haven't been able to use an HSA,' Stidom says. 'This change could offer significant new tax benefits.' Learn more: Medical expense deduction: How to claim medical costs on your taxes Some tax breaks will now expire this year The sweeping legislation also ends several clean energy tax credits, but on different timelines. The popular electric vehicle (EV) tax credit is set to expire on Sept. 30. After that date, the credit will no longer be available. Originally introduced in 2008, the credit was expanded under President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, offering up to $7,500 for new EVs and $4,000 for used models. 'If you're considering buying a vehicle, now is the time to buy an electric vehicle,' Carney says. 'Unless Congress extends the credit in the future, buyers won't have the chance to take advantage of it once it's gone.' Other credits — specifically, the energy efficient home improvement credit and the residential clean energy credit — are now scheduled to end after 2025. Until the end of the year, taxpayers can claim up to $3,200 per year for eligible improvements to their primary residence under the energy efficient home improvement credit. The credit covers 30 percent of qualified expenses, such as for installing energy efficient doors and windows. The residential clean energy credit allows taxpayers to claim 30 percent of the cost for new qualified clean energy property — including solar panels, solar water heating systems, geothermal heat pumps and more. These credits are nonrefundable, meaning they cannot reduce your tax bill below zero. Learn more: Tax credits are a valuable tool to trim your tax bill — here's how they work Bottom line Carney recommends that taxpayers review both expiring tax provisions and new ones that may apply to their situation. 'Whether it's making qualified home improvements to lower your tax liability or maximizing overtime pay this year, being strategic with your tax planning can lead to big savings when you file your 2026 return,' she says. More: These 9 states have no income tax — that doesn't always mean you'll save money Sign in to access your portfolio

Scoop: Dems think they can get ahold of Epstein's birthday book
Scoop: Dems think they can get ahold of Epstein's birthday book

Axios

time6 minutes ago

  • Axios

Scoop: Dems think they can get ahold of Epstein's birthday book

House Democrats are trying to get their hands on the now-infamous book celebrating Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday after it was suggested the disgraced financier's estate is in possession of it, Axios has learned. Why it matters: As the minority party in Congress, Democrats have been largely toothless in their attempts to investigate President Trump. They believe this is a rare opportunity to obtain concrete information. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who is leading the effort, told Axios it would be "very difficult" to obtain the book if it was in the hands of the Department of Justice. "In this case, you literally have a private attorney," said the California Democrat. "A private attorney is much more likely to comply. It's a much easier challenge than going after the administration." Driving the news: Khanna and House Oversight Committee ranking member Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) wrote to attorneys for the Epstein estate's executors asking for a "complete, unredacted copy" of the book, according to a copy of their letter obtained by Axios. Citing Wall Street Journal reporting that Trump submitted a poem and drawing for the book, the lawmakers wrote that it may be "essential" for a probe of the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein matter. Trump has denied the Wall Street Journal's reporting and sued the outlet for libel. What they're saying: " We write with deep concern regarding potential public corruption, abuse of power, and failures in the federal law enforcement response to the Epstein case," Khanna and Garcia wrote. They argued that members of the Oversight Committee should be permitted to review the book before deposing Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who reportedly put it together. "Information gathered from this document may also inform the development of legislative reforms addressing sex trafficking networks, financial regulation, or other critical matters," they added. State of play: Brad Edwards, a lawyer for over 200 of Epstein's victims, said in an MSNBC appearance Thursday, "I know the executors of the estate are in possession of that book." "If somebody simply called" Epstein's executors "and said, 'Give us the book,' they would probably give you the book," Edwards said. "They have attorneys, their attorneys are good people. If they didn't just voluntarily turn over the book out of fear of reprisal, Congress could just issue a subpoena to their attorneys ... they would turn the book over immediately." The three attorneys for Epstein's executors did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Axios. What's next: Khanna and Garcia asked that Epstein's estate turn over the book by August 10. Khanna told Axios: "I will make sure, if we get it, that whatever we do in terms of releasing it is what the victims want, what the victims' attorney wants, and not just trying to score partisan points." "If the victims don't want certain things, I am going to guarantee that the victims are the topmost consideration," he said. "But I do believe that they will want some of it released and once we get it, we can."

Salt Lake City named USDA hub in federal reshuffling
Salt Lake City named USDA hub in federal reshuffling

Axios

time6 minutes ago

  • Axios

Salt Lake City named USDA hub in federal reshuffling

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is moving most of its employees from Washington, D.C., to five hubs, including Salt Lake City. Why it matters: Shifting operations to Utah's capital could give the state's farmers and ranchers more access to federal officials — and potentially shape policies that better serve the Mountain West. The big picture: The move, announced Thursday by Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, will close nearly all USDA offices in D.C. It is part of the Trump administration's effort to cut costs and consolidate the federal government. The other agriculture hubs include: Raleigh, North Carolina; Kansas City, Missouri; Indianapolis; and Fort Collins, Colorado. Despite the relocation, USDA has maintained that its critical functions "will continue uninterrupted," according to a news release. Reality check: While Utah's cost of living is lower than D.C.'s, it still has one of the nation's most expensive housing markets. Salt Lake City's federal salary locality rate is about 17%. Zoom in: Utah's farmland totaled about 10.5 million acres in 2023 — one-fifth of the state's total land area, according to the University of Utah's Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute. Utah ranks 25th among U.S. states for total farmland. What they're saying: Utah Republican leaders, including Gov. Spencer Cox and U.S. Sen. John Curtis, celebrated Rollins' Thursday announcement. "The USDA's decision to refocus on its core mission, supporting farmers, families, and rural communities, is long overdue," Curtis posted on X. "Utahns are the best at advocating for and advancing American agriculture." The other side: U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) called the decision a "half-baked proposal," warning it could affect the USDA's "ability to provide critical services for Americans" and farmers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store