
Did Horses Trigger The 1918 Flu Pandemic?
The 1918 influenza pandemic remains the deadliest in modern history, killing tens of millions—and leaving scientists with enduring questions about where it began.
For decades, many researchers assumed the virus emerged in pigs. But when scientists sequenced the virus's genome in 2005, they found it was primarily avian in origin. One possibility was that the virus originated in birds, passed through pigs—where it adapted to mammalian cells—and then jumped to humans. However, more recent evidence has cast doubt on this so-called 'mixing vessel' hypothesis. Studies show that avian-to-swine transmission is rare, that pigs and humans have similar distributions of sialic acid receptors in their respiratory tracts to which influenza viruses bind, and that the 1918 virus's genome shows little sign of prolonged adaptation in pigs.
Based on this, scientists Martha Nelson and Michael Worobey concluded that seven avian genes in the 1918 virus were probably transmitted from birds to humans at the start of the pandemic, and from humans to swine once the pandemic was widespread in humans.
View of victims of the Spanish flu cases as they lie in beads at a barracks hospital on the campus ... More of Colorado Agricultural College, Fort Collins, Colorado, 1918. (Photo by American Unofficial Collection of World War I Photographs/PhotoQuest/Getty Images)
Now a new hypothesis, put forth by medical historian Martin Furmanski and virologist Pablo Murcia published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, suggests a different intermediate host was spreading a prepandemic avian-origin virus before 1918: the horse.
The idea is biologically plausible and historically grounded—and it reframes how we think about the origin of the 1918 pandemic.
Influenza viruses infect hosts by binding to sialic acid receptors in the respiratory tract. Avian viruses preferentially bind to α2,3-linked receptors, while human viruses target α2,6-linked receptors. Most mammals express one type or the other, but some—including pigs and horses—express both. This dual susceptibility has led scientists to propose that these species may act as 'bridge hosts,' enabling avian and human viruses to co-infect the same cells and exchange gene segments through reassortment. They may also provide an environment in which avian viruses can acquire additional mutations that affect processes besides receptor binding enhancing replication, cell entry, and transmission in mammals.
While pigs have long been considered for this role (although, as noted above, that notion was challenged by Nelson and Worobey), horses have only recently received attention. But a growing body of evidence shows that horses exhibit both α2,3 and α2,6 sialic acids. Moreover, all three known equine influenza viruses are believed to have derived from avian strains.
The new hypothesis draws on more than just receptor biology. It also points to an overlooked historical episode: a large epizootic of equine influenza that began in North America in 1915. Reports at the time described unusually severe respiratory illness and pneumonia among horses—a feature also seen in human cases during the 1918 pandemic.
BOSTON - MARCH 18: Police horse Sweetie Don't first came into the department in 1913. He helped keep ... More order in the Haymarket district. He was being retired as he had caught a "horse flu" which caused him to become lame. He spent the rest of his days on a rest farm. horsesgetty (The Boston Globe via Getty Images)
The timing is notable. Between 1914 and 1918, World War I drove one of the largest mobilizations of horses in U.S. history. The U.S. Army purchased over 300,000 horses and mules after joining the war effort, in addition to 68,000 used during the 1916 Mexican Punitive Expedition. Furmanski and Murcia provide evidence that over two million animals were mobilized by the military between 1914 and 1918, the majority of which were eventually exported to Europe.
These animals were housed in crowded stables, transported in train cars across the country, and shipped overseas. Such conditions created ample opportunity for viruses to spread, mutate, and reassort. Ultimately, at some point seven segments from an avian H7N1 virus combined with an H1 hemagglutinin gene that was already adapted to humans, producing the 1918 pandemic virus.
Reconstructions of 1918 influenza viruses support the idea of gradual adaptation to humans. As reviewed in a forthcoming paper in the journal Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, an early strain isolated in New York has been found to bind both avian-type (α2,3-linked) and human-type (α2,6-linked) sialic acid receptors and failed to transmit efficiently in ferrets—a standard model for human infection. Such a virus might have been well adapted to horses. By contrast, a later strain from South Carolina primarily binds to human-type receptors and transmits readily via aerosols, suggesting that it had by then acquired adaptations permitting human-to-human spread.
Camp Funston in Kansas is often cited as the site of the first well-documented outbreak of 1918 flu in humans. It was also a major staging ground for military horses. Tetanus was common, and millions of doses of antitoxin serum were produced using horses—another point of close contact between humans and equids during wartime.
1918 or 1919 - Camp Funston, interior (Photo by: HUM Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)
Conclusive evidence is still lacking; confirming past infections or reassortment events would require archived horse tissue or serum from the 1910s. But taken together, the historical and biological clues offer a compelling case.
Understanding how pandemic viruses emerge is key to anticipating future outbreaks. If horses can serve as a bridge between avian and human influenza viruses, they warrant closer surveillance—particularly where they are kept near poultry or people. The recent spread of H5N1 among dairy cattle, another unexpected mammalian host, underscores how little we may yet understand about the pathways influenza can take.
Influenza pandemics are shaped by more than viral mutation. They emerge at the intersection of biology, human behavior, and historical circumstance. In 1918, that intersection may well have been in a horse stable.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Merck (MRK) as a Reliable Dividend Player in the Dogs of the Dow Lineup
Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK) is included among the 11 Dogs of the Dow Dividend Stocks to Buy Now. A close-up of a person's hand holding a bottle of pharmaceuticals. Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK) has faced stock pressure due to its reliance on Keytruda but is diversifying. On July 9, Merck announced it would acquire UK biotech Verona Pharma for $10 billion, adding Ohtuvayre, a promising COPD treatment approved last year, to its portfolio. Ohtuvayre has had a strong launch and is being studied for more uses. Some analysts predict its sales could reach $4 billion, potentially making it another blockbuster for Merck. In its first quarter earnings, Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK) highlighted that it began the year with strong progress, driven by growing contributions from its recently commercialized medicines and vaccines, along with ongoing advancements in its pipeline. It is focused and determined to fully capitalize on near-term opportunities while swiftly advancing the next wave of innovations that will improve patient outcomes and create long-term value for all stakeholders. Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK) is also popular because of its dividend growth history, which spans 16 consecutive years. Currently, the company offers a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.82%, as of July 26. While we acknowledge the potential of MRK as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure: None. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Prince and Princess of Wales 'consider leaving Adelaide Cottage'
The Prince and Princess of Wales are reportedly considering moving from Adelaide Cottage. The royal couple have lived in the grounds of Windsor Castle for the last three years, but they are now considering relocating to somewhere bigger, with Fort Belvedere - which is located in Windsor Great Park - being tipped as one possible destination. A source told the Mail on Sunday newspaper: "They feel they have outgrown Adelaide Cottage and need somewhere more substantial. "This is the perfect new home for them. It has a swimming pool and tennis court, and Charlotte loves playing tennis." The Prince and Princess of Wales - who have Prince George, 12, Princess Charlotte, ten, and Prince Louis, seven, together - are currently evaluating their options, but no move is imminent. Earlier this year, the Princess announced that she was in remission from cancer. The 43-year-old royal took to social media in January to reflect on her emotional return to the Royal Marsden Hospital in west London, where she received treatment for cancer, and to confirm that she was in remission from the disease. Catherine - who went public with her cancer diagnosis in March 2024 - wrote on X: "I wanted to take the opportunity to say thank you to The Royal Marsden for looking after me so well during the past year. "My heartfelt thanks goes to all those who have quietly walked alongside William and me as we have navigated everything. "We couldn't have asked for more. The care and advice we have received throughout my time as a patient has been exceptional. "In my new role as Joint Patron of The Royal Marsden, my hope is, that by supporting groundbreaking research and clinical excellence, as well as promoting patient and family wellbeing, we might save many more lives, and transform the experience of all those impacted by cancer. "It is a relief to now be in remission and I remain focussed on recovery. As anyone who has experienced a cancer diagnosis will know, it takes time to adjust to a new normal. I am however looking forward to a fulfilling year ahead. There is much to look forward to. Thank you to everyone for your continued support. C (sic)"
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
The six natural alternatives to statins to lower your cholesterol
For those of us in middle age and beyond, conversations about cholesterol are hard to avoid – and with good reason. In England, according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, high cholesterol leads to more than 7 per cent of all deaths and affects six in 10 adults, a number that rises for those in middle age: the most recent NHS Health Survey for England found that in the 45-64 age group, 77 per cent of women and 67 per cent of men had raised cholesterol. Surprisingly, these figures drop in the over-64 age group. Why? Because many of this older cohort are on statins. Statins are currently prescribed to around eight million people in the UK, and taking this daily tablet is a proven way to lower cholesterol levels and reduce your risk of heart attack or stroke. 'We are the first generation of people who have the opportunity to reduce our cardiovascular risk – still the number-one killer – because we have effective treatments in the form of statins,' says Robin Choudhury, a professor of cardiovascular medicine at the University of Oxford, a consultant cardiologist at John Radcliffe Hospital and the author of The Beating Heart: The Art and Science of Our Most Vital Organ. The turn against statins However, for some people with a lower cardiovascular risk, it may be possible to avoid statins by adopting lifestyle changes and/or seeking out other natural options. This is welcome news for many, because statins are often viewed with mistrust. Some critics argue that perhaps these pills are being doled out too liberally and that lots of people shouldn't be on them at all. Others think that statins may even be bad for us. In his 2007 book The Great Cholesterol Con, Scottish GP Malcolm Kendrick argues that high cholesterol levels don't cause heart disease, that statins have many more side effects than has been admitted and that their advocates should be asking more questions. This is something Prof Choudhury finds mystifying. 'I really don't know why people are reluctant to take them,' he says. 'There is one serious side effect associated with statins, called rhabdomyolysis, which is a severe muscle inflammation. But it's extremely rare. It affects one to two patients per 10,000 treated.' 'A lot of people just don't want to take a tablet every day,' suggests Dr Oliver Guttmann, a consultant cardiologist at the Wellington Hospital, part of HCA Healthcare UK. 'People also want to try and do it in what they call the 'natural' way.' The other natural options So, are there other effective natural options to statins? The answer is yes – but only up to a point. 'The bottom line,' says Dr Guttmann, 'is that with all the natural alternatives, there's some effectiveness, but they're not magic bullets.' He accepts, however, that other natural options can play 'a supporting role, especially for those people who are generally healthy and just want to try complementary treatments to decrease mild cholesterol elevation'. If you have been offered statins and decide not to take them, it's crucial to discuss the risks with your GP or cardiologist. Prof Choudhury emphasises that if you've already had a heart attack, angina or stroke, or if your percentage risk of a future event is high, taking statins is usually a sensible route that is grounded in evidence. 'For those who have heart disease, very few people have a good reason not to be on statins. For those who've never had an event, it's important to take an holistic view of risk [incorporating blood pressure, diabetes and family history] but for many individuals, alternatives to statins are perfectly reasonable.' Here are six other cholesterol-lowering options to consider: Plant sterols and stanols Plant sterols and stanols, also known as phytosterols, are naturally occurring compounds that have a similar structure to cholesterol. Prof Choudhury explains: 'They help lower LDL cholesterol levels by reducing cholesterol absorption in the gut because they compete for the same absorption sites.' Found in foods such as vegetable oils, nuts, seeds and whole grains, phytosterols have been shown to lower LDL cholesterol by eight to 10 per cent when eaten regularly as part of a healthy diet. They also work well in combination with statins. However, according to the British Dietetic Association, you need to consume reasonably large quantities – around 2g – each day, with meals, for them to be effective. Most people achieve this by having a plant sterol- or stanol-fortified mini yogurt drink every day or by eating two to three portions of foods with at least 0.8g of added plant sterol/stanol, such as 10g of fortified spread (eg margarines) or one 250ml glass of fortified milk. Oats and barley Oats and barley contain beta-glucans, a soluble fibre, which can be consumed in food or as supplements to regulate blood sugar and lower cholesterol. Cholesterol can go into the blood or the gut, Prof Choudhury explains. 'If you can take that cholesterol out of the gut and stop it being reabsorbed, that has a beneficial net effect on blood cholesterol levels. Beta-glucans bind to the soluble cholesterol that's in the gut and it then exits the bowel.' Some studies suggest that if a healthy adult consumes around 3g of beta-glucan daily – a bowl of porridge – they can decrease their LDL levels by five to 10 per cent over three months. Omega-3s Omega-3 fatty acids do not lower LDL cholesterol, but they have been shown to reduce triglycerides – a different type of fat found in the blood that are deemed to be harmful. Taken in supplement form, omega-3 can lower triglycerides by around 20-30 per cent. 'I tell my patients to take omega-3s all the time,' says Dr Guttmann. 'You find them in oily fish, like salmon and mackerel, though most people take them in supplement form. They work really well taken together with statins to lower your risk of heart disease. They've also been shown to support your brain health, cognitive function and mood.' Red yeast rice Commonly used in traditional Chinese medicine, red yeast rice is sometimes described as a natural statin. 'It blocks cholesterol production in the liver in a similar way to statins,' Dr Guttmann explains. 'The problem is, it's very difficult to get the exact amount you need because the dosages and qualities can vary from one supplement to another. People can also sometimes consume red yeast rice in very high doses, which may cause liver problems.' Prof Choudhury is also concerned by the unregulated nature of red yeast rice capsules, which have been linked to safety issues. 'Statins originated from yeast,' he says, 'and there's a component of red yeast rice [a compound called monacolin K] which has a statin-like action that lowers LDL cholesterol. But it's not a regulated product, so you don't know what you're getting when you take it.' Psyllium husk Psyllium husk is a soluble fibre that helps to lower LDL cholesterol levels. When consumed, it forms a gel-like substance in the digestive tract that traps bile acids and prevents their absorption, causing them to be excreted through the stool. The liver responds by pulling in cholesterol from the blood to produce more bile acids, reducing the amount of cholesterol circulating in the blood. 'Psyllium husk is basically a digestive aid,' says Dr Guttmann. 'It's used as a laxative because it helps regulate your bowel movement, and in the process, it can lower cholesterol and decrease reabsorption. If you take it regularly, it probably reduces your LDL level by about five per cent. So it's great if you just want to be living a healthier lifestyle but inadequate as a medical intervention.' Garlic Some research suggests that allicin, a chemical found in garlic, can lower your blood pressure and cholesterol. One clove (3-6g) of garlic a day may help decrease your LDL by up to 10 per cent, though the evidence is not yet conclusive. 'The problem is that if you just eat fresh garlic, you need to consume a very high amount,' says Dr Guttmann. 'And that's difficult for most people to achieve. So most people take garlic supplements in quite a high dose. I advise people to try this for a while and then re-monitor their LDL to see how they react to it. But it's certainly not a replacement for statins.' And one to be sceptical about… Apple cider vinegar 'The one product often mentioned as an alternative to statins that doesn't really have any significant evidence to back it up is apple cider vinegar,' says Dr Guttmann. 'While it might help to decrease your sugar levels, it does not appear to affect your LDL significantly.' Prof Choudhury concurs: 'I'm not aware of any convincing evidence to suggest that this is effective.' Lifestyle changes to lower your cholesterol 'Our cholesterol level is, to a large extent, genetic,' says Prof Choudhury. 'With lifestyle modifications, you can make some impact on it, though usually not more than 10-15 per cent. For people who don't have very high cholesterol, but have other risk factors, it's a sensible thing to do.' There are five main ways to reduce your cholesterol level without taking statins: Eat a healthy, balanced diet that's high in fibre Exercise regularly Maintain a healthy weight Limit the amount of alcohol you drink Stop smoking For Dr Guttmann, increasing our consumption of dietary fibre is perhaps the quickest and easiest lifestyle change to make. 'Eating a high-fibre diet not only improves your gut health, it also decreases your cholesterol absorption. It binds to the cholesterol in your gut and prevents it being absorbed by the body, which lowers your levels of harmful LDL cholesterol.' He adds: 'My patients often ask me, 'If I do all of these things, surely it's the same as taking a statin?' But the truth is, because they're all working in a similar way, the benefits are not cumulative.' He does concede, however, that it very much depends on the individual. 'I've had some patients surprise me,' he nods. 'By changing their diet and lifestyle and by incorporating some of the interventions in the list above, people can achieve dramatic improvements. But, overall, statins are still the gold standard.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.