
Ranbir Kapoor and Yash's Ramayana budget revealed: Both parts cost Rs 4,000 crore; more expensive than Jurassic World Rebirth and Superman
He said, 'So, when we set out to make it, six, seven years ago, just after the pandemic, when we started to really get serious about mounting it and producing it, and budget-wise, it was like everybody thought I'm a lunatic. Because no Indian film, by a long distance, comes close to it. So, to put it simply, it'll be about $500 million by the time we're done, on both films put together, part one and part two, which is over Rs 4,000 crore.'
Despite industry skepticism over the scale of spending, Namit insists the project is both financially responsible and creatively necessary. 'So, I say it like this: we're making the largest film in the world for the greatest story, the greatest epic, that the world should see. And I still think it's cheaper than what it cost to make some of the biggest Hollywood films. So I think we're making a bigger film at a lower cost. Because that Indian in me still believes that we're not being irresponsible financially. We're not being irresponsible with money.' Namit said that the industry might view him as irresponsible, but the investment is justified.
Also Read | Ranbir Kapoor's onscreen mother from Ramayana says he never showed any starry attitude: 'I did Animal with him, he recommended me'
For Namit, Ramayana is a way to honour India's foundational cultural ethos, and to share it with the world. 'I'm taking the greatest belief system of our country. We're taking something that we have pride in. It's a foundational piece of our culture. And I'm going to mount it and present it in the grandest form possible. And it's going to cost whatever it costs. Why is that a risk? When I think about Ramayana, I'm like, is it really a risk? All I'm doing is, I have to just make sure we do justice to people's expectations, and beyond. There has to be pride that must come through, in every Indian first, and then every other person in the world, to say: that's a great piece of culture. I genuinely think the relevance of Ramayana today in the world, not just India, is massive. Look at the wars in the West. Look at the way the countries are operating. I've lived in America. I've lived in the UK. I've hesitated to send my kids abroad to study.'
He also shared his belief that Indian culture and stories like Ramayana offer a much-needed grounding in today's global climate. 'My kids are growing up in Mumbai today. They're going to Indian schools. I want them to study in India. Not because I don't believe in the Western education system, but because I genuinely have greater faith and confidence in India today. And I'm making those decisions. And I'm making that commitment. So I'm like, there's something we're doing right. The West has sort of lost its way a little bit. And nothing like our culture to really help give that grounding and anchor. We're not trying to provide sermons to the world. But what we're saying is: Hey, we've learned a lot from you. Take something from us.'
Director Nitesh Tiwari also echoed this sentiment at the official first glimpse launch earlier this month, expressing that his intention with Ramayana is to evoke pride in India's ancient culture and heritage. Ramayana will be released in two parts, with Part One scheduled for Diwali 2026 and Part Two for Diwali 2027. The film stars Ranbir Kapoor as Lord Ram and Yash as Ravan, with Sai Pallavi playing Sita, Ravi Dubey as Lakshman, and Sunny Deol as Hanuman.
Ramayana: Part One's production budget equals those of films such as Black Panther: Wakanda Forever and Guardians of the Galaxy: Vol 3. It is higher than the $225 that was spent on the new Superman film, and also higher than the $180 million spent on Jurassic World Rebirth.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
King Charles tells Shubman Gill about Siraj's dismissal in ENG vs IND 3rd Test; check his reply
On July 15, the Indian men's and women's cricket teams met King Charles at Clarence House, London. The king warmly greeted players like Jasprit Bumrah, Rishabh Pant, Shubman Gill and others. The 76-year-old monarch mentioned watching highlights of the 3rd Test match, which India narrowly lost to England by 22 runs. Gill shared that the King had called the last wicket very unlucky. Mohammed Siraj got bowled by Shoaib Bashir's ball rolling onto the stumps. "It's a game of cricket," Gill told King Charles. "It was amazing. I think he was very kind and generous to be able to call us here, and it was a pleasure meeting the king, and we had some really good conversations," ANI quoted Gill as talking about the meeting with King Charles. King Charles also met Indian cricket stars Rishabh Pant and Jasprit Bumrah, sharing a light-hearted moment with them. He then greeted other team members like Yashasvi Jaiswal, KL Rahul, Ravindra Jadeja and coach Gautam Gambhir. Later, he met the Indian women's team and spoke briefly with some players. India Women's cricket team captain Harmanpreet Kaur said it was a lovely experience meeting King Charles during their England tour. The monarch asked about their travel and made them feel welcome. 'We came to England so many times, but this was our first time when we met him, and he was very friendly. He asked us, like, how the travel was and all. And, it was really nice to meet him," Kaur said. "Definitely, we have been playing good cricket, and I think with that we are getting a lot of opportunity to express ourselves, so really happy the way things are moving on," she added. Before this, the team also met British actor Idris Elba. During a short chat with Gill, Bumrah and Pant, the Avengers actor admitted he said he used to be a small-time bowler. "I'd say I'm a fan, but I don't follow cricket as well as I should. I was just a little bowler, that's all," he said.


India Today
24 minutes ago
- India Today
Candid camera or creepy crew: What is 'breach of privacy'?
Shraddha Kapoor's viral video sparks outrage. When does a harmless video turn into a full-blown privacy nosedive? Just because someone's in the skies doesn't mean their boundaries should disappear into thin air. Welcome aboard the not-so-friendly skies of secret DOES BREACH OF PRIVACY MEAN IN LEGAL TERMS?Breach of privacy in India refers to any unauthorised interference with an individual's personal life, space, communications, or information without their explicit includes actions such as secretly recording someone, sharing personal photos or messages without permission, or accessing private data like phone records, emails, or CCTV footage unlawfully. Under Indian law, the right to privacy is recognised as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution (Right to Life and Personal Liberty), as affirmed by the Supreme Court in the Puttaswamy judgment (2017).SMILE YOU'RE IN A CABIN CAMERAHere's what happened, Shraddha Kapoor, Bollywood's doe-eyed darling, was flying through the clouds with her rumoured boyfriend Rahul instead of being left in peace to sip her complimentary beverage, she was secretly filmed by a member of the cabin crew, who thought leaking a private moment was somehow part of the in-flight Tandon with a virtual chappal of justice, slammed the airline for breaching Shraddha's privacy. And rightly so. But let's unpack this, because whether you're a national heartthrob or just a sweaty commuter on the Delhi Metro, privacy isn't a privilege. It's a PRIVACY MID-AIR: MORE TURBULENT THAN IT LOOKS?Here's a little nugget for the legally curious. The moment you board a flight, you're not in a surveillance jungle just because the clouds are watching. Airlines operate under strict rules, particularly under the Aircraft Rules, 1937 and Civil Aviation Requirements (CAR), Section 3, Series M, boring and binding stuff, but it's all true.A flight attendant is not allowed to secretly film passengers. Period. Even if the passenger is flipping their hair like it's a shampoo ad. This act can be interpreted under Section 66E of the IT Act, which criminalises the capture or transmission of images of a person's private area without consent, even more so if it's intrusive and shared most airlines have internal conduct rules for crew members that explicitly prohibit using personal phones for such purposes. So yes, a breach of trust, policy, and possibly the VS GROUND: IS PRIVACY ALTITUDE SENSITIVE?Short answer? Nope. Whether you're at 30,000 feet or walking your dog in a Park, your privacy remains your fundamental right. The Supreme Court in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) affirmed that privacy is a constitutional right under Article 21, the right to life and personal context matters though. On-ground breaches are easier to pursue legally because:There are clearer jurisdictional or public/private space distinctions are more can actually walk into a police station and file a the air? Trickier. You may need to file with the DGCA (Directorate General of Civil Aviation) or take it up with the airline's internal grievance redressal system before it CAN I NEVER TAKE A PICTURE AGAIN? IT'S ALL ABOUT THE CONSENTTaking a selfie with a celeb at a public event? Cool, if they nod or recording someone (anyone!) in a personal moment without consent, on land, air, or Mars? That's a legal make one thing clear. No consent? No camera.- EndsMust Watch


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kumkum – Ek Pyara Sa Bandhan clocks 23 years: Juhi Parmar recreates her iconic Kumkum look
It's been 23 years since Kumkum – Ek Pyara Sa Bandhan first aired, yet the show continues to hold a special place in the hearts of viewers. Back in the early 2000s, when daily soaps were primarily slotted for evenings or prime time, Kumkum broke all norms by becoming one of the highest-rated shows in the afternoon slot. Families would sit together post-lunch to watch Kumkum and Sumit's emotional yet endearing journey. Juhi Parmar , who played the titular role, became a household name overnight. Her portrayal of the ideal daughter-in-law, Kumkum, was loved by viewers across generations. Her chemistry with Hussain Kuwajerwala , who played Sumit, was effortless and gave television one of its most adored jodis. Today, marking the show's 23rd anniversary, Juhi Parmar shared a special video on Instagram, dressed exactly like Kumkum. Wearing a red saree and sporting the signature round red bindi that became a rage during the show's run, Juhi recreated the nostalgia. The iconic Kumkum title track played in the background as she smiled gracefully, taking fans straight back to the golden days of Indian television. Take a look! In an earlier interview with Times of India, Juhi Parmar spoke about the show's significance, sharing, "I believe 'Kumkum' was truly progressive and ahead of its time. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it legal? How to get Internet without paying a subscription? Techno Mag Learn More Undo We promoted widow remarriage in the show and showcased how Kumkum and Sumit's relationship was accepted. It depicted the positive side of life, where one's life doesn't end simply because they have lost their partner at a young age. It conveyed the message that one can always give life another chance. We aimed to create a show that would have a positive impact on society, and perhaps that's why the show is still loved so dearly." "While many other shows during that time focused on multiple marriages and changing partners, 'Kumkum' stood out as a series where Kumkum and Sumit remained together from the beginning till the end, even after their demise. Even in reincarnation, they were destined to be together. We promoted a selfless and enduring love in the show," Juhi explained. With Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi returning on screens, fans are now demanding Kumkum's return too. After all, some stories and characters are timeless, and Kumkum remains etched as one of Indian TV's most beloved shows even after two decades. Juhi Parmar along with daughter Samairra made flameless chocolate modak