Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not
Interior Department Response to Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal
Live Events
Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal Technical and Cultural Challenges
Can Mount Rushmore Have More Faces?
Mount Rushmore Rock's Poor Quality
Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal Political Support and Resistance
FAQs
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
has hogged the limelight again as a renewed political push has emerged to add a fifth face to Mount Rushmore, this time that of President Donald Trump. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) has formally requested that Interior Secretary Doug Burgum study the feasibility of the addition. However, experts and park officials continue to emphasize the structural and philosophical barriers.Rep. Ogles wrote a letter to Secretary Burgum urging the Department of the Interior to consider expanding the Mount Rushmore National Memorial. He pointed to Trump's domestic policy bill, which passed Congress on Thursday, and the administration's ongoing border security efforts.Ogles also posted his proposal on social media, writing that the monument should evolve to include recent moments in US history.The Department of the Interior did not directly comment on the expansion proposal. A spokesperson said the agency reviews all correspondence from Congress seriously and thoroughly. The National Park Service, which manages Mount Rushmore, did not issue a fresh statement in response.In the past, NPS officials have stressed that the rock surrounding the current sculpture is unsuitable for new carvings.Ogles acknowledged the difficulties involved in modifying Mount Rushmore. He suggested a feasibility study involving the public and experts to address technical, legal, and cultural concerns. Mount Rushmore sits on sacred Lakota Sioux land, a source of ongoing dispute with Indigenous groups.Ogles argued that recognizing Trump's accomplishments would increase the site's importance and visitor numbers, benefitting South Dakota and local communities.Park officials and geologists have repeatedly warned that the monument cannot safely accommodate another face. Maureen McGee-Ballinger of the NPS stated in 2020 that no suitable rock remains near the sculpted area.A long-standing engineering partner, RESPEC, supports this view, saying any new carving could destabilize the existing structure.Geomechanical engineer Paul Nelson said removing more material could harm the support of the monument, possibly risking structural damage.Mount Rushmore's original sculptor, Gutzon Borglum, made several changes to his design due to the rock's poor quality. Jefferson's first face had to be blasted away and moved. Roosevelt's face was carved in a narrow space near a crack, and Lincoln's face is held by friction.In the 1990s, scientists mapped over 140 fractures across the site, showing it is already fragile. Park rangers even angled Jefferson's gaze to avoid a fracture.Alongside Ogles, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) has introduced legislation to begin carving Trump's face on the mountain. The bill has not yet received a hearing.In past interviews, Trump expressed interest in being added to the monument. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem once said Trump told her it was his dream.However, sculptor Borglum's granddaughter said the monument was not intended to celebrate individuals but ideals. Past suggestions to include other presidents were never acted on.Experts say the rock is unstable. Carving more faces risks damage to the existing sculpture and could make the entire structure unsafe.Yes, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna introduced a bill in January to carve Trump's face, but it has not advanced in Congress.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
20 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Congress, BJP aid corporate hospitals by vilifying Kerala's public health sector: CPI(M)
The Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] State secretariat has accused the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) of launching a vilification campaign against Kerala's robust public health system to aid the corporate medical-care sector. CPI(M) State secretary M.V. Govindan told a news conference here on Friday that the Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had sought to politicise the tragic building collapse at the Government Medical College Hospital (MCH), Kottayam, to paint a dismal picture of State-funded hospitals to help corporate hospitals corral patients. He said the building collapse occurred when the hospital authorities were moving patients to the newly constructed block. Mr. Govindan said global capital had 'gobbled up' most legacy hospitals in the private sector, which had sacrificed medical ethics at the altar of profit-making. He said the Left Democratic Front (LDF) had sought to protect the working class from predatory medical practices by adding more super-specialty units, including liver and kidney transplant departments, to State-run hospitals. Affordable care He said the Government Medical College Hospitals had successfully conducted organ transplants at minimal rates. The service was provided at no cost to economically disadvantaged individuals. 'In contrast, private corporate hospitals charged not less than ₹40 lakh for the life-saving procedures,' he said. Mr. Govindan said that an almost 50% increase in patient footfall at State-run hospitals had deprived the private sector of business. The Congress and the BJP had come to the aid of the corporate medical industry by seeking to demonise public health care. Mr. Govindan said the private sector was appalled that the LDF had opened outpatient centres at primary health-care centres and created 2,430 new facilities, adding to the existing clinical services to make health care easily accessible and affordable for the public. The private sector had now found a partner in the Congress and the BJP, who were out to malign State-subsidised health care. 'UDF cut allocation' Mr. Govindan said between 2011 and 2016, the Congress government had systematically slashed public health sector allocation from ₹139 crore to ₹116 crore. 'The UDF had planned to privatise State-funded hospitals,' he added. In contrast, since 2021, the second LDF government had increased public health spending to ₹1,600 crore. Kerala's health sector had won at least 21 national and international recognitions. Mr. Govindan said the BJP government at the Centre punished Kerala for its public health achievements by reducing allocations as part of the Centre's 'vengeful politics.' The LDF balanced the books by raising ₹80,000 crore from the global market to modernise State-funded hospitals, which now offered state-of-the-art treatment on a par with developed nations. It also increased the Gross State Domestic Product to catalyse welfare and development, given the Centre's attempt to financially strangulate Kerala.
New Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
‘Never heard it that way': Trump defends use of anti-Semitic slur at rally, denies knowing its meaning
US President Donald Trump used an anti-Semitic slur during a rally in Iowa as he celebrated passage of his marquee spending bill but insisted he did not know the word was offensive to Jewish people. "No death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowings from, in some cases a fine banker, and in some cases shylocks and bad people," Trump told the crowd Thursday at the Iowa State Fairgrounds in Des Moines. The term "shylock" is borrowed from William Shakespeare's "The Merchant of Venice." The tale features a Jewish character, who is portrayed as a ruthless moneylender demanding "a pound of flesh" from a merchant unable to repay a loan. The word refers to loan sharks and has long been considered offensive, playing on stereotypes of Jews and greed. The Trump controversy echoes a similar incident in 2014 when then-vice president Joe Biden used the term while describing exploitative lenders. Biden later apologized, calling it "a poor choice of words." "We see once again how deeply embedded this stereotype about Jews is in society," Abraham Foxman, then-director of a Jewish activist group, the Anti-Defamation League, said at the time. When asked about his use of the term after he got off Air Force One returning to Washington, Trump said he has "never heard that" the word could be considered anti-Semitic. He added: "I've never heard it that way. The meaning of Shylock is somebody that's a money lender at high rates. You view it differently. I've never heard that." Daniel Goldman, a Democratic US congressman from New York, called Trump's remarks "blatant and vile anti-Semitism, and Trump knows exactly what he's doing." "Anyone who truly opposes anti-Semitism calls it out wherever it occurs -- on both extremes — as I do," Goldman wrote on X. Before his re-election last year Trump promised to combat what he called a wave of anti-Semitic sentiment in the United States. Since taking power his administration has attacked major universities that saw protests over the war in Gaza, accusing the schools of allowing anti-Semitism and support for the Palestinian militant group Hamas.
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Big Beautiful Bill': Democrats sound alarm after Trump's sweeping bill passes house
President Donald Trump's tax-cut legislation cleared its final hurdle in the U.S. Congress on July 3 as the Republican-controlled House of Representatives narrowly approved a massive package that would fund his domestic agenda and push millions of Americans off health insurance. The 218-214 vote amounts to a significant victory for the Republican president that will fund his immigration crackdown, make his 2017 tax cuts permanent and deliver new tax breaks that he promised during his 2024 campaign. Every Democrat in Congress voted against it, blasting the bill as a giveaway to the wealthy that would leave millions uninsured. Show more Show less
