Donald Trump orders entry fee, DEI changes at national parks
A new executive order calls for charging non-U.S. residents higher fees for park entry and recreation passes, like the yearlong America the Beautiful pass, which grants access to public lands across federal agencies.
"From the awe-inspiring Grand Canyon to the tranquility of the Great Smoky Mountains, America's national parks have provided generations of American families with unforgettable memories," Trump said in the order issued July 3.
"It is the policy of my Administration to preserve these opportunities for American families in future generations by increasing entry fees for foreign tourists, improving affordability for United States residents, and expanding opportunities to enjoy America's splendid national treasures," he said.
The order also calls for giving Americans "preferential treatment with respect to any remaining recreational access rules, including permitting or lottery rules."
Any revenue generated by higher fees from foreign tourists will be funneled back into infrastructure improvements and other enhancements across federal recreation sites.
Reservations required: Which national parks require them in 2025
Unrelated, the executive order also revokes a presidential memorandum signed by then-President Barack Obama in 2017 that promoted a range of diversity and inclusion efforts in the management of national parks and other public lands.
It called for improving access for all Americans and "considering recommendations and proposals from diverse populations to protect at-risk historic, cultural, and natural sites."
Diversity and inclusion were also priorities for parks during the Biden administration.
Before leaving office in January, then National Park Service Director Chuck Sams told USA TODAY: "When I took my oath of office on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, Secretary (Deb) Haaland said, on behalf of the president of the United States, myself and the American people, I'm charging you with these monuments, memorials and parks, but more importantly, we're charging you to find those stories that are less told or haven't been told yet, and to tell them fiercely.
"So over the last three-plus years, working all across the park system, we've been able to tell stories to ensure that every American sees a reflection of themselves in the parks," he said.
But the latest move comes after Trump on his first day back in office in January ordered an end to government diversity, equity, and inclusion programs established under Biden.
USA TODAY has reached out the Interior Department and National Park Service for comment on the new executive order.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump orders national parks to charge some tourists higher fees
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
4 Ways the Musk-Trump Clash Could Shake Up Your Investments
The very public blowout with President Trump and Elon Musk continues. And while their personal attacks remain ongoing, experts in finance are taking notice. Consider This: Find Out: 'I've watched my tech investments swing wildly since Elon started this whole Twitter saga,' finance expert Andrew Lokenauth with Be Fluent in Finance said. 'The Tesla stock in my portfolio dropped about 65% — and honestly, it's been a mess.' The feud started when Musk bashed Trump's controversial new bill, and called out Republicans supporting it. On X, he wrote, ' I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' In a June 7 interview with NBC News, Trump said he does not wish to repair the relationship with Musk and has no plans of talking to him. 'I'm too busy doing other things,' he said. 'I have no intention of speaking to him.' The fallout continues to impact investors. Here's how their clash could affect your investments, according to finance experts. As a result of the bad blood between Musk and Trump, Tesla's value fell $152 billion, per CNBC. According to Lokenauth, Tesla isn't just a car company anymore — it's Musk's personal brand, and that's a problem because he's losing credibility after the spat. 'I've trimmed my Tesla position by about 75%, he said. 'The company's still solid, but the stock price swings are just too wild and most of my conservative clients have completely exited their positions.' Learn More: When powerful figures collide, financial backlash can happen, and some are predicting the renewable energy sector is at risk. 'If Trump's policies lean heavily toward traditional energy and Musk publicly pushes back, investors might see wild swings in companies like Tesla or SpaceX's partners,' said Danny Ray, founder of PinnacleQuote 'The Life Insurance Experts.' He added, 'If you're holding stocks tied to either camp, it's smart to tighten your strategy and stay nimble.' It's not just Tesla stocks investors should look at. According to Lokenauth, tech is down across the board due to Trump and Musk's conflict. 'The tech sector's getting hammered from multiple directions,' he said. 'My tech-heavy clients have seen their portfolios take serious hits.' He explained, ' When you've got two massive personalities like Musk and Trump battling it out in public, it creates uncertainty — and markets hate uncertainty. I've started shifting some of my clients' assets toward more stable value stocks, which has been working pretty well so far.' Investing in X (formerly known as Twitter), Facebook (part of Meta) and other social media platforms was lucrative, but according to Lokenauth, investors should look elsewhere right now for a return. 'Speaking from experience handling social media stocks, Twitter's chaos is spilling over to other platforms,' he said. 'Meta's down and Snap's worse, so I've completely restructured my approach to social media investments.' He explained, 'These companies are dealing with falling ad revenue, and the Musk-Trump situation isn't helping.' While investors wait out the tumultuous period, there are other opportunities to take advantage of. Defense is one area Lokenauth suggests. 'I've moved about 30% of my tech allocation into boring old consumer staples and utilities — they're not exciting, but they're stable, he said. In addition, he added dividend aristocrats — companies that have increased dividends for 25 plus years straight to his strategy. 'These moves have cut my portfolio volatility almost in half,' he explained. Another method Lokenauth recommended is REIT (Real Estate Investment Trusts) — companies that operate or own real estate that's income producing. 'REITs have been performing surprisingly well — they're up about 15% in my portfolio,' he said. 'These sectors tend to ignore the social media circus completely.' While Lokenauth believes the impact this high-profile clash has on the market will pass, the best approach is staying diversified. 'I'm keeping about 40% in broad market ETFs, 30% in value stocks, and the rest split between alternatives and cash,' he said. 'It's not exciting, but it's helped my clients sleep better at night while this drama plays out.' Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 5 Types of Cars Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on 4 Ways the Musk-Trump Clash Could Shake Up Your Investments
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I'm a Financial Expert: Here's 5 Ways to Adjust Your Spendings Due to the Impact of Tariffs and Inflation
On Apr. 2, President Donald Trump announced that global tariffs would be implemented on imported goods entering the United States. 'Liberation Day' was designed to level the playing field as it relates to trade practices with other nations. Historically, an increase of tariffs has triggered higher inflation, and this is a major concern for experts today. The relationship between tariffs and inflation is due to the potential increased expenses being passed onto the average consumer of a product that is shipped internationally. Such actions can contribute to great financial woes within a family. Try This: Find Out: As a financial planning expert, here are five ways you can change your spending to avoid the potential impact tariffs may have on inflation. One of the biggest challenges with the implementation of tariffs causing inflation to rise is the effect it will have on interest rates. While it may not make economic sense to aggressively pay down debt, primarily consumer debt, during uncertain times, looking to shift credit card balances to zero percent vehicles makes sense. It will give you time to pay down the liability while keeping your expendable resources available as prices begin to increase. Learn More: Identify your nondiscretionary versus your discretionary expenses to determine in advance what adjustments you are willing to make to maintain a comfortable standard of living. Look for opportunities to review the monthly automatic payments for goods and services you don't utilize consistently. Putting a temporary freeze on gym memberships that are not regularly used or other subscriptions you may not fully take advantage of are minor tweaks to your budget that can help you navigate through economic uncertainty. While the United States remains the second-largest manufacturing country behind China, it has slowly transitioned from being predominantly manufacturing to a service-based economy. Therefore, one can expect goods and products to cost more. For example, the automotive industry did an analysis indicating an increase in tariffs will detrimentally impact auto parts, even if car production is completed in the United States. This reality can impact jobs and the purchase of new cars. If an individual must purchase a vehicle, you should consider used vehicles as a financially manageable option. However, if anyone can avoid making major purchases until an inflationary period cools, you would be better positioned to manage the higher tariffs. Consider purchasing nondiscretionary, basic essential items in bulk to reduce the overall cost of the item and save money along the way. Generally, when a family eats out, the cost associated with dining out can be significant. Purchasing groceries and other necessities in bulk will allow a family to purchase more items at a lower cost. If one considered using coupons and rebates as well, it can truly add increased savings over time. Spending your money locally benefits local entrepreneurs and may potentially avoid the impact of tariffs. However, keep in mind that a local vendor may pass on their expenses to the consumer to stay in business. If the entrepreneurs' cost of doing business increases because of tariffs, then the business owner may have to increase their prices to stay afloat. However, your willingness to support local vendors will help companies stay in business. This season of economic uncertainty can become quite overwhelming. However, making minor adjustments and sitting down with a financial professional can truly ease your financial anxiety. Take a moment to review your financial status so that you can always maintain and improve your standard of living. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard Here's the Minimum Salary Required To Be Considered Upper Class in 2025 4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years This article originally appeared on I'm a Financial Expert: Here's 5 Ways to Adjust Your Spendings Due to the Impact of Tariffs and Inflation Sign in to access your portfolio
American Press
28 minutes ago
- American Press
Jim Beam column:Checks, balances don't exist
Republican President Donald Trump is close to making American federal government a one-man operation, which the father of our constitution warned us about.(Photo courtesy of PBS). Today's Republican members of Congress and conservative justices on the U.S. Supreme Court have apparently forgotten about the checks and balances provided for in the Constitution. Under President Donald Trump, it is abundantly clear that the executive branch has almost complete control of the federal government. James Madison, the father of the Constitution, defended the checks and balances in that document that don't exist at the moment. Madison said, 'The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.' We are awfully close to that point today. Trump has pretty much ignored the rulings of federal courts. Republicans in Congress are so frightened Trump will fight them at the next election they are either doing his bidding or deciding not to run for re-election. The civics text that I used years ago said the three branches of government are not completely independent of one another. While each branch has its own distinct field of powers, it is subject to a series of constitutional checks which the other branches may exercise against it. The president, for example, may veto acts of Congress, but Congress has the right to override those vetoes by a two-thirds majority vote. Or Congress may refuse to appropriate funds requested by the president, which the current GOP Congress doesn't have the courage to do. Congress can also impeach the president, judges and other civil officers. Its members had the courage to impeach Trump twice during his first term — on Dec. 18, 2019, and Jan. 13, 2021. The first impeachment stemmed from a call Trump had with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. Trump wanted him to investigate the Bidens and some in Ukraine who interfered in the 2016 election. The second impeachment followed the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021, when Trump was impeached for 'incitement to insurrection.' In each case, he was acquitted on all counts by the Senate. Conviction requires a two-thirds vote of senators present. When all 100 are there, it requires 67 votes. The votes on the two articles at the first trial were 48-52 and 47-53. The vote at the second trial was 57-43. Federal courts have the power to pass on the constitutionality of acts of Congress or actions of the president (judicial review). President Harry Truman in 1952 seized the steel industry to prevent a strike. However, the Supreme Court said that was a job for Congress, and that Truman had exceeded his powers. My civics text said the check and balance system makes compromise necessary, and compromise is of the essence in a democratic system. Unfortunately, compromise has pretty much become a lost art in today's hostile political climate. Many political scientists are convinced Trump was elected based on his promise to get control of immigration. The unrestricted flow along the nation's borders during the President Joe Biden administration bothered many Americans (Democrats and Republicans). Trump continues to insist getting illegal immigrants out of this country is his No. 1 priority. In order to do that, some members of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have taken questionable actions when rounding up immigrants. Going back to that civics text, it says democracy cannot succeed except where all people are entitled to fair treatment under the law. It adds that both the national Constitution and constitutions of the various states contain numerous guarantees of fair treatment for those accused of crime. The 14th Amendment reinforces the guarantees against unfair treatment by the states. And the Writ of Habeas Corpus is a court order directing that a person being held be brought before the court so a judge can determine whether the prisoner is being illegally detained. That hasn't happened for many immigrants who have been rounded up and shipped to some country they have probably never heard of. The courts have tried to stop it, but the Trump administration throws up as many roadblocks as possible. Kristi Noem, secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security under which ICE operates, during a Senate hearing in May said habeas corpus was 'a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country and suspend their rights.' Anyone who thinks this country's democracy isn't in trouble hasn't been keeping up with the news. Jim Beam, the retired editor of the American Press, has covered people and politics for more than six decades. Contact him at 337-515-8871 or Reply Forward Add reaction
