
Even parts of the P.E.I. government say we're moving to eliminate trade barriers too quickly
As the P.E.I. government moves full steam ahead toward an agreement to reduce trade barriers and improve labour mobility with Nova Scotia, Ontario and any other provinces that want to join, there are entreaties for the province to slow down — including from within the P.E.I. government itself.
Premier Rob Lantz tabled a bill on April 11 modelled on similar legislation recently enacted in Nova Scotia.
The goal is to have participating provinces enact laws to recognize each others' regulations, standards and accreditation programs to eliminate trade barriers and promote labour mobility.
But professional associations and other groups consulted by the P.E.I. government in the lead-up to tabling its legislation complained the province was moving too quickly and cautioned about potential unintended consequences from the effort that could put the public at risk.
One of the complaints came from the director of the province's Financial and Consumer Services Division, according to emails that Lantz tabled in the legislature on April 16.
"It is unfortunate the division was not made aware of this parallel legislative initiative," Steve Dowling wrote in an April 4 email to staff with the Department of Workforce and Advance Learning.
P.E.I. premier tables act to eliminate interprovincial trade barriers in face of Trump tariffs
3 days ago
Duration 1:57
Prince Edward Island Premier Rob Lantz says his new Interprovincial Trade and Mobility Act will make it easier to move goods from province to province, and easier for people to work in other places. The premier hopes to have it in place for Canada Day, in the face of instability regarding markets in the United States. CBC's Stacey Janzer reports.
The department sent out consultation drafts of the legislation on the afternoon of Monday, March 31, asking groups to provide feedback during either of two sessions scheduled two days later.
"The three-day window accorded to the division to review and respond to the proposed act contrasts significantly with our extensive, proactive and collaborative work with you" on parallel efforts to reduce trade barriers under the Canada Free Trade Agreement, Dowling wrote.
Ultimately Dowling suggested his colleagues conduct further consultation and wait for more provinces to put forward similar legislation so that P.E.I. could learn from their work.
Ontario tabled its bill on interprovincial trade barriers on April 16.
Nova Scotia bill had to be changed
The original bill put forward in Nova Scotia by the Tim Houston government required significant amendments after regulatory bodies raised concerns about unintended consequences that could put public safety at risk.
Groups including the Nova Scotia Veterinary Medical Association said the original legislation would have removed their ability to monitor who was practising in the province, and leave them unable to detect people posing as regulated professionals.
Similar concerns were raised during P.E.I.'s consultation process.
The registrar of the P.E.I. Veterinary Medical Association, Dr. Jessie MacQuarrie, told the province the proposed legislation would leave the association with no ability to provide oversight or "impose restrictions or suspensions against veterinarians from reciprocating jurisdictions, no matter how egregious the offence."
MacQuarrie also said the lack of a requirement in the legislation that accredited individuals also work from an accredited facility would mean that people "could engage in the practice of veterinary medicine from the back of a vehicle in a parking lot."
She asked that her group be included as an excluded regulatory authority under the act.
The legislation includes specific exclusions for health professions that fall under the Regulated Health Professions Act (which does not include veterinarians) and for the Law Society of P.E.I.
Other professions can be excluded from the act when regulations are developed applying to it down the road.
Additional professional groups that asked to be excluded from the new law include Island psychologists, teachers, engineers, social workers, chartered professional accountants and land surveyors.
P.E.I.'s deputy minister of Housing, Land and Communities, Jamie MacDonald, advised government to limit the recognition of credentials for elevator installers from other provinces.
The P.E.I. College of Pharmacy warned of a potential loophole that could let a person with an outstanding criminal charge practise on the Island by providing proof of an outdated criminal records check.
The Canadian Labour Congress pointed to research suggesting increased labour mobility could lead to workers leaving one jurisdiction in search of better wages in another.
The P.E.I. Association of Social Workers raised concerns that the bill could create a vacuum of professional accountability, warning that if "an individual (service user, client, or patient) experiences harm due to this legislation, there may not be recourse for the individual."
Several groups including the P.E.I. Department of Justice said they would struggle to meet the requirement in the bill that certifications for professionals from other jurisdictions be provided within 10 business days.
Trying to speed up progress: Lantz
On Wednesday in the legislature, the Liberals and Greens filed a joint motion asking for the legislation to be sent to committee for further review. The PCs denied the unanimous consent required to let that motion be debated the same day it was tabled.
People in our position have struggled for decades to make any progress on this, because it was approached from the perspective primarily of trying to harmonize regulations and laws across jurisdictions.
During question period, Lantz defended comments he had made previously, that the bill represents a "quick and dirty" effort to reduce barriers to trade with other provinces.
"People in our position have struggled for decades to make any progress on this, because it was approached from the perspective primarily of trying to harmonize regulations and laws across jurisdictions," Lantz said. "This is a simple approach of mutual recognition that will advance free trade across this country in the simplest way possible and the quickest way possible."
Lantz has said he wants the law to be in place by July 1, the date set by Prime Minister Mark Carney to have freer trade between the provinces and territories after meeting with first ministers in March.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
2 days ago
- CTV News
Lowering Confederation Bridge toll at the top of P.E.I. Premier's list when meeting with Prime Minister
Prince Edward Island's Confederation Bridge is seen on May 31, 2022. (CTV Atlantic) Lowering the Confederation Bridge toll is at the top of Prince Edward Island Premier Rob Lantz's list when he meets with Prime Minister Mark Carney next week. Lantz will travel to Ontario for the First Ministers' Meeting and Council of the Federation from July 21 to 23. 'First and foremost, I will be speaking directly with Prime Minister Carney and his team about the immediate need to follow through on their promise to lower the tolls on the Confederation Bridge to $20 and reduce the Wood Islands Ferry tolls by half,' he said in a news release Friday. Carney said he would lower the tolls during his election campaign in April. Currently, the Confederation Bridge toll is $50.25. Lantz said he also intends to bring up recent issues with the new MV Northumberland and will ask that Transport Canada officials 'monitor the situation closely.' 'It is imperative that we have a consistent, two-vessel ferry service throughout the season to support our economy and maintain confidence in our transportation infrastructure,' said Lantz. The meetings bring together all of Canada's premiers from each of the 13 provinces and territories. 'It enables Premiers to work collaboratively, form closer ties, foster constructive relationships among governments, and show leadership on important issues that matter to Canadians,' reads a news release from the Council of the Federation. Lantz said he also hopes to work with his colleagues to continue to break down internal trade barriers, explore new trading partnerships and increase labour mobility throughout the country. 'With ongoing uncertainty in our trade relationship with the United States, it is more important than ever that we strengthen our domestic economic ties and work together to explore new markets for our products and services around the world,' said Lantz. For more P.E.I. news, visit our dedicated provincial page.


CBC
3 days ago
- CBC
14 parties charged over alleged immigration scheme involving 2 P.E.I. farm operations
Social Sharing Fourteen people and companies with ties to Canadian Nectar Products and Island Gold Honey are facing charges under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act in P.E.I. provincial court, with some of them also facing criminal charges for money laundering. CBC News has been reporting on the companies since 2022, after the Canadian Border Services Agency executed search warrants at properties across Prince Edward Island. In Georgetown court Thursday, a federal prosecutor told the court the case is based on what was found after eight search warrants were carried out. It also relies on electronic evidence, including text messages, gathered over the last number of years. Among those charged are Kamalpreet Khaira and his company, Canadian Nectar Products, as well as Roger O'Neill and his company, Island Gold Honey. Who's been charged Several numbered companies have been charged, including: 102045 P.E.I. Inc., also known as Fruits Canada, 102095 P.E.I. Inc., also known as Atlantic Canada Nurseries Inc., and 2786244 Ontario Inc. A lawyer appearing virtually from Ontario on behalf of Greenspan Humphrey Makepeace told the court she was representing all those numbered companies, as well as Canadian Nectar Products and the Khairas. Two people who share Kamalpreet Khaira's surname have also been charged, as well as MCPA Consulting Group Walker and Associates and its director, Thomas Walker, a former P.E.I. accountant who was expelled from his professional organization in 2006 after pleading guilty to theft charges. The registrar with Chartered Professional Accountants of P.E.I. confirmed to CBC News that Walker has not been reinstated since his expulsion. The charges include: Both P.E.I. numbered companies, Canadian Nectar Products, Kamalpreet Khaira and four other people have been charged with committing infractions under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. Canadian Nectar Products, Island Gold Honey, Walker and Associates, Walker, O'Neill and two other people are charged with employing a foreign national in ways that were not authorized. Kamalpreet Khaira, Roger O'Neill, Island Gold Honey, Canadian Nectar Products, the P.E.I. numbered companies and one other person are charged with misrepresenting information under the immigration act. And finally, criminal charges for laundering the proceeds of crime were filed against the Ontario numbered company, Island Gold Honey, Walker and Associates, Kamalpreet Khaira, Walker and O'Neill. None of the allegations have been tested in court and pleas to the charges have not yet been entered. Investigation going back at least four years Search warrants unsealed after a CBC News court application show the Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) had been investigating Khaira, O'Neill and their companies since November of 2021 after a tip from the Cooper Institute about poor living conditions for temporary foreign workers tied to Island Gold Honey. Canada's Temporary Foreign Worker Program allows employers to hire migrant workers from outside the country to fill temporary jobs when qualified Canadians are not available. Businesses that hire foreign workers are supposed to provide a fair wage and help cover workers' travel and housing costs. Once workers arrive to take up the job, they are tied to the same employer and cannot work for someone else, in most cases. In those documents obtained by CBC, the CBSA alleges Khaira runs multiple companies to access additional temporary foreign workers, and had his staff provide "fraudulent documentation to support work that did not actually take place," the search warrant application said. In an investigation done by CBC's The Fifth Estate, four workers said they paid up to $30,000 each to immigration consultants who promised them jobs in Canada and eventually a path to permanent residency. After the payments were made, workers said they arrived in P.E.I. to discover the promised jobs didn't exist. They say they were shuttled between companies, and when they did work, they were offered substantially fewer hours than first promised. In the search warrant documents, the CBSA said workers said they never actually worked for Island Gold Honey after being hired, but were instead brought to the business premises of Canadian Nectar Products, on Peters Road in Alliston, P.E.I. One worker spoke of being taken to live on a farm after arriving on P.E.I. while work was being arranged. Months later, the worker was still not employed. Another worker told CBSA that repeated phone calls to O'Neill were not returned, and no one from Island Gold got in touch after the person arrived in Canada. Instead, the newcomer was directed to Canadian Nectar Products. CBSA investigators also talked to a worker who said they were recruited by Kamalpreet Khaira as a farm worker with Atlantic Canada Nurseries, in Belle River, P.E.I. The worker said they were told they would have to pay Khaira $50,000 in installment payments. The worker described being shocked upon arriving at that job site because there were no company buildings or nursery — only flat ground and one house. The warrant documents said Kamalpreet Khaira told the worker they'd be picking apples at Canadian Nectar Products instead, but would need to hide that fact. The migrant workers also described being required to pay cash in order to receive their paycheques — which were often made out in lesser amounts than what they had paid their employer in cash. The workers needed the paycheques to prove they were legally in Canada and gainfully employed, for the purposes of building a case for gaining permanent resident status. Workers told The Fifth Estate they went ahead with the alleged scheme because they believed they needed the pay stub as a record of employment, something they say they were told they needed to apply for permanent residency. In August 2022, P.E.I.'s Employment Standards Branch ordered Canadian Nectar Products to pay thousands of dollars to four foreign workers who refused to participate in what its ruling called a "cash for pay scheme." One worker whose circumstances were described in that matter complained of having to pay $600 in cash to receive a paycheque for $499.70. Charges reflect alleged improper use of TFW system O'Neill represented himself in court on Thursday. Provincial court Judge Nancy Orr urged him to seek legal counsel due to the seriousness of the charges. The other companies and people were all represented by various lawyers. Not all of the charges were read aloud in court on Thursday, but some were. Among the allegations detailed were that O'Neill and Island Gold Honey submitted labour market impact assessments — a step in getting approval to hire TFWs — for 27 foreign workers who were not needed, and then knowingly offered them jobs that didn't exist. Orr read from a charge document saying that Canadian Nectar Products has been accused of knowingly employing foreign nationals who were not authorized to work there, while many of the other charges allege individuals knowingly assisted in various steps of making that happen. Orr was not satisfied with the way the Crown had filed the charges — with many different names appearing on the same information sheets when she said they should have been split up. The lawyers and judge all agreed it was best to adjourn the case for about a month to get everything sorted and allow time for the defence to review the documents and case. The matter will be back in court in August.


Toronto Sun
3 days ago
- Toronto Sun
Major projects: How Bill C-5 works and why Indigenous leaders are so concerned
Published Jul 17, 2025 • 4 minute read Prime Minister Mark Carney addresses the crowd during the Canada Day festivities in Ottawa on Tuesday, July 1, 2025. Photo by Jean Levac / Postmedia Network OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney held a meeting with hundreds of First Nations chiefs Thursday, amid widespread skepticism and frustration over his controversial major-projects legislation. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Bill C-5 gives the federal government sweeping new powers to speed up permitting for what the Liberals call 'nation-building projects.' Carney says Bill C-5 is needed to shore up the economy in the face of a trade war with the United States, while opponents call it a massive power grab. Here's what's C-5 does and what people are saying about it. What problem is this trying to solve? Canada has built few large projects over the past decade. That has led Conservatives, some provinces and some industry groups to argue that Ottawa's regulatory burdens are holding back growth. The Liberals tried to streamline project approvals through Bill C-69, an impact assessment law meant to resolve environmental and Indigenous concerns upfront to keep projects from getting tied up in the courts. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Critics say the legislation has actually been holding back major infrastructure projects since it became law in 2019. Federal Conservatives have dubbed the law the 'No More Pipelines Act' and it's deeply unpopular in Alberta and Saskatchewan. Carney was elected in April with a mandate to diversify Canada's economy and ensure exports can more easily reach countries beyond the U.S. Ottawa has also promised to build up northern infrastructure, in part to meet a NATO military alliance spending target for critical infrastructure. Carney said Bill C-5 'creates the ability to flip … the attitude towards those projects once they are selected, once conditions are put in place — how those projects can move forward, as opposed to why.' Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. We don't know yet. The government has pointed to ports, railways and sometimes pipelines. The Ontario government has suggested a major commuter highway tunnel could qualify as a nation-building project. What are the provinces doing? Some provinces have also passed legislation aimed at speeding up development. Ontario's government has given itself the right through Bill 5 to designate 'special economic zones' where it can suspend everything from safety rules to environmental and labour standards, with a focus on mining projects. British Columbia's Bill 15 similarly allows the province to expedite the construction of anything from critical mineral mines to local hospitals. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The legislation has two main parts. The first part looks to eliminate barriers to interprovincial trade and labour mobility and work to harmonize various regulations across the country. It also allows Ottawa to decide that goods and services that have met one province's requirements can be deemed to have met 'comparable federal requirements' when moving interprovincially. That might involve things like energy efficiency standards on household appliances. The main part of the bill relates to fast-tracking approvals for projects that Ottawa decides are 'in the national interest.' The government says that decision is meant to be based on five criteria, including whether the project can 'strengthen Canada's autonomy, resilience and security,' help fight climate change or 'advance the interests of Indigenous peoples.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Getting that seal of approval would clear all federal approvals for the project — including virtually all environmental laws — while requiring the proponent to fulfil obligations set out by Ottawa. Why the rush? The government fast-tracked Bill C-5 with support from the Conservatives, and the House delivered the bill to the Senate with a programming motion that effectively forced the upper chamber to pass it within days. Critics called for a deeper review of the bill, arguing there was no need to rush it through because proposed fast-track projects won't start work before Parliament returns from its summer break. The government also could have had Parliament sit through the summer, instead of sending MPs and senators home for 12 weeks. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. There is widespread opposition to the legislation among First Nations, Inuit and Metis leaders, who argue elements of it could be used to undermine their rights. The government had amended the legislation to clarify it cannot override the Indian Act, though Indigenous leaders say it still puts fundamental rights at risk. The bill didn't mention a UN declaration Ottawa has endorsed that promises those communities 'free, prior and informed consent.' The Assembly of First Nations warned that the government's plan to set up advisory councils after the bill becomes law does not give real power to Indigenous communities on the ground. Those criticisms were amplified in the hastily organized meeting that took place Thursday. Chiefs have been complaining that they are not getting direct talks with Carney and his ministers, while being barred from allowing technical staff to attend the meeting. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Some walked out of the meeting after realizing much of it consisted of free time for chiefs to discuss the legislation with each other, instead of having direct engagement with the government. Other chiefs boycotted the process. Chief Phyllis Whitford of O'Chiese First Nation of Alberta said the meetings were 'political theatre' and not meaningful consultation. 'This is a pre-determined process — a process that is disrespectful, top-down and (that) divided Indigenous leaders, by privileging some voices over others,' she said. Chief Vernon Watchmaker of Kehewin Cree Nation, also of Alberta, predicted more court battles leading to less investor confidence, thanks to legislation that centralizes power in Ottawa. 'That is not modernization. It is colonization in 2025,' he said. Some Indigenous communities have welcomed the legislation, including some Alberta communities with economic stakes in energy projects and the Manitoba Metis Federation. Others say they are ready to undertake widespread, disruptive protests against specific projects. — With files from Kyle Duggan and Alessia Passafiume Toronto & GTA Toronto & GTA MMA Tennis Toronto Maple Leafs