logo
Otago Polytech to regain autonomy

Otago Polytech to regain autonomy

Otago Polytechnic's leaders are "deeply disappointed" with a new educational model they say will risk its future viability.
Vocational Education Minister Penny Simmonds' yesterday announced 10 polytechnics — including Otago and the Southern Institute of Technology — would return to autonomy at the start of next year.
The announcement marked the beginning of the end for mega-polytechnic Te Pukenga, which brought together the country's 16 Institutes of Technology and Polytechnics (ITPs) five years ago.
Ms Simmonds has frequently criticised Te Pukenga's model as being unwieldy and uneconomic — and unable to deliver vocational education to the regions.
"This is a major milestone in building a vocational education system that's locally led, regionally responsive and future focused.
"We've listened to extensive industry feedback and I'm confident our plan will set the sector up for long-term economic and learning success."
The Open Polytechnic of New Zealand will be the anchor polytechnic of a new "federation", which would include Otago Polytechnic and Universal College Of Learning (UCOL).
"The federation will co-ordinate programmes and other services, including shared academic boards.
"It will provide a low overhead way for polytechnics to create more efficient business models than they could on their own through the use of online learning resources and programmes."
Otago Polytechnic executive director Megan Potiki said she was deeply disappointed to see that Otago had been included as part of a federation model.
"Otago Polytechnic currently boasts one of the highest learner completion rates in the polytechnic sector, and we are concerned that the federation model would dilute this offering and impact our organisation's proud reputation and future success.
"The federation model risks undermining our learner success rates and the quality of teaching at Otago Polytechnic, and ultimately risks undermining our independence and future viability as a regional institution."
Dr Potiki said the polytechnic would pursue a path towards independence, and would welcome the support of the government and the local community to get there.
"Standing alone would mean the autonomy to make our own decisions and the ability to respond to the needs and aspirations of our ākonga [students], our kaimahi [staff], our local communities and employers."
Green MP Francisco Hernandez said the process of disestablishing Te Pūkenga had been more disruptive than the original merger.
"The lack of support and ad hoc planning has cost nearly one in 10 jobs in the polytech sector and the closure of so many critical courses and campuses right across the country.
"Here in Otago — we know that valuable courses such as horticulture and English foundation courses have gone by the wayside, along with countless jobs."
Mr Hernandez said while it was good news some polytechnics got to stand on their own, the creation of the federation for polytechnics raised more questions than it answered.
"The decision to create an awkward three-way merger between Otago Polytechnic, UCOL and Open Polytechnic is a questionable one.
"The people of Otago ... deserve a thriving, local polytechnic that can meet the needs of the learners, communities and businesses that they serve — and a three-headed hydra that straddles two different islands isn't the answer."
Tertiary Education Union general secretary Daniel Benson-Guiu said the federation model could end up being a "race to the bottom".
"No-one asked or wanted to be part of the federation."
There was the risk of creating a "confused system", he said.
"Our concern is that it will lead to a reliance on online learning, which can become problematic, especially for those looking to get back into the education system — any limiting of face-to-face learning will only compound inequities in the system.
"The minister had an assignment, she's presented it late, it's full of errors and she's upset a heap of staff in the process."
Meanwhile, NorthTec, Western Institute of Technology at Taranaki, Whitireia Community Polytechnic and Wellington Institute of Technology and Tai Poutini Polytechnic will remain with Te Pukenga. Decisions about their futures are due in the first half of next year. The standing 10
The 10 polytechnics returning to regional governance are. —
— Ara Institute of Canterbury (Ara)
— Eastern Institute of Technology (EIT)
— Nelson Marlborough Institute of Technology (NMIT)
— Southern Institute of Technology (SIT)
— Toi Ohomai Institute of Technology
— Waikato Institute of Technology (Wintec)
— Unitec Institute of Technology (Unitec) and Manukau Institute of Technology (MIT), which will stand up as a single entity
— Otago Polytechnic
— Universal College of Learning (UCOL)
— The Open Polytechnic of New Zealand
matthew.littlewood@odt.co.nz
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Undetermined and undermined
Undetermined and undermined

Otago Daily Times

timea day ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Undetermined and undermined

What a mess. The years of disruption and uncertainty in the polytechnic and vocational education sector have continued unabated. Despite a flawed and inadequate funding system, Otago Polytechnic was a thriving institution, even generating surpluses, thanks in part to its Auckland campus for overseas students. In February 2019, Labour Education Minister Chris Hipkins, concerned about several polytechnics running large and persistent deficits, triggered upheaval by beginning the centralisation of the 16 polytechnics. This led to the creation of Te Pūkenga and a costly Hamilton-based bureaucracy. The plan was poor, and the execution was a shambles. By July 2022, about $200 million had been spent on reorganisation, and the projected deficit of $110m far exceeded the net deficits before the upheaval. The promises of economies of scale, reduced course duplication, greater expertise, improved consistency and less waste on marketing were alluring. In practice, however, such reforms often lead to additional layers of highly paid management, the dead hand of bureaucracy, and diminished innovation. Compromised were speedy responses, local pride, genuine local community involvement, and even a touch of healthy inter-polytechnic competition. Regional polytechnics will be better attuned to local needs than branch offices operating under Te Pūkenga. The government and Vocational Education Minister Penny Simmonds have since taken a ham-fisted approach to dismantling Te Pūkenga. Crucial courses have been cut, and many valued staff lost, while restructuring drags on. This week finally brought announcements that 10 polytechnics would return to regional governance. Yet what should have been a positive step for Otago has instead been met with confusion and criticism. Although Ms Simmonds insists Otago Polytechnic will have its own council governance structure with local representatives, it has been placed under a "federation model." Executive director Megan Pōtiki says she has no idea what this will actually mean. In extraordinarily strong criticism, Dr Pōtiki said she feared the federation model would dilute Otago's high learner completion rates and damage its reputation. Its independence and viability as a regional institution were at risk. Ms Simmonds said that being part of the federation — anchored by the Open Polytechnic and including the Universal College of Learning (UCOL) — would enable collaboration in areas such as online learning resources, IT, procurement, and specialist services. This, she argued, would reduce duplication and support financial sustainability. Ideally, such co-operation could occur under regional governance across all 10 "autonomous" polytechnics, not solely through Otago's imposed federation membership. As Tertiary Education Union general secretary Daniel Benson-Guiu said, no-one asked to be part of the federation. Is this simply a "race to the bottom"? Will it lead to excessive reliance on online learning? Surely it would have been helpful if Dr Pōtiki had been consulted on both the federation and the supposed "autonomy", which resembles more a halfway house for her polytechnic. As of Wednesday, she said she still had not been contacted by Ms Simmonds about the changes. How can Otago be truly autonomous while the Open Polytechnic leads and provides services to it? It is bound to be both confusing and unwieldy. Given Ms Simmonds' background as a successful head of the Southern Institute of Technology, one might have expected her to bring more of the sector onside as the system reverts towards its earlier structure. At least, Labour leader Chris Hipkins acknowledges the turbulence endured by polytechnics and their staff. He acknowledges that a return to Te Pūkenga-style centralisation would be unwise for that reason if the coalition loses power at the next election. Inadequate funding and a crude "bums-on-seats" model underpinned earlier deficits. For any system to succeed, sufficient resourcing is vital. Otago Polytechnic has a long and proud history. It must be granted genuine autonomy, adequate funding, and space to rebuild its strength, resilience and innovation.

Nightmare over as autonomy back
Nightmare over as autonomy back

Otago Daily Times

timea day ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Nightmare over as autonomy back

Former Otago Polytechnic principal Ian Hall believes the decision to split up Te Pūkenga returns full autonomy to Otago. Dry July may have limited the celebrations at the Forth St head office of Otago Polytechnic. But celebration there should certainly be, with the overdue announcement by Vocational Education Minister Penny Simmonds of the restoration of full autonomy to our local polytechnic. The ill-fated Te Pūkenga nightmare is finally, and almost inevitably, coming to an end that few will lament. A bright new future for our polytechnic surely lies ahead once strong local governance and clear-headed leadership is again in place. I welcome the minister's announcement. It is something of a personal journey for me as it is 40 years since I landed my dream job as the polytechnic's third principal, following the pioneering work of the earlier principals, Ian Scollay and Ted Aitcheson. On the day that I shifted into my office, the bulldozers started work on the polytechnic's new Forth St campus. What an exciting time it was as the new buildings were opened to replace the outdated facilities in the old King Edward Technical College campus. Mind you, there were frustrations, as all day-to-decisions were stifled by the overbearing control of the Department of Education. Funding was based on student hours, laboriously recorded in daily class registers, and every significant staffing and curriculum decision needed referral to the department or other central agencies. Innovation and creativity was stifled. All decisions on the new buildings had to be signed off in Wellington and every piece of equipment was centrally funded. Dramatic change came about after the 1989 Learning for Life reforms of Education Minister David Lange and his sidekick, Phil Goff. The universities feared Armageddon as the University grants committee was abolished, with its cosy arrangement of five-early funding, and the pesky upstart polytechnics were granted degree-awarding powers. In Dunedin, always a centre of educational excellence, co-operation and mutual respect become the order of the day. A joint tertiary liaison committee was established under the wise stewardship of Dame Dorothy Fraser. Robin Irvine as vice-chancellor at Otago and Lester Taylor as principal at the Dunedin Teachers College committed to a collegial way of working to the benefit of all. The first polytechnic degree, in physiotherapy, was initially a joint venture between the polytechnic and the university, though it was not long before the polytechnic established its own degrees, initially in the health sciences. Liberated from stultifying central control, the building programme at Forth St continued apace and the regional campuses in Oamaru and Cromwell expanded rapidly. New courses were created and student access was broadened through the creative use of technology. The long-standing links to mana whenua at the Ōtākou marae were strengthened and the late Tasi Lemalu did wonderful work in encouraging links with Pasifika communities. International students were recruited in increasing numbers. Like all businesses, the polytechnic subsequently went through some challenging times. In time, the inspired leadership of Phil Ker as chief executive, and the strong work of dedicated staff, saw the polytechnic recognised as a leader in diverse areas, supported by a sound financial position and high levels of student satisfaction. It is sad that so much good work has been compromised in recent times, and that so many good staff have been lost. Te Pūkenga could have been a useful adjunct if its powers had been circumscribed, but there is little to be gained now from speculating about what could have been done better. What is surely important is to focus clearly on the new opportunities that lie ahead. It is worth remembering that Otago Polytechnic is the only institution to have retained its original name throughout all of the changes of recent times. Others have chosen at various times to be known as community colleges or institutes of technology but only Otago has held fast to its founding name. It has also, I would argue, held true to the mission of vocational education, and graduates who will contribute to the economic and social development of our region and beyond. This is a time for our community to once again add its support to our local polytechnic as it capitalises on the opportunities created by the decisions now made. I have no doubt that, given local support, Otago Polytechnic can once again add to Dunedin's hard-earned reputation as a centre of educational excellence and innovation. ■ Dr Ian Hall was principal of Otago Polytechnic from 1985 to 1992. He now lives in Albert Town and was recently chairman of the board at Mount Aspiring College.

Gore mayor Ben Bell fires back on tough first term
Gore mayor Ben Bell fires back on tough first term

RNZ News

time2 days ago

  • RNZ News

Gore mayor Ben Bell fires back on tough first term

Gore mayor Ben Bell has had a difficult first term in office but is seeking re-election. Photo: LDR / Otago Daily Times Gore mayor Ben Bell has labelled a recent account of his tumultuous first term as "bullying". On Wednesday, a story about the mayor's difficult few years in office was published by RNZ and re-used by other outlets. It covered a widely publicised fallout with the former chief executive, a near vote of no confidence in Bell, and dirty politics. The story said numerous attempts had been made to interview Bell - including a trip to Gore to meet him - but the mayor pulled out at short notice and stopped responding. Bell wasn't happy with what he read in the RNZ article. "I think it's an example of the bullying that I've experienced the whole way through," he said. "I don't think they've done a positive article on anything that we've done, and to get comments from the former mayor kind of shows their attitude towards us." Bell also felt it was misreported that he didn't want to speak for the story. "I've just actually been busy serving my community and schedules didn't line up and they didn't want to talk to me on the phone. "I think they said I was avoiding them, that's not the case whatsoever." In response, an RNZ spokesperson said the broadcaster stood by its article which included the perspective of a former mayor and the current deputy mayor of Gore. "As stated in the article, RNZ made numerous attempts to interview the current mayor Ben Bell, even travelling to Gore to meet with him. We also made clear to Mr Bell that we wanted to give him an opportunity to respond to the comments of others. "Mr Bell did not take up this opportunity and has not responded to RNZ's subsequent efforts to make contact," the spokesperson added. Former long-serving mayor Tracy Hicks was a key feature in the piece and took his opportunity to jab at the mayor. Hicks wondered what Bell had achieved, questioned the mayor's long-term commitment to the area, and said the council would have avoided reputational damage had he been re-elected. Bell disagreed with Hicks but said he was entitled to his opinion. The young mayor was seeking re-election and pointed to that decision as an example of his commitment to Gore. "In terms of my reflection, I think the first year and a half was a struggle. There was a lot of change brought about. A lot of councillors just getting used to me and my style," Bell said - a tamer view than what Hicks made of the first year: "a train wreck". Bell said progress was being made with the new chief executive onboard and momentum was building. When elected in October 2022, the then-23-year-old became the youngest mayor in New Zealand history. He thwarted Hicks' shot at a seventh term by just eight votes. Hicks told the Southland Times last election that he was running for the final time, but since indicated to RNZ he is reconsidering. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store