logo
Aussie nurse loses savings in just 24 hours from ‘phone porting' scam — what it is and how to protect yourself

Aussie nurse loses savings in just 24 hours from ‘phone porting' scam — what it is and how to protect yourself

Yahoo18-06-2025

An Australian nurse had her life upended when scammers hijacked her phone number, drained her bank accounts and opened loans in her name — all within 24 hours.
'They were able to change my email, passwords,' Lee-Anne McLean told 9News. 'They broke into my social media and they opened bank loans.'
And she doesn't know how they did it. 'I have security on my phone and my computer, so I'm not sure how they got all my personal information but I would really like to know.'
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
Phone porting is a legitimate process that lets you keep your phone number when switching carriers, and it's typically protected by verification safeguards. But scammers have learned how to exploit it.
'To work around these protections, scammers will gather personal information about their target online, combing through social media posts, or purchasing information from cyber thieves or hackers,' according to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
If fraudsters have the right combination of personal information — which could include your address, birth date, Social Security number, PINs and passwords — they 'may be able to con the victim's phone company into believing the request to port out the number is from the authorized account holder,' says the FCC.
Once the fraudster convinces your phone company to transfer your number, your phone goes offline — and theirs lights up with your messages and calls, often allowing them to bypass safety measures like two-factor authentication.
'Once the scammer has access, they attempt to drain the victim's bank accounts,' says the FCC. 'In another variation, the scammers may attempt to sell or ransom back to the victim access to their social media accounts.'
This happened to Associated Press reporter Fatima Hussein in 2024, who woke up one morning to discover she didn't have cell service. 'Using my home Wi-Fi connection, I checked my email and discovered a notification that $20,000 was being transferred from my credit card to an unfamiliar Discover Bank account,' she explained in an article for the Financial Post.
Hussein said it took 10 days to get her number back from Cricket Wireless. 'And that wasn't until I told company representatives that I was writing a story about my experience,' she wrote in the Financial Post. During that time, fraudsters had accessed her account three times and transferred $19,000 from her credit card to the same unfamiliar account, even after freezing her credit and changing all her passwords. Bank of America was working to reverse the $19,000 transfer.
Neither McLean nor Hussein know how fraudsters got their information.
Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it
In 2024 alone, SIM swapping scams led to nearly $26 million in reported losses, according to the FBI — and the real figure may be even higher, since many victims don't report.
To minimize the risk, start by asking your wireless provider about port-out authorization. 'Every major wireless has some sort of additional security for accounts or for port-out authorization that customers can set up, like a unique pin, or add verification questions, which will make it more difficult for someone to port out your phone,' according to the Better Business Bureau (BBB).
Be on the lookout for phishing scams, which can lead to phone porting scams. A phishing scam takes place when fraudsters try to trick you into giving away personal information, typically by posing as a legitimate individual or business (such as an HR manager or your bank). They may contact you via text, email or phone.
Never give away any personal information to a call or email from an unknown contact. Hang up (or ignore the email) and contact the individual or business with a trusted phone number or even an in-person visit.
'Typically, loss of service on your device — your phone going dark or only allowing 911 calls — is the first sign this has happened,' according to the FCC.
If this has happened to you, time is of the essence. Contact your phone company and bank, and place a fraud alert on your credit reports. Aside from filing a police report, you can also file a complaint with the FCC.
But for victims like McLean or Hussein, recovery can be a long, difficult process.
'My days are basically taken up by trying to prove who I am again,' McLean told 9News, 'and piece by piece trying to put my life back together.'
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now
This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week.
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Seniors on Social Security Just Got Some Really Tough News
Seniors on Social Security Just Got Some Really Tough News

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Seniors on Social Security Just Got Some Really Tough News

Social Security's trust funds will be depleted by 2034. This is a year earlier than expected. It's likely the government will reform the program so significant benefit cuts aren't necessary. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › You probably know by now that retirement isn't all about carefree fun. Living off a fixed income can be tough, especially if you weren't able to save as much as you wanted to when you were younger. So every dollar you have, including your Social Security checks, matters. Unfortunately, the latest Social Security Trustees Report has raised concerns about the program's solvency. This is a serious issue for seniors who rely heavily on their Social Security benefits to carry them through the next few decades. But that doesn't mean you'll soon be covering your expenses all on your own either. Social Security has been spending more money than it's taken in every year since 2021, and that problem continues to worsen. Baby boomers retiring en masse and fewer workers in younger generations to replace them has meant that Social Security tax revenue isn't enough to pay out everyone's benefits. So far, the program has stayed afloat by making up the difference with money in the program's trust funds. But this won't work forever. Eventually, those trust funds will run out, and Social Security could face a shortfall when it does. When Social Security will run out of money has always been a bit of a moving target. Last year, the Trustees Report predicted depletion in 2035. But this year's report now estimates that the trust funds will be depleted a year earlier. This may be due to the passage of the Social Security Fairness Act earlier this year, which increased benefits for certain retirees, and which was projected to accelerate trust fund depletion by six months. This wouldn't be the end of Social Security, though. It would continue to receive revenue from workers paying Social Security payroll taxes and seniors who owe income taxes on a portion of their benefits. Together, this would be enough to cover the majority of Social Security benefits payable today. The 2024 Trustees Report estimated that after trust fund depletion, the program could pay out about 83% of scheduled benefits. The 2025 report puts this a little lower -- around 81%. In either case, you'd definitely continue to get something from the program in 2035 and beyond. That said, a nearly 20% benefit cut is a serious concern, particularly for those who have little to no personal savings. But it probably won't happen. Though the deadline has moved up a little, the government has been aware of Social Security's looming insolvency for years, and this isn't the first time this has happened either. Last time, Congress made changes, like adding Social Security benefit taxes, to bring in more money so it wouldn't have to slash benefits. It's likely this happens again, though we don't know when Washington will make the changes or what they'll look like. Benefit cuts remain a possibility, but it's unlikely they would be 20%. And they may not happen at all. The government might decide to increase the Social Security payroll tax rate that workers pay or increase the ceiling on income subject to Social Security tax (currently $176,100 in 2025). This would force wealthier Americans to pay more into the program. For now, all we can do is wait to see what happens. But once there's a plan in place, it'll be time to revisit your budget and figure out how you'll cover your expenses moving forward. If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Seniors on Social Security Just Got Some Really Tough News was originally published by The Motley Fool

Plan to sell off public land in the West nixed from ‘big, beautiful bill' amid GOP backlash
Plan to sell off public land in the West nixed from ‘big, beautiful bill' amid GOP backlash

Los Angeles Times

time5 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Plan to sell off public land in the West nixed from ‘big, beautiful bill' amid GOP backlash

A controversial plan to sell hundreds of thousands of acres of public land across Western states — including California — was axed from the Republican tax and spending bill amid bipartisan backlash, prompting celebration from conservationists. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who spearheaded the proposal, announced he was pulling the provision on Saturday night on the social media platform X. Lee had said the land sale was intended to ease the financial burden of housing, pointing to a lack of affordability afflicting families in many communities. 'Because of the strict constraints of the budget reconciliation process, I was unable to secure clear, enforceable safeguards to guarantee that these lands would be sold only to American families — not to China, not to BlackRock and not to any foreign interests,' he wrote in the post. For that reason, he said, he was withdrawing the measure from the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' that Trump has said he wants passed by July 4. Lee's failed measure would have mandated the sale of between roughly 600,000 and 1.2 million acres of Bureau of Land Management land in 11 Western states, including California. The areas available for auction were supposed to be located within a five-mile radius of population centers. The effort represented a scaled-back version of a plan that was nixed from the reconciliation bill on Monday for violating Senate rules. The initial plan would have allowed for the sale of up to 3.3 million acres of land managed by BLM and the U.S. Forest Service. Lee's decision to scrap the proposal arrived after at least four Republican senators from Western states vowed to vote for an amendment to strike the proposal from the bill. At lease five House Republicans also voiced their opposition to the plan, including Reps. David Valadao of California and Ryan Zinke of Montana, who served as the Interior secretary during Trump's first term. The death of the provision was celebrated by conservationists as well as recreation advocates, including hunters and anglers, even as they steeled themselves for an ongoing fight over federal lands. The Trump administration has taken steps to open public lands for energy and resource extraction, including recently announcing it would rescind a rule that protects 58.5 million acres of national forestland from road construction and timber harvesting. Some critics saw the now-scrapped proposed land sale as means to offset tax cuts in the reconciliation bill. 'This is a victory for everyone who hikes, hunts, explores and cherishes these places, but it's not the end of the threats to our public lands,' said Athan Manuel, director of Sierra Club's Lands Protection Program, in a statement. 'Donald Trump and his allies in Congress have made it clear they will use every tool at their disposal to give away our public lands to billionaires and corporate polluters.' Chris Wood, president and chief executive of Trout Unlimited — a nonprofit dedicated to conserving rivers and streams to support trout and salmon — described protecting public lands as 'the most nonpartisan issue in the country.' 'This is certainly not the first attempt to privatize or transfer our public lands, and it won't be the last,' Wood said in a statement. 'We must stay vigilant and defend the places we love to fish, hike, hunt and explore.' Lee, in the Saturday X post, suggested the issue remained in play. He said he believed the federal government owns too much land — and that it is mismanaging it. Locked-away land in his state of Utah, he claimed, drives up taxes and limits the ability to build homes. 'President Trump promised to put underutilized federal land to work for American families, and I look forward to helping him achieve that in a way that respects the legacy of our public lands and reflects the values of the people who use them most.'

SALT income tax deduction takes key step forward on Senate deal
SALT income tax deduction takes key step forward on Senate deal

Miami Herald

time7 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

SALT income tax deduction takes key step forward on Senate deal

A much followed tax break improvement is inching toward becoming a reality. A proposed tweak to the state and local tax (SALT) deduction - capped at $10,000 since 2018 - could soon offer relief to taxpayers in high-tax states. If passed, the Senate's version of the One Big Beautiful Bill of America (OBBBA) would give taxpayers a temporary boost in their ability to deduct SALT payments, especially for those who've felt the sting of the cap since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) took effect. And as lawmakers inch toward a deal, taxpayers - and their accountants - are watching closely. Photo by Ian Hutchinson on Unsplash What is the SALT income tax deduction cap? Under the TCJA, the SALT deduction was capped at $10,000 annually - including the combined total of property taxes, income taxes, and sales taxes. That cap, still in place today, is set to expire at the end of 2025. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter But since its enactment, it has disproportionately affected residents in states with high property values and/or income tax rates. Think: New YorkCaliforniaNew JerseyConnecticutMassachusettsMarylandIllinois In these states, many middle-and upper-middle-income households have long paid more than $10,000 in state and local taxes. Related: How the IRS taxes Social Security income in retirement As a result, despite the higher standard deduction that was part of TCJA, some families have been unable to fully deduct those expenses on their federal tax returns-a costly outcome. Both the House and Senate versions of the OBBBA seek to expand the SALT deduction, but with key differences. In the House proposal, the cap would rise to $40,000 for married couples, phased out for households earning over $500,000. The new cap would last until 2034. Related: Social Security income tax deduction clears critical hurdle Not all lawmakers are on board. Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.), for instance, told Axios he was a "no" on a temporary deal. "I need $40K for my constituents, and it has to be $40K forever," he said. The Senate version takes a different approach. It proposes a temporary SALT cap increase from 2025 through 2029, followed by a return to the $10,000 cap: 2025: Cap rises to $40,0002026: Adjusted to $40,4002027–2029: Cap increases annually by 1%2030 and beyond: Cap returns to $10,000 For married individuals filing separately, these caps are halved. High-Income taxpayers face phase-down of SALT deduction The Senate plan includes a phase-down for high earners, starting in 2025. Here's how it works: The benefit phases down once your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) exceeds $500,000 (or $250,000 for married filing separately).The reduction equals 30% of the amount your MAGI exceeds the the SALT cap cannot fall below $10,000 - even for the wealthiest filers. This means high-income households would still see some benefit from the temporary cap hike, just not the full amount. "For a lot of people, this cap is the difference between taking the standard deduction and itemizing deductions," said Michael Lofley, a financial adviser with HBKS Wealth Advisors. "If they itemize, they now get some additional tax benefit for other deductions, like charitable giving or mortgage interest." Related: Medicare recipients face a growing problem While some taxpayers - particularly small business owners - have used pass-through entity taxes (PTETs) to bypass the cap, W-2 earners such as corporate executives don't have that option. For them, this proposal offers real financial relief. Standard deduction increases under Senate tax plan The Senate tax bill includes more than just SALT deduction relief. It also proposes permanent extensions of the TCJA's higher standard deduction amounts. And for the years 2025 through 2028, it adds an extra boost: $1,000 for single filers$1,500 for heads of household$2,000 for married couples filing jointly That means in 2026, the standard deduction could be: $16,000 for singles$24,000 for heads of household$32,000 for married joint filers After 2026, these amounts would adjust with inflation. Retirees also have reason to pay attention. The Senate bill includes a larger senior tax deduction - $6,000 per eligible filer aged 65 or older (up from $4,000 in the House bill). This enhanced deduction would apply through 2028 and would phase out for incomes above: $75,000 (single filers)$150,000 (married filing jointly) Before the TCJA, about 31% to 32% of taxpayers itemized deductions. But after the law took effect in 2018, that figure dropped significantly: 2018: 11% to 11.5%2020–2022: Just 9% to 10% If the SALT cap is temporarily expanded, even if the standard deduction increases, more taxpayers - especially in high-tax areas - may once again find it beneficial to itemize deductions on their federal tax returns. "If Congress meets President Trump's July 4th deadline for passing the final bill, taxpayers will soon be able to update their 2025 tax projections," says Jean-Luc Bourdon, CPA. "This could prompt some taxpayers to revise their estimated quarterly payments or tax withholdings for the remainder of the year." Related: Workers struggle with one big problem when they retire The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store