First direct flight from Pyongyang lands in Moscow
The Boeing 777 aircraft, operated by Russia's Nordwind Airlines, had already flown from Moscow to Pyongyang on Sunday.
It landed back in the Russian capital at 0750 GMT on Tuesday, completing its first round trip on the route, according to the website of Moscow's Sheremetyevo airport.
The 440-seater plane was 'completely full', with most of the passengers being North Korean, Russia's state RIA news agency reported.
Russian diplomat Matvei Krivosheyev, who was also on board, was quoted as saying it was the first such flight in almost three decades.
'We are confident that this flight will be in demand both by Russian tourists and by Korean comrades,' he told the RIA news agency.
Russia and North Korea have forged closer ties in recent years, with Pyongyang supplying troops and weapons for Russia's military operations in Ukraine.
The two countries signed a mutual defence pact last year, when Russian President Vladimir Putin visited the reclusive state.
North Korea confirmed for the first time in April that it had deployed a contingent of its soldiers to the frontline in Ukraine, alongside Russian troops. AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Taiwan to seek lower tariff after Trump's 'temporary' 20% levy
TAIPEI: Taiwan vowed on Friday (Aug 1) to seek a lower tariff after Donald Trump imposed a "temporary" 20 per cent levy on its shipments to the United States as part of his trade war. The US president's announcement was part of a sweep of measures - reaching 41 per cent - against dozens of global partners as they scrambled for deals with Washington to avert the painful tolls. The figure is down from the 32 per cent toll imposed in his Apr 2 "Liberation Day", since when Taipei and Washington have held four rounds of face-to-face talks and multiple video conferences to resolve the issue. On Friday, Taiwan President Lai Ching-te said on Facebook they were still working to strike an agreement. "The US has announced a temporary 20 per cent tariff for Taiwan, with the possibility of further reductions should an agreement be reached," he wrote. "The government will continue to strive for a reasonable tariff rate and complete the final stages of the tariff negotiations." While Trump had set Friday as the deadline for agreements to be made, he delayed it until the end of next week. No timeline was given for Taiwan, which could mean the island was caught in the middle of US-China trade negotiations, said Alicia Garcia-Herrero, chief economist for Asia Pacific at Natixis. Washington and Beijing held two days of talks this week aimed at reaching a deal to extend a truce in their trade war and prevent the reimposition of sky-high tariffs on Aug 12. "The conditions on Taiwan might be relevant for China, imagine export controls," Garcia-Herrero told AFP. After US tech giant Nvidia announced it will resume sales of its H20 AI chips to China, Garcia-Herrero said "there could be other stuff that China needs from Taiwan that the US can offer". "THIS IS THE CEILING" Taiwan is a global powerhouse in chip manufacturing, with more than half the world's semiconductors and nearly all of the high-end ones made there. The owner of a Taiwanese machinery exporter to the United States said he was worried that lower tariff rates on Japan and South Korea - 15 per cent - would advantage his competitors there. He told AFP the recent appreciation in the Taiwan dollar against the greenback had also "put a lot of pressure on us, creating a double whammy". The uncertainty over tariffs was hurting US sales, said textile producer Eddie Wang, with clients "feeling overwhelmed" and reluctant to place orders. Soaring demand for AI-related technology has fuelled Taiwan's trade surplus with the United States - and put it in Trump's crosshairs. Around 60 per cent of Taiwan's exports to the United States are information and communications technology, which includes chips. In a bid to avoid the tariffs, Taipei has pledged to increase investment in the United States, buy more of its energy and increase its own defence spending. Economist Sun Ming-te said the 20 per cent levy was "probably the best outcome Taiwan can achieve with the US under the current conditions."
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
‘Clinton Plan' e-mails were likely made by Russian spies, new documents show
Evidence that undermines the theory that Mrs Hillary Clinton's campaign conspired to frame US President Trump for colluding with Moscow in the 2016 election has been declassified. WASHINGTON – The Trump-era special counsel who scoured the Russia investigation for wrongdoing gathered evidence that undermines a theory pushed by some Republicans that Mrs Hillary Clinton's campaign conspired to frame Mr Donald Trump for colluding with Moscow in the 2016 election, information declassified on J uly 31 shows. The information, a 29-page annex to the special counsel's 2023 report, reveals that a foundational document for that theory was most likely stitched together by Russian spies. The document is a purported e-mail from July 27, 2016, that said Mrs Clinton had approved a campaign proposal to tie Mr Trump to Russia to distract from the scandal over her use of a private e-mail server. The release of the annex adds new details to the public's understanding of a complex trove of 2016 Russian intelligence reports analysing purported e-mails that Russian hackers stole from Americans. It also shows how the special counsel, Mr John Durham, went to great lengths to try to prove that several of the e-mails were real, only to ultimately conclude otherwise. The declassification is the latest disclosure in recent weeks concerning the Russia investigation. The wave has come as the administration is seeking to change the subject from its broken promise to release files related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Even as the releases shed more light on a seismic political period nearly a decade ago, Mr Trump and his allies have wildly overstated what the documents show, accusing former President Barack Obama of 'treason'. The release of the annex was no exception. Mr John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, said in a statement that the materials proved that suspicions of Russian collusion stemmed from 'a coordinated plan to prevent and destroy Donald Trump's presidency'. And Mr Kash Patel, the FBI director, who has a long history of pushing false claims about the Russia investigation, declared on social media that the annex revealed 'evidence that the Clinton campaign plotted to frame President Trump and fabricate the Russia collusion hoax'. In reality, the annex shows the opposite, indicating that a key piece of supposed evidence for the claim that Clinton approved a plan to tie Trump to Russia is not credible: Mr Durham concluded that the e-mail from July 27, 2016, and a related one dated two days earlier were probably manufactured. Before the 2020 election, Mr Ratcliffe, as director of national intelligence in Mr Trump's first term, had declassified and released the crux of the July 27 e-mail, even though he acknowledged doubts about its credibility. Officials did 'not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication,' he said. Among some Trump supporters, the message became known as the 'Clinton Plan intelligence,' as Durham put it in his final report. In his report, Durham used the US government's knowledge of the supposed plan, via the Russian memos, to criticize FBI officials involved in the Russia investigation for not being more skeptical when they later received a copy of the Steele dossier and used it to obtain a wiretap order. The dossier, a compendium of Trump-Russia claims compiled by a former British spy, stemmed from a Democratic opposition research effort and was later discredited. 'Whether or not the Clinton Plan intelligence was based on reliable or unreliable information, or was ultimately true or false,' Mr Durham wrote, agents should have been more cautious when approaching material that appeared to have partisan origins. Mr Durham's report also mentioned that Mrs Clinton and others in the campaign dismissed the allegation as ridiculous, positing that it was Russian disinformation. But Mr Durham banished to the annex concrete details he had found that bolstered her campaign's rebuttal, burying until now the conclusion that the e-mail he called the 'Clinton Plan intelligence' was almost certainly a product of Russian disinformation. The annex shows that the person who supposedly sent the July 27 e-mail, Mr Leonard Benardo of the Open Society Foundations network, told Mr Durham in 2021 that he had never seen the message and did not write it. The network is the philanthropic arm of liberal financier George Soros, who has been made out to be a villain by Russian state media and by some American conservatives. The annex also cited a purported e-mail from July 25, 2016, also attributed to Mr Benardo. Referring to President Vladimir Putin of Russia, the message claimed that a Clinton adviser was proposing a plan 'to demonize Putin and Trump,' adding, 'Later the FBI will put more oil into the fire.' That message identified the adviser as 'Julie,' while the July 27 one said 'Julia'. An accompanying Russian intelligence memo identified the aide as Ms Julianne Smith, a foreign policy adviser for the Clinton campaign who worked at the Centre for a New American Security. But the trove of Russian files contained two different versions of the July 25 message – one that somehow had an additional sentence. And Mr Benardo denied sending it, telling Mr Durham's team that he did not know who 'Julie' was and would not use a phrase like 'pour more oil into the fire'. Ms Smith informed Mr Durham in 2021 that she had no memory of proposing anything to campaign leadership about attacking Mr Trump over Russia, although she 'recalled conversations with others in the campaign expressing their genuine concerns that the DNC hack was a threat to the electoral system, and that Trump and his advisers appeared to have troubling ties to Russia'. The annex also shows that Mr Durham obtained e-mails from several liberal-leaning think tanks mentioned in the Russian memos and did not find copies of the messages supposedly written by Mr Benardo. The think tanks included the Open Society Foundations, the Atlantic Council, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Centre for a New American Security. But Mr Durham found other 'e-mails, attachments and documents that contain language and references with the exact same or similar verbiage' to those messages. Those included a July 25 email by a Carnegie Endowment cyber expert that contained an extensive passage about Russian hacking that was echoed, verbatim, in the purported July 25 message attributed to Mr Benardo. Mr Durham also obtained text messages from Ms Smith on July 25 showing that she had unsuccessfully tried to determine whether the FBI had opened an investigation into the Democratic National Committee breach, although they did not mention Mr Trump. And he obtained a July 27 e-mail from Ms Smith asking her colleagues at the think tank to sign a bipartisan statement criticising Mr Trump's denunciations of the Nato alliance as reckless and too friendly to Russia. Mr Durham wrote that it would have been logical for someone to conclude that she played a role in efforts by the Clinton campaign to tie Mr Trump to Russia. Her July 25 texts and July 27 email could be seen as support for the idea that such a plan existed, he added. But ultimately, in weighing all the evidence, Mr Durham concluded that the Russians had probably faked the key e-mails, the annex shows. 'The office's best assessment is that the July 25 and July 27 emails that purport to be from Benardo were ultimately a composite of several emails that were obtained through Russian intelligence hacking of the US-based think tanks, including the Open Society Foundations, the Carnegie Endowment and others,' it says. The Russian intelligence memos first came to public attention in 2017 after The New York Times and The Washington Post explored the decision by Mr James Comey, then the FBI director, to violate Justice Department procedure. In publicly addressing the investigation into Mrs Clinton, he sharply criticised her use of a private e-mail server but said no charges could be brought over it. Mr Comey later told Congress and an inspector general that he decided to be the face of the decision, rather than allowing Justice Department officials to do so, as is typical, in part because of something in the Russian memos. A Dutch spy agency had hacked the memos from a Russian spy agency's server in 2016 and gave copies to the US government. Two of the memos described purported communications in January 2016 and March 2016 involving a top Democratic Party leader, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, one with Mr Benardo and the other with a different official at the Open Society Foundations. The memos indicated that the attorney general at the time, Ms Loretta E. Lynch, was pressuring the FBI about the e-mail inquiry and sharing confidential information about it with the Clinton campaign. But Mr Comey and other officials also said they believed that the memos described fake e-mails, in part because the January one also said that Mr Comey himself was trying to help Republicans win the election. In 2017, Mr Benardo and Mr Wasserman Schultz said that they had never even met, let alone communicated about Mrs Clinton's e-mails. The Trump administration has also declassified and released a report by Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee that summarised unflattering claims about Mrs Clinton from the Russian memos without flagging suspicions that the trove contained misinformation. After the special counsel investigating the Trump campaign's ties to Russia, Mr Robert Mueller, issued his final report, the attorney general at the time, Mr Bill Barr, assigned Mr Durham to hunt for evidence proving Mr Trump's conspiracy theory that the investigation had stemmed from a deep-state plot against him. In 2020, as The New York Times has reported, after Mr Durham failed to find evidence of intelligence abuses, he shifted to instead trying to find a basis to blame the Clinton campaign for the fact that Mr Trump's campaign had come under suspicion of colluding with Russia. Mr Durham was never able to prove any Clinton campaign conspiracy to frame Mr Trump by spreading information that it knew to be false about his ties to Russia, but he nevertheless used court filings and his final report to insinuate such suspicions. He brought charges of false statements against two people involved in outside efforts to scrutinise possible ties between Mr Trump and Russia, both of which ended in quick acquittals. NYTIMES
AsiaOne
3 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Russia claims capture of Chasiv Yar after 16-month battle, World News
Russia said on Thursday (July 31) it had captured the town of Chasiv Yar in eastern Ukraine after nearly 16 months of fighting, opening the way for potential further advances. Russia's Defence Ministry said in a brief statement its forces had "liberated" the town. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy dismissed the claim as "disinformation". A Ukrainian military spokesperson called it "propaganda". But a video posted by a Russian military unit and verified by Reuters showed a Russian paratroop banner and the national flag being raised by soldiers in the desolate ruins of the town. Russia has been slowly grinding forward in eastern Ukraine as talks to end the 3-1/2 year war have failed to make progress towards a ceasefire, prompting US President Donald Trump to threaten new sanctions on Russia and buyers of its exports from next week. Moscow's forces are also mounting intense pressure on the city of Pokrovsk, 60km southwest of Chasiv Yar. Military analyst Emil Kastehelmi, co-founder of the Finland-based Black Bird Group, said it was likely that battles were continuing near Chasiv Yar. "The terrain of Chasiv Yar has favoured the defender. Forested areas, waterways, hills and a varied building stock have enabled Ukraine to conduct a defencive operation lasting over a year, in which the Russians have made minimal monthly progress," he told Reuters. Gradual advance Kastehelmi said it was likely that the town's fall, if confirmed, would create conditions for Russia to advance further in eastern Ukraine, but still only gradually. "The fall of the city to the enemy is nevertheless a challenging situation for Ukraine, as it will bring the Russians closer to Kostiantynivka, which Russia is now approaching from several directions," he said. "The logistics in the area will also be affected, as Russians can bring drone teams even closer." Zelenskiy, in his nightly video address, said Ukrainian units around Chasiv Yar were "defending our positions. Every Russian attempt at advancing in Donetsk region, in Sumy, in Kharkiv is thwarted in the end." Quoting a report from top Ukrainian commander Oleksandr Syrskyi, Zelenskiy said the most intensive battles were still near Pokrovsk. Ukrainian forces, he said, were repelling Russian sabotage and reconnaissance parties. The popular Ukrainian blog DeepState, which uses open source materials to track the movements of Russian forces, also denied that Moscow's forces were in control of Chasiv Yar. The battle for Chasiv Yar began in April last year, when Russian paratroopers reached its eastern edge. Russian state media reported then that Russian soldiers had begun phoning their Ukrainian counterparts inside the town to demand they surrender or be wiped out by aerial guided bombs. The town, now destroyed, had a pre-war population of more than 12,000 and its economy was based around a factory that produced reinforced concrete products and clay used in bricks. It lies just west of Bakhmut, which Russia captured in 2023 after one of the bloodiest battles of the war. [[nid:720856]]
