&w=3840&q=100)
Overseas mining acquisitions by Chinese firms at highest level in over a decade; here's why
A mining machine is seen at the Bayan Obo mine containing rare earth minerals, in Inner Mongolia, China. File photo/Reuters
Chinese mining companies have stepped up acquisitions abroad, reaching their highest level in more than a decade as they seek to secure vital raw materials amid rising geopolitical tensions.
There were 10 overseas mining deals by Chinese firms worth more than $100 million in 2023, the most since 2013, according to an analysis of data from S&P and Mergermarket. Separate research from the Griffith Asia Institute also found that last year marked the busiest period for Chinese overseas mining investment and construction since at least 2013.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
China's immense demand for raw materials as the world's top consumer of most key minerals. It has long driven its firms to pursue assets abroad. Analysts say the recent rise in dealmaking reflects efforts by Chinese groups to accelerate acquisitions before global political tensions restrict such activity, Financial Times reported.
Michael Scherb, founder of private equity firm Appian Capital Advisory, said there had been 'more activity in the past 12 months because Chinese groups believe they have this near-term window … They're trying to get a lot of M&A done before geopolitics get difficult.'
The momentum has continued into 2024. Zijin Mining of China recently announced a $1.2 billion deal to acquire a gold mine in Kazakhstan, while in April, Appian sold its Mineração Vale Verde copper and gold mine in Brazil to Baiyin Nonferrous Group for $420 million.
'In the next few years we are likely to continue to see a healthy level of dealmaking activity from Chinese mining companies,' said Richard Horrocks-Taylor, global head of metals and mining at Standard Chartered.
Christoph Nedopil, director of the Griffith Asia Institute and a specialist in Chinese overseas investment, said that unlike transport and infrastructure projects under the Belt and Road Initiative — which have tended to be smaller — mining and resource deals have remained substantial. He said this shift aligns with China's emphasis on high-tech manufacturing, particularly in sectors such as batteries and renewable energy.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
China maintains a dominant position in processing critical minerals such as lithium, cobalt and rare earths, but still depends on imports for many raw materials. The United States and several European nations are working to reduce reliance on Chinese supply chains for these materials, which are vital for electric vehicles, semiconductors and green technologies.
Western countries including Canada and Australia have grown 'increasingly wary' of Chinese investment in domestic mining operations due to the 'strategic nature of a lot of these minerals,' said Adam Webb, head of battery raw materials at Benchmark Mineral Intelligence.
Analysts say Chinese firms have grown more adept at acquiring mining assets from western rivals, often willing to take longer-term views on value and invest in riskier locations.
'There has been a [growing] sophistication of Chinese buyers' outbound M&A strategies,' said Scherb. 'The Chinese government used to select one buyer per asset sale process and back that group. What's evolved over the past three to four years is the government allowing Chinese groups to compete with one another. That implies they don't fear losing to the west anymore.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
John Meyer, an analyst at SP Angel, said Chinese groups were 'actively' acquiring resources 'to keep the west out of certain critical materials which they dominate'. He added, 'Every time someone gets close to mining lithium, the Chinese come running with a cheque book.'
Among the most active players in overseas deals are CMOC, MMG and Zijin Mining. Meanwhile, Chinese financial institutions have issued billions of dollars in loans for mining and mineral processing projects in developing countries.
Timothy Foden, co-head of the international arbitration group at law firm Boies Schiller Flexner, said Chinese firms were also benefiting from a rise in resource nationalism, particularly in African countries such as Mali. Some military-led governments have taken over western-owned mining assets and demanded increased royalties.
Chinese companies are often willing to accept lower returns in exchange for operating control of such assets, Foden said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
29 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Asia stocks fall on US tariff uncertainty, oil slips on Opec+ move
Stock markets slipped in Asia amid much confusion as US officials flagged a delay on tariffs but failed to provide any detail or paperwork on the change, while oil prices slid as Opec+ opened the supply spigots more than expected. The United States is close to finalising several trade agreements in the coming days and will notify other countries of higher tariff rates by July 9, President Donald Trump said on Sunday, with the higher rates to take effect on August 1. "President Trump's going to be sending letters to some of our trading partners saying that if you don't move things along, then on August 1 you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level," US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNN. Trump in April announced a 10 per cent base tariff rate on most countries and higher "reciprocal" rates ranging up to 50 per cent, with an original deadline of this Wednesday. However, Trump also said levies could range in value from "maybe 60 per cent or 70 per cent tariffs to 10 per cent and 20 per cent", further clouding the picture. With very few actual trade deals done, analysts had suspected the date would be pushed out, though it was still not clear if the new deadline applied to all trading partners or just some. "This renewed escalation in trade tensions comes at a time when major trade partners, including the EU, India and Japan, are believed to be at crucial stages of bilateral negotiations," analysts at ANZ said in a note. "If reciprocal tariffs are implemented in their original form or even expanded, we believe it will intensify downside risks to US growth and increase upside risks to inflation." Investors have grown somewhat used to the uncertainty surrounding US trade policy and the initial market reaction was cautious. S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq futures both eased 0.3 per cent. Japan's Nikkei lost 0.3 per cent, while South Korean stocks fell 0.7 per cent. MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan eased 0.1 per cent. Dollar doldrums Safe-haven bonds were better bid, with 10-year Treasury yields down almost 2 basis points at 4.326 per cent. Major currencies were little changed as the dollar index continued to languish near four-year lows at 96.913. The euro held at $1.1787, just off last week's top of $1.1830, while the dollar dipped to 144.38 yen. The dollar has been undermined by investor concerns about Trump's often chaotic tariff policy and what that might do to economic growth and inflation. The same worries have kept the Federal Reserve from cutting rates and minutes of its last meeting should offer more colour on when the majority of members might resume easing. It is a relatively quiet week for Fed speakers with only two district presidents on the docket, while economic data is also sparse. The Reserve Bank of Australia is widely expected to cut its rates by a quarter point to 3.60 per cent at a meeting on Tuesday, the third easing this cycle, and markets imply an eventual destination for rates of 2.85 per cent or 3.10 per cent. New Zealand's central bank meets on Wednesday and is likely to hold rates at 3.25 per cent, having already slashed by 225 basis points over the past year. In commodity markets, gold slipped 0.3 per cent to $3,324 an ounce, though it did gain almost 2 per cent last week as the dollar fell. [GOL/] Oil prices slid anew after the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies, a group known as OPEC+, agreed on Saturday to raise production by a larger-than-expected 548,000 barrels per day in August. [O/R] The group also warned that it could hike by a similar amount in September, leaving analysts with the impression it was trying to squeeze lower margin producers and particularly those pulling oil from US shale. Brent dropped 52 cents to $67.78 a barrel, while US crude fell $1.01 to $65.99 per barrel. [O/R] text_section_type="notes">To read Reuters Markets and Finance news, click on For the state of play of Asian stock markets please click on:


Mint
36 minutes ago
- Mint
Italys Bridge to Nowhere Shows Defense-Boom Risks
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- The defense boom in Europe is as close to a tech-style gold rush as the Old Continent can offer. Armaments stocks are outperforming Nvidia Corp., and defense-themed funds are amassing billions in anticipation of rising military spending in a more dangerous world. NATO allies have agreed to more than double defense spending goals to 5% of gross domestic product in the coming years. But with so many countries already struggling to stump up the billions needed to keep up in artificial intelligence, reindustrialization and the energy transition, where's the cash going to come from? With the notable exception of Germany, many European countries are already near the limit of investor and voter patience with borrowing and taxation. And good luck shrinking the welfare state. Italy, a serial defense under-spender with the second-highest debt ratio in the euro area, has one answer: Stretch the definition of 'defense' to breaking point. Officials are reportedly looking to reclassify a proposed €13.5 billion ($15.8 billion) bridge linking Sicily to the mainland as a defense investment. You almost have to applaud the chutzpah. This is a bridge that has been a field of political dreams for decades, if not centuries, and attracted plenty of criticism for its cost, lack of utility and riskiness. To say that this is about rearmament is tantamount to defense-washing a pet political project — one beloved by populist Matteo Salvini, who, ironically, is one of the most vocal critics of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. One MEP from the opposition Five Star Movement called the plan a 'mockery' of military spending. Of course, this isn't to say that only things that go bang should count as defense. NATO's 5% targets include 1.5% for infrastructure and interoperability. We live in a world of deadly drones, AI and cyberattacks — which require tools other than bullets. And governments want to make sure wide swathes of society benefit from military-spending spillovers, which means casting nets wider than usual. 'Defense is the new Keynesianism,' says Richard Aboulafia, managing director of consultancy AeroDynamic Advisory. Still, Italy's plan should set alarm bells ringing. Slapping the label 'defense' on national boondoggles would further exacerbate differences between European countries at a time when defense is already too fragmented. It would make Europe weaker, not stronger. It would also prove Goodhart's Law: When a number becomes a target, it ceases to be a useful measure. NATO's previous 2% targets already included some eyebrow-raising outlays on railways and firefighters, according to Der Spiegel. If this is how the 5% era is set to go, credibility will wither. Clearer definitions, better coordination and ultimately more leadership are needed to ensure the blurred lines between military and civil infrastructure don't vanish completely. The EUISS think tank recommends focusing on disruptive research and innovation via a European version of Darpa, the US Defense Department's advanced research projects agency, more measures to attract top scientific talent and putting more European funding to work. And the Bertelsmann Stiftung think tank also says that Germany's unique position as top spender means it should also step up when it comes to the framework for defense-related infrastructure. Nobody wants yet more box-ticking that stops money getting out the door, but voters deserve better than a defense twist on greenwashing. This isn't about preventing the real economy from getting some of the rewards of a defense boom, but ensuring those spillovers actually happen. Italy has other more positive examples of supporting a more defense-oriented Europe, such as Fincantieri SpA's plan to refocus some shipyards on just making warships. The defense boom is worth celebrating, but a bridge to nowhere isn't a good outcome. More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist writing about the future of money and the future of Europe. Previously, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes. More stories like this are available on


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
BRICS leaders to call for data protections against unauthorised AI use
Leaders of the BRICS group of developing nations will call for protections against unauthorized use of artificial intelligence (AI) to avoid excessive data collection and allow mechanisms for fair payment, according to a draft statement seen by Reuters. The diplomatic bloc is dedicating part of its discussions on Sunday to AI during a two-day summit in Rio de Janeiro. Big tech firms largely based in wealthy nations have resisted calls to pay copyright fees for material used to train AI models. Leaders of the BRICS group of developing nations also condemned attacks on Gaza and Iran, called for reforms of global institutions and presented the bloc as a haven for multilateral diplomacy amid violent conflicts and trade wars. With forums such as the G7 and G20 groups of major economies hamstrung by divisions and the disruptive 'America First' approach of U.S. President Donald Trump, expansion of the BRICS has opened new space for diplomatic coordination. In opening remarks to the summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva drew a parallel with the Cold War's Non-Aligned Movement, a group of developing nations that resisted joining either side of a polarized global order. 'BRICS is the heir to the Non-Aligned Movement,' Lula told leaders. 'With multilateralism under attack, our autonomy is in check once again.' BRICS nations now represent more than half the world's population and 40% of its economic output, Lula noted in remarks on Saturday to business leaders warning of rising protectionism. The original BRICS group gathered leaders from Brazil, Russia, India and China at its first summit in 2009. The bloc later added South Africa and last year included Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates as members. This is the first summit of leaders to include Indonesia. 'The vacuum left by others ends up being filled almost instantly by the BRICS,' said a Brazilian diplomat who asked not to be named. Although the G7 still concentrates vast power, the diplomat added, 'it doesn't have the predominance it once did.' However, there are questions about the shared goals of an increasingly heterogeneous BRICS group, which has grown to include regional rivals along with major emerging economies. Stealing some thunder from this year's summit, Chinese President Xi Jinping chose to send his premier in his place. Russian President Vladimir Putin is attending online due to an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court. Still, several heads of state were gathered for discussions at Rio's Museum of Modern Art on Sunday and Monday, including Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. More than 30 nations have expressed interest in participating in the BRICS, either as full members or partners.