Beloved Play School presenter Donald Macdonald, dead at 86
The former Play School presenter, who had a stage and TV career for 40 years, died following a battle with cancer.
Macdonald appeared on Play School between 1966 and 1969.
Journalist Craig Bennett broke the news of the death on Monday.
'One of our showbiz greats left us at 12:45am today,' the post read.
He continued: 'Donald Macdonald was a stalwart of stage and screen, who'd written smash-hit plays like Caravan, dazzled on London's West End, and delighted millions over the decades with his starring turns on TV series like Play School where he was a presenter from 1966 to 1969.'
'He guested on shows from Certain Women, The Box, Cop Shop and Skyways, to the raunchy Alvin Purple, and in movies like Superman Returns. Donald was a dapper delight and always great company.'
Macdonald had been with his cousins, Paula Duncan and Amelia Barrett, according to Bennett.
'On Saturday we turned his hospital room into a party, laughs and smiles a-plenty, as Donald enjoyed some bubbly and lemon meringue pie,' he continued.
'Blue was always his colour, even in a hospital gown! He gave his permission to post his last photo, saying 'what the heck!' Vale to a true gentleman.'
Macdonald had a storied career, including in several theatre shows, including Is Australia Really Necessary, A Cup of Tea, a Bex and a Good Lie Down.
He also appeared in A Country Practice, Rake and Rafferty's Rules.
A number of fans were quick to share their grief.
'We were VERY LUCKY to meet Donald through you both, get to know him, and be entertained by his lovely demeanor, sharp wit and of course his writing skills. What a lovely, gentleman. xx' one fan wrote.
'A very good man… was honoured to be part of the first national tour of Caravan. Some wonderful memories. Sending love to you all,' yet another added.
'Thank you, Craig for letting us all know. A sad day for those Left Behind who loved this dear gentleman. It's beautiful Craig how you honour people that need to be honoured and reminds all of us of their rich and incredible life. May he rest in peace. Xx' another added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Wimbledon champion Barbora Krejcikova spots Aussie megastar Cate Blanchett in Royal Box during match
Reigning Wimbledon champion Barbora Krejcikova has revealed her primary motivation for winning her opening match wasn't necessarily to get through to the second round. The 29-year-old fought back from losing the first set to win 3-6 6-2 6-1 to avoid fellow Czech Marketa Vondrousova's swift exit last year when she was the defending champ. But none of that was front of mind for Krejcikova on match point — instead, she just wanted to impress Australian megastar Cate Blanchett in the Royal Box. 'Might have won the match point... but let's be honest, I was really just trying to impress Cate Blanchett,' Krejcikova laughed before noting she had achieved her goal. '(!!! She clapped.)' Blanchett sat next to Rebel Wilson for the occasion, while Russell Crowe was on the other end behind English golfer Justin Rose. Sam Smith in commentary said it was 'extraordinarily wonderful' to see Blanchett there. 'You actually put people together who would normally never meet, it's an extraordinary setup and a hot ticket certainly,' she said. Anne Keothavong added: 'We've got some A-list Hollywood stars mixed with the likes of Julia Donaldson, who I'm a huge fan of — she has written some incredible children's books that my children are very familiar with.' Donaldson wrote The Gruffalo and Room on the Broom among many other books. Krejcikova entered Wimbledon under an injury cloud after withdrawing from the Eastbourne quarter-finals with a right thigh issue. It was the last thing she needed after missing the Australian Open — and many more tournaments — with a back injury. 'I was in a lot of pain and I didn't really know how my career's going to go,' Krejcikova said of the back problem. 'I'm super happy and super excited that I can be here and that I can play, and play on such a great court.' Krejcikova said she was motivated seeing her own trophy in the clubhouse. 'I was definitely enjoying the moment,' she said. 'I was really excited for this day and before the match I was really counting down every minute to the match, and when I walked from the locker room it was just very nice and special having that opportunity to see my name there.' Krejcikova started slowly against Eala with 19 unforced errors in the first set. But she cleaned up her play and had just 18 total for the rest of the way, often willing herself to victory with a clenched fist and a yell to celebrate points that moved her closer to victory. Eala was in just her second grand slam but loomed as a threat, having already beaten three top-20 players this year. The 20-year-old left-hander from the Philippines honed her skills at the Rafael Nadal Academy and broke out with a run to the Miami Open semi-finals earlier this year.
Sydney Morning Herald
5 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
He has turned suffering into an art form – but does that make it good?
Richard Moore claims, half-jokingly, that his film about performance artist Stelarc has been more than 40 years in the making. But that doesn't mean Suspending Disbelief – co-directed with John Doggett Williams – is the definitive work about the man, born Stelios Arcadiou in Cyprus 79 years ago, who became globally famous in the 1980s and '90s for 'suspensions' in which he dangled from ropes attached to metal hooks pierced through his skin. 'We're not trying to do a piece that examines how important he is,' demurs Moore, a former director of the Melbourne International Film Festival. 'We're doing a homage to his career, to his spirit of exploration and curiosity, to his longevity in the Australian art scene – to the fact that here is a guy who's grown up in the western suburbs of Melbourne and gone on to become one of the better-known performing artists on the international circuit. It's a salute to him and his personality and his cultural output over a very long time.' Moore first encountered a Stelarc performance in 1982, when the artist was suspended, naked (as was his wont) from the limbs of a massive gum tree in Canberra. For Moore, who was then working in theatre, the sight of Stelarc's body twitching as his limbs froze up was instantly fascinating. 'It was the ritual element of it, the theatrical side of it. These are images that will burn into your retina and never, ever leave you – and I'm grateful to Stelarc for that.' Decades later, Moore met Doggett Williams, whom he describes as 'an inveterate collector of footage', including of Stelarc's performances over the years. There was an archive at ACMI, too. And Stelarc had 'eight boxes [of footage] in his house, on all these formats known and unknown to man, stuff we've never seen before'. The seeds of a career-spanning filmic survey were in place. Suspending Disbelief doesn't offer much insight into Stelarc himself. It's far more focused on the work than the man. And, says Moore, that's a deliberate response to what has become standard practice in the endangered realm of the arts documentary. 'We seem to be drifting towards the hagiography mode,' says Moore. 'I look in horror at a program like the ABC's Creative Types... all those personalities are wonderful, they're celebrities. But art is also dirty and painful, it hurts and it's messy and it's chaotic. And we wanted to make a counter to that style of reporting.' Arguably, no film about Stelarc could ever do differently. His career – which dates back to the late 1960s – has always revolved around the body. There were early experiments in tracking its internal functions, the famous suspensions – embraced by a generation of younger fans today as pioneering efforts in body modification and self-mutilation – and the later (and ongoing) efforts to transcend the limits of the corporeal form through integration of technology, robotics and AI into the physical shell. There's not a lot of hand-holding in the film, but there are a few signposts that serve as pointers for further research for the curious – the briefly glimpsed reference to the Fluxus art movement, for instance, and the emergence of the body itself as a medium for art. To that end, there's footage of fellow Australian Mike Parr's infamous performance at the Venice Biennale in 1977, in which he appeared to chop off his own arm (the severed limb was, in fact, a prosthesis packed with meat, and attached to the end of Parr's actual foreshortened arm, with which he was born). It is remarkable, and appalling, and arrives without warning – and Moore makes no apologies for its inclusion. 'It's incredible footage, and it illustrates a point for us about the European body-art movement,' he says. 'But how do you warn people about it? Do you warn people about it? Do you say, 'oh, the sequence that's going to happen now is actually artificial, it's not a real arm'? But John and I agreed, we wanted the shock value.' Loading Scenes like this are meant to be disturbing, both in the film and in the moments captured in it. 'They hark back to images of crucifixion or public hangings,' Moore says of Stelarc's suspensions, as well as the broader body-art movement. 'There's something deep down and slightly nasty and scary about them. It's blood and pain, something subterranean.' But, many people will ask, is it art? 'Of course it is,' he insists. 'If he'd done it in his bedroom and just kept it there, it probably wouldn't be. Because he's made it so public, shoved it in our faces and made us look at it, it becomes art. 'Whether you like it or not,' he adds, 'is a different question.'
The Age
5 hours ago
- The Age
He has turned suffering into an art form – but does that make it good?
Richard Moore claims, half-jokingly, that his film about performance artist Stelarc has been more than 40 years in the making. But that doesn't mean Suspending Disbelief – co-directed with John Doggett Williams – is the definitive work about the man, born Stelios Arcadiou in Cyprus 79 years ago, who became globally famous in the 1980s and '90s for 'suspensions' in which he dangled from ropes attached to metal hooks pierced through his skin. 'We're not trying to do a piece that examines how important he is,' demurs Moore, a former director of the Melbourne International Film Festival. 'We're doing a homage to his career, to his spirit of exploration and curiosity, to his longevity in the Australian art scene – to the fact that here is a guy who's grown up in the western suburbs of Melbourne and gone on to become one of the better-known performing artists on the international circuit. It's a salute to him and his personality and his cultural output over a very long time.' Moore first encountered a Stelarc performance in 1982, when the artist was suspended, naked (as was his wont) from the limbs of a massive gum tree in Canberra. For Moore, who was then working in theatre, the sight of Stelarc's body twitching as his limbs froze up was instantly fascinating. 'It was the ritual element of it, the theatrical side of it. These are images that will burn into your retina and never, ever leave you – and I'm grateful to Stelarc for that.' Decades later, Moore met Doggett Williams, whom he describes as 'an inveterate collector of footage', including of Stelarc's performances over the years. There was an archive at ACMI, too. And Stelarc had 'eight boxes [of footage] in his house, on all these formats known and unknown to man, stuff we've never seen before'. The seeds of a career-spanning filmic survey were in place. Suspending Disbelief doesn't offer much insight into Stelarc himself. It's far more focused on the work than the man. And, says Moore, that's a deliberate response to what has become standard practice in the endangered realm of the arts documentary. 'We seem to be drifting towards the hagiography mode,' says Moore. 'I look in horror at a program like the ABC's Creative Types... all those personalities are wonderful, they're celebrities. But art is also dirty and painful, it hurts and it's messy and it's chaotic. And we wanted to make a counter to that style of reporting.' Arguably, no film about Stelarc could ever do differently. His career – which dates back to the late 1960s – has always revolved around the body. There were early experiments in tracking its internal functions, the famous suspensions – embraced by a generation of younger fans today as pioneering efforts in body modification and self-mutilation – and the later (and ongoing) efforts to transcend the limits of the corporeal form through integration of technology, robotics and AI into the physical shell. There's not a lot of hand-holding in the film, but there are a few signposts that serve as pointers for further research for the curious – the briefly glimpsed reference to the Fluxus art movement, for instance, and the emergence of the body itself as a medium for art. To that end, there's footage of fellow Australian Mike Parr's infamous performance at the Venice Biennale in 1977, in which he appeared to chop off his own arm (the severed limb was, in fact, a prosthesis packed with meat, and attached to the end of Parr's actual foreshortened arm, with which he was born). It is remarkable, and appalling, and arrives without warning – and Moore makes no apologies for its inclusion. 'It's incredible footage, and it illustrates a point for us about the European body-art movement,' he says. 'But how do you warn people about it? Do you warn people about it? Do you say, 'oh, the sequence that's going to happen now is actually artificial, it's not a real arm'? But John and I agreed, we wanted the shock value.' Loading Scenes like this are meant to be disturbing, both in the film and in the moments captured in it. 'They hark back to images of crucifixion or public hangings,' Moore says of Stelarc's suspensions, as well as the broader body-art movement. 'There's something deep down and slightly nasty and scary about them. It's blood and pain, something subterranean.' But, many people will ask, is it art? 'Of course it is,' he insists. 'If he'd done it in his bedroom and just kept it there, it probably wouldn't be. Because he's made it so public, shoved it in our faces and made us look at it, it becomes art. 'Whether you like it or not,' he adds, 'is a different question.'
