
Israel-Iran conflict: When will the West learn?
THE world once again watched in alarm as the United States (US) launched military strikes against Iran, citing concerns over its nuclear weapons development.
The international reaction has been largely cautious, with many nations urging diplomacy over aggression. But for those who remember the early 2000s, this latest development feels eerily familiar.
History, it seems, is repeating itself and the lessons of the past remain unheeded.
In 2003, the US, backed by Britain, Australia and other allies, invaded Iraq under the claim that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). That assertion was later proven to be false.
No WMDs were ever found, and the war, arguably based on a fabricated premise, led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, destabilised an entire region, and fuelled a generation of extremism.
Yet, two decades later, not a single senior figure from the US or Britain faced civil or criminal liability. No tribunal, no sanctions, no legal consequences for initiating what some international law experts have labelled a 'crime of aggression'.
The architects of the war continued their careers, published memoirs, gave lectures, and disappeared into quiet obscurity. Justice, for Iraq and for the world, was never served.
Now, the same narrative is playing out with Iran. Allegations of nuclear weapons development, despite Iran's repeated insistence that its nuclear program is civilian in nature, are being used to justify military action.
Meanwhile, the same countries that invaded Iraq with righteous fury remain silent about North Korea, a nation that has not only developed nuclear weapons but has conducted multiple missile tests aimed at showcasing its long-range strike capabilities.
North Korea's Hwasong-14 and -15 missiles, launched in 2017, demonstrated potential range to strike US territories.
As recently as 2024, North Korea conducted mock nuclear warhead launches and fired dozens of short-range ballistic missiles in defiance of US-South Korean military drills. Despite these provocations, the US has refrained from military strikes. Why the double standard?
The answer may lie in geography, risk, and resources. North Korea, while dangerous, does not sit atop vast oil reserves. It is also bordered by China, a military and nuclear superpower, making any aggressive miscalculation potentially catastrophic.
Iran and Iraq, on the other hand, are oil-rich nations located in a region where the US has long sought influence through both diplomacy and force.
Control of oil routes, access to resources, and support for regional allies like Israel and Saudi Arabia have all contributed to the Middle East being a frequent target of Western military interventions.
But what is often overlooked in this calculus is the human and cultural cost of these interventions.
Iraq is not just a battlefield: it is Mesopotamia, the cradle of civilisation, home to some of the world's earliest writings, laws, and cities.
Iran is not merely a 'nuclear threat': it is Persia, a land of poets, scientists, and empires that shaped human history. To reduce these nations to talking points in a geopolitical chess game is to insult their legacy and ignore their potential.
If we continue to allow military might to dictate global norms without accountability, we not only erode the principles of international law, we risk destroying civilisations that have enriched humanity for millennia.
The world deserves better than a system where power excuses everything and history is rewritten by the victors.
The cradle of Mesopotamia, the gardens of Persia, the philosophies, the poetry, the science—these are not threats. They are treasures. And if they are lost, it will not be the fault of tyrants alone, but of those who stood by while empires masked greed as justice.
Let us finally hold to account those who manipulate truth to justify violence. If the West is sincere in its pursuit of justice, it must understand that peace is not imposed; it is earned through humility, restraint, and the courage to see others as equals. ‒ June 27, 2025
Dr Sheila Ramalingam is the Deputy Executive Director of UMLEAD, International Institute of Public Policy and Management (INPUMA), and Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Law, Universiti Malaya.
The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.
Main image: Reuters

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Wave of Russian strikes wounds 7 in Ukraine
KYIV: Fresh Russian strikes targeting Ukrainian regions in the night of Saturday to Sunday wounded at least seven people, according to the war-torn country's authorities. Since launching its invasion in February 2022 Russia has launched near-nightly bombardments of its neighbour's towns and cities, raining down drones and missiles on military and civilian targets alike. Talks on ending the fighting between the two sides are at an impasse, with Kyiv accusing Moscow, which occupies nearly one-fifth of Ukraine's territory, of wanting the war to drag on. In the night the Russian army launched 477 drones and 60 missiles of various types, according to the Ukrainian air fosrce, which said it had intercepted 475 and 39 of those respectively. The strikes led to 'six impacts', the air force said, without giving further details. Pointing to the bombardment, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky argued they showed that his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin 'has long decided to pursue this war, despite the international community's calls for peace'. 'Ukraine must reinforce its aerial defence, which is the best way to protect lives,' he added, repeating his willingness to buy US-made Patriot anti-missile systems. US President Donald Trump, who has tilted Washington's policy on the war in favour of Moscow since retaking office, has not responded to Kyiv's request. In the central Cherkasy region, the Russian strikes wounded a total of six people, including a child, the Ukrainian police said on Telegram. Far from the frontline in the western Ivano-Frankivsk region, the strikes likewise wounded a woman who was 'taken to hospital', according to the regional governor Svitlana Onyshchuk. Besides the civilian casualties, a fighter pilot was killed in the night after his F-16 jet was damaged in mid-air 'without him having the time to eject', according to an air force statement. Paying the pilot his respects, Zelensky said he was working to shoot down Russian projectiles before his death. In the morning after the nighttime strikes, a Russian drone attack killed a 60-year-old man after hitting his car in the northwest Kharkiv region, where the Russian army is on the march, according to the authorities. For its part the Russian army said it had intercepted three Ukrainian drones in the night of Saturday to Sunday.


New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Trump backs Netanyahu, slams Israeli corruption trial
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said Saturday the United States was "not going to stand" for the continued prosecution of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on corruption charges. "The United States of America spends Billions of Dollar a year, far more than on any other Nation, protecting and supporting Israel. We are not going to stand for this," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. Netanyahu responded on X, saying "thank you again" and promising that "together, we... will make the Middle East Great Again!". An Israeli court on Friday rejected Netanyahu's request to postpone giving testimony in his corruption trial, ruling that he had not provided adequate justification for his request. In one case, Netanyahu and his wife Sara are accused of accepting more than US$260,000 worth of luxury goods such as cigars, jewelry and champagne from billionaires in exchange for political favors. In two other cases, Netanyahu is accused of attempting to negotiate more favorable coverage from two Israeli media outlets. Netanyahu has denied any wrongdoing and has thanked Trump for his support in Israel's war with Iran, which saw a ceasefire agreement earlier this week. His lawyer had asked the court to excuse the leader from hearings over the next two weeks, saying he needs to concentrate on "security issues." Trump on Wednesday sprung to Netanyahu's defence, describing the case against him as a "witch hunt." On Saturday, he described Netanyahu as a "War Hero" and said the case would distract the prime minister from negotiations with Iran and with Hamas, the Gaza-based Palestinian armed group that Israel is at war with. "This travesty of 'Justice' will interfere with both Iran and Hamas negotiations," said Trump, although it was unclear what negotiations he was referring to with regards to Iran. Hamas took 251 hostages during its Oct 7, 2023, attack on Israel, with 49 still believed to be held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Talks are ongoing for the return of the remaining hostages and the bodies of those killed, while Israel's punishing war on Gaza continues unabated. The US leader also likened Netanyahu's legal troubles to his own before he took office for his second term. "It is a POLITICAL WITCH HUNT, very similar to the Witch Hunt that I was forced to endure," said Trump. The Republican was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records in May 2024 in a case related to hush money payments to a porn star.


The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Tensions escalate as Democratic Party of Korea pushes to approve PM nominee, extra budget
Rep. Kim Byung-kee, acting leader and floor leader of the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (left, talks with Prime Minister nominee and three-term lawmaker Rep. Kim Min-seok during a parliamentary plenary session at the National Assembly on Friday. - Photo: The Korea Herald/ANN SEOUL: Tensions between the main parties are projected to intensify this week over whether to approve the nomination for prime minister for Kim Min-seok, as well as the review of an extra budget proposal. The main opposition People Power Party on Sunday (June 29) said it plans to hold a 'people's' confirmation hearing for Kim, where the four-term lawmaker would be questioned by members of the public from outside the National Assembly. The party's remarks come as the People Power Party and the ruling Democratic Party of Korea have failed to close the gap in their stance over the approval of Kim, with the main opposition criticising the nominee regarding various scandals. 'Tomorrow, at 11am, the People Power Party plans to hold a people's confirmation hearing where candidate Kim's issues will be dealt with,' Rep. Song Eon-seog, who was recently elected as the People Power Party's floor leader, said in a Facebook post on Sunday (June 29). 'The two-day parliamentary confirmation hearing is over, but the people's judgment starts now. We plan to continue the verification on candidate Kim by inviting committee members consisting of young Koreans (in their 20s and 30s), North Korean defectors and experts in various areas,' he added. The Assembly's 13-member special committee on personnel hearing, consisting of lawmakers from both the ruling and main opposition parties, has yet to adopt a confirmation hearing report for Kim, due to objections from the People Power Party. The committee held two days of hearings for Kim on Tuesday and Wednesday, but the main opposition denounced the unprecedented absence of witnesses tied to the prime minister nominee's scandals surrounding his assets and family. According to People Power Party Rep. Joo Jin-woo, a member of the personnel hearing committee, Kim's assets stood at some 500 million won (US$370,000) in 2020, yet the nominee spent 1.3 billion won around that time, without clear receipts pointing to additional earnings and spending. Kim has also been accused of failing to submit documents demonstrating the source of money for his son's tuition at a US university. The four-term liberal lawmaker, who was nominated for prime minister by President Lee Jae Myung on June 4, was convicted by the country's top court in 2005 of violating the Political Funds Act by receiving 200 million won in illegal funds from conglomerate SK Group in 2002. Additionally, the Supreme Court in 2010 found him guilty in a separate political slush fund case, in which he received illegal funds worth a combined 720 million won from three of his aides in 2007. Despite the People Power Party's disapproval of Kim, the Democratic Party, which holds a firm majority of 167 seats in the 300-seat Assembly, has requested Assembly Speaker Rep. Woo Won-shik to convene a plenary meeting on Monday in an apparent bid to vote in favor of the prime minister nominee. 'The office of the Assembly speaker has yet to respond, despite our party's request to convene a plenary meeting tomorrow for the appointment of the prime minister nominee,' Democratic Party spokesperson Kim Hyun-jung told reporters around noon on Sunday. 'Instead of pressuring the Assembly speaker's office, our stance is that we can pass (the motion to appoint Kim) on July 4 when we plan to pass the extra budget proposal — the plenary session (that we are pushing for tomorrow) has yet to be decided.' The issue of approving the Lee administration's 20.2 trillion won extra budget proposal is expected to fuel partisan tension as well. The extra budget proposal is the second of its kind this year and the first since Lee took office. The People Power Party took issue with a portion of the budget that includes distribution of vouchers ranging from 150,000 to 520,000 won per person, depending on income level. On Friday, the Assembly elected four chairs for parliamentary committees in the plenary session, as the People Power Party walked out of the session in a show of protest. - The Korea Herald/ANN