logo
From protest to policy — how to prepare student leaders for governance roles

From protest to policy — how to prepare student leaders for governance roles

Daily Maverick03-06-2025
Leadership development begins in childhood and is either matured or sabotaged in early adulthood. What surfaces later in public life is merely the ripple effect of how young leaders were shaped, or not shaped, in those formative years. The impact is seen in everything from government, to corporates and civil society formations. Nowhere is this more evident than in the corridors of tertiary institutions, where student leaders often find themselves catapulted from protest to policy proponents without a roadmap.
South Africa's Higher Education Act affirms the importance of the student voice, through the establishment of student representative councils. These structures are meant to form part of university governance, giving legitimacy to student participation and co-ownership of institutional decisions. However, a troubling paradox lies hidden in plain sight. The students who are elected to lead are often those who have risen through the fiery furnace of very essential campus activism. They are politicised, energised and popular – but are they prepared to govern?
That is the dilemma. Passion without preparation. Power without posture. Protest without bureaucratic policy insight.
Student organisations across campuses – whether aligned to Sasco, Pasma, Daso, the EFFSC or others – reflect our nation's fractured political landscape. Their members fight hard for electoral visibility. But when the protests are over, when the slogans fade and the victory photos are taken, what follows is an often painful transition – moving overnight from activist to structural representative. And too often, it fails.
Students find themselves suddenly required to operate in the very spaces they previously vilified. Instead of megaphones and placards, they now face committee rooms, university statutes and boardroom coffee. As one student leader admitted during a capacity-building session: 'You sit there drinking coffee with management, and you've got a lump in your throat because you know your people outside don't trust this table.'
This isn't just political tension. It's a deep psychological rupture – one not confined to student leadership but familiar in many transitions of power. It shows up when trade unionists ascend to corporate boards. When activists become ministers. When freedom fighters become cabinet politicians. This is possibly the case also when a country moves from revolutionary struggle to diplomatic status at the United Nations. The transition from outsider to insider is complex, and if mishandled, corrosive – both to the soul of the individual and to institutional systems.
The leadership bottleneck becomes clear: student leaders, once driven by mobilisation and moral fire, now face institutional processes they neither understand nor control. Their term of office is punitively short. Their learning curve is steep. The same voices that carried weight on the picket line are now weighed against policy cycles, academic calendars and budget meetings. Decisions on exclusions, accommodation or financial aid don't move at protest speed. They move at the pace of bureaucracy.
This mismatch between urgency and process often creates a crisis of identity. Many student leaders, untrained in governance and under pressure to remain 'relevant', begin to perform rather than lead. They attend to operational issues – responding to every complaint, attending every event – not because it is strategic, but because it is visible. They believe leadership is about being seen. And being seen means votes.
In the absence of strategic tools, some regress into dangerous patterns. They use the student body as leverage, sometimes impulsively and very often manipulatively. They stage unrest to regain relevance. They conflate outrage with influence. But what began as representation quietly morphs into exploitation.
The consequences can be devastating.
Protests escalate. Trust erodes. Institutional governance becomes fragile. Millions are lost in property damage. Students face disciplinary hearings or arrests. Some drop out. Some are maimed. Many student leaders themselves leave office bitter, disillusioned or psycho-spiritually broken. Their passion was pure, but the system gave them no scaffolding.
But there is another way.
It begins not with slogans or elections, but with structure. With strategy. With formation.
The Early Adulthood Development Foundation (EADF) proposes a new pathway. We propose a reimagined pipeline for student leadership formation. One that prepares the next generation not just to protest, but to govern. Not just to lead a chant, but to lead a council.
The first pivot is this: From performance to formation. Leadership is not a stage. It is a calling which requires self-mastery and not just public appeal. Training must begin before elections and continue long after the term begins. We must invest in deep personal formation, not reactive workshops.
Second: From popularity to credibility. We need leaders who are trusted, not just followed. Who are respected for their integrity, not just their volume. This requires political literacy, strategic maturity and ethical clarity. The student body on campus must stop rewarding visibility without sustainable vision.
And third: From protest to policy. Activism should not die when office begins. It should evolve. Protest must give birth to policy. Student leaders should be equipped to translate the pain they've seen into the policies they propose. That means knowing how systems work, how power flows and how decisions are made.
This is where the proposed EADF scaffolds come in. They are simple, but transformative:
Structured pre-election training to lay the foundation;
Baseline entry assessments to identify maturity gaps;
A leadership eligibility pipeline that ensures experience before elevation; and
Consistent mentorship and coaching throughout the term.
These are not luxuries. They are real necessities, if we are serious about cultivating ethical and effective leadership for the next generation.
From churches and corporates, to governments and NGOs, crisis always mirrors character. The tertiary education sector is not just a space for academic growth. It offers a sacred potential rehearsal environment for public life.
If we form leaders who can stand with conscience and insight in the boardroom, kneel with compassion in their dorm rooms and lead with temperate foresight in protest, then we are not just shaping student politics, we are safeguarding the future of leadership itself. DM
Tebogo Mothibinyane is a student development practitioner. Professor Cecil Bodibe is a clinical psychologist and past DVC student at Unisa. Dr Zolile Mlisana is a paediatrician and past principal of Medunsa.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NSFAS Crisis to Board Scandals: 5 reasons SASCO wants Nkabane out
NSFAS Crisis to Board Scandals: 5 reasons SASCO wants Nkabane out

IOL News

time30-06-2025

  • IOL News

NSFAS Crisis to Board Scandals: 5 reasons SASCO wants Nkabane out

SASCO demands Minister Nobuhle Nkabane's removal, citing NSFAS delays, governance failures, and poor leadership driving education into crisis. They accuse DHET of serving capital over student transformation. Sasco cited multiple failures under Nkabane's leadership, including severe delays in NSFAS disbursements, flawed board appointments, chronic underfunding of institutions, and the growing commodification of education. "It is the direct result of poor governance by the Department of Higher Education and Training and the opportunistic, malicious, and poor bourgeoisie agenda by the university and college management.'' Kamatshe said the crisis facing students today is not incidental. As previously reported by IOL, Nkabane has faced criticism following allegations of corruption and for allegedly misleading Parliament about the illegal appointment of the SETA board, including false details about the appointment process and panel composition. Speaking at the ANC's Luthuli House on Sunday, Sasco president Alungile Kamtshe said, 'We contend that DHET, led by Minister Nobuhle Nkabane, within the government of national unity, has consistently failed to deliver on its most basic responsibilities.' The South African Students Congress (SASCO) has called for the immediate removal of Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane , accusing her and the Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET) of catastrophic governance failures that are driving the higher education sector into crisis. Sasco accused the Nkabane and her department of gross negligence, illegal conduct, and structural violence that disproportionately harms black, poor, and working-class students. 'We are left with no choice but to take a drastic stance in defence of the education sector that has been built through the blood, sweat and tears of the students and the public servants for over the centuries.'' Here are the five main reasons SASCO believes Minister Nkabane must go: 1. Illegal Appointment of the NSFAS Board SASCO asserts that the current NSFAS board was illegally appointed, violating Section 5 of the NSFAS Act of 1999, which mandates that three out of thirteen board members must be nominated by national student organisations. The absence of these student-nominated representatives, SASCO argues, renders the board illegitimate and its decisions null. 'The Minister has failed in her duty relating to the appointment of the NSFAS this extent, we declare that that board is illegal,'' said Kamtshe. SASCO plans to take legal action to compel the Minister to comply with the law. 2. Delays in NSFAS Allowances & Student Exclusion SASCO slammed the catastrophic delays in NSFAS disbursements, saying that thousands of students are still without their allowances midway through the academic year. Many are reportedly homeless, sleeping in libraries, toilets, or on the streets, while institutions issue exclusion letters. 'This is not just bureaucratic incompetence. It is structural violence. Institutions are merciless and have been dishing out exclusion letters to add insult to injury.' They demand the immediate payment of all allowances by the end of the current recess, and an end to financial, academic, and accommodation-based exclusions,particularly targeting vulnerable first-year students. 3. Mishandling of SETA Board SASCO alleges the appointment of Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) boards and Community Higher Education Planning Committees (CHPCs) was riddled with secrecy, misrepresentation, and possible dishonesty to Parliament. 'The Minister may have lied to the Portfolio Committee. The process shows a pure disregard for the citizens of this country.' They warned that the delay in appointments has created a vacuum, giving executives unchecked power due to the absence of board oversight. SASCO demands that the process to appoint new boards to be restarted immediately and be completed by August 1. 4. Negligence Over Student Housing & the Death of Sisonke The tragic death of Sisonke, a student at Walter Sisulu University, is central to SASCO's call for accountability. SASCO accuses the Minister's office of spreading misinformation, claiming Sisonke was not a student, only for the claim to be proven false. 'The officials that publicly lied, continue to earn their salaries. The death of Sisonke was in vain.' SASCO demands justice for Sisonke, and calls for NSFAS to accredit institutionally owned residences, especially in historically disadvantaged universities where students live in unsafe and inhumane conditions.

'It's president prerogative to redeploy',Nkabane says
'It's president prerogative to redeploy',Nkabane says

The Citizen

time30-06-2025

  • The Citizen

'It's president prerogative to redeploy',Nkabane says

Nkabane has come under fire after being embroiled in allegations of corruption and other issues. Minister of Higher Education and Training Dr Nobuhle Nkabane at the official launch of the National Skills Fund (NSF) Disabilities Programme Phase I at Blind SA on 29 November 2024 in Alberton, South Africa. Picture: Gallo Images/Fani Mahuntsi As calls grow for Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane to be removed for failing to deliver on the department's basic responsibilities, the minister said it is the prerogative of President Cyril Ramaphosa to redeploy her. Nkabane has come under fire after being embroiled in allegations of corruption and the illegal appointment of the Seta board, including accusations that she misled Parliament by providing false information about the procedure for appointing Seta chairs — a list dominated by ANC cadres — and about the composition of the panel that made the appointments. Calls for removal On Sunday, the South African Students Congress (Sasco) called for the immediate removal of Nkabane. It is the third organisation to call for the minister's axing, after the EFF and the DA also lodged complaints against her. ALSO READ: WATCH: Sasco calls for immediate removal of Minister Nobuhle Nkabane 'Not much to say' Speaking to the media on Monday, Nkabane said she did not have 'much to say'. 'Basically, there's nothing that I can say because it is the prerogative of the president to appoint and redeploy, so I cannot say anything. However, what I believe in is that we have an open-door policy as the department, and we do have a stakeholder engagement framework where we engage our stakeholders from time to time if there are any concerns. 'I'm still waiting for them to come and raise their concerns within the frameworks and the protocols of government because they did not come to me to raise those issues. I saw some of their concerns that they were raising yesterday through their media briefings,' Nkabane said. Criticism Nkabane said she welcomes criticism. 'We believe it is criticism that is going to make us grow and grow as we learn'. Nkabane said her department is ready to table the budget vote on Thursday, despite the DA stating it would not be voting because the minister is implicated in scandals. 'I wouldn't say they are correct or incorrect for raising their views. Everyone has a right to raise their views and opinions. However, we are preparing for the budget vote on Thursday, and we are ready as a department to table our budget vote in parliament and NCOP, so we are not shaken'. ALSO READ: 'Reputational discomfort': Minister apologises to Advocate Motau over Seta panel claim 'Lying to Parliament' Nkabane 'lied' to parliament about the appointment of the Sector Education and Training Authority (Seta) board chairs and 'must be fired', DA MP and portfolio committee member of education, Karabo Khakhau, told Ramaphosa in no uncertain terms last week. 'Mr President, you have a lying minister in your Cabinet, who has been caught red-handed. 'It is time for you to fire Minister Nobuhle Nkabane with immediate effect and to replace her with a minister committed to making higher education work, not committed to making work for ANC insiders,' Khakhau said. The minister was questioned by the portfolio committee on the composition of the panel tasked with appointing the chairs, and got into hot water when she told the committee that Advocate Terry Motau had chaired the process. Motau last week denied that he chaired the process, nor was he officially appointed as the panel chair. ALSO READ: 'A lying minister in Cabinet': Why has Ramaphosa not fired Nkabane?

SASCO calls appointment of current NSFAS board illegal
SASCO calls appointment of current NSFAS board illegal

Eyewitness News

time30-06-2025

  • Eyewitness News

SASCO calls appointment of current NSFAS board illegal

JOHANNESBURG - The South African Students Congress (SASCO) has slammed the appointment of the current National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) board, calling it illegal. The organisation alleges that Minister of Higher Education Nobuhle Nkabane failed to follow appointment regulations. ALSO READ: SASCO calls for immediate removal of Higher Education Minister Nkabane The board, which consists of 12 members, was appointed in February. SASCO held a media briefing at the African National Congress (ANC)'s Luthuli House headquarters on Sunday to address the state of the department, NSFAS and the Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA)s. SASCO is demanding urgent changes in the scheme. Section 5 of the NSFAS Act stipulates that the board must consist of 13 members, three of whom must be nominated by national organisations representing students. SASCO president Alungile Kamtshe claimed that the minister had failed to follow this legal procedure when making the appointments. Kamtshe said that student organisations were not properly consulted. "Three are designated to be nominated by national organisations representing students and that's to this extent that we declare that that board is illegal, considering that its appointment has been flawed throughout." Kamtshe warned that if their calls were ignored, students would be mobilised into action.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store