Ending Irrational Objectification Of Space Means Ending Rapacious Exploitation On Earth
Driving the new capitalistic/militaristic space race is a persistent, pernicious way of thinking. Though the polycrisis is the culmination of mans rapacious consciousness, even many progressives continue to believe it can be remedied externally, by more …
I'm old enough to remember the naïve thrills of the first American spaceflights of Mercury and Gemini. I was in high school when Neil Armstrong planted that ridiculous American flag on the moon. Now, between SpaceX and Blue Origin, spacefaring has become a churlish and childish tourism and tech fantasy.
A recent example of delusional technophilia is entitled, 'How space exploration can improve life on Earth.' Ignoring evidence and common sense, the author absurdly proclaims: 'We will not be able to combat global heating, biodiversity loss, pollution and so many other environmental challenges without space-faring. Going to space is in fact taking care of problems on Earth first.'
He doesn't stop with that illogical claim. 'Tracking the consequences of government policies, distributions of wealth, and dozens of other more directly socio-economic phenomena have strong spatial dimensions that make space-based remote sensing indispensable.'
Conclusion? 'Opposing space-faring unwittingly inhibits all this crucial activity.' In a classic bit of Trumpist reversal and projection, we're told that those who have 'a cynical, 'anti-space' ideology' would halt human progress.
This self-declared geologist makes no distinction between the previous five mass extinctions resulting from meteor strikes or super-volcanoes, and the Sixth Extinction at the hands of a supposedly intelligent species. 'Extinction is a destructive force, but it also increases biodiversity; humans need to acknowledge that awkward truth if we want to survive,' he has written with astounding obtuseness.
Stringing together a series of non-sequiturs, the writer doubles down: 'Anti-space ideology amounts to a critique that unwittingly embraces a politics of neoliberal austerity while ironically undermining our ability to deal with the manifold ecological and social crises we face.'
The Western mindset is dying hard. The problem with space exploration is not ideological but existential. Exploiting the near-Earth environment is the highest expression of man's manipulation of nature. Nations and corporations have littered orbital space with space junk of planned obsolescence. And you won't be able to look at the moon in ten years without thinking of all the competitive mining operations on its surface.
Driving the new capitalistic/militaristic space race is a persistent, pernicious way of thinking. Though the polycrisis is the culmination of man's rapacious consciousness, even many progressives continue to believe it can be remedied externally, by more technology.
Space exploration has its place. However, only if enough people begin looking inwardly, rather than outwardly for the remedy to what is essentially a planetary, collective crisis of consciousness.
Why won't 'improving our ability to get to space improve our ability to perform Earth systems monitoring – and thus to deal with climate change and other environmental crises?'
First, because there is no connection between 'Earth systems monitoring from space,' and effectively addressing and redressing 'climate change and other environmental crises.' Indeed, there's an inverse relationship: the more we've been able to monitor the Earth from space, the more the climate crisis has intensified.
Second, the fragmentary approach, which is implicit in the phrase 'climate change and other environmental crises,' lies at the root of the problem.
Viewing the crisis in man's relationship to nature in terms of many 'environmental crises' directly contributes to a paralysis of analysis. In short, the Earth burns while the experts monitor it.
Cui bono? Siloed scientists, absent-minded academics, colluding capitalists and militaristic madmen.
Third, the shibboleth that science will save us is simply untrue, no matter how many Landsat and other space-based monitoring satellites we send into orbit.
One has only to reflect on the 'scientifically conducted' thermonuclear detonations over the Bikini Atoll, which remains radioactively uninhabitable for its former people to this day, to realize that science can be used for good or ill.
Fourth, the failure of imagination, or more accurately of insight that underlies the technophile mindset is egregious in light of the real and present danger to our already overheated atmosphere and oceans. The prospect of thousands more touristic, capitalistic and militaristic rocket launches, much less the energy AI energy sucks to support them, should give everyone pause.
The crux of the matter is that the climate, pollution and Sixth Extinction crisis has its source in man's obsessively externalizing, extractive consciousness.
Indeed, the ecological crisis is the ultimate manifestation of the crisis of human consciousness.
Without radically changing the separative, fragmenting and extractive mentality, things will only get worse. Must techno-fools and their spacefaring children render the Earth a barren echo of its former beauty and diversity before they realize this?
It's a question of basic direction: Do we continue with the Western mindset of pathological externalization and extraction, or can we restore the inwardness of the East within us as global citizens while proceeding with scientific and technological progress?
Voracious individualism and consumerism overwhelmed the last gasp of a countervailing inwardness of ancient India a half-century ago. Despite its arrested development materially, ancient India provides an alternative to the obsessive materialism and externalization of the West.
This is not a call to graft Buddhist traditions and practices onto moribund Western societies. That's been tried over the last 40 years and it has failed to alter the course of America, much less the now globalized capitalistic system.
So what is a true breakthrough? Clearly it begins within us as undivided human beings, not in any scientific much less technological or political breakthrough.
Such breakthroughs are completely secondary to the inner breakthrough in human consciousness that must occur if humanity is to survive and flower on this wondrous Earth.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
The Inevitable Militarisation Of Space?
President Donald Trump's plans to build a space-based Golden Dome missile defense shield have drawn immediate criticism from China, which has framed it as a renewed American push to 'weaponise space.' This programme, announced in an executive order signed in January 2025, echoes former President Ronald Reagan's 1980s Strategic Defense Initiative, or 'Star Wars,' which was never completed but is believed to have pressured the Soviet Union into a costly arms race. Whether the Golden Dome will meet the same fate or move beyond rhetoric remains to be seen. Regardless of its future feasibility, the president's announcement marks another departure from the vision of space as a peaceful domain. Aside from the U.S. Air Force's anti-satellite (ASAT) missile test in 1985 and the abandoned Star Wars program, treaties like the Limited Test Ban Treaty (1963), the Outer Space Treaty (1967), and the Moon Agreement (1979) helped restrain space militarisation during the Cold War. In the 1990s, multinational projects like the International Space Station further reinforced a vision of international cooperation under U.S. leadership. As a result, public discussion of space weapons remained largely restricted, even as governments quietly advanced their capabilities. That began to change in 2007, when China shocked observers by using a missile to destroy its own satellites, followed by a similar U.S. Navy test a year later. These events signaled a clear break from past restraint and kick-started a new space race. In place of the Cold War's bipolar competition, the 2020s have seen a more multipolar and militarised space race taking shape. U.S. The 2019 reorganisation of U.S. space branches marked a turning point in Washington's military approach to space. It created the U.S. Space Force for training and equipping personnel, and reestablished the U.S. Space Command, responsible for operational missions. NASA, though a civilian agency, continues to support military objectives through dual-use technologies and interagency coordination, while the White House's National Space Council also helps shape policy. Trump's second term has seen the Space Force intensify its rhetoric on space conflict, casting doubt on the Artemis Accords' stated peaceful intentions declared in 2020. In April 2025, General Stephen Newman Whiting, head of Space Command, publicly called for deploying weapons in space, according to Defense One. Meanwhile, General B. Chance Saltzman, the Space Force's chief of space operations, outlined six types of counterspace capabilities during the Air & Space Forces Association Warfare Symposium in March 2025; three ground based (kinetic missiles, directed energy, and jamming), and the same three methods adapted for use from satellites in orbit. In April, the Space Force released a new document titled Space Warfighting, which provides a framework to guide military planning in the largely untested environment. The focus remains on Earth's orbit, broken down into low, medium, and geostationary orbit, where most satellites operate. The unmanned Boeing X-37B spacecraft, launched in 2010 by the Pentagon, is just one secretive military project in space. It stayed in orbit for more than 900 days from 2020 to 2022, raising concerns over U.S. ambitions in co-orbital warfare and its ability to tamper physically with other satellites. Private industry has long been integral to American space capabilities, and a new wave of companies is expanding that role. Elon Musk's Starlink, designed as a civilian internet service, has become a critical asset for Ukraine's military during its war with Russia. Meanwhile, firms like L3Harris have repurposed commercial satellite sensors for military surveillance and tracking. The Commercial Augmentation Space Reserve (CASR), initiated by the Department of Defense in 2024, aims to integrate with the private sector for space-based operations. Beyond Earth's orbit, the cislunar space between the Earth and the moon is emerging as a major zone of competition. The Air Force Research Laboratory's (AFRL) 'Primer on Cislunar Space' in 2021 identified the region as a growing military priority, and the Pentagon established the 19th Space Defense Squadron to monitor activity in cislunar space and regions beyond traditional satellite orbits. AFRL is also developing the Oracle-M spacecraft to track objects in cislunar orbit, and completed thruster and ground systems tests in March and April 2025, respectively, and is now moving toward launch readiness reviews. While some experts argue that the strategic value of cislunar space is overblown, the moon itself is increasingly seen through a militaristic lens. NASA plans to return U.S. astronauts to the moon by 2027, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's (DARPA) NOM4D program aims to study how lunar materials could be utilised for future military use. The Space Force and the AFRL are also testing a lunar reconnaissance satellite called the Defense Deep Space Sentinel to 'demonstrate operations in lunar orbit, including surveilling the lunar surface,' according to the news organization Breaking Defense. But not everyone is convinced about the reasoning for these developments. According to the co-director of the Outer Space Institute Aaron Boley, 'there is no current need for debris removal in cislunar space, and there is unlikely to be any such need for decades to come,' stated a 2022 article in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Paul Szymanski of the Space Strategies Center stated in a 2023 article in that companies are planning to provide 'cell phone service on the moon and the Air Force Research Lab is developing several programs, such as space surveillance for the far side of the moon. None of this makes sense, unless there is some other not publicly known factor that has changed everyone's attitudes.' Other Countries With help from private companies, the U.S. is at the forefront of space militarisation, though it faces growing competition from other countries. Its former Cold War competitor, Russia, brought its 'air force and the… Aerospace Defense Forces under one unified command,' of Aerospace Forces (VKS) in 2015, according to the Moscow Times. Russia displayed its ASAT capabilities in November 2021, when it destroyed one of its defunct satellites. Just before it invaded Ukraine in February 2022, Russia launched the Cosmos 2553 satellite into a high, radiation-heavy orbit around 2,000 km above Earth, a zone rarely used by communications or observation satellites. U.S. officials believe it may be connected to a Russian project for a space-based nuclear weapon. In 2024, reports emerged that Russia was developing a weapon that could disable hundreds of satellites using 'radiation effects or the resulting electromagnetic pulse.' Also in 2024, the U.S. accused Russia at the UN Security Council of launching a satellite capable of attacking other satellites. Experts suggested this satellite was part of a series of similar Russian satellites launched over several years that may carry kinetic projectile weapons. Then, in March 2025, U.S. officials observed multiple Russian satellites 'work together to surround and isolate another satellite that was positioned in low earth orbit, demonstrating how they could potentially target enemy spacecraft in a future conflict,' stated an official in a CNN article. China, however, has overtaken Russia since the end of the Cold War to become the U.S.' primary competitor in space. In December 2024, several Chinese satellites conducted what U.S. officials described as 'advanced patrols and advanced attack' approaches, showing their ability to physically disable nearby satellites. A senior U.S. general later confirmed that China is testing satellites capable of 'dogfighting maneuvers,' also using multiple spacecraft. China's missile capabilities have also advanced rapidly. In 2021, the country tested several hypersonic weapons faster than Mach 5—or five times the speed of sound—using a Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS), in trials that surpassed anything the U.S. has publicly demonstrated. In each case, China launched a payload into low earth orbit that circled part of the globe before releasing a hypersonic glider, which struck a target in China. In one test, the glider released a second missile during its descent. These tests laid the groundwork for later claims of more sophisticated, space-based strike systems. In April 2025, Chinese military officials claimed they can launch missiles from space using various platforms, including reentry glide vehicles capable of reaching up to 13,000 miles per hour. This all comes as China plans to land its own astronauts on the moon by 2030. China, Russia, and the U.S. have all developed Earth-based lasers capable of blinding satellites. As these powers advance their arsenals, other nations are building up their own. Among the newcomers, India has demonstrated its own ASAT capabilities in 2019 when it shot down one of its satellites. New power blocs are also taking shape. Traditional coordination between the U.S. and allies in Europe and Japan now faces growing competition from China and its partners. The China and Russia-led International Lunar Research Station project aims to build a lunar base by 2035. Nearly a dozen other countries have already pledged support. Managing Space Militarisation Risks Is the Way Forward While Washington seeks to preserve its lead in space, that very dominance can make it vulnerable. Russia, less dependent on space infrastructure, is investing in systems designed to trigger cascading effects. Chinese strategists, meanwhile, believe the U.S. would win a prolonged war in space but may be vulnerable to a sudden first strike, influencing their planning. Debris from previous ASAT tests by the U.S., China, and Russia already threatens spacecraft and satellites. As more countries acquire offensive space capabilities, the vision of a peaceful and cooperative exploration of space becomes harder to realize. A more realistic approach may be to acknowledge space militarization and focus on managing risks. In preparing for conflict, humanity may still develop technologies and infrastructure that ultimately serve the public good. Author Bio: John P. Ruehl is an Australian-American journalist living in Washington, D.C., and a world affairs correspondent for the Independent Media Institute. He is a contributor to several foreign affairs publications, and his book, Budget Superpower: How Russia Challenges the West With an Economy Smaller Than Texas', was published in December 2022.
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Endangered turtles share this Mexican beach with SpaceX rocket debris. The company says there's no risk of harm
By Ivonne Valdes , Max Saltman , Ana Melgar and Isa Cardona , CNN Recently hatched endangered turtle on Bagdad beach, Tamaulipas, Mexico on 20 June 2025. Photo: CNN / Supplied / Jesus Elias Ibarra The debris arrives in the rockets' wake: melted plastics, aluminium and pieces of blue adhesive. It all ends up stranded on the sands of Bagdad beach in northern Tamaulipas, Mexico, home to an endangered species of sea turtle. Just across the border lies Starbase, SpaceX's launchpad and company town. Since November, Conibio Global, a small non-governmental organisation, has taken on a daunting task: cleaning up trash from SpaceX, one of the most powerful companies in the world. Jesús Elías Ibarra, founder of Conibio Global, told CNN that in November 2024, he witnessed one of SpaceX's launches and saw one of the rocket boosters fall into the Gulf of Mexico. That time, Ibarra said people arrived in at least three helicopters and more than 10 boats just a few hours later to clean up. CNN reached out to SpaceX to ask if they were responsible for this cleanup. In May, however, there was another launch, with more debris. This time, the activist claims, millions of particles ended up contaminating the area on the Mexican side. Ibarra said that a few days later, the organisation collected more than a ton of waste in an area of 500 metres. "In half a kilometre out of the 40km of shoreline, we already collected one ton (of trash)," added Ibarra. "We are a very small group, it's impossible to clean everything." Ibarra said that Conibio Global handed the debris to the Mexican government's environmental protection agency, PROFEPA. In response to inquiries from CNN , SpaceX referred to what they published on social media site X on 26 June, where they claim to have offered resources and support for cleanup efforts. As previously stated, there are no hazards to the surrounding area. Previous independent tests conducted on materials inside Starship, including toxicity analyses, confirm they pose no chemical, biological, or toxicological risks. And as is the case before any test, a safety… The company claimed that they have also requested local and federal assistance from the Mexican government for debris recovery. Under the Outer Space Treaty, SpaceX is entitled to have its debris returned. Multiple pieces of rocket debris found on Bagdad Beach in May. Photo: CNN / Supplied / Jesus Elias Ibarra The statement added that the company had performed tests that they claim confirm that there are no chemical, biological or toxicological risks associated with the flotsam and jetsam of a typical SpaceX launch. CNN contacted the authorities of Tamaulipas and the Presidency of Mexico about SpaceX's offer and is awaiting a response. Ibarra said that Conibio Global has not had any contact with the company. Marlon Sorge, executive director of the Aerospace Corporation for Debris Reentry Studies (Cords), told CNN in an email that it's best not to touch space debris if found. This label with a SpaceX logo washed up on Bagdad Beach in May. Photo: CNN / Supplied / Jesus Elias Ibarra "Although a lot of debris is not hazardous, spaceflight-related vehicles can contain hazardous chemicals and materials," Sorge wrote. "Be aware that it is not worth the risk to touch a piece of debris, and it could interfere with important investigations." Some of the objects found during cleanup operations, Ibarra said, are solid and spongy plastics, a type of rubber with a consistency similar to cork, aluminium with SpaceX labels, pieces of plastic bubble wrap, steel tubes, and pieces of a blue-coloured adhesive. Some of this trash, Ibarra predicted, could end up being ingested by Kemp's ridley turtles, an endangered species of sea turtle that inhabits the area. On its website, SpaceX said it is committed to minimising the impact and improving the environment whenever possible, highlighting agreements with various US agencies and the Texas government. Trash and blue adhesive washed up on Bagdad Beach last month after a SpaceX launch went awry, Ibarra said. Photo: CNN / Supplied / Jesus Elias Ibarra After the recent explosion of a SpaceX rocket on 19 June, the NGO reported that some large fragments appeared in Mexican territory the next morning. It stated that several officials from the Mexican government got in touch so that they could be informed of the situation. Conibio follows SpaceX's social media announcements to know when there will be launches and goes to the sites to collect evidence of debris they know will fall. He said this happens in the northern area of Bagdad Beach and on a parcel of communal farming land in nearby Matamoros. Following persistent public complaints, Mexico's president, Claudia Sheinbaum, spoke out at her daily conference on 25 June. Sheinbaum said that her government had found that there is indeed pollution and that the impact of rocket launches in general will be reviewed in order to take action "within the framework of international laws," including possible legal actions. Ibarra, who is also a veterinarian and director of the Marine Turtle Program at Conibio Global, said that he believes the vibrations generated by the rockets compact the sand where there are turtle nests and prevent them from emerging. He said that at least 300 hatchlings have died in the compacted nests. "There is vegetation that the last explosion burned, the entire edge of the Rio Bravo, and the pipes broke many trees, which fell near a small population of people," said Ibarra. He added that in several border cities between Tamaulipas and Texas, it was reported that there was minor damage to houses due to the vibrations from the rockets. A team of environmental officials and personnel from the Mexican Navy Secretariat went to collect the waste Conibio collected last weekend, and during the visit, Ibarra recounted, they found a tank approximately 4m long and a stainless steel pipe weighing about 5 kg. Dealing with cleaning up the waste has cost the NGO more than US$26,000 in operating expenses and beach monitoring due to vehicle fuel they use and labourers' wages, as well as cleaning materials, the organisation claims. Ibarra noted that the Mexican government has collaborated with them since they became aware of the situation, especially since it involves a foreign company. He claimed that during one of the visits, they were "harassed" by SpaceX drones that were recording them. SpaceX did not respond to CNN' s request for comment on Ibarra's allegation. CNN has also contacted the Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT) and the government of Tamaulipas for comments on Ibarra's statements. In SpaceX's statement on social media, the company said that the debris is its property and that its recovery attempts have been hindered by individuals who had "trespassed" on private property without authorisation. CNN has asked SpaceX and the government of Tamaulipas about what private property the company is referring to. The government of Tamaulipas has always expressed that it wants a collaborative relationship with SpaceX. Governor Américo Villarreal visited Starbase in November 2024. While the bigger rocket pieces have been removed, Ibarra said the trash remains a major problem at Bagdad Beach. "The debris is still there," Ibarra said. "It's no longer as visible as in the photos because the tides have been burying it, but it's there, and it has to be removed sooner or later." - CNN
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Peer Influence Drives Youth Vaping Epidemic
Young people with friends who vape are 15 times more likely to use e-cigarettes, and more adolescents are turning to illicit cannabis products, University of Queensland research has found. In two separate UQ-led studies, researchers have uncovered vaping trends, including a significant increase in the number of young people who don't know what they're inhaling. In one study, PhD candidate Jack Chung from UQ's National Centre For Youth Substance Use Research examined the types of cannabis compounds that youth aged 11-18 years old were vaping between 2021 and 2023. 'We analysed how many teens were vaping 2 types of cannabis compounds, the first of which is commonly used for its psychoactive 'high' effects, and the 2nd is usually used for medicinal purposes,' Mr Chung said. 'We also studied the use of lab-made synthetic cannabinoids which can be more potent and deadly. 'We saw an increase in all products between 2021 and 2023, but it was concerning to see a rise in synthetic cannabinoids, where vaping doubled in young people aged between 11-15 years. 'Synthetic cannabinoids are particularly dangerous as they can lead to unpredictable health consequences and even death. 'It was also worrying to see more adolescents were unsure about the substances they were vaping – 1.8 per cent of teens in 2021 weren't sure if they had vaped synthetic cannabinoids, increasing to 4.7 per cent in 2023.' Mr Chung's study analysed data from 70,773 middle and high school students in the United States, which was captured in the country's National Youth Tobacco Surveys. In a separate UQ-led vaping study, PhD candidate Giang Vu found peer influences were a major factor in vaping trends, while disapproval of e-cigarettes from people important to teens – such as parents – reduced the likelihood of a teen vaping by about 70 per cent. 'We analysed data from 20,800 American youth between 2015 and 2021 and found while the proportion with friends who smoked declined, having friends who vaped remained concerningly common,' Ms Vu said. 'In 2015, 31.6 per cent of young people had friends who vaped, and while this decreased to 22.3 per cent by 2021, this figure is still high. 'The outbreak of lung disease associated with vaping, and COVID-19 related disruptions to social networks and access most likely contributed to this decline.' Associate Professor Gary Chung Kai Chan, who collaborated on both studies, said social media played a big part in vaping rates among young people. 'In many videos, vaping is portrayed as trendy and a healthier lifestyle choice when compared to cigarette smoking, but this is dangerous messaging,' Dr Chan said. 'We need more regulation on social media, along with targeted policies and campaigns to decrease vaping rates. 'Further research is also needed to help us understand the evolving trends of cannabis vaping and the physical and mental health impacts on youth.' The first paper has been published in American Journal of Preventative Medicine. The second paper has been published in Nicotine & Tobacco Research. Key findings Adolescent cannabis vaping trends: In 2023, it was estimated: 7.4 per cent of US adolescents were vaping a cannabinoid known as THC (which is extracted from the cannabis plant and produces a psychoactive high) 2.9 per cent were vaping cannabidiol known as CBD (also extracted from a cannabis plant and is more often used for medicinal purposes) 1.8 per cent were vaping synthetic cannabinoids (a dangerous lab-made drug that mimics the effects of cannabis) Vaping of all 3 products increased between 2021 and 2023 in teenagers aged 11-18 years old. Vaping rates were higher among females than males. The number of 11-13-year-olds vaping THC and synthetic cannabinoids doubled between 2021 and 2023. Consistent increase in the number of teens who weren't sure what product they had inhaled. Trends in social norms towards cigarette smoking and e-cigarette use: Teens who had friends who vaped were 15 times more likely to use e-cigarettes themselves. Between 2015 and 2021, the probability of having friends who smoked cigarettes decreased from 26.1 per cent to 7.9 per cent. Meanwhile, the probability of having friends who vaped decreased from 31.6 per cent to 22.3 per cent. Between 2015 and 2020, perceived public disapproval increased for both cigarettes (73.3 per cent to 84.2 per cent) and vaping (55.4 per cent to 77.5 per cent). Disapproval of e-cigarettes from people important to teens reduced the likelihood of a teen vaping by about 70 per cent.
