Key takeaways: Documentary names alleged killer of Al Jazeera's Abu Akleh
A new documentary claiming to have uncovered the name of the Israeli soldier responsible for shooting Al Jazeera correspondent Shireen Abu Akleh has been released online.
Abu Akleh, a Palestinian American who had been with Al Jazeera since 1997, was killed while reporting from Jenin in the occupied West Bank in May 2022.
Shortly after her death, Israeli officials and media suggested she had been killed by Palestinian gunfire.
However, subsequent reports from human rights organisations and news agencies showed that the Palestinian fighters initially accused by Israel were some distance from Abu Akleh's killing and, in September, Israel conceded there was a 'high probability' its forces had 'accidentally' killed the correspondent.
Contributors to the documentary, Who Killed Shireen? released on Thursday by Zeteo, suggested that Abu Akleh's killing has helped further embolden a sense of impunity among Israeli soldiers, which has since contributed to the killing of more than 200 journalists by the Israeli military and settlers in the West Bank.
Here are four of the key takeaways from the investigation:
According to numerous testimonies featured in the film, officials within the Biden administration either knew or suspected that Abu Akleh had been shot by an Israeli soldier, but continued to support Israeli claims that she had been killed by Palestinians.
The filmmakers also claim that US officials had been informed by an unnamed Israeli general responsible for the West Bank within hours of Abu Akleh's killing that one of his soldiers had likely shot her.
Despite this, US officials continued to support public Israeli accounts of Abu Akleh's killing that attempted to shift the blame, and then, when Israel publicly admitted the likely culpability of one of its soldiers, that the killing was unintentional.
US officials did not publicly dispute that narrative, and instead said they were unable to determine if a crime had been committed without access to the shooter, which Israel refused to allow.
Speaking to reporter Dion Nissenbaum, one anonymous staffer within the former administration of President Joe Biden said that officials declined to press the Israeli administration on killing one of their citizens for fear of 'anger[ing] the Israeli government'.
This is despite officials having concluded, the same source said, that Abu Akleh's killing had been an intentional act.
Interviewed in the documentary, Eyal Hulata, who was Israel's national security adviser at the time of the killing, defended Israel's decision not to release the suspected soldier for questioning by the United States, saying that Israel had a 'very good and trustworthy investigative mechanism'.
Asked if he could ever remember the subject of the US journalist's murder arising in discussions between President Biden and Naftali Bennett, who was Israeli prime minister at the time, Hulala replies, 'This wasn't a topic between the prime minister and the president.'
Further requests from the Biden administration that Israel change the rules of engagement that some felt had led to Abu Akleh's death met, according to one interviewee, 'the brush off'.
The failure of the Biden administration to hold Israel to account or bring about a change to its rules of engagement after Abu Akleh's murder has, US Senator Chris Van Hollen told filmmakers, contributed towards 'the deaths of … other Americans and other civilians'.
The film reports that, according to soldiers active that day, Abu Akleh was killed by Alon Scagio, a sniper with the Israeli military's elite 'Duvdevan' unit.
Speaking of his response to having killed the journalist, despite her identity as a member of the press being clear, a friend of Scagio says he didn't 'remember anything special' about Abu Akleh's killing, 'so it wasn't, like, an issue. He wasn't happy, like, 'Hey, I killed a journalist,' of course, but he wasn't … eating himself from the inside.'
Investigations by the filmmakers show Scagio was moved out of the Duvdevan to a commander position in a different unit, distancing him from any investigation, as a result, the filmmakers guess, of having killed Abu Akleh.Scagio was later killed in June 2024 by a roadside bomb in Jenin, the same West Bank city in which he is accused of killing Abu Akleh.
As a result of the fallout from Abu Akleh's killing, Scagio's friend claims the Duvdevan unit took to using her image for target practice.
The killing of Abu Akleh came during what at the time was considered an intense phase of Israeli raids on the occupied West Bank. She was one of at least 145 Palestinians killed during the raids in 2022.
But since then, Israel has only ramped up its violence in both the West Bank and Gaza.
Israel has killed more than 52,000 Palestinians since it launched its war on Gaza in October 2023, decimating the territory and refusing the entry of food since March, starving the local population.
And in the West Bank, Israel has increased the severity of its attacks, using heavy weaponry and air strikes, and forcing Palestinians out of their homes. More than 900 Palestinians have been killed there.
Despite that, the US – both under former President Joe Biden and current President Donald Trump – has maintained its support of Israel, even as much of the rest of the world has criticised its actions.
At the United Nations, the US regularly votes alongside Israel, while the majority of member states seek to use the international body to pressure Israel to stop. And the US has threatened the International Criminal Court for seeking to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for committing war crimes.
It is, therefore, perhaps no surprise that, even though Abu Akleh was a journalist doing her job when she was killed and an American citizen, the US has been willing to look the other way.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Video shows Chicago Fire security 'hog tied' fan during match
A Chicago Fire supporter was hog-tied and carried out of his Soldier Field seat on Wednesday during a game against the Philadelphia Union. Video of the incident shows members of local security firm Monterrey Security carrying the fan, Dominic Osmund, from his section after guards were responding to supporters in the area waving Palestinian flags. Osmund told CBS Chicago he was not waving a flag, not that it would make the actions of these guards any less egregious if he were. Another security guard was also seen lunging at, and restraining, a separate fan filming the incident. WARNING: NSFW Language Here's what Osmund says happened, per CBS: "I would imagine it's a matter of kind of the wrong place at the wrong time," [Osmund] said. "They needed somebody. They were worked up. I was there." Osmund said the incident involved fans in front of him who were holding up Palestinian flags. He said security told them to put the flags down, and they complied. He said he had been sitting with his parents watching the game, and at halftime, he went down to join the group with the Palestinian flags and support them and the Palestinian cause. He said he was not there to protest and did not have a flag at any point. "At the end of the 65th minute, towards the end of the game, they came down — and even though nobody was flying them, they started grabbing the flags, and you know, confiscating all of them," Osmund said. "...I said: 'Hey, why are you doing this? We weren't having a problem before. Nobody was doing anything. What was going on? Why are you doing this?' And that was when I was grabbed by one of the security guys kind of coming from behind me. He grabbed me, started immediately trying to handcuff me, and then there were hands on me from all directions, like two or three guys trying to grab me." Osmund said he was never given any verbal warning before security grabbed him. He was was arrested and charged with one count of misdemeanor battery. Block Club Chicago spoke with a season ticket-holder who confirmed Osmund's version of events: Martin Tomszak witnessed Osmund's ejection while with a group of friends he brought to the game. He said one of his friends was assaulted and detained for filming the incident, suffering bruises to his wrists. Tomszak said that at no point did security give a verbal warning about filming. 'Dom is essentially grabbed by four or five Monterey security members, and he's tackled to the point where he is clearly unable to breathe right, and then hog tied and has his head rammed against concrete steps,' Tomszak said. 'When he was in lockup, he didn't know where he was. They let me check up on him, and he was clearly either in shock or concussed. These are detainment protocols that not even CPD uses. Why is a private security firm escalating in this manner?' Tomszak, a season ticket holder, said he's heard from other fans who will skip Saturday's match after seeing the disturbing encounter. On Reddit, supporters who witnessed the event describe a chaotic scene and, frankly depressing aftermath. The Chicago Fire announced they were meeting with Osmund on Friday as they continued to investigate the matter, but a bureaucratic maze will likely slow down any attempt to actually start holding people accountable. The Fire play at Soldier Field, which is owned by the Chicago Park District. That's three entities all involved here. Block Club received a statement from Fire spokesperson Jessica Braverman, who said the organization would meet 'with Soldier Field leadership, who oversees and holds the contract with the stadium security provider". The Park District released a statement that said it asked Soldier Field management company ASM Global to investigate. In the meantime, this is just the latest accusation of extremely aggressive behavior by Monterrey Security, but the politically connected firm endures.
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
G7 agrees to exclude US from corporate minimum tax
The Group of Seven (G7) said Saturday that it will allow American companies to be excluded from a global minimum tax imposed by other countries, creating instead a 'side-by-side' agreement where regular American tax rules would apply. In 2021, nearly 140 countries agreed to tax multinational companies at a minimum rate of 15 percent, regardless of where they were headquartered, in a deal aimed at preventing conglomerates from seeking out tax havens. The Biden administration was then a proponent of the deal, as it was in line with its plans to raise the corporate tax rate. The Friday move by the G7 is nonbinding and still requires approval from the OECD, the intergovernmental organization that established the 2021 agreement. But the G7 members, which include the world's largest economies, dominate the OECD. The G7 statement is a major win for the Trump administration, which has pushed for the United States to be exempted from the tax agreement. The 'big, beautiful bill' now making its way through the Senate initially included a 'revenge tax' that would have imposed a levy of up to 20 percent on investments from countries with economic policies deemed to be unfair to American businesses, a broad definition that could have included the OECD deal. The language was pulled Thursday after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said progress with the G7 had been made, a move celebrated by congressional Republicans. 'We applaud President Trump and his team for protecting the interests of American workers and businesses after years of congressional Republicans sounding the alarm on the Biden Administration's unilateral global tax surrender under Pillar 2,' wrote Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Ind.) and Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), the chairs of each chamber's tax policy committee.
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Rubio condemns Iran's threats against IAEA chief
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has condemned calls in Iran for the arrest and execution of Rafael Mariano Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, following the U.S.'s attack on three of Iran's nuclear sites last week. 'Calls in Iran for the arrest and execution of IAEA Director General Grossi are unacceptable and should be condemned,' Rubio wrote on X Saturday. 'We support the lAEA's critical verification and monitoring efforts in Iran and commend the Director General and the lAEA for their dedication and professionalism. We call on Iran to provide for the safety and security of IAEA personnel.' The extent of threats against Grossi was not immediately clear. Last week, Ali Larijani, a top advisor to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, wrote on X, 'When the war ends, we will settle the score with Grossi' in Arabic. Iran also recently elected to ban the head of the nuclear watchdog and remove agency cameras from its nuclear facilities, claiming that the Israeli government had been able to obtain sensitive data. The IAEA is responsible for monitoring the nuclear program of Iran as well as other countries. Iran previously allowed the agency to access and inspect its nuclear plants as part of the 2015 Obama-era nuclear deal. However, access has become more difficult after President Trump withdrew in 2018, although the IAEA has negotiated with Tehran to continue monitoring. The day before Israel began launching missiles at Iranian nuclear and military sites, the nuclear agency said that Tehran had amassed a worrying quantity of enriched uranium and that the country was in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years. The IAEA has also examined the impact of American airstrikes on the Iranian nuclear sites of Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Grossi said Saturday that the facilities had sustained serious damage, although he was unsure whether the IAEA would have the access needed to establish whether nuclear activity was still proceeding.
