Senate strikes AI provision from GOP bill after uproar from the states
The Senate voted 99-1 to strike the AI provision for the legislation after weeks of criticism from both Republican and Democratic governors and state officials.
Originally proposed as a 10-year ban on states doing anything to regulate AI, lawmakers later tied it to federal funding so that only states that backed off on AI regulations would be able to get subsidies for broadband internet or AI infrastructure.
A last-ditch Republican effort to save the provision would have reduced the time frame to five years and sought to exempt some favored AI laws, such as those protecting children or country music performers from harmful AI tools.
But that effort was abandoned when Sen. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican, teamed up with Democratic Sen. Maria Cantwell of Washington on Monday night to introduce an amendment to strike the entire proposal. Voting on the amendment happened after 4 a.m. Wednesday as part of an overnight session as Republican leaders sought to secure support for the tax cut bill while fending off other proposed amendments, mostly from Democrats trying to defeat the package.
Proponents of an AI moratorium had argued that a patchwork of state and local AI laws is hindering progress in the AI industry and the ability of U.S. firms to compete with China.
Some prominent tech leaders welcomed the idea after Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, who leads the Senate Commerce committee, floated it at a hearing in May.
But state and local lawmakers and AI safety advocates argued that the rule is a gift to an industry that wants to avoid accountability for its products. Led by Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, a majority of GOP governors sent a letter to Congress opposing it.
Also appealing to lawmakers to strike the provision was a group of parents of children who have died as a result of online harms.
—-
O'Brien reported from Providence, Rhode Island.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada News.Net
37 minutes ago
- Canada News.Net
Trump administration escalates feud with judges on immigration policy
WASHINGTON, D.C.: In a striking escalation of tensions between the executive and judicial branches, the Trump administration has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland and all 15 of its federal judges, challenging a recent order that temporarily blocks migrant deportations in the state. The lawsuit, filed late June 24 by the Justice Department in a Baltimore federal court, targets a standing court order issued last month that imposes an automatic two-business-day delay on deporting any migrant in Maryland who files a new habeas corpus petition challenging their detention. The Justice Department argues that the order exceeds judicial authority and violates Supreme Court precedent on injunctions. It contends that under the Immigration and Nationality Act, federal courts are barred from interfering with active deportation proceedings. Calling the Maryland court's action an "egregious example of judicial overreach," the administration is seeking a ruling to invalidate the order and an injunction to prevent its enforcement. The lawsuit also requests that all Maryland judges recuse themselves and ask that a judge from another jurisdiction handle the case instead. A representative for the Maryland court declined to comment. Chief U.S. District Judge George Russell, an appointee of a Democratic president, signed the court's order. It cited a "recent influx of habeas petitions" involving detained migrants at risk of imminent removal. It noted that many of these filings occurred during evenings, weekends, or holidays, resulting in rushed hearings where judges struggled to get clear information on detainees' locations and legal status. The two-day pause was intended to give judges time to review such cases before deportations proceeded—an effort at judicial due process amid the Trump administration's aggressive immigration enforcement. The issue gained national attention after the 2023 deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national who had lived in Maryland with his American wife and child. Though an immigration judge ruled in 2019 that Abrego should not be deported due to the risk of gang violence, he was nonetheless removed in March of this year. He was returned to the U.S. on June 6, after a Maryland court ordered his return. That only happened, however, after the Justice Department filed criminal charges against him for migrant smuggling—a charge he has denied. He is now awaiting a court ruling in Tennessee on the conditions of his release. The Justice Department's lawsuit frames the Maryland court's order as part of a broader pattern of judicial resistance to the president's immigration policies. "Every unlawful order entered by the district courts robs the Executive Branch of its most scarce resource: time to put its policies into effect," the lawsuit stated. "In the process, such orders diminish the votes of the citizens who elected the head of the Executive Branch." While the Maryland judges have not responded publicly, the legal battle could have major implications for how courts nationwide handle emergency immigration filings and how far the executive branch is willing to go to counter them.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
The Latest: The House returns in a rush to pass Trump's bill
Republican leaders in the House are sprinting toward a Wednesday vote on President Donald Trump's tax and spending cuts package, determined to seize momentum from a hard-fought vote in the Senate while essentially daring members to defy their party's leader and vote against it. It's a risky gambit designed to meet Trump's demand for a July 4 finish. Here's the latest: Paramount to pay $16 million in settlement with Trump over '60 Minutes' interview In a case seen as a challenge to free speech, Paramount has agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit filed by President Trump over the editing of CBS' ' 60 Minutes' interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris in October. Paramount told media outlets the money will go to Trump's future presidential library, not to the president himself. It said the settlement did not involve an apology. Trump's lawyer said the president had suffered 'mental anguish' over the editing of the interview by CBS News, while Paramount and CBS rejected his contention that it was edited to enhance how Harris sounded. They had sought to get Trump's lawsuit dismissed. There was no immediate word from the White House about the settlement of the case, which Trump filed in Amarillo, Texas. Trump urges House Republicans to vote for his tax and spending cuts package The encouragement comes as the Republican-controlled House sprints toward a vote Wednesday on the bill after it cleared the Senate by the narrowest of margins a day earlier. Vice President JD Vance, in his role as Senate president, cast the tie-breaking vote on the measure. Some House GOP members have voiced reservations about the bill. House Democrats are united in their opposition to the legislation. 'Republicans, don't let the Radical Left Democrats push you around. We've got all the cards, and we are going to use them,' Trump said in a post on his social media site.
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
U.S. stops some arms shipments to Ukraine as Kyiv expresses disappointment
Ukraine is forging ahead with embryonic plans for joint weapons production with some of its international allies, top officials said, while the U.S. announced it was halting some arms shipments promised to help Ukraine fight off Russia. Those plans come at what appears to be a key point in the all-out war launched by Moscow nearly three-and-a-half years ago. A renewed Russian push to capture more Ukrainian land has put Ukraine's short-handed defenses under severe strain, and Russian missiles and drones are battering Ukrainian cities. U.S.-led diplomatic efforts to find a peace settlement, meanwhile, have stalled. As Washington has distanced itself under U.S. President Donald Trump from Ukraine's war efforts, a bigger onus has fallen on European countries to pressure Russia. French President Emmanuel Macron and Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday held their first direct telephone call in almost three years. Macron's office said that during their two-hour conversation, the French leader underlined France's 'unwavering support for Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity' and called for a ceasefire. Story continues below advertisement Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that officials are preparing with a sense of urgency for upcoming meetings with European Union countries and other partners to talk about cooperation in weapons manufacturing. 'One of the key topics will be weapons production – our joint investments, joint projects,' Zelenskyy said in his daily address on Tuesday evening. Defense Minister Rustem Umerov announced that draft legislation on joint weapons production with international allies is expected to be put to a vote in the Ukrainian parliament later this month. The proposed laws were shown to national defense companies on Tuesday, Umerov said. 1:46 Trump says Putin 'has to end' Russia-Ukraine war The program includes plans to create a special legal and tax framework to help Ukrainian defense manufacturers scale up and modernize production, including building new facilities at home and abroad, according to Umerov. Story continues below advertisement Earlier this week, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said during a visit to Kyiv that Germany aims to help Ukraine manufacture more weapons more quickly. He was accompanied on the trip by German defense industry representatives. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The U.S. is halting some weapons deliveries to Ukraine out of concern that its own stockpiles have declined too far, officials said Tuesday. Certain munitions were longer-term commitments promised to Ukraine under the Biden administration, though the Defense Department didn't provide details on what specific weapons were being held back. Ukraine's Foreign Ministry summoned the U.S. chargé d'affaires, John Hinkel, on Wednesday to discuss ongoing defense cooperation. Deputy Foreign Minister Maryana Betsa thanked the U.S. for its continued support, but emphasized the 'critical importance' of maintaining previously allocated defense packages, especially for bolstering Ukraine's air defense. Fedir Venislavskyi, a member of the Ukrainian parliament's national security and defense committee, called the decision to halt the shipments 'very unpleasant for us.' 'It's painful, and against the background of the terrorist attacks which Russia commits against Ukraine, it's a very unpleasant situation,' he told reporters in Kyiv. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that the Pentagon's decision will help bring a settlement closer, because 'the fewer weapons supplied to Ukraine, the closer the end of the (war) is.' Story continues below advertisement 3:02 Putin says 'the whole of Ukraine is ours' in theory, may take city of Sumy The United States has been Ukraine's biggest military backer since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of its neighbor on Feb. 24, 2022. Under Trump, there have been no new announcements of U.S. military or weapons aid to Ukraine. Between March and April, the United States allocated no new aid to Ukraine, according to Germany's Kiel Institute, which tracks such support. For the first time since June 2022, European countries surpassed the U.S. in total military aid, totaling 72 billion euros ($85 billion) compared with 65 billion euros ($77 billion) from the U.S., the institute said last month. Washington's latest decision could remove some of the most formidable weapons in Ukraine's battlefield arsenal. Analysts say Ukraine's European allies can fill some of the gaps and provide artillery systems. But they don't possess alternatives to the U.S.-made HIMARS missiles and air defense systems, especially Patriots, which are crucial to help defend Ukrainian cities from Russian air attacks. Story continues below advertisement It's not clear how much weaponry Ukraine possesses or what its most urgent needs are.
