Supreme Court administration asks Centre to take back CJI bungalow allotted to Justice Chandrachud, he says ‘only a matter of a few days'
In a July 1 letter to the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, the Supreme Court administration pointed out that the time allowed for the former CJI to vacate the official accommodation had already expired.
Rule 3B of the Supreme Court Judges Rules, 2022, allows retired CJIs to retain their bungalow for up to six months after retirement. Currently, 5, Krishna Menon Marg, is designated as the official residence of the CJI.
Justice Chandrachud, who retired as CJI in November 2024, wrote to his successor Justice Sanjiv Khanna on December 18, 2024, seeking time until April 30, 2025, to vacate the place, and this was allowed.
On April 28, Justice Chandrachud wrote again to then CJI Khanna, seeking time until June 30, citing difficulty in finding a suitable accommodation that would also cater to the needs of his two daughters with special needs.
Reached for comments, Justice Chandrachud said he received no reply to that communication dated April 28. He added that he had a telephonic conversation with the incumbent CJI B R Gavai as well, and informed him that the government had allotted him an accommodation on rent. Due to some repairs that had to be carried out, the contractor had promised to hand it over by June 30, he said.
'It's now only a matter of a few days and we are waiting for the ok word from the contractor. Maybe some work remained and that's why the delay,' he said.
Justice Chandrachud said the accommodation allotted to him was in a state of disuse for almost two years, and that is why repairs have to be carried out. He said the 'grant of extension (to judges to stay in their official accommodation) is not an exceptional thing'.
He pointed out that he was earlier staying at 14, Tughlaq Road residence, which is a transit accommodation for judges and had decided against moving out from there even after becoming CJI as the family liked the place.
'But a few months after becoming CJI, I realised that the place is too small for official work. Even then, I moved into 5, Krishna Menon Marg, only one year after becoming the CJI,' Justice Chandrachud said.
He added that when he became a judge of the Supreme Court, he was staying in the Uttar Pradesh Sadan for almost six months before he was allotted a bungalow.
Supreme Court sources, meanwhile, said that with the court functioning with 33 judges, there is always a demand for accommodation for the judges.
The sources added that the Supreme Court administration is awaiting a response to the letter sent on July 1.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Karnataka must win over Tamil Nadu to unlock Mekedatu dam project, say experts
Bengaluru: Experts believe the impasse over the Mekedatu balancing reservoir project would not be permanent if Karnataka changes its approach from confrontation to collaboration. Planned at the confluence of Cauvery and Arkavathi rivers in Bengaluru South district, the Rs 9,000-crore project aims to store 48tmcft of water, supply 4.7tmcft for Bengaluru's drinking needs, and generate 400Mw of hydropower. Karnataka claims the project will help regulate water flow, prevent droughts and floods, and recharge groundwater. Despite political unity within Karnataka, the project has failed to move forward due to Tamil Nadu's opposition and pending approvals from central agencies. Tamil Nadu fears the dam will reduce its share of Cauvery water. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru A 2018 Supreme Court verdict on the Cauvery water-sharing issue did not prohibit Karnataka from building a dam at Mekedatu, but it said any such project must be cleared by Cauvery Water Management Authority (CWMA), which is bound to consider Tamil Nadu's objections. Although both states are now partners of the INDIA bloc, the dispute remains. For Karnataka, which is battling erratic rainfall and mounting demand in Bengaluru, shelving the project is not an option. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo The state assembly has repeatedly passed unanimous resolutions demanding early clearance, escalating tensions with Tamil Nadu. Deputy chief minister DK Shivakumar, who led a 168-km padyatra in 2023 ahead of the assembly polls in support of the project, has been less vocal in recent months. He continues to express commitment but blames the Centre for not facilitating inter-state talks or granting approvals. Experts say Karnataka must reposition the project as a cooperative effort. "This is a project that can move forward but only if Karnataka stops presenting it as a unilateral exercise," said Dr Roopesh Kumar, a retired professor and water policy expert. "It should bring Tamil Nadu into the process. There is room for negotiation under the Cauvery tribunal framework if Karnataka can prove that the project won't affect flows to Tamil Nadu. " Political analyst Vishwas Shetty believes Karnataka's unity on the project offers leverage. "This is a rare issue where all Karnataka parties agree. The state can use that consensus to build pressure on the Centre," he said. "But Karnataka must first assure Tamil Nadu through diplomatic and technical channels that its water share won't be compromised." JD(S) state chief and Union minister HD Kumaraswamy also urged a direct dialogue between states. "The Congress govt in Karnataka should convince the DMK govt in Tamil Nadu to clear the project. I will then get clearance from Prime Minister Narendra Modi in five minutes," he said. Tamil Nadu had passed resolutions opposing the project, citing the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956, and moved the Supreme Court. "Any construction across the Cauvery by Karnataka will violate both tribunal and court orders," a senior Tamil Nadu official said. Karnataka maintains Mekedatu is a non-irrigation project and does not threaten Tamil Nadu's allocation of 404tmcft under the tribunal's final award and the apex court's revised 2018 order. Karnataka's allocation is 284tmcft. A Central Water Commission official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Karnataka must back its case with data. "Karnataka needs to submit a fresh, detailed project report with real-time data on flow, storage, and release mechanisms. If the DPR is watertight and shows that regulated releases will ensure Tamil Nadu's share, the Centre and CWMA may find it difficult to reject." A senior Jal Shakti ministry official said CWMA could mediate too. "CWMA's role isn't only to monitor releases; it can facilitate coordinated efforts to manage water resources. If both states are willing to discuss safeguards, a resolution is not impossible."
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Govt to hold mega recruitment drive, says CM Fadnavis
The Maharashtra government is gearing up to launch a mega recruitment drive across various departments, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis informed the state Legislative Assembly on Monday. 'This mega bharti (mega recruitment) will be initiated once a clear picture of the vacant posts emerges following a 150-day target programme assigned to all departments,' he said. Responding to a 'calling-attention notice' raised by MLA Bhimrao Keram regarding vacant posts in the Scheduled Tribes (ST) category, Fadnavis said, 'We had earlier announced the recruitment of 75,000 posts. So far, over one lakh positions have been filled. The government will not hold back when it comes to recruitment.' The CM outlined key goals under the 150-day programme — restructuring departmental frameworks, updating recruitment rules, ensuring 100% compassionate appointments, and identifying clear vacancies. Based on these, a mega recruitment will be planned, he said. Fadnavis also revealed that as many as 6,860 posts reserved for Scheduled Tribes are currently held by individuals who have not submitted valid caste certificates, even after serving for 20 years or more. 'In a humanitarian approach, the government has treated these posts as supernumerary, meaning these employees will continue in their positions but will not be eligible for promotions. After they retire, these posts will be considered vacant and can be filled as per reservation norms,' he said. Out of these, 1,343 posts have already been filled with eligible ST candidates, and the process is underway to fill the rest. The government is also working to simplify and digitise the caste verification process using blockchain-based systems, aiming to bring speed and transparency. In a related development, Fadnavis announced that the Supreme Court has lifted the stay on inheriting sanitation jobs. Recruitment for such posts will now proceed based on the recommendations of the Lad–Page Committee. 'Recruitment for ST-reserved posts in the Public Works Department will also be taken up shortly. A special secretarial task force will be constituted to expedite and streamline the caste certificate verification process,' the CM added.
India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
Ex-chief justices back simultaneous polls, flag poll body's broad powers in bill
Former Chief Justices of India have supported the constitutionality of the 'one nation, one election' concept but raised concerns about the provisions of the proposed bill, particularly the wide powers granted to the Election Commission of India (ECI). Their views were conveyed to a parliamentary committee examining the bill on simultaneous a written opinion submitted to the Joint Committee of Parliament, former Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud dismissed the opposition's contention that synchronising Lok Sabha and state assembly elections violates the Constitution's basic argument that staggered elections are a part of the Constitution's basic structure (or form part of the principles of federalism or democracy) does not hold. Staggered timing of elections cannot be considered as a feature of the original Constitution, let alone an immutable feature,' he said. Chandrachud, however, expressed reservations over the 'sweeping powers' the bill seeks to grant the Election Commission. He warned that such 'unbounded authority' could allow the poll body to extend or curtail the tenure of a state assembly beyond the constitutionally mandated five years under the pretext of aligning elections with the Lok Sabha. 'The Constitution must define, delineate and structure the circumstances under which the ECI may invoke this power,' he Chief Justices Ranjan Gogoi and J S Kehar are scheduled to appear before the committee on July 11 for discussions with members over the bill's provisions. Gogoi had earlier appeared before the committee in March and shared concerns about excessive powers being given to the Chief Justice U U Lalit had appeared in February and advised that simultaneous polls be introduced in a phased manner. He warned that cutting short the terms of state assemblies with significant tenure left for synchronisation could invite legal their concerns, all three former Chief Justices agreed that the idea of simultaneous elections does not breach the Constitution. Chandrachud said, 'Simultaneous elections will not infringe upon the voters' right to elect their representatives and that the bill ensures that electors remain continuously represented by their duly elected MPs or MLAs.' He further criticised arguments against the bill as being based on the belief that 'the Indian electorate is naive and can be easily manipulated.'Chandrachud also cautioned that simultaneous elections could marginalise regional and smaller parties due to the influence of better-funded national parties. 'To ensure a level playing field among political parties, the rules governing electoral campaigning, particularly those relating to campaign finance, must be strengthened,' he pointed out that while individual candidates face spending limits under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, there are no caps on party the bill's proposal that houses elected through midterm polls will only serve the remainder of the original five-year term, Chandrachud flagged concerns about the effectiveness of such short-term governments. He said their ability to implement meaningful projects would be constrained, as the Model Code of Conduct would apply six months before the next members of the parliamentary panel have echoed this concern, questioning the capacity of short-tenure governments to deliver on policy and governance.- EndsMust Watch IN THIS STORY#One Nation One Election
