Supreme Court administration asks Centre to take back CJI bungalow allotted to Justice Chandrachud, he says ‘only a matter of a few days'
In a July 1 letter to the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, the Supreme Court administration pointed out that the time allowed for the former CJI to vacate the official accommodation had already expired.
Rule 3B of the Supreme Court Judges Rules, 2022, allows retired CJIs to retain their bungalow for up to six months after retirement. Currently, 5, Krishna Menon Marg, is designated as the official residence of the CJI.
Justice Chandrachud, who retired as CJI in November 2024, wrote to his successor Justice Sanjiv Khanna on December 18, 2024, seeking time until April 30, 2025, to vacate the place, and this was allowed.
On April 28, Justice Chandrachud wrote again to then CJI Khanna, seeking time until June 30, citing difficulty in finding a suitable accommodation that would also cater to the needs of his two daughters with special needs.
Reached for comments, Justice Chandrachud said he received no reply to that communication dated April 28. He added that he had a telephonic conversation with the incumbent CJI B R Gavai as well, and informed him that the government had allotted him an accommodation on rent. Due to some repairs that had to be carried out, the contractor had promised to hand it over by June 30, he said.
'It's now only a matter of a few days and we are waiting for the ok word from the contractor. Maybe some work remained and that's why the delay,' he said.
Justice Chandrachud said the accommodation allotted to him was in a state of disuse for almost two years, and that is why repairs have to be carried out. He said the 'grant of extension (to judges to stay in their official accommodation) is not an exceptional thing'.
He pointed out that he was earlier staying at 14, Tughlaq Road residence, which is a transit accommodation for judges and had decided against moving out from there even after becoming CJI as the family liked the place.
'But a few months after becoming CJI, I realised that the place is too small for official work. Even then, I moved into 5, Krishna Menon Marg, only one year after becoming the CJI,' Justice Chandrachud said.
He added that when he became a judge of the Supreme Court, he was staying in the Uttar Pradesh Sadan for almost six months before he was allotted a bungalow.
Supreme Court sources, meanwhile, said that with the court functioning with 33 judges, there is always a demand for accommodation for the judges.
The sources added that the Supreme Court administration is awaiting a response to the letter sent on July 1.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Vice President warns of 'Ides of March' for judiciary after cash found at judge's residence
Kochi, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar on Monday said he hopes a criminal investigation will be launched into the large stash of cash found at a judge's official residence in New Delhi, comparing the incident to the "Ides of March" a reference to Shakespeare's Julius Caesar and a symbol of looming misfortune. Vice President warns of 'Ides of March' for judiciary after cash found at judge's residence Referring to the incident, he said now the point is, if that cash was found, the system should have moved immediately and the first process would have been to deal with it as a criminal act, find out those who are culpable and bring them to justice. While interacting with the students and faculty members at the National University of Advanced Legal Studies , the Vice President likened the cash discovered at the High Court judge's residence to the "Ides of March." He said the judiciary faced its own "Ides of March" on the night of March 14–15, when large amounts of cash were officially acknowledged to have been found, yet no FIR was filed. Dhankhar stressed that the system should have treated it as a criminal matter from the start, but added that the Centre is currently constrained by a Supreme Court ruling from the early 1990s. "But so far, there has been no FIR. The government at the central level is handicapped because an FIR cannot be registered in view of a judgment of the Supreme Court rendered in early 90s," he said. His statement comes amidst reports that Justice Yashwant Varma was facing an impeachment in Parliament after an unspecified amount of money was found in his official residence following a fire. Justice Varma has denied all allegations and submitted responses to both the Delhi High Court Chief Justice and a Supreme Court-appointed panel. Despite this, judicial work was withdrawn from him, and he was later transferred to the Allahabad High Court, where the Chief Justice was directed by the apex court not to assign him any judicial duties for the time being. The panel investigating the incident has recorded statements from over 50 people, including Delhi Police Commissioner Sanjay Arora and Delhi Fire Service chief Atul Garg, who were among the first responders. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hans India
22 minutes ago
- Hans India
Bihar voter list revision: Lalu Prasad, Tejashwi say conspiracy to snatch rights
Patna: Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) national president Lalu Prasad Yadav on Monday launched a sharp attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah over the ongoing voter list verification process in Bihar. Taking to social media platform X, Lalu Prasad wrote, 'Two Gujaratis are trying to snatch the right to vote of 8 crore Biharis. These two Gujaratis hate Bihar, the Constitution, and democracy. Wake up and raise your voice! Save democracy and the Constitution.' The voter list revision exercise ahead of the Bihar Assembly elections has triggered a major political storm, with the opposition accusing the Centre, the Bihar government, and the Election Commission of hatching a conspiracy to delete the names of crores of voters to manipulate the elections. Leader of Opposition Tejashwi Yadav also took to X, calling the exercise a 'deep conspiracy' to disenfranchise voters in Bihar. 'A deep conspiracy of the vote ban in Bihar. The game of cutting the votes of Dalits, OBCs, and minorities and adding fake votes has started. This is the deepest conspiracy to implement the vote bandi in Bihar,' Tejashwi wrote. He further alleged that 'Modi-Nitish are working through the Election Commission, determined to crush the Constitution and democracy and snatch your right to vote. These people are now upset after seeing their direct defeat. When the vote of the voter is abolished, then what is the use of democracy and the Constitution?' The issue has now reached the Supreme Court, with several petitions filed against the voter list revision, calling it unconstitutional and anti-people, and demanding immediate intervention to prevent the alleged removal of lakhs of names from the voter list. On Monday, senior advocate Kapil Sibal mentioned the matter before the Supreme Court, seeking an urgent hearing. The apex court has agreed to hear the case on Thursday, July 10.
Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
SC to hear pleas against EC's special voter roll revision in Bihar on Thursday
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a batch of petitions challenging the Election Commission of Indias decision to carry out a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. The move has sparked widespread concern in the poll-bound state. A Bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Joymalya Bagchi will take up the matter on Thursday (July 10). The petitions argue that the timing and methodology of the SIR could disenfranchise lakhs of eligible voters and undermine the fairness of the upcoming elections. On June 24, the Election Commission issued instructions to begin a special revision exercise in Bihar to identify and remove ineligible voters and to ensure that only eligible citizens remain on the rolls. However, the petitioners have raised concerns about the voter verification process. They claim that requiring specific documents, while excluding Aadhaar and ration cards, could lead to mass disenfranchisement. Migrant workers, marginalized communities, and long-time voters without ready access to the required paperwork may be disproportionately affected. The Election Commission has defended its decision, stating that the SIR is a routine part of maintaining accurate electoral rolls. It cited factors such as rising urbanisation, migration, and demographic shifts as reasons for the revision. The Commission has also clarified that affected voters can submit claims and objections during a designated window. The Supreme Courts decision to examine the issue comes at a crucial moment as Bihar prepares for elections. Accuracy of voter rolls is expected to be a politically sensitive issue in the months ahead.
