logo
‘We are all terrified': Mass General Brigham to lose millions in medical research grants under Trump cuts

‘We are all terrified': Mass General Brigham to lose millions in medical research grants under Trump cuts

Boston Globe01-04-2025
The latest cuts will affect research programs awarded at least $70 million at MGB hospitals' labs over multiple years, with most of that money already paid but at least $18 million still untapped, a federal
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Related
:
Advertisement
Far more devastating cuts could loom. On Monday, the Trump administration
Advertisement
While research-funding agencies offered only vague reasons for the cuts, some terminated studies focused on the COVID pandemic or on LGBTQ or transgender health issues, subjects of partisan rancor in the Trump era. It also wasn't clear whether grant applications are being penalized for stating how they will include women and minorities in their programs, information required by a law passed
'We've been hit by a wave,' said Dr. Duane Wesemann, an associate professor at Harvard Medical School and associate physician at Brigham and Women's, who got word last week that the NIH canceled funds for the last two years of a five-year, $10 million flagship program he headed on pandemic readiness. 'The impact is devastating.'
A spokesperson for NIH released a statement Monday saying the agency 'is taking action to terminate research funding that is not aligned with NIH and [Department of Health and Human Services] priorities.'
The statement didn't address how NIH decided to terminate programs. 'We remain dedicated to restoring our agency to its tradition of upholding gold-standard, evidence-based science,' it said.
Related
:
Researchers at some MGB labs fear the cuts have only begun.
'We are all terrified,' said Dr. Bruce Fischl, professor of radiology at Harvard Medical School who
Millions of more dollars have been cut from funding at other Massachusetts research universities and hospitals, including the University of Massachusetts' Chan Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Boston Medical Center. Many of those research labs are appealing the NIH funding cuts, but in the meantime, their money has stopped coming in.
Advertisement
Boston Children's has had five grants terminated, totaling $11.3 million. One was for a program studying how the COVID pandemic affected mental health among LGBTQ people. In its termination note, NIH said the award 'no longer effectuates the program goals or agency priorities.'
'I was shocked and devastated,' said Ariel Beccia, principal investigator on the mental health study and an instructor at the LGBTQ Health Center of Excellence at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 'If this continues, we are going to lose a generation of scientists.'
"If this continues, we are going to lose a generation of scientists," said Ariel Beccia, an instructor at the LGBTQ Health Center of Excellence at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health who has had her NIH funding terminated.
Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff
Wesemann's lab was exploring the viability of a vaccine that could fight all coronaviruses, not just COVID-19. At another Brigham and Women's lab run by principal investigator Dr. Abraam Yakoub, the team was studying the root causes of 'long COVID,' including neurological problems lasting long after the infection appears to pass. Both labs received letters from NIH saying their funding was no longer needed because 'the [COVID] pandemic is over.'
In an appeal, Wesemann argued that his research was meant to study the immune system to develop a vaccine that could protect people against a future coronavirus pandemic, not specifically for COVID.
'COVID won't be the last coronavirus to go into humans,' he said. 'There's a continued worry about other coronaviruses and other viruses that will jump into humans and cause havoc. I said, 'The whole point of this research is that the questions have not been answered.''
Related
:
Yakoub, assistant professor at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's, took issue with the NIH assertion that the pandemic is over, noting that COVID
Advertisement
'To us, as scientists who have dedicated their lifetime to research, each of these research projects is like our very own babies,' he said. 'Each big discovery we make is five or more years of our lifetime. This is my life's mission and what I live for — to understand why disease happens and/or find ways to treat it.'
For the past century, money from agencies such as the NIH and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been the lifeblood of medical research, bankrolling the basic discoveries that underpin lifesaving therapies such as vaccines and cancer drugs.
Related
:
While funding levels have ebbed and flowed in the past, the Trump administration cuts are 'entirely unprecedented and vicious beyond any precedent,' said Don Berwick, the former administrator of the
Berwick said Massachusetts labs are being disproportionately hurt because the state has 'been not just a national, but an international leader in biomedical research for decades.'
The full impact of the cuts on Mass General Brigham, which drew more than $655 million in NIH funding at Mass. General and more than $388 million at Brigham and Women's last year, wasn't clear.
In a recent federal document, NIH only listed as terminated about seven grants to the hospitals, though researchers say there are far more canceled
awards not yet reflected on the document. Most are for multiyear research programs in which some or most of the funding was already paid. Some were in collaboration with other hospitals that drew part of the funding.
Advertisement
Ellie Dehoney, senior vice president of policy and advocacy at the nonpartisan alliance
'Those are the last grants you want to see terminated,' she said. 'That is throwing good money away. That's not something anyone wants to see.'
Data from outside researchers tracking funding cuts nationally suggest their economic impact is already being felt. Federal cuts have
Related
:
NIH grant cuts have come in waves since late February and appear to be broadening with each passing week. Initially, they were focused on projects related to the health of transgender and LGBTQ people. More recently, NIH is canceling scores of studies related to COVID-19.
Alan Sager, a Boston University professor of health law, policy, and management, said he has been surprised by the 'lack of public uproar' over the NIH rollbacks. The cuts 'don't appear to be backed by an overriding goal,' he said. 'It feels like policy by muscle spasm.'
Robert Weisman can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CDC bars expert groups from advising on vaccines
CDC bars expert groups from advising on vaccines

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

CDC bars expert groups from advising on vaccines

Click in for more news from The Hill{beacon} Health Care Health Care The Big Story CDC bars expert groups from advising on vaccines The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) told some expert groups that they will no longer be able to help review scientific data used to issue vaccine recommendations. © APSome members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice's (ACIP) working groups, including physician groups and infectious disease specialists, were sent e-mails late Thursday notifying them that they will no longer serve on the subcommittees. The groups were removed from the subcommittees because they were deemed biased by the Trump administration, according to a copy of the email shared with The Hill. "By definition, Liason organizations are special interest groups and therefore are expected to have a 'bias' based on their constituency/and or population that they represent," the email reads. "It is important that the ACIP Workgroup activities remain free of influence from any special interest groups so ACIP workgroups will no longer include Liason organizations." Eight of the advisory groups released a joint statement Friday saying they are 'deeply disappointed' that they are now barred from informing the development of vaccine recommendations. 'For decades liaisons from our organizations have reviewed published and unpublished data and literature related to vaccine efficacy, effectiveness, and safety and provided unbiased input for ACIP's consideration,' the statement reads. 'To remove our deep medical expertise from this vital and once transparent process is irresponsible, dangerous to our nation's health, and will further undermine public and clinician trust in vaccines.' The groups, which include the American Medical Association, as well as the Infectious Diseases Society of America, called on the Trump administration to reconsider their exclusion from the vaccine review process. A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which oversees the CDC, said that experts will continue to be included in the review process based on 'relevant experience and expertise." 'Under the old ACIP, outside pressure to align with vaccine orthodoxy limited asking the hard questions,' the spokesperson wrote. 'The old ACIP members were plagued by conflicts of interest, influence and bias.' The notice is the latest move from the Trump administration to shake up the nation's vaccine policy and is another major change to the CDC's advisory panel on vaccines. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr abruptly fired all 17 sitting members of ACIP in early June, accusing them of having conflicts of interest and rubber-stamping decisions related to the COVID-19 vaccine. He then replaced the panel with eight hand-picked appointees, including some vaccine skeptics. Welcome to The Hill's Health Care newsletter, we're Nathaniel Weixel, Alejandra O'Connell-Domenech — every week we follow the latest moves on how Washington impacts your health. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will be impacting the health care sector this week and beyond: Most adults do not plan on getting COVID-19 shot amid vaccine policy changesMore than half of American adults — 59 percent — say they do not expect to get the COVID-19 booster shot this autumn, according to new poll findings from health care policy group KFF. Poll results show 23 percent of U.S. adult respondents said they will 'probably not' get the vaccine, while 37 percent said they will 'definitely not' get the shot. Americans who said they will 'probably' or 'definitely' not get the shot were … Full Story Blue states challenge Trump's restrictions on gender-affirming care More than a dozen Democratic attorneys general announced a lawsuit challenging recent moves by President Trump's administration to severely restrict access to gender-affirming health care for anyone under 19, including in states where treatment is legal and protected by law. Full Story Fired vaccine board members warn of fallout from RFK Jr. policiesRecently removed members of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccine advisory panel warn that Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s move to replace them shows he is 'abandoning' rigorous scientific review and open deliberation. Kennedy fired all 17 sitting members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) in early June, accusing members of having conflicts of … Full Story In Other News Branch out with a different read: Number of Texans receiving out-of-state abortions quadrupled between 2021 and 2023 AUSTIN (KXAN) — Texans who sought an abortion out of state more than quadrupled between 2021 and 2023 after a state law went into effect that bans the procedure in almost all cases. Data from the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) shows at least 7,844 Texas residents received an abortion in a different state in 2023, up from 4,718 in 2022 and 1,712 in 2021. Still the total number of abortions for Texas residents … Full Story Around the Nation Local and state headlines on health care:More than 2,000 DACA recipients in California to lose health insurance (the San Francisco Chronicle) Some rural Texas seen THC as a lifeline for their health and economy (The Texas Tribune) Illinois becomes first state to require mental health screenings for students (ABC) What We're Reading Health news we've flagged from other outlets: Medicare, Medicaid plans to experiment with covering weight loss drugs (The Washington Post) Wildfire smoke and unhealthy air fill the Midwest before spreading to the East (The Washington Post) Remember running a mile in school? The Presidential Fitness Test is coming back (NPR) You're all caught up. See you next week! Close Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here The latest in politics and policy. Direct to your inbox. Sign up for the Health Care newsletter Subscribe

Most Americans Won't Get COVID-19 Booster This Fall, Survey Says
Most Americans Won't Get COVID-19 Booster This Fall, Survey Says

Epoch Times

timean hour ago

  • Epoch Times

Most Americans Won't Get COVID-19 Booster This Fall, Survey Says

A majority of Americans said they will likely not receive a COVID-19 booster vaccine this fall, according to a poll released Friday. A survey from the health care organization KFF found that 59 percent of respondents said they either will not or likely will not receive the booster dose. Around 37 percent said they would 'definitely not' receive the shot, while 23 percent said they would 'probably not get' the shot.

States sue Trump, saying he is intimidating hospitals over gender-affirming care for youth
States sue Trump, saying he is intimidating hospitals over gender-affirming care for youth

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

States sue Trump, saying he is intimidating hospitals over gender-affirming care for youth

Seventeen Democratic officials accused President Donald Trump's administration of unlawfully intimidating health care providers into stopping gender-affirming care for transgender youth in a lawsuit filed Friday. The complaint comes after a month in which at least eight major hospitals and hospital systems — all in states where the care is allowed under state law — announced they were stopping or restricting the care . The latest announcement came Thursday from UI Health in Chicago. Trump's administration announced in July that it was sending subpoenas to providers and focusing on investigating them for fraud. It later boasted in a news release that hospitals are halting treatments. The Democratic officials say Trump's policies are an attempt to impose a nationwide ban on the treatment for people under 19 — and that's unlawful because there's no federal statute that bans providing the care to minors. The suit was filed by attorneys general from 15 states and the District of Columbia, plus the governor of Pennsylvania, in U.S. District Court in Boston. 'The federal government is running a cruel and targeted harassment campaign against providers who offer lawful, lifesaving care to children,' New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement. Trump and others who oppose the care say that it makes permanent changes that people who receive it could come to regret — and maintain that it's being driven by questionable science. Since 2021, 28 states with Republican-controlled legislatures have adopted policies to ban or restrict gender-affirming care for minors. In June, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states have a right to enforce those laws . For families with transgender children, the state laws and medical center policy changes have sparked urgent scrambles for treatment. The medical centers are responding to political and legal pressure The Center for Transyouth Health and Development at Children's Hospital Los Angeles, the biggest public provider of gender-affirming care for children in teens in the U.S., closed in July. At least seven other major hospitals and health systems have made similar announcements, including Children's National in Washington D.C., UChicago Medicine and Yale New Haven Health. Kaiser Permanente, which operates in California and several other states, said it would pause gender-affirming surgeries for those under 19 as of the end of August, but would continue hormone therapy. Connecticut Children's Medical Center cited 'an increasingly complex and evolving landscape' for winding down care. Other hospitals, including Penn State, had already made similar decisions since Trump returned to office in January. Alex Sheldon, executive director of GLMA, an organization that advocates for health care equity for LGBTQ+ people, said the health systems have pulled back the services for legal reasons, not medical ones. 'Not once has a hospital said they are ending care because it is not medically sound,' Sheldon said. Trump's administration has targeted the care in multiple ways Trump devoted a lot of attention to transgender people in his campaign last year as part of a growing pushback from conservatives as transgender people have gained visibility and acceptance on some fronts. Trump criticized gender-affirming care, transgender women in women's sports, and transgender women's use of women's facilities such as restrooms. On his inauguration day in January, Trump signed an executive order defining the sexes as only male and female for government purposes, setting the tone for a cascade of actions that affect transgender people. About a week later, Trump called to stop using federal money, including from Medicaid, for gender-affirming care for those under 19. About half of U.S. adults approve of Trump's handling of transgender issues, an AP-NORC poll found. But the American Medical Association says that gender is on a spectrum , and the group opposes policies that restrict access to gender-affirming health care. Gender-affirming care includes a range of medical and mental health services to support a person's gender identity, including when it's different from the sex they were assigned at birth. It includes counseling and treatment with medications that block puberty, and hormone therapy to produce physical changes, as well as surgery, which is rare for minors. In March, a judge paused enforcement of the ban on government spending for care. The court ruling didn't stop other federal government action In April, Attorney General Pam Bondi directed government investigators to focus on providers who continue to offer gender-affirming care for transgender youth. 'Under my leadership, the Department of Justice will bring these practices to an end,' she wrote. In May, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a report discouraging medical interventions for transgender youth and instead focusing solely on talk therapy. The report questions adolescents' capacity to consent to life-changing treatments that could result in future infertility. The administration has not said who wrote the report, which has been deeply criticized by LGBTQ+ advocates. In June, a Justice Department memo called for prioritizing civil investigations of those who provide the treatment. In July, Justice Department announced it had sent more than 20 subpoenas to doctors and clinics involved in gender-affirming care for youth, saying they were part of investigations of health care fraud, false statements and other possible wrongdoing. And in a statement last week, the White House celebrated decisions to end gender-affirming care, which it called a 'barbaric, pseudoscientific practice' Families worry about accessing care Kristen Salvatore's 15-year-old child started hormone therapy late last year at Penn State Health. Salvatore said in an interview with The Associated Press before the lawsuit was announced that it was a major factor in reduced signs of anxiety and depression. Last month, the family received official notice from the health system that it would no longer offer the hormones for patients under 19 after July 31, though talk therapy can continue. Salvatore has been struggling to find a place that's not hours away from their Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, home that would provide the hormones and accept Medicaid coverage. 'I'm walking around blind with no guidance, and whatever breadcrumbs I was given are to a dead-end alleyway,' she said. The family has enough testosterone stockpiled to last until January. But if they can't find a new provider by then, Salvatore's child could risk detransitioning, she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store