Strike shuts down Bangladesh's biggest port
DHAKA: Operations at Bangladesh's biggest port were suspended on Sunday as a strike by customs officials brought shipping activity to a halt.
The shutdown at Chittagong Port is part of an ongoing dispute between tax authority employees and the government, which is trying to overhaul the body.
'The port typically handles around 7,000 to 8,000 containers daily... But since this morning, there has been no movement in offloading or onboarding of goods,' said Mohammed Omar Faruq, secretary of the Chittagong Port Authority.
'This is having a huge impact on the country's economic situation,' he told AFP.
Bangladesh is the world's second-largest garment manufacturer, while textile and garment production accounts for about 80 percent of the country's exports.
Mahmud Hasan Khan, president of the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association, said the halt in port operations would cost the industry $222 million.
'The cost of recovery will be staggering -- beyond comprehension -- and many factories risk going bankrupt,' he told AFP.
Staff at the National Board of Revenue (NBR) have been striking on and off for weeks over plans to split the authority into two separate bodies.
Bangladesh's interim leader, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus, urged them to end the walkout.
'We hope NBR's staff will report back to work setting aside their unlawful programme that goes against the national interest of the country,' his office said in a statement.
'Otherwise for the sake of the people of this country and safeguarding the economy the government will be left with no option but to act firmly,' the statement added.
NBR staff were prevented from entering their offices on Sunday after a government order sought to stop them from protesting within their building premises.
Meanwhile, 13 business chambers held a press conference on Saturday urging the government to resolve the issue as soon as possible.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Indonesia begins US$5.9bil EV battery project despite environmental fears
This aerial handout picture taken and released on June 29, 2025 by Indonesia's Presidential Palace shows the prospective site of South-East Asia's largest battery industry project, inaugurated by Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto in Karawang, West Java. Indonesia broke ground on June 29 on a USD 5.9 billion megaproject for EV battery production backed by Chinese giant CATL, despite NGOs raising concerns over a lack of environmental guarantees. - AFP Jakarta, June 29, 2025 (AFP) - Indonesia broke ground Sunday on a US$5.9 billion megaproject for EV battery production backed by Chinese giant CATL, despite NGOs raising concerns over a lack of environmental guarantees. Indonesia is the world's largest nickel producer and it is trying to capitalise on its vast reserves, with a 2020 export ban spurring a domestic industrial boom of the key metal used in EV batteries and stainless steel. The EV battery project will include a $4.7 billion investment on the eastern island of Halmahera and a $1.2 billion investment in West Java, energy minister Bahlil Lahadalia said in a speech alongside President Prabowo Subianto. "According to my calculation, it won't take long, in probably between five to six years we will be able to reach energy self-sufficiency," Prabowo said at a groundbreaking ceremony in Karawang, West Java. Bahlil said the Halmahera complex will focus on mining, smelting and production of cathodes which are a key component in rechargeable batteries. The West Java complex will focus on battery cell production, the minister said. The two politicians did not say when the megaproject was slated to be operational, but Indonesian officials have said a CATL plant in Halmahera would open in March next year. Alongside CATL, the Halmahera complex is backed by China's Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt and Indonesia's state-owned Antam. Climate Rights International (CRI) and Greenpeace Indonesia this week issued a call for greater assurances from Jakarta that measures were in place to protect the surrounding environment at the bigger complex in eastern Halmahera. Environmental group Mining Advocacy Network (Jatam) said in a statement Saturday that Jakarta was "chasing vague economic growth while consciously ignoring the people's scream" to end damage to the environment and residents' livelihoods. Halmahera, a once-pristine island in the Maluku archipelago, has seen environmental damage increase as operations have grown at a large industrial park that hosts the world's largest nickel mine. A CRI report this month warned the Indonesian government was allowing environmental damage to go unchecked around the Weda Bay mine and the industrial park that hosts it. An AFP report last month detailed how the home of the nomadic Hongana Manyawa tribe was being eaten away by mining operations there. - AFP
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
China to keep anti-dumping steel duties on EU, UK, South Korea and Indonesia
BEIJING/JAKARTA (AFP): China will maintain duties on certain steel products from the European Union, the United Kingdom, South Korea and Indonesia, its commerce ministry said Monday, as overcapacity concerns drive global trade turbulence. The duties on stainless steel billets and hot-rolled plates, first levied by Beijing in 2019, range from 20.2 percent for Indonesian imports to 43 percent for those from the EU. China's commerce ministry said that an internal investigation found the potential termination of the anti-dumping duties could still cause "damage" to the domestic stainless steel industry. Authorities will therefore continue to impose duties on products from the three countries and the European bloc "for a period of five years starting from July 1", the ministry said in a statement. China, the world's largest steel producer, first took the measures in response to tariffs imposed on it by the United States during Donald Trump's first presidential term. The US tariffs were motivated by fears in Washington and among its allies that unfair industrial policies in China had led to a global glut of cheap exports, threatening to undercut local producers. Since returning to office in January, Trump has sent the world economy into a tailspin with a tariff blitz that has hit Chinese exports particularly hard. Trade tensions between the world's top two economies remain high despite China and the United States reaching a temporary truce to the tariff war this month. - AFP
Sinar Daily
2 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Peace is Not the Price of Palestinian Freedom
ACROSS political commentary and diplomatic discourse, a dangerous narrative persists. Palestinians must first prove themselves peaceful and orderly before being granted recognition as a state. Often framed as pragmatic, this demand is anything but. It reproduces a colonial logic that makes rights conditional, asking the oppressed to perform submission before they can be seen as worthy of sovereignty. Such reasoning must be confronted, whether voiced by diplomats, pundits or settler-state apologists. It is not simply a matter of misjudged policy or misplaced optimism. It is a discursive tactic that recasts colonisation as a technical failure of negotiation, allowing those in power to defer justice indefinitely while appearing reasonable. Beneath its surface lies an insistence that the oppressed must perform civility while being brutalised, that they must negotiate with the boot still on their necks. It reverses cause and effect, blames the colonised for their own erasure and casts the denial of basic rights as the path to peace. Palestinians have not refused peace. They have refused surrender. And it is long past time we stopped asking them to earn their humanity. Commentators often begin by expressing frustration with the lack of progress in the peace process. But this frustration quickly turns into blame, casting Palestinians as obstructionist. The claim that Palestinians reject peace because victimhood is more politically expedient is not only dehumanising. It is wilfully dishonest. It recasts systematic oppression as strategic manipulation. It imagines that suffering is staged, calibrated for political effect, as though Palestinian grief were a performance for international sympathy rather than a lived consequence of structural violence. In doing so, it trivialises the enormity of their dispossession and shifts attention away from the systems that produce it. It suggests that Palestinians wear suffering as a costume, rather than being forced into it by decades of siege, displacement and military rule. A Palestinian woman reacts as she sits amidst the rubble of Yaffa School in the Tuffah neighbourhood of Gaza City following overnight Israeli strikes, on June 30, 2025. (Photo by Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP) This narrative flattens the complexities of struggle into caricature. It positions Palestinians not as political actors navigating the violence of statelessness but as cunning performers whose pain must be doubted, dissected or delayed. Such framing absolves those in power of accountability. It makes theatre out of survival and cynicism out of resistance. Palestinians have not rejected peace. They have rejected the obliteration of their political agency. There is a difference. And what is often framed as intransigence is, in truth, a refusal to be erased. It is a rejection of frameworks that ask the oppressed to forget their history, abandon their rights and sanitise their resistance in order to be granted the most basic political recognition. That refusal is not the barrier to peace. It is the condition of dignity. Assertions that recognising Palestine would hinder peace depend on a deliberate rewriting of history. From the Oslo Accords to the Arab Peace Initiative, Palestinian leadership has accepted frameworks for a two-state solution. It is Israel that has repeatedly undermined these frameworks by expanding illegal settlements, fragmenting territory and cementing a system of apartheid. Recognition of Palestine does not obstruct peace. Its denial is what has kept peace perpetually out of reach. Claims that Palestinians do not need a state are not only weak but also morally bankrupt. No people living under foreign military rule, denied the ability to move freely, bombarded from land and air and stripped of political autonomy can be said to have no need for self-determination. That such arguments continue to appear in mainstream outlets shows how comfortably colonial thought lives in the present. Some argue that recognising Palestine is merely performative. But the act of recognition is not symbolic. It is an affirmation of a right enshrined in international law. Palestinians, like all peoples, have a right to self-determination. Recognition is not a reward. It is an obligation. Those who call it virtue signalling ignore the fact that Palestinian survival depends on visibility, accountability and recognition within the global legal and political system. Critics often point to dysfunction within the Palestinian Authority as a reason to delay or deny statehood. But this misrepresents the cause of that dysfunction. The Authority operates under structural constraint. It has no real sovereignty, no control over its borders and no reliable access to resources. It is regularly bypassed by Israeli incursions and administrative control. Its weakness is not evidence of Palestinian unfitness. It is evidence of occupation. The most dangerous discourses are those that dehumanise. Palestinians are described through metaphors of animals and threats. Crocodiles. Vipers. Shadows. These are not neutral descriptions. They strip people of moral standing. They evoke fear, disgust and pre-emptive justification for violence. They make it easier to kill. And they make it harder for the world to care. Assertions that Palestinians would exploit statehood to intensify violence reinforce this same logic. The colonised are cast as innately treacherous. Their empowerment is feared. Their resistance is criminalised. Their historical trauma is erased. Palestinians gather around a huge crater after the Israeli army targeted the tents of displaced people in the northern Al-Rimal neighborhood of Gaza City on June 28, 2025. (Photo by Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP) Meanwhile, Israel continues to receive recognition, weapons and diplomatic protection without condition. It is not held to any standard of restraint or morality. It is only the colonised who are told to earn their rights. The silences in these narratives are deafening. Nothing about the blockade on Gaza. Nothing about illegal settlements. Nothing about mass incarceration without trial. Nothing about the razing of entire communities. Nothing about the tens of thousands killed. To speak of peace without acknowledging this is not neutrality. It is complicity. Peace is not a gift to be awarded to the obedient. It is not a moral favour to be extended by the powerful. It is not something Palestinians must prove themselves worthy of. Peace follows justice. It does not precede it. And recognition of Palestinian statehood is not the final gesture. It is the first minimal step. We must abandon any framework that requires the colonised to behave according to the expectations of their colonisers. We must stop asking Palestinians to soften their demands, their voice or their grief. Justice does not accommodate comfort. It confronts power. And it reclaims the full humanity of those who have been denied it. If peace is to be real, it must begin by acknowledging that Palestinian statehood is not a prize. It is not an aspiration. It is a legal right. And it is long overdue. The world must stop rehearsing its moral credibility at the expense of Palestinian life. As long as we do, there will be neither peace nor justice. Only the deepening complicity of those who mistake neutrality for principle. Dr Siti Nurnadilla Mohamad Jamil is a linguist and discourse analyst whose research focuses on language, ideology, and the legitimisation of violence in media and political discourse. She is currently a Visiting Researcher at Lancaster University and an Assistant Professor of Linguistics at the International Islamic University Malaysia. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of Sinar Daily.
