Democrats are letting the far-left take them out of the running for 2028
Except they didn't. Exactly the opposite.
Seven months after Trump redefined how to win a presidential campaign, Democrats have been backed deeper into a corner by the far-left activists they still fear, whose creed contains only three fundamental dogmata: Trump-hatred, perpetual self-victimhood, and identity politics as the center and source of all decisions.
All three of those doctrines were strongly rejected by the majority of voters in 2024, including an increasing number of Black and Hispanic men, non-white voters in general, the disenfranchised, younger people and independent voters. The reason was obvious to everyone paying attention: Trump-hatred, forever victimhood, and identity politics are not policies. They are angry rants — and tired ones at that. Left-of-center HBO host Bill Maher has made this point time and again.
Those who switched to Trump in 2024 did so for one reason: He was addressing the 'bread and butter' issues that were upending voters' lives and threatening their futures.
There are a great many voters who have come to believe that the Democratic Party is not only leaderless, but completely lacking when it comes to real solutions to the problems affecting their lives and futures. Whether or not the Democrats or mainstream media admit it, these are people who took the time to listen to Trump in 2024, with a growing percentage believing his policies would address their needs.
The question for the Democrats now, come the midterms and looking to 2028, is: Will more from those communities once loyal to Democrats also educate themselves and move away from a party that has taken them for granted for decades? Current trends and Trump's piling up of 'bread and butter' victories indicate that this is a real possibility.
When voices from these communities and others disenchanted with Democrats turn their weary eyes to the new leadership of that party of today, what do they see? Sadly for them, only the doubling down of 'hate Trump,' identity politics and 'forever victimhood.'
Two of those pushing these hardest are Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). Both seem laser-focused on winning the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028.
But as both preach this tripartite Democratic gospel, there is a very easy test by which potential voters can judge them: What have they actually done to improve the lives and safety of the constituents in their districts? You know, as in the people they were elected to serve.
Hating on Trump and creating as much self-serving publicity as possible are neither policies nor strategies. Rather, they are actions that could be viewed as narcissistic behavior.
Famed sportscaster and longshot 2028 Democratic candidate Stephen A. Smith recently addressed this issue on his podcast, He criticized both Ocasio-Cortez and Crockett, whom he believes will turn off a majority of voters.
'I think if you are a Democrat, if you are a leftist who rails against the system … if you believe that higher taxes is the way to go, that a focus shouldn't be on securing the borders, if you believe those kind of things, and that's where you stand ideologically, AOC is your candidate,' he said. 'Most people in the country are centrists, they're moderates. Whether they're Republican moderates or Democratic moderates or just flat-out centrists who are independents — that's most of the American population … she gives the impression, when you talk about universal healthcare and you talk about other things, if you equate it to taxing Americans 70 percent of their income she wouldn't be against it. That ain't going to win you elections.'
Smith also singled out Crockett for seemingly having just one position on anything: Being against any policy or opinion Trump champions. Bingo.
Like him or not, Smith has his finger on the pulse of tens of millions of disenchanted voters — working-class, poor and disenfranchised, wondering more and more why the current leadership of the Democratic Party has abandoned them and their needs in favor of more self-serving rants against Trump.
The Democrats ignore these millions of voices — who know the difference between useless bumper-sticker slogans and actual policy — at their own peril.
Douglas MacKinnon is a former White House and Pentagon official.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
10 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump to add 25% tariff to Indian imports. Which everyday goods could be impacted?
President Donald Trump announced the United States will impose a 25% tariff on Indian goods starting Aug. 1, after months of negotiations over a limited trade agreement between the two nations appeared to fall through. Trump announced the new tariff in a post on his social media app Truth Social on July 30, two days before a bevy of increased reciprocal tariffs will go into effect for dozens of nations on Aug. 1. These new import levies come amid an existing baseline tariff of 10%, and Trump warned this week that most trading partners that do not negotiate separate trade deals could soon face new baseline tariffs of 15% to 20%. India, the world's fifth-largest economy, relies significantly on the U.S., counting it as its top trading partner in 2024, though China is close on its heels by a small margin. Learn more: President Trump announces 25% tariff on imports from India Indian goods exports to the U.S. totaled $87 billion in 2024, with pharmaceuticals and jewelry among its top product types, followed by petrochemicals and textiles. Separately, services exports, mainly IT and professional services, were worth $33 billion last year. The U.S. is India's third-largest investor, and currently has a $45.7 billion trade deficit with the South Asian nation. Here are some of the products the U.S. relies on most from India, according to data from the U.S. International Trade Commission: Pharmaceuticals The U.S. accounts for nearly a third of India's pharmaceutical exports, mainly cheaper versions of popular drugs, Reuters reports, with sales jumping 16% to about $9 billion last fiscal year. Among the dozens of types of medications the U.S. imports from India, a few classifications make up a significant share. They are items like wadding, gauze and bandages; antineoplastic and immunosuppressive medications, including those used to treat cancers; and analgesics, antipyretics and nonhormonal anti-inflammatory agents, such as pain relievers and medications used to reduce fevers. Smartphones Though China and Vietnam were responsible for more than half of phones sent to the U.S. last year, India also produces a significant share, and looks to be gaining a firmer foothold in the market. According to a new report, India has overtaken China in the last few months as the top exporter of smartphones to the U.S., following Apple's pivot to center manufacturing in New Delhi amid tariff concerns. The share of U.S. smartphone shipments assembled in China fell from 61% to 25% over the past year, the research firm Canalys said, with India picking up most of the decline and increasing its smartphone volume by 240% roughly within the same time frame. More: Trump's trade talks intensify with tariff deadline fast approaching Jewelry and precious stones Next to pharmaceuticals, jewelry and precious stones are among India's top products exported to American consumers. More than 30% of India's gems and jewelry exports go to the U.S., accounting for about $10 billion in annual trade in an industry that topped $30 billion in India in the 2023/2024 fiscal year. These goods include unmounted or unset diamonds, precious metal jewelry and jewelry clad with precious metal − such as pieces plated with gold or silver. Home linens India is among the top countries responsible for imported home linens in the U.S., representing 36% of nearly $6 billion in imports, according to a New York Times analysis of government data. These products include bathroom and kitchen linen made of terrycloth or cotton, along with bed and table linens. India is also a leader in some types of imported clothing, such as activewear, shirts, baby clothes and suits. According to the Yale Budget Lab, the tariff hikes so far have disproportionately affected clothing and textiles, with consumers facing up to 39% higher shoe prices and 37% higher apparel prices in the short run. Other products The U.S. also relies on Indian imports of frozen shrimp and prawns, petroleum oils such as transformer oil and motor fuel, semiconductor technologies like solar panels and certain types of electrical machinery and parts. Contributing: Reuters. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.
Chicago Tribune
10 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Federal Reserve leaves interest rates unchanged even as Trump demands cuts
WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve left its key short-term interest rate unchanged for the fifth time this year, brushing off repeated calls from President Donald Trump for a cut. The Fed's decision Wednesday leaves its key short-term rate at about 4.3%, where it has stood after the central bank made three cuts last year. During a news conference, Chair Jerome Powell said that Trump's sweeping tariffs are starting to push up inflation and it will take time for the Fed to determine whether the uptick in prices will be a one-time effect or something more persistent. 'That is a risk to be assessed and managed,' he told reporters. There were some signs of splits in the Fed's ranks: Governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman voted to reduce borrowing costs, while nine officials, including Powell, favored standing pat. It is the first time in more than three decades that two of the seven Washington-based governors have dissented. One official, Governor Adriana Kugler, was absent and didn't vote. The choice to hold off on a rate cut will almost certainly result in further conflict between the Fed and White House, as Trump has repeatedly demanded that the central bank reduce borrowing costs as part of his effort to assert control over one of the few remaining independent federal agencies. Powell said that while tariffs are starting to push up the cost of goods — and he expects more of that to happen in the coming months — the price of services — rents, insurance, and hotel rooms — has continued to cool. He suggested it could take some time to determine whether the impact of the tariffs will be short-lived or more persistent. 'We think we have a long way to go to really understand exactly how' the tariffs and prices will play out, Powell said. Many economists and Wall Street investors have expected the Fed to cut its rate at its next meeting in September, but Powell's remarks suggest there may not be enough data before September to support a cut. 'We have made no decisions about September,' Powell said. The chair acknowledged that if the Fed cut its rate too soon, inflation could move higher, and if it cut too late, then the job market could suffer. Major U.S. indexes, which had been trading slightly higher Wednesday, went negative after Powell's comments. 'The markets seem to think that Powell pushed back on a September rate cut,' said Lauren Goodwin, chief market strategist at New York Life Investments. Powell also underscored that the vast majority of the committee agreed with a basic framework: Infation is still above the Fed's target of 2%, while the job market is still mostly healthy, so the Fed should keep rates elevated. On Thursday, the government will release the latest reading of the Fed's preferred inflation gauge, and it is expected to show that core prices, excluding energy and food, rose 2.7% from a year earlier. Gus Faucher, chief economist at PNC Financial, says he expects the tariffs will only temporarily raise inflation, but that it will take most of the rest of this year for that to become apparent. He doesn't expect the Fed to cut till December. Trump argues that because the U.S. economy is doing well, rates should be lowered. But unlike a blue-chip company that usually pays lower rates than a troubled startup, the Fed adjusts rates to either slow or speed growth, and would be more likely to keep them high if the economy is strong to prevent an inflationary outbreak. Earlier Wednesday, the government said the economy expanded at a healthy 3% annual rate in the second quarter, though that figure followed a negative reading for the first three months of the year, when the economy shrank 0.5% at an annual rate. Most economists averaged the two figures to get a growth rate of about 1.2% for the first half of this year. Some of the disagreement likely reflects jockeying to replace Powell, whose term ends in May 2026. Waller in particular has been mentioned as a potential future Fed chair. Bowman, meanwhile, last dissented in September 2024, when the Fed cut its key rate by a half-point. She said she preferred a quarter point cut instead, and cited the fact that inflation was still above 2.5% as a reason for caution. Waller also said earlier this month that he favored cutting rates, but for very different reasons than Trump has cited: Waller thinks that growth and hiring are slowing, and that the Fed should reduce borrowing costs to forestall a weaker economy and a rise in unemployment. There are other camps on the Fed's 19-member rate-setting committee (only 12 of the 19 actually vote on rate decisions). In June, seven members signaled that they supported leaving rates unchanged through the end of this year, while two suggested they preferred a single rate cut this year. The other half supported more reductions, with eight officials backing two cuts, and two — widely thought to be Waller and Bowman — supporting three reductions. The dissents could be a preview of what might happen after Powell steps down, if President Donald Trump appoints a replacement who pushes for the much lower interest rates the White House desires. Other Fed officials could push back if a future chair sought to cut rates by more than economic conditions would otherwise support. Overall, the committee's quarterly forecasts in June suggested the Fed would cut twice this year. There are only three more Fed policy meetings — in September, October, and December. When the Fed cuts its rate, it often — but not always — results in lower borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans and credit cards. Some economists agree with Waller's concerns about the job market. Excluding government hiring, the economy added just 74,000 jobs in June, with most of those gains occurring in health care. 'We are in a much slower job hiring backdrop than most people appreciate,' said Tom Porcelli, chief U.S. economist at PGIM Fixed Income. Michael Feroli, an economist at JPMorgan Chase, said in a note to clients this week if the pair were to dissent, 'it would say more about auditioning for the Fed chair appointment than about economic conditions.'
The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
Brazil's Lula on Trump criticism: ‘There's no reason to be afraid'
Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva said in a Tuesday interview that he's not afraid to criticize President Trump publicly — even if that means no deal can be reached to stave off the 50-percent tariff on Brazilian imports that Trump announced earlier this month and moved to put into action on Wednesday. In an interview with The New York Times published Wednesday, Lula was asked about his willingness to openly criticize Trump, including calling him an emperor, while other heads of state have been reluctant to do so. Asked if he thinks that approach 'could worsen things,' Lula said, 'I don't.' 'There's no reason to be afraid,' he continued. 'I am worried, obviously, because we have economic interests, political interests, technological interests. But at no point will Brazil negotiate as if it were a small country up against a big country. Brazil will negotiate as a sovereign country.' Lula stressed the importance of finding middle ground. 'In politics between two states, the will of neither should prevail. We always need to find the middle ground. This is achieved not by puffing out your chest and shouting about things you can't deliver, nor by bowing your head and simply saying 'amen' to whatever the United States wants,' Lula said. Trump, earlier this month, announced plans to impose a 50-percent tariff on all goods from Brazil, citing the prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro, an ally of his, over an alleged plot to remain in power after losing an election. Trump originally warned the tariffs would go into effect on Aug. 1, but, on Wednesday, the president signed an executive order officially raising the tariffs on Brazil to 50 percent. The order goes into effect seven days after its signing: on Aug. 6. Trump, who has criticized Brazil's treatment of Bolsonaro, said in a letter to Lula earlier this month that the new tariffs are 'due in part to Brazil's insidious attacks on Free Elections and the fundamental Free Speech Rights of Americans,' and he also cited Brazil's 'Tariff, and Non-Tariff, Policies and Trade Barriers.' 'The way that Brazil has treated former President Bolsonaro, a Highly Respected Leader throughout the World during his Term, including by the United States, is an international disgrace. This Trial should not be taking place. It is a Witch Hunt that should end IMMEDIATELY!' Trump wrote in the letter, which was posted to the president's Truth Social platform earlier this month. Lula responded at the time by fiercely defending the independence of the government institutions and saying Brazil would not be threatened. He reiterated that sentiment in the Times interview this week but stressed his desire to work with the U.S. president on trade without involving politics. 'I want to tell Trump that Brazilians and Americans do not deserve to be victims of politics, if the reason President Trump is imposing this tax on Brazil is because of the case against former President Bolsonaro,' Lula said, when asked for his message to the U.S. president. 'The Brazilian people will pay more for some products, and the American people will pay more for other products. And I think the cause does not merit this,' Lula continued. 'Brazil has a Constitution, and the former president is being tried with a full right to a defense.' Trump and Lula had not spoken, as of the Tuesday interview. Lula said he had tried to reach out to arrange a conversation with Trump, but 'so far, it hasn't been possible.' Lula, a left-wing politician, urged Trump to give him a chance, saying, 'I honestly don't know what Trump has heard about me. But if he got to know me, he'd know that I'm 20 times better than [Bolsonaro].' But Lula brushed off the potential consequences of tariffs, saying Brazil will look to trade more with China going forward. 'If the United States doesn't want to buy something of ours, we are going to look for someone who will,' he said.
