Thousands of Jewish worshippers visit Jerusalem holy site as Israeli lawmaker boasts ‘Arabs aren't allowed to come near us'
Thousands of Jewish worshippers visited a Jerusalem holy site during the holiday of Passover as far-right Israeli lawmaker Zvi Sukkot boasted, 'Arabs aren't allowed to come near us.'
Sukkot, a member of the Religious Zionism party, visited the al-Aqsa compound in the Old City of Jerusalem on Thursday morning, prostrating himself on the ground and praying in violation of the delicate status quo agreement that governs the site.
'Jews are bowing, praying, holding minyanim here,' said Sukkot, referencing a quorum of ten men required for certain Jewish worship. 'Arabs aren't allowed to come near us at all,' the lawmaker added, with Israeli security forces walking amongst the worshippers around him.
While anyone can visit the al-Aqsa compound, only Muslims are allowed to pray there, according to the status quo agreement, which has existed since Israel captured the Old City of Jerusalem in 1967. The site, which is known to Jews as the Temple Mount, is the holiest place in Judaism. It is known to Muslims as the Haram al-Sharif, and it is the third holiest site in Islam.
But the status quo agreement has increasingly been tested and, in some cases, deliberately challenged. Far-right lawmakers in Israel have made repeated visits to the holy site, encouraging other Jewish worshippers to do the same. Some of these visits have sparked protests, as well as diplomatic fallout across the region.
Video from the scene on Thursday showed Sukkot surrounded by a group of Jewish men openly praying while an Israeli police officer walked around in the background, not disturbing or interrupting the prayer session. Sukkot said it was far different to his last visit to the site 14 years ago.
'Back then, they used to watch you closely – if they saw you whisper a prayer, they'd jump on you. What's happening now is an incredible miracle,' he said.
Sukkot's visit comes amid a surge of Jewish worshippers going to the holy site to pray, according to the Temple Mount Administration, which said 6,315 worshippers had so far attended prayer sessions since Passover began last weekend.
The organization, which filmed the video of Sukkot at the compound, added that a daily record was set on Thursday, with 2,106 attending. Despite the moniker, the Temple Mount Administration is not a government agency.
Instead, it is a right-wing organization working to organize and promote Jewish prayer at the holy site. They described the number of visitors as 'historic records,' saying it was a 37% increase from last year.
Far-right Israeli Minister of National Security Itamar Ben Gvir, who leads the Jewish Power party, praised Sukkot's visit. 'What wasn't done in 30 years is being done on my watch, and I'm grateful to have been granted, by God's grace, the privilege of leading this tremendous change,' he said on social media.
Ben Gvir has frequently visited the holy site, making clear his intentions to allow and promote Jewish worship, despite the prohibition. Following a visit in December, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office was forced to put out a statement saying, 'The status quo at Temple Mount has not changed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Iran strikes threaten to roil elections in Michigan
The U.S.'s military intervention in Iran could roil next year's House and Senate races in Michigan, a key battleground state that saw Democratic tensions play out last cycle over the war in Gaza. Democratic candidates in particular there will be forced to navigate a political minefield when it comes to President Trump's involvement in Iran, a conflict that is linked to Israel's ongoing war in Gaza, which proved to be a major liability for Michigan Democrats during last year's election. But the conflict also raises questions for Republicans, who will need to win over Arab, Muslim and Jewish Americans statewide while navigating the Trump administration's position on the broader conflict. 'The races next year should be really interesting, because in some ways, they're going to be a referendum on some of the key questions of who the Democratic Party is and who it will become,' said Abbas Alawieh, a senior Democratic strategist who was one of the leaders of the Uncommitted Movement last year, which sought to pressure then-President Biden over his stance on the war in Gaza. That conflict became a flashpoint during the 2024 election, nowhere more so than in Michigan, which has a Jewish population of more than 100,000 while the Arab and Muslim American population is estimated to be about several hundred thousand in the state. 'The Middle Eastern vote, the Muslim vote in particular, has been moving slightly to the right over the last couple of elections and clearly Trump capitalized on it,' said Jason Cabel Roe, a Michigan-based Republican strategist. 'It remains to be seen that Muslim Americans, while they might not love Israel and may even hate Israel, they don't necessarily love Iran,' he added. 'And I do think that everyone recognizes that Iran has been for nearly 50 years the primary disruptive force in the region.' The Uncommitted Movement — in which Arab, Muslim and progressive voters urged Democrats to vote 'uncommitted' in the primary against Biden — notably started out in the Midwestern state, and then later spread across the country, in reaction to the war. After replacing Biden on the ticket, Vice President Kamala Harris lost the state by more than 1 point, fairing only better in Wisconsin among the seven battleground states. The Arab and Muslim 'community here in Michigan … can no longer be taken for granted as just lining up with the Democratic candidate,' Alawieh said. 'I think Democrats are going to have to work harder for that vote.' The Trump administration's decision to bomb several nuclear facilities in Iran last week has only magnified the issue heading into 2026, with Trump on Friday leaving open the possibility to further strikes. Some members of Michigan's Arab and Muslim communities who spoke with The Hill believe that conflict could impact key elections or be an important issue next year again, particularly in the Senate race. The Democratic primary has positioned Rep. Haley Stevens (Mich.), a pro-Israel Democrat who's previously received backing from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), against state Sen. Mallory McMorrow and former Wayne County Health Director Abdul El-Sayed. Stevens noted the need for congressional approval for the strikes and demanded that the administration brief Congress on the matter. 'Like most Michiganders, I believe the last thing our country needs is to be involved in another foreign war,' Stevens said. 'I intend to use my power as a member of Congress to ensure that this president and this administration do not continue to abuse the system of checks and balances we have in this country.' McMorrow said in her own statement following the strikes that the U.S. 'cannot be dragged back into a forever war.' 'The U.S. could have prevented Iran from developing a nuclear weapon through diplomacy. Trump's actions have now put U.S. troops in danger and made us all less safe,' McMorrow said. In an interview with The Hill, El-Sayed equated the issue of foreign intervention to affordability. 'You don't have to be from the Middle East, you have to be from Michigan to know that this is a waste of taxpayer dollars,' El-Sayed said. 'This seems totally removed from the affordability crisis that they're living through. It doesn't increase the access that they have to affordable groceries or reduce the price of eggs.' 'I don't think everyday folks are asking what's Iran up to; I think they're asking am I going to be able to afford my life tomorrow?' Michigan GOP Senate candidate and former Rep. Mike Rogers (Mich.) said in an interview that members of the state's Middle Eastern community he has spoken to see the endgame when it comes to Trump's strikes on Iran. 'What I'm sensing is nobody likes it, the fact that they had to do it, but they all support the outcome because they believe that this is going to get us one step closer to peace,' said Rogers, who has a law enforcement and intelligence background. 'People are nervous,' he continued. 'They don't want to see a bigger, wider-spread war. Neither does the president, and I think they're with him on that.' Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-Mich.), who told reporters Thursday that he was 'seriously exploring' a Senate bid himself, suggested Saudi Arabia and other nations along the Persian Gulf privately 'are very nervous about a nuclear Iran as well.' In addition to the Senate race, Alawieh suggested the issue could play out in the primary for Stevens's House seat, Rep. John James's (R-Mich.) seat and in the Democratic primary between Rep. Shri Thanedar (Mich.) and state Rep. Donavan McKinney, who's backed by progressives. 'Very important,' said Osama Siblani, publisher of The Arab American News, when asked how candidates' positions on the military intervention in Iran and the broader global conflict would affect how he votes next year. 'Because, remember, we are a community that has relatives overseas.' At the same time, Siblani — who declined to endorse Trump or Harris last cycle — noted domestic issues were also extremely important to him. Why are Trump and Republicans 'doing what they're doing in the … campuses, arresting people, deporting them, not giving them the due process?' Siblani asked. 'The country that I came to in 1976 is not the same country that I live in today,' he added. One national Republican strategist said the Israel-Hamas war would likely play a bigger role in the state's campaign discourse than Iran's conflict with Israel. 'It's always going to be an issue when the Middle East comes up regarding politics,' the strategist said. 'The bigger issue will still continue to be more of Israel's war eliminating Hamas.' While a global conflict is looming over the country, some lawmakers caution it's too soon to know how the U.S. intervention in Iran could impact Michigan next year or express ambivalence that it will be as much of a lightning-rod issue. 'Let's see how it all plays out. We haven't even gotten the facts,' Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) said Tuesday. Michigan state Rep. Noah Arbit (D), who founded the Michigan Democratic Jewish Caucus, was not convinced it would be a major issue next year. He suggested what would motivate voters would be anticipated cuts to Medicaid from Trump's megabill and tax cuts that wealthy Americans would benefit off of. Rogers noted that if the conflict were to break down into a broader war and enflame other parts of the Middle East 'then it becomes something very different.' But the Michigan Republican is betting most voters will side with Trump over the issue when it's over. 'I just don't see it happening,' he said. 'I think this is going to be a huge positive.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Israeli settlers rampage at a military base in the West Bank
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Dozens of Israeli settlers rampaged around a military base in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, setting fires, vandalizing military vehicles, spraying graffiti and attacking soldiers, the military said. Sunday night's unrest came after several attacks in the West Bank carried out by Jewish settlers and anger at their arrests by security forces attempting to contain the violence over the past few days. More than 100 settlers on Wednesday evening entered the West Bank town of Kfar Malik, setting property ablaze and opening fire on Palestinians who tried to stop them, Najeb Rostom, head of the local council, said. Three Palestinians were killed after the military intervened. Israeli security forces arrested five settlers. 'No civilized country can tolerate violent and anarchic acts of burning a military facility, damaging IDF property and attacking security personnel by citizens of the country,' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. Footage on Israeli media showed dozens of young, religious men typically associated with 'hilltop youth,' an extremist movement of Israeli settlers who occupy West Bank hilltops and have been accused of attacking Palestinians and their property. The footage showed security forces using stun grenades as dozens of settlers gathered around the military base just north of Ramallah. The Israeli military released photos of the infrastructure burned in the attack, which it said included 'systems that help thwart terrorist attacks and maintain security.' Far-right Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir , who has often defended Israelis accused of similar crimes, offered a rare condemnation of Sunday's violence. 'Attacking security forces, security facilities, and IDF soldiers who are our brothers, our protectors, is a red line, and must be dealt with in full severity. We are brothers,' he wrote on X. Opposition leader Yair Lapid told Israel's Army radio that the riots were carried out by 'Jewish terrorists, gangs of criminals, who feel backed by the (governing) coalition.' A hard-line supporter of Jewish settlements, Ben-Gvir was previously convicted in Israel of racist incitement and support for terrorist groups, and has called for the deportation of all Arab citizens from Israel. Though once widely shunned by Israel's politicians, Ben-Gvir's influence has grown and alongside a shift to the right in the country's electorate has further emboldened violence from extremist settlers in the West Bank. Defense Minister Israel Katz vowed Monday to 'eradicate this violence from the root,' and implored the extremist settlers to remember that many of the security forces are exhausted reservists serving multiple rounds of duty. Over the past two years of the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, Palestinian residents in the West Bank have reported a major increase in Israeli checkpoints and delays across the territory. Israel, meanwhile, says threats from the West Bank against its citizens are on the rise. Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem in the 1967 Mideast war, and Palestinians want all three territories for their future state. The West Bank is home to some 3 million Palestinians live under seemingly open-ended Israeli military rule, and 500,000 Jewish settlers. The international community overwhelmingly considers settlements illegal. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
John T. Shaw: Wesleyan University's president stands up for higher education as it's under assault
The Donald Trump administration's attack on higher education is both wide-ranging and carefully targeted at certain institutions. It has included, figuratively speaking, cluster bombs and surgical strikes. The ordinary human impulse when under assault is to flee or to hide. The more noble response, however, is to stand up and confront one's attacker head on, acting with firmness, calm and clarity. Many in higher education have opted for the former strategy. Michael Roth, the president of Wesleyan University in Connecticut, has taken the harder and more honorable route. He has been a strong and clear voice defending higher education in op-eds, TV appearances, podcasts and interviews with publications such The New Yorker, The Washington Post and Politico. Roth is the statesman that higher education needs in this difficult time, explaining its mission and record, responding to criticisms and threats, and pointing the way to a better future. His statesmanship has been shrewd, strategic and inspiring. Most especially, it has been courageous. Roth is a Wesleyan alum. He graduated in 1978 and has been its president since 2007. He earned a doctorate in history at Princeton; his central academic interest is how people make sense of the past. Perhaps this analytical perspective helps him make sense of this turbulent present. There are several impressive features of Roth's academic statesmanship. First, he comes to the debate as a passionate, but also fair-minded, advocate for higher education. He is a staunch supporter but not an uncritical one. Roth has long argued that some parts of the higher education system are elitist and condescending. He acknowledges that elite institutions are often most accessible to the children of the wealthy and privileged. While his political views are left of center, he argues that more conservative voices are needed on college campuses to provide ideological balance and a wider range of perspectives. Second, Roth has persuasively framed the challenges facing higher education as part of the administration's attack on civil society, including law firms, nonprofits, cultural institutions and the media. Civil society, he says, must resist the slide toward authoritarianism that has gathered momentum. Roth believes the current moment is dire. 'I think this is the greatest fear in civil society, including in the higher education system, since the McCarthy era. People are really afraid to be targeted by the government,' he told Politico. Roth says that a vibrant civil society is essential and represents traditional American values. Leaders in civil society, and especially in higher education, should accept their responsibility to participate in this debate. Third, he has been willing to engage on hard and specific issues such as antisemitism. In a sharply worded essay in The New York Times in April, Roth argued that the administration is using this issue cynically. 'As the first Jewish president of a formerly Methodist university, I find no comfort in the Trump administration's embrace of my people, on college campuses or elsewhere,' he wrote. 'Jew hatred is real, but today's anti-antisemitism isn't a legitimate effort to fight it. It's a cover for a wide range of agendas that have nothing to do with the welfare of Jewish people.' Fourth, he has acknowledged that he is now fearful, yet is compelled to step forward. 'I think my job as a leader of the university is to speak up for the values that we claim to believe in, especially when they're at odds with people with enormous power,' he said in The New Yorker. Roth says he has had to become more combative than he prefers, but that he is obliged to respond when vulnerable people are getting mistreated. Finally, Roth continues to depict America's higher education system as a national treasure that has benefited from a strong partnership with the federal government. The research accomplishments of our universities have been breathtaking and have improved the lives of hundreds of millions around the world. And a college education, he declares, is a truly transformative opportunity. Roth was the recipient of this year's PEN/Benenson Courage Award that honors exceptional acts of courage in the exercise of freedom of expression. He began his acceptance speech by quoting a friend who told him that 'if someone offered me a courage award, I'd duck.' Roth did not duck then and has not ducked, hedged or wavered since. He has stood tall and, in doing so, reminds us of the powerful words of the great reformer, Martin Luther, 'Here I stand; I can do no other.' Would that all higher education leaders stand with him. John T. Shaw is director of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute. Shaw's columns, exclusive to the Tribune, appear the last Monday of each month. His most recent book is 'The Education of a Statesman: How Global Leaders Can Repair a Fractured World.'
