News Corp team confronted after alleged attempt to provoke staff at Sydney Middle Eastern restaurant
NSW Police said they opened an investigation after a staff member at Cairo Takeaway in Newtown alleged she had felt intimidated by a customer who entered the restaurant at about midday on Tuesday. The police said their investigation concluded on Wednesday, with no criminal offences identified.
Hesham El Masry, the owner of the restaurant, alleged there was an attempt to deliberately provoke an antisemitic response from his staff members in the presence of Daily Telegraph reporters. The restaurant and its owner have been vocal supporters of Palestine on social media.
CCTV images from inside the cafe seen by Guardian Australia showed a man wearing a Star of David cap and necklace entering the busy premises. El Masry said that the man was served tea with 'no issues'.
The footage then shows the man moving to one side of the cafe, where he 'lingered' for about two minutes, raising the concern of staff, he said.
The waitress walked outside, where a reporter, photographer and cameraman appeared to be waiting, he said.
A verbal altercation then took place between the waitress, the man in the cap and the journalists.
'That is out-and-out intimidation. Who comes into a restaurant and asks me a question about this gentleman who I don't even know?' the woman is heard asking the journalists in footage posted to social media.
The man wearing the Star of David cap adds: 'I think something's upsetting her.'
In a separate video, the woman tells one of the journalists: 'I'll do exactly what you did to me – filming'. The journalist starts to respond, and the woman can be heard saying: 'You're hanging around with the wrong crowd. That's divisive journalism.'
The man in the cap then says: 'What do you mean the wrong crowd?'
The woman responds: 'You wanted to make antisemitic statements up here? Look at you in shame, look at you, tails between your legs.
'You picked the wrong restaurant to try this shit in.'
The video ends with Daily Telegraph journalist Danielle Gusmaroli asking the woman not to touch her phone. The man in the cap can be heard saying 'do not touch her'.
In a series of posts on X – and later posted to Instagram by the restaurant – Fahad Ali, a geneticist with the University of Sydney and member of the Palestine Action Group who was not in the restaurant but who spoke to people who were there, said the man asked the staff member: 'Do you have a problem with me because I'm Jewish?'
'The server was shocked and completely taken aback. She said 'excuse me?' The man continued: 'you're intimidating me, you're making me feel unsafe',' he wrote on X.
Cairo Takeaway chef, Talaat Sehia, said via X that police had spoken with him and the waitress, who he said was left 'distraught' after the incident.
El Masry alleged the man in the cap had 'clearly come in looking for trouble'.
'I'm pretty certain that it was a planned operation,' he said.
The restaurant was preparing for its Gadigal to Gaza fundraising event on Sunday, he said.
According to a News Corp source who spoke on the condition of anonymity, newsroom staff were appalled by the incident. The source said they were disgusted that it could have been sanctioned and even more disgusted that there appeared to be zero consequences.
The Daily Telegraph, News Corp Australia and Gusmaroli did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Gaza's aid crisis: Looting, blame and the fight for control
The grainy video shows a flat-bed lorry piled high with cardboard boxes, surrounded by Palestinians. Standing on top of the boxes, clear enough against the sandy backdrop, are two masked figures, both armed with Kalashnikov rifles. The IDF published the footage on Tuesday, saying it showed Hamas 'violently looting humanitarian aid' and 'preventing it reaching the civilian population of Gaza'. Purportedly shot on Friday, the video acts as 'further evidence that Hamas is the primary obstacle to the delivery of humanitarian aid', the military said. In the maelstrom of claim and counterclaim over Gaza – where foreign journalists are banned – pictures and footage such as this have taken centre stage in the propaganda battle over what is really going on with the delivery of aid. It is an argument that entered a new phase this week, after Israel enacted daily pauses in fighting in three highly populated areas, and established 'safe' corridors, following a torrent of international criticism Hamas says it provides security for aid from looters and gangs. The UN, WHO, dozens of other NGOs, and several of Israel's key allies (Britain included) say that escalating starvation in the Strip is principally caused by Israel's two-and-a-half-month total blockade up to the second half of May, followed by the lethally ineffective US-backed replacement scheme, coupled with a 'trickle' of NGO aid trucks since then. Further arresting imagery emerged on Tuesday, this time taken from a satellite and showing what appeared to be hundreds of people swamping aid trucks in Khan Younis. Gaza's famine was thus 'visible from space'. One thing all sides agree on is that looting is a widespread problem. Mobile phone footage taken on top of a truck also showed hundreds swamping an aid vehicle. Israel claims Hamas is looting the aid in a concerted effort to steal it for its own fighters and to fill its coffers, with a parallel aim of depriving civilians of food, thus enabling 'useful idiots' in the West to accuse the Jewish state of deliberately starving Palestinians. Hamas denies this. However, given the terror group's track record of using Palestinians as human shields, critics say it is unlikely they will not be seizing the food and supplies for themselves when opportunities arise. The UN and the international humanitarian community concedes that there is significant looting of its vehicles, including since the IDF improved access on Sunday. They put this down to a number of factors, including the inevitable instability caused by, they say, Israel's starvation of the civilian population through its military blockade. The organisations also blame what they describe as the IDF's reluctance to work with them to ensure the safety of their convoys, thus reducing the number of truck deliveries they can even attempt, let alone complete. In one sense, this current row was triggered, or at least escalated, by the IDF's publication last week of drone footage of a vast open-air storage site just inside the Gaza perimeter at the Karem Shalom Crossing in the south of the enclave. According to the military, it showed enough aid to fill 1,000 lorries which had been cleared for delivery but left languishing by the UN. The implication was – and this was briefed off the record by certain officials – that the UN either was not capable or could not be bothered to pass the food, clean water, medical supplies and fuel to ordinary Gazans. Some anonymous officials even suggested the UN was privately supportive of Hamas. The UN hit back, saying that, in practice, Israel was placing practical and bureaucratic hurdles in the way of successful deliveries. Towards the end of last week, the UN's Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs published a more detailed explanation of what those hurdles allegedly were. One of the principal accusations was that, amid a disintegrating situation in the Strip, the IDF was effectively refusing to work with the UN to provide safe routes for its trucks. Last week, the Times of Israel newspaper quoted one senior Israeli defence official as saying that nearly all of the trucks heading to warehouses of aid organisations and the UN were being looted by Gazan mobs, not Hamas. Barak Ravid, an Israeli journalist renowned for his access to senior officials, reported on the N12 channel that, prior to last week, Israel had, in practice, allowed only one route for the 'safe' transfer of aid – where trucks were routinely looted. Some have suggested that this looting was in part instigated by a gang led by Yasser abu Shabab, the Bedouin leader of an anti-Hamas gang which has links to organised crime, and which it has been alleged is armed by Israel. On Tuesday, Al-Araby al-Jadeed, a London-based Arab news outlet, reported that more than half of the Egyptian aid trucks that entered Gaza on Sunday, the first day of the improved access regime, were looted, with their contents sold in local markets. Out of 130 trucks, 73 were looted on or near the Morag Corridor, a key military axis that separates Rafah from Khan Younis and is controlled by the IDF. For those who accuse Israel of a deliberate policy of starvation, which Israel strongly denies, this is further evidence. Images were also released last week of air drops of aid into Gaza. For the first time, Israel, the country controlling access on the ground, participated, sending cargo aircraft to parachute in emergency aid. The IDF published impressive footage showing infrared footage of the drops, emphasising its role in 'facilitating humanitarian assistance'. Inevitably, however, there was a counter-narrative. 'Humiliation', screamed sections of the Israeli press, referring to what they described as Benjamin Netanyahu's volte-face on the ever acrimonious question of aid.
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
UCLA agrees to $6.5m settlement with Jewish students over pro-Palestinian protests
The University of California, Los Angeles, will pay nearly $6.5m to settle a lawsuit by Jewish students and a professor who said the university allowed antisemitic discrimination to take place on campus during last year's pro-Palestinian protests. The lawsuit alleged that with the 'knowledge and acquiescence' of university officials, protesters prevented Jewish students from accessing parts of campus, and made antisemitic threats. Under the settlement agreement announced on Tuesday, the university admitted it had 'fallen short' and agreed to pay $2.33m to eight groups that support UCLA's Jewish community, $320,000 to a campus initiative to fight antisemitism, and $50,000 to each plaintiff. 'We are pleased with the terms of today's settlement. The injunction and other terms UCLA has agreed to demonstrate real progress in the fight against antisemitism,' the parties said in a joint statement provided by the University of California. On Tuesday, the Trump administration announced the US Department of Justice's civil rights division found UCLA violated the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 'by acting with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students'. 'UCLA failed to take timely and appropriate action in response to credible claims of harm and hostility on its campus,' said Harmeet K. Dhillon, assistant attorney general of the justice department's civil rights division. The university has said that it is committed to campus safety and will continue to implement recommendations. UCLA was the site of massive protests last year amid a wave of campus demonstrations nationwide in response to the war in Gaza, in which Israeli forces have killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, which experts say is probably an undercount. The protests at UCLA attracted national attention, particularly after counter-protesters staged a violent attack on pro-Palestinian demonstrators. UCLA also faces a lawsuit from more than 30 pro-Palestinian protesters who say the university was negligent during the 'brutal mob assault' on the encampment and that officials did not intervene. 'This was four-plus hours of unmitigated violence while UCLA private security stood sometimes feet away and did nothing to protect the faculty, students and community members protesting genocide,' Thomas Harvey, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said earlier this year. The lawsuit that was settled this week was filed last year. This spring the Department of Justice announced it would investigate the University of California system for possible antisemitic discrimination and violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The university said it had taken 'substantive action' to combat antisemitism, including publicizing information about campus bans on encampments, opposing calls to boycott Israel and publishing a systemwide anti-discrimination policy. 'Antisemitism, harassment and other forms of intimidation are antithetical to our values and have no place at the University of California. We have been clear about where we have fallen short, and we are committed to doing better moving forward,' said Janet Reilly, the UC board of regents chair. 'Today's settlement reflects a critically important goal that we share with the plaintiffs: to foster a safe, secure and inclusive environment for all members of our community and ensure that there is no room for antisemitism anywhere.'
Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The common but very naughty driving habit that will cost you a $400 fine and five demerit points
Thousands of drivers who were fined for using their phones while behind the wheel argued that the device was actually another item - like a wallet or banana bread. Three out of four motorists who told the judge they weren't using their phone on NSW roads were still required to pay their fines. But the low success rate didn't stop many drivers from arguing that it wasn't a phone pictured in their hand, with some going as far as to claim it was actually 'a chocolate wafer,' 'a calculator,' or 'banana bread.' Mobile phone detection cameras were introduced in early 2020 and have since caught one in every 957 drivers breaking phone laws. Despite being photographed holding their phones by the cameras, 879 people have contested their fines so far this year. One motorist told the court they had been snapped holding a 'receipt tin,' which the judge dismissed, ordering them to pay a $500 fine. Another claimed they were using an 'electric shaver' but were still found guilty. In a shocking case, a driver claimed the phone pictured was actually a 'Kit Kat,' but the judge upheld their $400 fine and ordered them to cover an additional $600 in departmental costs. Other failed misidentification arguments included banana bread, wallets, a calculator, and a 'remote control for a car stereo'. Transport for NSW Secretary Josh Murray explained that many motorists likely believed they could get away with disputing the fine, as the photo they receive is often small and grainy. He claimed many were shocked when they realised the image supplied to the judge is large and detailed, with the phone clearly visible. "They're thinking, 'What's to say what the picture shows'," Murray told the Daily Telegraph. "But once the pic is shown on a big TV screen next to the magistrate, it's often very clear that it is a phone — sometimes you can even see the brand name. "Everyone deserves their day in court but with three out of four cases being upheld, it's clear many drivers are ticking the box." Roughly 614 million cars have been checked by mobile phone detection cameras since March 1, 2020. Of those, 910,000 checks resulted in fines for illegal phone use. Transport for NSW Secretary Josh Murray explained that many drivers mistakenly believed mobile phone detection cameras (pictured) produce poor-quality images. The fine for using a mobile phone is typically $423 but jumps to $562 if the offence was recorded in a school zone. On top of the monetary loss, convicted drivers lose five demerit points. Up to 47 mobile phone detection cameras operate in NSW at a time. Revenue collected from mobile phone, seatbelt and speeding fines goes into a Community Road Safety Fund to help cover the cost of road safety initiatives.
