Top Marine calls for affordable, lethal and autonomous systems
Marine Corps Commandant Eric Smith told the audience at the annual Modern Day Marine exposition Thursday that the force design decisions made over the past six years have put new capabilities in the hands of crucial formations, such as the Marine Expeditionary Unit, or MEU.
'This is about more than ships, it's about deterrence and denial,' Smith said. 'That is why the 3.0 [Amphibious Ready Group] MEU matters, it gives our leaders options.'
A 3.0 presence means a three-ship ARG-MEU, each deployed out of the East Coast, one out of the West Coast and a third on episodic deployments out of Okinawa, Japan.
Top Marine's deployment plans face familiar wrinkle: Inert Navy ships
An ARG includes an assault ship, a landing ship with helicopter platform and a dock landing ship. The MEU contains a battalion landing team, ground combat element, aviation combat element and combat logistics element to form a Marine Air Ground Task Force, or MAGTF.
To achieve that, the Corps needs 31 amphibious ships at a readiness level of 80%. Demand is higher from combatant commands, Smith said. The demand is more than five ARG MEUs, the most requested asset behind the Carrier Strike Group.
Readiness levels hover at around 50%, Smith said in early April at the Navy League's annual Sea-Air-Space Exposition. That's because following two decades of land-based wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Corps had largely not maintained its fleet. Money for maintenance and shipbuilding went to those wars instead.
And Smith wants more capabilities for those MEUs as the service battles an amphibious ship shortage.
'What I need is affordable, lethal, autonomous, light and I can fund at budget time,' Smith said.
Some of those new developments include the Marine Air Defense Integrated System, or MADIS, and its lighter version, the L-MADIS.
The system still needs more autonomous solutions to get after a major threat – drone swarms.
'The big thing that really keeps me up at night is swarms,' Col. Andrew Konicki, head of ground-based air defense for Marine Corps Systems Command, said Wednesday.
Striking those threats from aboard ship or on shore is vital to keeping Marines alive.
'That is how we're going to say ahead of the adversary, with autonomy,' Smith said.
Thirteen of 21 Light Marine Air Defense Integrated Systems, or L-MADIS, have been fielded over the past three years.
That light system was fielded to the 3rd Littoral Anti-Air Battalion, 3rd Marine Littoral Regiment in 2024. It handles group I and II drone threats.
Marine Expeditionary Units have used the system when crossing various maritime chokepoints, and it has proved effective in the maritime environment, despite the system being built mainly as a ground-based air defense system, Konicki said.
Seven more of the larger MADIS system will be fielded by September, bringing the Corps total to 20, with full fielding expected by 2033.
That's for air defense. For a more offensive approach, the Corps expects to receive four-dozen mobile fires platforms, dubbed the Navy-Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System, or NMESIS.
The NMESIS is made up of a Naval Strike Missile mounted on a Joint Light Tactical Vehicle platform with semi-autonomous and autonomous capabilities to launch remotely.
The 3rd Marine Littoral Regiment, a newly created unit for fighting in the littorals, or waters near land, received the first six NMESIS in November.
The Hawaii-based unit formed in 2021. The service then established the 12th MLR on Okinawa, Japan, with plans for a third rotational MLR on Guam.
Six of the NMESIS systems are set to field with 12th MLR beginning March 2026.
All these moves and the push for new, better equipment have a singular aim, he said.
'Modernization with a clear purpose – to keep Marines lethal and survivable,' Smith said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Engadget
2 hours ago
- Engadget
The best Prime Day Apple deals on iPads, MacBooks, AirPods and more
There's a reason Apple gear is so in demand. After reviewing nearly every major device out there, our current favorite laptop, smartwatch, tablet and smartphone are all made by Apple. The only problem is, Apple gear isn't cheap. So it's sometimes wise to wait for an event like Amazon's Prime Day before you buy. This guide rounds up the best Prime Day Apple Deals we could find so far, including some of the lowest prices of the year on iPads, Apple Watches, AirPods and MacBooks. We've also linked to our reviews and buying guides so you can make the most informed purchases possible. Apple Watch SE for $169 (32 percent off): Those on tight budgets can opt for the Apple Watch SE and know they're getting the core Apple wearable experience with few compromises. We consider it to be the best smartwatch for newbies. Apple iPad Pro (11-inch, M4) for $899 ($100 off): We named the iPad Pro the best tablet money can buy. The screen is one of the best we've seen and Apple somehow managed to make the Pro model lighter than Air models. If you plan on handling heavy productivity — video rendering and editing, machine learning apps and the like, this is the way to go. Apple iPad Pro (13-inch, M4) for $1,099 ($200 off): The larger iPad pro is the ultimate laptop replacer. The M4 chip is faster than many computers out there but the thin and light design makes it super portable. The battery life will last through a whole day of work and more (we clocked over 10 hours of use in our review) and the screen is brilliant. Our only real complaint is the price, and this Prime Day helps at least a little. Apple iPad Mini (A17 Pro) for $399 ($100 off): Apple's smallest iPad earned an 83 review score from us when it came out late last year. Despite its compact size, it's still a fully-featured iPad, with support for accessories and a laminated, anti-reflective screen. It's not a laptop-replacer, but rather the perfect couch companion, handling games, video, web browsing and email triage. MacBook Air (M4, 15-inch) for $1,049 ($150 off): If you want a little more screen real estate, go for the 15-inch Air. Devindra found the screen more immersive than the smaller model, and only slightly less portable. The slightly larger battery gave it a few more minutes of life. Whichever size you go for, the MacBook Air will be able to handle all but the most demanding rendering tasks without breaking a sweat. MacBook Air (15-inch, M3, 24GB RAM) for $1,249 ($450 off): This higher-specced version of the M3 MacBook Air from last year has a 15-inch screen and a little extra internal memory. We gave the 15-inch model a score of 90 in our review when it came out in early 2024. Outside of its older M3 chip (which is still plenty fast for everyday use), marginally improved camera and inability to power two external displays with the lid open, this MacBook is virtually identical to the M4 version. AirPods Max (USB-C) for $480 ($69 off): Apple's only over-ear headphones are due for an update. The company outfitted the AirPods Max with a USB-C port late last year, but the internals haven't had an overhaul since 2020. Still, we named them the best (and only) over-earn AirPods. They are comfortable and relatively lightweight, have a balanced sound and the noise cancellation is solid. Apple Pencil Pro for $99 ($30 off): Apple announced the Pro version of its pencil at the same time as the iPad Pro with the M4 chip. It adds haptic feedback, squeeze gestures and roll capabilities to the usual stylus tricks. It works with the newest iPad Pro, Air and Mini models.
Newsweek
19 hours ago
- Newsweek
Millennials Are More Patriotic Than Boomers In Car-Buying Habits: Study
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Millennials are surprisingly more patriotic than their baby boomer counterparts—at least when it comes to their car-buying habits, according to a new study. In the report from 65 percent of millennials were willing to pay more for a vehicle if it created more U.S. jobs, whereas just 37 percent of boomers said the same. Why It Matters Baby boomers have garnered a reputation for being more traditional and patriotic in nature, but their actual spending habits may reflect different priorities. Millennials, known to be more critical of traditions and patriotism, actually want to create more U.S. jobs through their vehicle purchases, the study found. On average, Americans spent $12,078 on car ownership costs in 2023, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. A Tesla charges up in the Silicon Valley town of Mountain View, California, on August 24, 2016. A Tesla charges up in the Silicon Valley town of Mountain View, California, on August 24, 2016. Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images What To Know Millennials were by far the most patriotic car buyers, scoring 65 percent, with Gen X finishing second at 50 percent, Gen Z coming in third at 48 percent and boomers finishing last with 37 percent, according to the generational study. "The generation that gets labeled as unpatriotic snowflakes is actually the one putting their money where their mouth is," Michael Ryan, finance expert and founder of told Newsweek. "Meanwhile, Boomers, who'll lecture you about supporting America all day long. They balk at paying an extra $50 for something made here." President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs have impacted car manufacturing, especially as many Americans historically purchase vehicles built by non-U.S. companies. More than half of those surveyed said they've accelerated their vehicle purchase timeline to avoid tariff-driven price hikes, and 73 percent of shoppers would consider an American-built vehicle to avoid added tariff costs. When it comes to which vehicles and car brands contribute the most to the U.S. economy through manufacturing, parts sourcing and employment, Texas-based Tesla claimed the top four spots, with its Model 3 topping the list. The Jeep Gladiator and Kia EV6 also ranked high, while Honda vehicles took three spots in the top 10 list. What People Are Saying Patrick Masterson, lead researcher for American-Made Index, said in the report: "As import tariffs shake up the auto industry and influence consumer priorities, our 2025 American-Made Index [AMI] offers a timely snapshot of which vehicles and automakers are truly driving U.S. economic impact. Tesla continues to lead, claiming the top four spots and showcasing its commitment to domestic production. About 25 percent of the more than 400 vehicles on sale in the U.S. made this year's AMI, and whether a vehicle is No. 1 or No. 99, it contributes to the U.S. economy." Ryan added to Newsweek: "Millennials aren't being patriotic in the flag waving, anthem singing way their grandparents were. They're being patriotic with their wallets. That's way more practical. Millennials came of age watching factories close, friends struggle with student debt, and entire communities devastated by job losses. "So when a millennial pays extra for an American made car, they're not thinking 'America, hell yeah!' They're thinking 'Maybe this keeps someone's dad employed' or 'Maybe this helps my town stay alive.'" Alex Beene, financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "While I'm sure there are some millennials willing to pay more for vehicles out of a genuine feeling the action would be patriotic, the reality is many millennials - particularly those on the older side of the spectrum for their generation - are entering years of their working life that result in higher pay. Financially, they may feel they can handle these price bumps at their elevated salaries and support workers in America." What Happens Next Millennials choosing to buy from brands that support American workers could have broader effects on the economy. "What this really reflects is that millennials understand something their elders missed: it's about action," Ryan said. "And when you're facing a housing crisis, climate change, and an economy that feels rigged against you ... They're not buying American cars to make America great again. They're buying them to make America work again."
CNBC
a day ago
- CNBC
Is hiring movers worth the cost? Ask yourself these 4 questions before paying for professional help
Moving can be a stressful process. And with kids or a busy job, it gets even harder. For many, hiring movers can feel like a good way to reduce the hassle — but it can also come with a high price tag. If you want to bring in professionals, the average cost of a two- to three-bedroom local move of about 7,500 pounds is $1,250, according to a moving services platform. A long-distance move of around 1,000 miles will run you $4,890 on average. That number can go up even higher, though, depending on factors such as the weight and size of your belongings, the distance of your move, the timing of it and the cost of labor. So, is it worth it to hire movers? Here are four questions to ask yourself first, according to financial experts. It might be easy to move a bedside table and a few bags of clothes with the help of a couple buddies, but consider whether you trust yourself to keep your more precious possessions safe too, says Ben Smith, a certified financial planner from Milwaukee, Wisconsin. As Smith's clients get older and accumulate pricier possessions, he finds they feel more comfortable spending money on movers to reduce the chances of breaking things or getting injured by doing the heavy lifting themselves, he says. Plus, professional moving companies usually offer insurance packages you can tack onto your deal, meaning if a flat-screen TV gets cracked in the truck, you might end up in a better position for getting a replacement than if you accidentally break it in the back of a U-Haul, Smith says. Like with any convenience service, consider the value of the time you'll get back by outsourcing in comparison to the price, Smith says. With his clients, Smith usually crunches these numbers with the help of online tools, like the salary to hourly calculators on Indeed or The Calculator Site, he says. When calculating your personal hourly rate, remember to account for base salary, bonuses, recurring job costs, benefits and vacation time. For a quick estimate, you can add your annual income and typical bonus together, then subtract estimated taxes and work-related expenses such as gas to and from the job. Divide that number by the total hours you work in a year, which is usually around 2,080 hours for full-time employees. If your hourly rate comes to $75, you may be comfortable paying someone $50 an hour on occasion to help with a tedious home maintenance task, Smith says. Moving, though, generally comes at a steeper price, and often requires you to think more long-term about managing your time, money and stress, beyond just your hourly rate. Consider the different factors that could raise the price tag and how much time you want to buy back, says Jovan Johnson, a CFP from Atlanta, Georgia. Are you willing to pay someone to help with packing, or would you prefer to save money by taking care of that step yourself? How long would it take you to get enough friends together to carry your couch out the door, into the truck and to your new place — and how much could you accomplish by using that time differently? If outsourcing can save you significant productive time, allowing you to prioritize your income, then it may be worth it, Johnson says. There are many factors to worry about when moving, and sometimes hiring professional help is key for "peace of mind," Smith says. It's why he and his wife decided to hire pros for the first time when they moved two years ago. Saving time and physical effort provided mental relief, he says, and allowed the couple to focus on other tasks, like changing addresses on credit cards. It also crucially allowed Smith to stay on track at work, he says. Your income is "the engine" of your financial health, Smith says. Prioritizing your happiness and outsourcing tasks that bog you down can reduce the risk of burnout and keep the engine running. So if hiring movers means you won't fall behind at work or into turmoil at home, then outsourcing might be the way to go, Smith says. Before hiring a moving company, it's best to shop around and find a price that won't deter your long-term financial goals, Johnson says. Depending on your budget, this may mean only hiring movers to take care of a small portion of your more breakable, bulky or precious items, while teaming up with friends or family to take care of the rest. You should never hire movers if it would jeopardize your ability to pay important bills or force you into high-rate debt, he says. Ultimately, it comes down to finding a price you can afford today that also won't deter your long-term goals, Johnson says.
