Why Non-Surgical Nose Jobs Are Replacing the Knife
'More and more patients are looking for impactful changes without the permanence or downtime of surgery,' says Dr. Ali Ghiyam, MD, of Simi Doctors. 'What used to be a multi-week commitment is now a 20-minute visit with results that can be just as transformative.'
Enter the liquid nose job, a fast, reversible fix that's transforming the world of facial aesthetics, one hyaluronic drop at a time.
A new generation of patients is reshaping beauty culture, and it's happening through subtle 'tweakments' instead of full-scale transformations. With platforms like TikTok flooding feeds with sculpted side profiles and filter-perfect noses, people are showing up to appointments with screen grabs, not celebrity references.
What they want isn't dramatic: it's a touch-up. A straighter bridge. A more lifted tip. A camera-friendly angle. Thanks to the tweakment trend, those wishes now come true with a syringe instead of a scalpel.
'A liquid rhinoplasty uses hyaluronic acid filler to smooth bumps, lift the nasal tip, or create a straighter profile,' explains the Cleveland Clinic. 'It's fast, non-invasive, and delivers immediate results, often with zero downtime. The key advantage? It's temporary and reversible.'
The procedure takes less than 30 minutes. Filler (often Juvederm or Restylane) is injected to contour the nose and refine its shape without reducing size or correcting internal structure. It's ideal for patients seeking cosmetic improvements without long recovery or surgical commitment.
And if you don't love the results? Hyaluronidase can dissolve the filler in minutes.
Liquid rhinoplasty has expanded far beyond the surgery-averse. It's now the go-to tweak for influencers, professionals, and even patients test-driving their future surgical look. Non-surgical procedures like this are part of a broader movement: over 4.4 million filler treatments were performed in the U.S. in a single year, with nose reshaping topping the request list.
For younger patients, especially, the appeal lies in control: you can try, adjust, or undo, no operating room required.
Despite the no-scalpel promise, liquid rhinoplasty is still a medical procedure, and one that carries risk. The nose contains critical blood vessels. If filler is improperly placed, it can lead to vascular occlusion, potentially causing tissue damage or even blindness.
That's why expert care is non-negotiable. Choose a board-certified provider with advanced knowledge of nasal anatomy and vascular safety. Minor swelling and bruising are common. But if you experience pain, skin blanching, or vision changes, you should seek immediate medical attention.
The rise of liquid nose jobs marks a shift in how we approach beauty: not as a permanent destination, but as a journey we can refine in real-time. A 2022 NIH study found that younger patients are significantly more likely to choose non-invasive procedures for cosmetic concerns, citing flexibility, reduced downtime, and lower risk.
This isn't about perfection, it's about personalization. It's skincare meets sculpting, minus the irreversible choices.
If you're curious about rhinoplasty but not quite ready for the OR, this might be the aesthetic middle ground you didn't know you needed. Expect to pay between $600 and $1,500, with results lasting 6 to 12 months depending on the product used and your body's metabolism.
Just remember: this is still a medical procedure, not a facial. Choose wisely. Ask questions. And don't let a filter talk you into a filler without doing your homework.
A liquid nose job, also known as non-surgical rhinoplasty, is a cosmetic procedure that uses injectable dermal fillers (usually hyaluronic acid) to temporarily reshape the nose. It can smooth bumps, enhance symmetry, and lift the nasal tip without the need for surgery or downtime.
Most non-surgical nose jobs last between 6 and 12 months, depending on the type of filler used and how your body metabolizes it. Some patients may need a touch-up around the 9-month mark to maintain results.
Yes, when performed by a qualified, board-certified injector. However, the nose is a high-risk area due to its blood vessel structure. Complications like vascular occlusion are rare but serious, so safety depends on the skill and anatomical expertise of the provider.
Technically, no, it won't reduce the size of your nose. But by adding filler in strategic places, a liquid rhinoplasty can create the illusion of a smaller, straighter, or more balanced nose by improving proportions and smoothing out irregularities.
The average cost of a liquid nose job in the U.S. ranges from $600 to $1,500, depending on the injector's experience, location, and filler brand. It's significantly more affordable upfront than traditional rhinoplasty, but the results are temporary.
Yes. If hyaluronic acid filler is used, the procedure is said to be reversible. An enzyme called hyaluronidase can be injected to safely dissolve the filler within 24 to 48 hours.
This procedure is ideal for individuals who want minor cosmetic refinements (such as smoothing a dorsal hump or lifting the nasal tip) but aren't ready for the permanence, downtime, or cost of surgery. It's not recommended for those needing structural correction or breathing improvements.
Click here to learn more about Dr. Ali Ghiyam, MD.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
The troubling truth behind ‘toxic' chemicals found on receipts — and whether they're actually killing you: doctor
QUESTION: Hi Dr Zac, I recently saw a viral video claiming the ATO is 'killing us softly' through thermal receipts – apparently they're coated in BPA and other hormone-disrupting chemicals. As someone who handles receipts at work all day (shoutout to retail life), I'm now kind of freaked out. Should we be worried about the long-term effects of touching them, or is this another TikTok conspiracy? – Jodie, 34, Wollongong NSW ANSWER: Hi Jodie, Good news – for once, TikTok has stumbled onto some real science. Thermal receipts – those shiny ones that fade faster than a politician's promise – often contain Bisphenol A (BPA) or its chemical sibling, BPS. These compounds are used in thermal printing to create text without ink. But here's the rub: both are known endocrine disrupters, meaning they can interfere with your hormones, especially estrogen (National Health and Medical Research Council, 2020). Advertisement What's more worrying is that BPA can be absorbed through the skin. A 2014 study in Environmental Health Perspectives found that people who handled receipts frequently – particularly with moisturised or greasy hands – absorbed measurable amounts of BPA. Another Australian study confirmed that regular skin contact can lead to significant exposure. Now, don't panic and start wrapping your hands in cling wrap. Most of the alarming research involves high-dose exposure, usually in industrial settings or lab environments. But for retail and hospitality workers handling receipts every day, the cumulative effect is something to take seriously. So how can you protect yourself without quitting your job or demanding a full PPE kit? Chemicals on store receipts often contain chemicals that can disrupt your hormones, according to Dr. Zac Turner. Vladimir Razgulyaev – 1. Wash your hands — and skip the wipes Advertisement Regular soap and water is more effective than antibacterial wipes when it comes to removing BPA residue. Easy, quick, and no need to buy anything fancy. 2. Keep your hands away from your face BPA doesn't need an invitation to hop from your fingertips to your mouth or eyes. Less contact, less risk. BPA chemicals can be absorbed through the skin. ViDi Studio – 3. Wear gloves if you're pregnant or working full-time with receipts Especially in busy environments where they're flying out like confetti. Disposable gloves can make a real difference — and no, they don't make you look ridiculous. 4. Go digital Advertisement If you're the customer, skip the paper. Most retailers now offer email or text receipts. It's cleaner, safer, and you'll stop collecting receipts for things you returned two months ago. 5. Don't be fooled by 'BPA-free' Many retailers have switched to BPS-coated paper instead. But early research suggests BPS may be just as hormonally active – possibly worse in some cases. So it's a bit like replacing cigarettes with cigars and calling it progress. Ultimately, we need broader changes – better regulation and safer materials. France banned BPA receipts in 2019. Australia's not there yet, but retail workers like you raising concerns is how change starts. Advertisement So yes, Jodie, your instincts were right. This isn't conspiracy – it's chemistry. And when it comes to protecting your hormones, even small changes count. Stay sharp, Dr Zac
Boston Globe
6 hours ago
- Boston Globe
‘Great news but a weird twist.' After the NIH moved to restore hundreds of grants, researchers remain in limbo.
Advertisement In New England, 63 of those grants, worth $126 million, are set to be restored, according to a Globe analysis based on the The grants were restored as the result of a lawsuit filed by the American Public Health Association and 16 state attorneys general arguing that the NIH improperly ended funding tied to topics like gender identity, health disparities, vaccine hesitancy, and DEI efforts. The judge in the case ruled in June that the terminations were 'illegal and void' and ordered the government to immediately make the funds available. The Trump administration has appealed the decision. Advertisement The grants are a fraction of the more than $3.1 billion in funding from the National Science Foundation and the Department of Health and Human Services that the Trump administration has canceled across New England. At a status hearing on the case Monday, attorneys representing the public health association said that more than 50 of its roughly 300 affected research grants across the country have not been reinstated, and that the NIH has not provided a timeline for when all grants will be restored. Researchers face other obstacles as well. At Harvard, virtually all federal funding remains frozen as part of the administration's broader assault on the university. Others face reduced staffing, due to layoffs, and shortened deadlines to complete their research. And funding at the federal level remains subject to sudden reversals, as shown Tuesday night when the White House In a statement Thursday, the NIH told the Globe it 'has been working to reinstate grants to comply with the court's order.' Scott Delaney, a Harvard scientist and co-creator of Grant Watch, said many researchers remain wary despite the win because of further appeals and reviews. 'Every indication is that NIH will continue to cut research on trans health and on DEI. They still remain hostile to broad bodies of research, and they continue to ask researchers to rewrite their grants to avoid certain topics,' said Delaney, who lost his own NIH funding and received a But many are pressing ahead despite the obstacles and hoping for the best. Advertisement Nancy Krieger, a professor of social epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, learned this month that her funding would be restored. She said that despite feeling vindicated by US District Court Judge William G. Young's ruling, she cannot access the funds due to the federal freeze on funds to Harvard. Since 2019, Krieger and her team have been working to measure the impact of six types of discrimination — including racism, sexism, and ageism — on health. The researchers enrolled 699 patients who completed two study questionnaires online and at three Boston community health centers — including Fenway Health, Mattapan Community Health Center, and Harvard Street Neighborhood Health Center in Dorchester — to test how discrimination contributes to psychological distress and sleep disorders. 'We can resume the work because we had completed all data collection and we were in the phase of data analysis and manuscript preparation,' Krieger said. 'Whether or not the funding ever truly gets reinstated for my grant — and I would like that it is — it's important, given the complexities, to make sure these things go from a court order to reality.' At Tufts, the school lost and then suddenly regained a pipeline for young talent, though several young scientists lost out in the process. The university hosts one of just 22 NIH-sponsored programs in the country that trains a diverse group of postdoctoral scholars in both research and teaching. The program, called the Institutional Research Career and Academic Development Award, or IRACDA, focuses on underrepresented groups. 'We were ramping up for another five years after earning highly competitive funding last fall,' said Mitch McVey, program director and professor of biology at Tufts. 'Then the new administration came in, and everything changed.' Advertisement When the NIH terminated funding, four incoming applicants had their offers rescinded just one day after receiving them. Marissa Maroni, 28, celebrated the news with her husband and prepared to move back to her home state. 'It felt like the right next step, personally and professionally,' said Maroni, who is finishing her PhD at the University of Pennsylvania. 'But just a day later, I got an email saying the program was canceled. It was incredibly disheartening.' The loss also affects Bunker Hill Community College, University of Massachusetts Boston, and Suffolk University, where IRACDA scholars like Maroni were slated to teach next year. McVey said Tufts might extend the offers again to the four applicants but, 'We're trying to balance the risk involved here, which would be that if the government wins the appeal, the funding will likely be terminated again. We don't want to put the scholars in a position where their job security is always in jeopardy, so we're trying to figure out how to best navigate this situation. It's not easy.' At Yale, nine NIH grants that were terminated are in the process of reinstatement. Four of those belong to John Pachankis, a Yale School of Public Health professor who has spent the past 20 years investigating why people in the LGBTQ+ community are at higher risk for depression, anxiety, and suicide. The sudden March terminations not only disrupted years of research but also halted the rollout of promising mental health interventions. One of Pachankis's halted trials aimed to train front-line mental health providers working at 90 LGBTQ+ community centers across 35 states in cognitive-behavioral therapy to treat depression, anxiety, and substance use. Advertisement 'Right before the funding termination, we learned that our trained mental health providers had started delivering our cognitive-behavioral therapy to over 4,000 LGBT people in just four months,' he said. The funding cut prevented them from studying the longer-term impact of the therapy and ways to sustain it in local communities. Restarting the work has been slow and resource-intensive, he said. It requires updating ethics approvals, reconvening data safety review boards, updating clinical trials registries, drafting now-overdue progress reports, and restarting trials enrollment while no longer having sufficient staff to do this work. 'The research infrastructure took years to build, was collapsed in a day, and will take months if not longer to rebuild,' Pachankis said. 'My confidence in future federal funding for this research remains shaken, but my team's commitment to asking and answering important scientific questions isn't going away.' Meanwhile, at Brown, Moitra is figuring out how to move forward with his research. Between 2022 and early 2024, he and his team recruited 240 LGBTQ+ participants, offering two counseling sessions to study the mental health impacts from the pandemic. After funding was pulled, Moitra said, they lost 40 participants' worth of data that had timed out after those participants received just one counseling session. Now that the grant has been reinstated, Moitra's team is left racing against the clock as the deadline for the funding to be used remains Aug. 31. The researchers are applying for a no-cost extension to allow them to complete the work without requesting additional funds. 'After five-plus months of uncertainty, we were moving on,' Moitra said. 'It's hard to scramble it all back together.' Advertisement Sarah Rahal can be reached at
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
How social media fuels teen anxiety
Social media was meant to help us feel more connected, but for today's teens, it's often doing the opposite. While apps like Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat offer opportunities for self-expression, they can also fuel anxiety, low self-esteem, and distorted self-image. For parents and caregivers, it's important to understand how these platforms are shaping teen mental health and what we can do to support our kids. The rise of the curated self According to the U.S. Surgeon General's 2023 advisory on social media and youth mental health, up to 95% of teens between 13 and 17 use social media, and more than a third report using it 'almost constantly.' With so much of their social world playing out online, teens are under pressure to present a version of themselves that is always interesting, attractive, and liked. But this constant self-monitoring takes a toll. The same advisory warns that more than three hours of daily social media use is linked to a doubled risk of anxiety and depression in adolescents. Social media's impact on teen mental health Social media isn't just a tool. It's an environment that shapes how young people see themselves and others. Studies show that heavy use is associated with rising rates of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and feelings of isolation. A 2023 CDC Youth Risk Behavior Survey found that 53% of teen girls reported feeling persistently sad or hopeless during the past year. While this is a slight improvement over the 2021 survey, this figure is still alarming. Experts cite social comparison, how teens measure their appearance, popularity, and worth against what they see online, as a key contributor. Platforms encourage comparison by rewarding curated, idealized content. Photos are filtered, moments are staged, and metrics like likes and comments become a stand-in for social validation. For teens still figuring out who they are, this can create a crushing sense of inadequacy. In fact, the Surgeon General's 2023 advisory highlights that nearly half of adolescents, especially girls, say social media makes them feel worse about their bodies. More: What parents should know about teen screen time and mental health | Parentally Speaking When 'normal' becomes toxic Not all screen time is harmful. Teens use social media to stay connected, learn new skills, and express themselves. But when the need to maintain a perfect image becomes constant, the pressure builds. Here are a few ways social media can worsen teen anxiety: Fear of missing out (FOMO): Seeing friends post about events or trips they weren't invited to can trigger exclusion and sadness. Perfectionism: Teens may feel they have to edit photos, delete posts that don't get enough likes, or constantly monitor their digital image. Cyberbullying: Negative comments or targeted harassment online can leave lasting emotional scars, and it often happens out of view from adults. Sleep disruption: Notifications and compulsive scrolling often cut into rest, which is directly tied to emotional regulation and resilience. What parents can do The goal isn't to ban social media. It's to help teens build a healthy, balanced relationship with it. Here's how you can start: Talk openly about what they're seeing online. Ask questions like: 'Have you seen anything online that made you feel bad about yourself?' or 'How do you decide what to post?' These conversations normalize critical thinking and self-reflection. Model real-life balance. Your own phone habits send a powerful message. Prioritize device-free meals, get outside together, and talk about your own digital boundaries. Encourage offline confidence-builders. Whether it's sports, art, volunteering, or in-person hangouts, help teens develop a sense of worth that isn't tied to likes or followers. Set limits collaboratively. Instead of imposing blanket restrictions, work with your teen to create screen-time agreements that make sense for your household. This builds trust and accountability. Let them know they're enough. Reassure them that they don't need to be perfect to be valued. Praise effort, empathy, and character, not just appearance or performance. At Wellspring Center for Prevention, we believe emotional resilience starts at home with informed, supportive families who understand the challenges of growing up in a digital world. By staying present, fostering open communication, and setting tech boundaries with compassion, parents can help their teens navigate the pressures of social media without losing sight of who they really are. Sean Peek is the Director of Marketing at Wellspring Center for Prevention, a nonprofit focused on substance use prevention and mental health in New Jersey. He works to empower families and communities through education, storytelling, and strategic outreach. This article originally appeared on How social media fuels teen anxiety Solve the daily Crossword
