logo
Who is Catherine Connolly and could she be Ireland's next president?

Who is Catherine Connolly and could she be Ireland's next president?

Times3 days ago
It should not have come as a ­surprise to President Higgins when his former party colleague announced her intentions to replace him in Aras an Uachtarain.
Although the Galway West politicians never engaged in public spats, Catherine Connolly's refusal to comply with Labour's 'yes' ­position during the Nice Treaty ­referendum of 2002 created an awkward split between the pair.
The outspoken critic and councillor of just three years was regarded as the heir apparent to Higgins, who was then one of Labour's most formidable forces.
But she did not let her personal views get in the way of their relationship, which was evident in how Connolly reacted when her party snubbed the veteran ­politician and poet for the presidential nomination in 2004.
'I am not surprised but I am very, very disappointed,' she said at the time.
'I would be absolutely 100 per cent behind him [Higgins]. He would be a great candidate and would show great vision and leadership.'
Their core left-wing principles remained largely the same, particularly when it came to opposing the war in Iraq. Connolly joined thousands of protesters in June 2004 against the use of Shannon airport as a transit stop for US troops.
However, her patience with the Labour Party ran out when ­Higgins was put forward as their only candidate in Galway West at the 2007 general election. Growing up with 13 siblings, Connolly must have always had to fight for space, and concluded where there is room for one, there is always room for another. Pat Rabbitte, the Labour leader at the time, obviously did not share the same sentiment and ignored Connolly's signals that she would run as an independent if she were not selected.
She stayed true to word and left the party, as did her sister Colette, who was a councillor in Galway West for 18 years.
Born in 1957, Connolly grew up in the working-class area of Fursey Road, ­Shantalla, in Galway city.
In 1970, the housing estate gained national attention when numerous residents targeted the home of a Traveller woman, Annie Furey, who was awarded the property by Galway Corporation.
Connolly's eldest brother attended University College, Galway with Higgins. Her father was a skilled plasterer, while her grandfather from the Claddagh worked as a skipper. She has lived in ­the Claddagh with her husband, Brian ­McEnery, since the late 1980s and they have two adult sons together.
In her time as a local representative, the barrister and clinical psychiatrist campaigned on local issues, particularly on the need for additional social homes. However, she did not escape a number of minor controversies.
In May 2005, a 'blazing row' erupted in the chambers of Galway city council after Connolly, then mayor, claimed she was snubbed by the local soccer club ­Galway Hibernians. She took offence when Frank Fahey, a junior minister, was invited to turn the sod on the club's new all-weather pitch instead of her.
However, councillor Michael Crowe told the chamber that the mayor had received two telephone calls of apology from the committee, acknowledging an error was made. He accused Connolly of rebuffing both apologies and being highly insulting to the people on the phone.
• Irish presidential election candidates 2025 — who is up for it?
'As far as I am concerned, you would not treat a dog the way you treated those people last week … You made a holy disgrace of yourself,' Crowe said.
He claimed that not only had Connolly refused to attend the function because she was not the 'star of the show', but she had stopped other councillors from going. Fellow councillor Declan McDonnell even went as far as accusing her of running a dictatorship when she refused to allow Crowe to make a statement.
In her response, Connolly said she was appalled at Crowe's personal attack on her, along with his use of language.
'It's not about a club or a mayor being snubbed, it's about respect for the mayor's office,' she said. 'I think I am one of the most informal mayors to date and I rarely stand on protocol.'
The council's €1,000-a-week spend on Connolly's transport needs as mayor was also a source of contention.
Padraig Conneely, a local election candidate, revealed that a limo company had been paid €650 to drive Connolly to see Galway play Cork in the 2005 All-Ireland hurling final. Connolly said at the time that the only alternative transport was a taxi, which would have incurred further costs on the council.
Although a popular figure, Connolly failed to gain one of the five seats up for grabs in Galway West during the 2007 general election.
In 2011, she was described as the designated successor to Higgins, who had already voiced his intentions to run in the presidential election of 2011, but lost out by just 17 votes to Fine Gael's Seán Kyne.
That result was made even more ­personally difficult for Connolly as her stepmother, Bridget, died during the count. Her father, Coleman, had died less than a year before, while her biological mother, Annie, died in 1965.
When Connolly finally won a seat — on the 14th count — in 2016, her grievances against her former party were not forgotten, as she claimed Labour had 'lost its soul'. However, despite their chequered history, the party has invited Connolly to address its members next week as part of the presidential nominations process.
Her priorities upon entering the Dail were health, the housing crisis, transport and repealing the eighth amendment.
But in 2018, Connolly faced criticism after she travelled to Syria for a week with the independent TDs Mick Wallace, Clare Daly and Maureen O'Sullivan, alongside others involved in the Ireland Palestine Solidarity campaign.
She is likely to be questioned about the trip in future debates as it took place when the dictator Bashar al-Assad, an ally of President Putin, was in power.
However, after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Connolly called Putin a dictator 'with no respect for democracy'.
Any state visits by President Trump may be an uncomfortable experience for all if the outspoken Gaeilgeoir proves victorious in November.
'If we have learnt anything it is … that there are countries we certainly cannot trust,' she said in February.
'America is one of those and England and France are others. What is behind their motivation is simply an arms industry, more war, ongoing war, normalising war and making huge profits. That needs to be called out over and over.
'The government is now using what Russia has done, while not calling out America. In the speech today Trump was called our friend, Trump who has trampled on international law, supporting Israel trampling on international law and reducing Gaza to nothing.'
On the divisive issue of immigration, Connolly has long stood for upholding the rights of asylum seekers. She argued in the Dail last year that direct provision 'does not work', adding: 'It isolates ­people, creates a stigma and is inhuman … There are any number of reports and judgments telling us that this system is just wrong.'
Calls to the independent TD went unanswered but last week, while speaking to Galway City Tribune, Connolly said: 'Yes, my mind is made up to run. I've support from across the spectrum, including the Social Democrats, People Before Profit and Solidarity, as well as a number of senators and others. Labour and Sinn Fein are still completing their own internal processes, which I fully respect. I'll be formally launching my campaign next week.'
People Before Profit's steering ­committee officially agreed to endorse Connolly's presidential bid yesterday. 'Catherine Connolly is a popular, principled figure on the left and we are pleased that she has put herself forward as a candidate,' Paul Murphy, the PBP TD, said. 'It's very important to have a voice to succeed Michael D Higgins in Aras an Uachtarain who continues to advocate for an equal and inclusive society.'
Earlier, the Social Democrats confirmed their backing for her, stating: 'Catherine has been a tireless advocate for progressive causes and we believe she would make an excellent president.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's Nvidia U-turn ‘will boost Chinese military'
Trump's Nvidia U-turn ‘will boost Chinese military'

Telegraph

time18 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Trump's Nvidia U-turn ‘will boost Chinese military'

Donald Trump's decision to let Nvidia sell powerful artificial intelligence (AI) microchips to China has sparked fears that the technology could be used to boost Beijing's military. Charles Parton, from the think tank Rusi, said there would 'inevitably' be sales of semiconductors 'which have the possibility of military use'. 'Once exports reach China, the Communist Party can direct their use,' he told The Telegraph. Luke de Pulford, of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, said: 'Given Beijing's stated policy of civil-military fusion, it has to be presumed these chips will be used for military applications, and is likely to facilitate the modernisation and expansion of the People's Liberation Army.' On Tuesday, Nvidia said it had begun filing new applications to sell its advanced chips in China again. 'The US government has assured Nvidia that licences will be granted, and [we] hope to start deliveries soon,' the company said. The decision to allow Nvidia's most advanced H20 chips to be sold to China reverses an earlier ban by Donald Trump. The US introduced new restrictions in April amid concerns the technology could be used to build cutting-edge supercomputers in China. However, a charm offensive by Jensen Huang, Nvidia's boss, appears to have prompted Mr Trump to change his position. This has included attending a $1m (£744k)-a-head dinner at Mr Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort and promising to build new factories in the US. Mr de Pulford said: 'This is a regrettable decision which suggests the US now believes it can no longer prevent China from acquiring the technology.' Theo Zenou, a research fellow at the Henry Jackson Society, said it remained a 'definite possibility' that US chips could end up in Chinese military technology. 'The danger remains, and we should expect China to try and use the chips for military applications,' he added. Under the Biden administration, the US stepped up efforts to block the sale of advanced AI microchips to China. Nvidia's processors are used to power the most advanced AI products and are being installed in their thousands in vast new supercomputers. 'Well-established concern' US security officials have long warned China could use American-made AI technology for military purposes, while thousands of processors have already been smuggled into the country. Last week, Democratic senators Elizabeth Warren and Jim Banks wrote to Nvidia's Mr Huang ahead of his trip to China, warning him of 'well-established concern' that Nvidia's chips could be used to 'support Chinese military and intelligence activities'. Mr Huang this week downplayed concerns about the use of Nvidia chips by China's military. 'They don't need Nvidia's chips, certainly, or American tech stacks in order to build their military,' he told CNBC. He told reporters in Beijing: 'We believe that every civil model should run best on the US technology stack, encouraging nations worldwide to choose America.' Nvidia's H20 chips were designed to be used by Chinese customers and swerve export controls on its most advanced technology, such as its H200, which remained banned from export to China.

Trump's tax bill funds $6bn expansion of US-Mexico border surveillance, report finds
Trump's tax bill funds $6bn expansion of US-Mexico border surveillance, report finds

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Trump's tax bill funds $6bn expansion of US-Mexico border surveillance, report finds

Donald Trump's sweeping tax bill will finance a vast expansion of surveillance along the US-Mexico border, according to a new report. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBA) will give the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – where US immigration agencies are housed – an unprecedented injection of $165bn in additional funding over the next four years. It's welcome news for the surveillance and defense tech industries that have been racing to cash in on the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. Signed into law on the Fourth of July, the OBBA earmarks more than $6bn of that spending for border technology, including surveillance, according to a new report by the immigration legal defense organization Just Futures Law. Among those standing to benefit are private prison corporations the GEO Group and Core Civic as well as surveillance firms such as Palantir and Anduril. US immigration agencies are seeking more funding for biometric data collection, license plate readers and phone hacking, the Just Futures Law report indicates. 'The spending is not about safety, it's about growing Trump's power through an agency like DHS,' said Laura Rivera, author of the report and senior staff attorney at Just Futures Law. 'I'm questioning why policing at the border should require this level of spending when the Trump administration is saying border crossing is at an all-time low.' Though many of these firms have already seen an increased investment from the federal government and the expansion of existing contracts since the start of the second Trump term, some executives have been banking on the additional funding swelling the budgets of immigration agencies such as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice). During a recent earnings call, for instance, executives at the Geo Group, which operates detention centers and sells surveillance products, repeatedly assured investors that they expected to see more 'momentum' for their businesses in the second half of the year once the Ice budget was finalized. Here's what the agencies are asking for, what the OBBA is giving them and who stands to profit the most: The biggest name among the firms that will see a windfall from the big funding boost to the DHS is Palantir. The data management company was previously awarded $30m in a new contract to build a platform called ImmigrationOS that makes deportations more efficient. As part of the contract, Palantir is reportedly enabling the government to bring together sensitive data on all Americans from the Internal Revenue Service, the Social Security Administration and the DHS. It's an unprecedented centralization of personal information by the federal government that civil liberties experts argue is a violation of privacy. The OBBA has allocated $673m to be spent on biometric systems – which collect and identify people based on physical attributes like their face or fingerprints – for ports of entry and exit. In April, for instance, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) put out a request for bids from firms that would help the agency perform real-time facial recognition on people inside vehicles crossing the borders. CBP previously signed a $16m contract with data broker LexisNexis for various services, including facial recognition. Since the start of 2024, CBP has awarded the little-known facial recognition firm Sentrillion nine contracts totaling $36.7m. According to its website, the company enables CBP officers to use 'voice and facial recognition from audio and video surveillance systems, as well as biometric fingerprint readers, to verify the identity of citizens'. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion CBP also has contracts with Clearview AI, which has been deployed at the US-Canada border, according to the Just Futures Law report. The DHS is also planning to ramp up its use of surveillance towers along the border. Supplied by firms like Peter Thiel-backed Anduril and the Israeli defense firm Elbit Systems, these automated surveillance structures are used to record and track who is crossing the border. CBP has asked for $140m for the upcoming fiscal year to construct more than 200 new towers along the border. The agency expects to have more than 900 towers up by September 2026, according to the report. Ice is looking to ramp up its social media surveillance capabilities with OBBA funding. In a request for information published in June, the agency sought an analytics firm to scour various sources of data including social media, geolocation and license plate reader information, financial information, international travel and crime data. The intention would be for the firm to analyze all of that information together to attempt to predict 'potentially criminal and fraudulent behavior before crime and fraud can materialize', according to the proposal. It's unclear how much funding is set aside for Ice's specific program, but the DHS has already implemented expanded screening procedures for visa applicants, including requiring their social media accounts be set to public. CBP has awarded a $1.2m contract for software developed by a company called Fivecast Onyx to scrape and analyze open source data, including social media.

Whoopi Goldberg turns on Barack Obama with furious rant that leaves co-hosts stunned
Whoopi Goldberg turns on Barack Obama with furious rant that leaves co-hosts stunned

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Whoopi Goldberg turns on Barack Obama with furious rant that leaves co-hosts stunned

Whoopi Goldberg took direct aim at former President Barack Obama, delivering a stunning and unsparing rebuttal that left her fellow co-hosts rattled and the audience in stunned silence. The unexpected clash erupted during Tuesday's episode of the The View following Obama's controversial remarks at a private fundraiser, where he urged Democrats to stop 'whining,' ditch 'navel-gazing,' and 'toughen up' following the 2024 election loss. 'It's going to require a little bit less navel-gazing and a little less whining and being in fetal positions,' Obama told donors, according to The New York Times. 'And it's going to require Democrats to just toughen up.' Never one to hold back, Goldberg was furious. 'Let me remind everybody who was out in the front lines marching when we had the giant marches that went on. It was the people. The people went out. They were not navel-gazing,' she declared as she stared down the camera. 'It was older people who were saying, "Why are you touching my Social Security?" It was not people whining. It was about people saying, "Why are you taking these rights away from my child when my child was born here?"' The 69-year-old didn't stop there. In a pointed rebuttal that directly challenged both Obama and Shark Tank billionaire Mark Cuban, who had also criticized the Democratic Party's messaging, Goldberg insisted that criticism of the left was misdirected. 'This has not been about Democrats laying back,' she thundered. 'This has been about y'all. Because their messaging was always the same. Democrats have been angry at what this man tried to do the last time. They've been angry this time. So, with much due respect to you both, I believe you are pointing the finger at the wrong person when you say Democrats.' Co-host Sara Haines attempted to clarify whether Goldberg was differentiating between voters and elected officials, to which she responded emphatically: 'Yes, I am. You're saying that because I agree - voters are very impassioned voters.' Cuban, speaking in a virtual address that aired during the segment, scolded Democratic strategists for reducing their message to a simplistic mantra: 'Trump sucks.' 'We picked the wrong pressure points,' Cuban said. 'It's just "Trump sucks." That's the underlying thought of everything the Democrats do. Trump says the sky is blue. 'Trump sucks.' That's not the way to win.' Co-hosts Ana Navarro and Sunny Hostin tried to offer more nuanced takes urging Democratic officials to produce detailed policy alternatives rather than rely on protest alone. Navarro pointed out how the public resistance to Trump's immigration policies, was actually resulting in a collapse in his polling numbers. 'Right now, Trump's handling on immigration has gone dramatically down,' she noted. 'Why is that? Because the American people have taken it upon themselves to amplify the truth, to show up and protest these horrible, inhumane raids... to tell the truth about what their relatives are going through. 'We have heard the story of US citizen children with cancer who are not getting treatment because they've had to leave with their deported parents. Because the American people are doing their part - amplifying, showing up at protest, donating, organizing, and being vigilant. 'So, some of us say that Donald Trump sucks. He does suck. And it feels good to say it,' Navarro said to cheers from the audience. Goldberg then turned her ire toward those criticizing flood victims in Texas, in a another rant that was no less emotional. 'Let's be really clear,' Goldberg said, 'You can't blame anybody for these floods. It's nobody's fault. I didn't do it. You didn't do it. Has nothing to do with Washington. This was a natural disaster. 'If you are writing on people's socials where you should be giving, if you're saying these kinds of things - damn you! Damn you! People are trying to get their lives together. These floods are no joke. This is not light humor. This is not how we do in America. We show up for whoever is in trouble. We don't say, "Who did you vote for?" We show up.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store