Salaries decreased by 2% in April, but higher than a year ago
Salaries decreased by 2% in April compared to March, but are still higher than a year ago, as take-home pay slowed again.
Mounting pressure on salaries also puts this week's interest rate decision in the spotlight, raising hope for relief among salary earners.
According to the Bankservafrica Take-home Pay Index (btpi), the average nominal take-home pay recorded a second consecutive month of moderation in April. The Index reflects data from approximately 3.8 million salary earners.
'The nominal average take-home pay declined to R17 495 in April 2025, down 2.0% from R17 846 in March.
'Despite this deceleration, levels remain significantly higher than the R15 370 recorded a year ago,' Shergeran Naidoo, BankservAfrica's head of stakeholder engagements, says.
He points out that the upward trend in take-home pay from the middle of last year marks a positive development after years of sluggish growth and salaries lagging behind inflation.
However, he says, the escalating global trade war has dampened sentiment worldwide, affecting confidence in South Africa and slowing economic activity as investors and households pull back on their spending.
ALSO READ: Here's what some of South Africa's SOE bosses earn
Economic forecasts not great, affecting salaries too
Elize Kruger, an independent economist, says although the worst-case scenario for the trade war impact seems to have been averted, economic growth forecasts were trimmed notably for the global economy, while local growth prospects are also expected to disappoint.
'This could hurt employment and earnings prospects of salary earners in South Africa in the coming months.'
Real take-home pay, adjusted for inflation, also moderated by 2.2% to R15 005 in April 2025, compared to R15 344 in March, but is still notably higher than a year ago.
'The significant moderation in consumer inflation during 2024 had a positive effect on the buying power of salary earners and the scenario is continuing into 2025, with the latest headline inflation figure at only 2.8% for April 2025,' she says.
With headline CPI now forecast to average to be around 3.4% in 2025 compared to 4.4% in 2024, it will be the lowest annual rate since the 3.3% recorded in 2020.
The recent increase in the rand exchange rate, combined with a lower international oil price will result in further fuel price declines in June despite the increase in the fuel levy, while the sluggishness in the economy keeps demand-driven pricing pressures well contained.
ALSO READ: Capitec CEO tops banking pay charts — but how do staff salaries compare? A look at how SA's top five banks pay
2025 expected to be a good year for salaries
'With this favourable inflation scenario, 2025 will likely be the second consecutive year of positive real take-home pay growth, supporting demand in the economy,' Kruger says.
However, with the elevated cost of living, additional taxes announced in Budget 2025, with no adjustment to tax brackets and an inflation-related fuel levy increase, as well as continuing high interest rates, salary earners remain under pressure.
Early indications are that the real gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate for the first quarter of the year will likely be zero, or even negative. With the current repo rate at 7.5%, the real repo rate stands at 4.1%, which is a very restrictive stance if the neutral real repo rate of 2.8% is considered, Kruger says.
'A decrease in the cost of credit could go a long way to offer relief to households and the business sector, boosting confidence levels somewhat, while also lowering the hurdle rate on capital expenditure programmes.
'While a more aggressive cut would have been welcomed, the South African Reserve Bank (Sarb) is likely to cut interest rates by only 25 basis points at best at its Monetary Policy Committee meeting on Thursday.'
ALSO READ: Increase in take-home pay in January shows positive start to 2025
Slightly higher salaries not enough – we need repo rate cut
With the economy stalling in the first quarter and global pressures mounting, accelerating structural reforms is now critical. Tackling energy, logistics and governance challenges will help to unlock growth and buffer against external shocks.
'The current low inflation environment, supported by lower international oil prices and the rand's notable recovery in recent weeks, provides an opportunity for monetary policy to play a role in offsetting some of the pain inflicted on the economy by recent global developments, as many developing and developed economies have already done,' Kruger says.
'While the debate about lowering the inflation target band is ongoing, it should not prolong the pain inflicted on the economy by exceptionally high interest rates.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
a day ago
- Daily Maverick
FSCA cleared to go global and pursue R50m fine for Viceroy over Capitec report
Following a high court ruling, South Africa's market cop has grown a new set of teeth that can pierce across borders. In a landmark ruling on 9 July, the Pretoria High Court handed the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) a powerful new weapon: the ability to fine foreign entities that mess with South Africa's markets, even if they've never set foot in the country. The FSCA said that it considers this a significant legal victory and believes that it is an 'essential part of protection of the public in an interconnected, digital global financial environment'. For the likes of Viceroy Research, which became a household name in 2018 after detonating a bomb under Capitec with a dodgy research report, the rules of the game have changed. The next time a hedge fund hit squad fancies nuking a JSE-listed stock with dubious 'research', they might want to budget for a fight in a South African court. How to burn R9.3-billion before lunch In January 2018, Viceroy lit a match in the form of a report titled Capitec: A wolf in sheep's clothing. The report accused the bank of 'predatory lending practices', pushing clients into debt spirals and called for an immediate curatorship by the South African Reserve Bank (SARB). The report went on to claim that Capitec had to write off more than 42% of the gross collectible principle due to it in the 2017 financial year, even suggesting the loan book was an 'irreconciliable R3-billion'. Twitter went feral, media outlets amplified the claims, and by closing bell, Capitec's price share had plummeted 23%, erasing R9.345-million in market value, according to a FSCA newsletter sent out in September 2021. The SARB scrambled to calm markets, assuring everyone that Capitec was solvent, capitalised and had adequate liquidity. The stock might have bounced back, but the reputational shrapnel lingered. The FSCA later warned that Viceroy's falsehoods 'posed a clear and present threat to the stability of the South African financial system'. Capitec told Daily Maverick that the bank has 'consistently maintained the 2018 report was misleading and caused unwarranted harm'. A calculated hit and a big payday The watchdog eventually pieced together that Viceroy was executing a targeted hit. A transcript of a hearing held by the Financial Services Tribunal (FST) in October 2022, reveals that Viceroy had a deal with a hedge fund, Oasis. It would $100,000 a month for tailor-made hit pieces plus 12.5% of the profits from short positions. Oasis banked an estimated R82-million, and Viceroy's cut was estimated by the FSCA to be close to $744,482 (R10-million at the time). All while ignoring legal obligations to correct falsehoods under the Financial Services Act. Dodging the net The FSCA initially slapped Viceroy with a R50-million fine for breaching Section 81 of the Financial Markets Act, which bans false or misleading statements about listed securities. FSCA commissioner Unathi Kamlana hoped the penalty would be 'a deterrent to those hoping to make a quick buck by peddling false information'. Viceroy cried foul, basically saying, 'You can't touch us, we're not in South Africa'. Shockingly, the Financial Services Tribunal largely agreed. The tribunal admitted that Viceroy's actions 'had an effect' on South Africa. But under common law, they said, you need to serve a foreigner in person while they're in the country to establish jurisdiction. The fine was set aside and the case was closed. Or so Viceroy thought. Closing the loophole The FSCA fought back and launched an application to review the decision to scrap Viceroy's fine. The Pretoria High Court ruled on 9 July 2025 that clinging to an area of physical service would 'hamper and frustrate the effective regulation of financial activity that takes place extra-territorial and digitally'. Citing section 173 of the Constitution, the court developed the common law. The FSCA can fine a foreigner if: Notice is delivered by any means (including electronically); and The conduct's link to South Africa is 'sufficiently close'. 'The court remitted the reconsideration application brought by Viceroy Research and partners back to the Financial Services Tribunal, so that a decision can be made on the merits,' the FSCA said. The case is not yet closed, but the R50-million penalty is back on the table. The FSCA remains confident that it made a clear and compelling case against Viceroy. 'The public can take confidence from the fact that the FSCA will not shy away from taking appropriate action to protect its investigation and enforcement powers to ensure appropriate investor protection and the integrity of financial markets,' it said. DM
Mail & Guardian
5 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
SA's unemployment is not a statistical construct; it's a real and painful hardship
South Africa's unemployment rate currently sits at 32.9% (Delwyn Verasamy/M&G) For the many jobless people in South Africa, the debate over whether the unemployment rate is 10% or 32.9% is futile. It makes little difference to an unemployed young graduate sitting at home whether Statistics South Africa counts them in the Quarterly Labour Force Survey or not. What may give them some solace is the acknowledgement that a problem exists. Seemingly, those with the power to act, including government ministers, are fixated on errors of inclusion and exclusion. The primary purpose of releasing the unemployment rate regularly is to provide a sense of economic health and urgency. The grim picture of unemployment in communities is glaring for all to see. Annual research from the Gauteng City Region Observatory demonstrates that people's perceived quality of life — socio-economic status, health, safety, public services — is diminishing. Government social spending is at an all-time high because of pressing social needs. Clearly, the economy's health is not in good shape, and this should be reflected in and affect various socio-economic matrices, including unemployment itself. So, why is South Africa debating the unemployment figures instead of its substance? Well, the saying, in every crisis lies the seed of opportunity, could not be more relevant than in this debate. After observing money movements in the millions of Capitec bank accounts, the outgoing chief executive could not reconcile the amounts of deposits flowing into the bank accounts with the official unemployment rate of 32.95% or 8.5 million people. As a bank serving low-income segments, the chief executive argues that millions of his depositors, who are likely to generate income in the informal economy, are not included in unemployment surveys. If accounted for, unemployment could be as low as 10%, he argues. The country's relatively small informal employment (19% or just over three million people) in comparison to peer African and emerging market economies reinforces his argument, with Brazil and India sitting at 39% and 90% respectively. The criterion for inclusion in the counting is not a bank deposit or income earnings (this debate has been exhausted). The opportunity that Capitec may have exploited through the provocative discussion is not so much about who is included, but what a different interpretation of those deemed informal implies for extending cash flow-based business credit lines and other banking services, such as PoS systems and related wallet value-added services. A recent International Monetary Fund and World Bank report suggests that only 4% of informal businesses in South Africa have access to credit lines compared to other African and income peers of 20% to 40%. Capitec has made no secret of its wish to replicate its success in the low-segment personal banking market by penetrating informal businesses, arguably estimated to be R450 billion to R750 billion a year. Tinkering with unemployment statistics won't change the fortunes of Capitec or any bank, for that matter. Neither would this affect the performance of the economy, because the size of the national income, including bank deposits from informal businesses, is given at any period. It is therefore not possible to achieve a sudden downward adjustment to the unemployment rate from 32.9% to 10% without a corresponding increase in economic output. One of the established doctrines in economics, dubbed Okun's law, suggests that the country's GDP must grow at about 3% to 4% a year to achieve a 1% reduction in unemployment. The prospects of achieving such robust output growth have eluded the country's economy for many years. Even if circumstances change dramatically, it will still take no less than 20 years to reach this elusive 10% unemployment rate. Unemployment and economic activity are inextricably intertwined, but their relationship in South Africa has been spurious, leading to mischaracterisation of whatever sluggish economic growth there is as jobless. Corporate executives can shape the public discourse on unemployment by steering debates toward addressing the structural determinants of unemployment or strategies to achieve 3-4% GDP growth. Unsubstantiated unemployment estimates may raise unwarranted and damaging questions about the country's national statistics. To some people, unaccounted unemployment may be equated with unaccounted income, leading to questions about the accuracy of GDP size. Closer to Capitec's home, some people may rightly question how corporate giants continually achieve double-digit earnings growth in an economy growing at1% a year. Of course, the answer is business prowess, just as Stats SA aptly boasts statistical mastery. But the question remains: is it conceivable that GDP may also be understated, based on observations of super corporate profit performance? Banks will be among the first to complain if anyone suggests a drastic revaluation of GDP, because it would lead to the misallocation of resources, production planning nightmares and flawed economic policy. Many economic policy decisions, including borrowing rates from which banks generate profits, hinge on the accurate measurement of GDP. Those familiar with the political economy of South Africa know too well that certain policy areas are sacred. Bank executives rarely comment on the percentage spread between the repo and prime rates or the perceived conservatism of the South Africa Reserve Bank in lowering lending rates, even when inflation is at the lower bound of the target band. Unemployment figures deserve the same level of sensitivity, for many reasons that bank executives must familiarise themselves with. This is not 'whataboutism', but a matter of principle when dealing with national statistics: accuracy, consistency, credibility and sensitivity. Unemployment is a painful reality for many South Africans. The South African Police Service received almost 148,000 applications within 48 hours of opening online applications for 5500 police trainees. This level of desperation is not consistent with a 10% unemployment rate. No amount of disagreement with Stats SA's counting methods should trivialise the sheer size of unemployment and the psychological effect of economic inactivity. Reports of government ministers lining up to talk to the Capitec chief executive are encouraging. Perhaps something will come out of the discussion. There is no shortage of solutions for jobs, only the will from the government and the private sector to work together in the best interest of every South African. The official unemployment rate remains at 32.9%. Period. Eddie Machete Rakabe oversees the political economy faculty at the Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Relations. viewsHe writes in his personal capacity.
The Herald
5 days ago
- The Herald
Steady but uneven: Women slowly climb the corporate ladder in South Africa's boardrooms
South Africa is making 'steady but uneven' progress towards gender equity in corporate boardrooms. This is according to the 2024 Spencer Stuart South Africa Board Index which tracks the composition of boards in the country's 50 largest JSE-listed companies. The report reveals that women now account for 37% of all directors and 40% of non-executive directors (NEDs) which is a significant improvement compared to previous decades. The report also showed persistent gaps especially in executive leadership and long-term retention. 'Sixty percent of boards now include at least one woman in a top executive position either as chairperson, CEO, CFO or another executive director. This signals that women are not only entering the boardroom but increasingly occupying key decision-making roles,' the report said. The index showed that despite these gains progress remains inconsistent. Just 43% of newly appointed NEDs are women and 22% of them have no prior board experience which is a sign of what the report calls a 'persistent pipeline problem'. The report also provides insights into age and tenure differences. The average board member is just under 60 years old but female NEDs are notably younger than their male counterparts, averaging 57.9 years versus 62.3. New directors are younger still, at 55.7 years. However the average tenure for women on boards is only 4.6 years compared to 7.5 years for men, raising questions about retention and long-term influence. In addition to gender, the Spencer Stuart Index tracks other dimensions of diversity including race, age and nationality. It found that 32% of board members are historically disadvantaged South Africans (HDSAs). Among these, HDSA women average 55.4 years in age and 4.9 years of tenure, slightly above the average for female directors. Still, the report cautions that women remain underrepresented at the highest rungs of corporate leadership. Globally, the MSCI All Country World Index (ACWI), which tracks thousands of companies, reports that just 6.5% of CEOs and 9.1% of board chairs are women. The MSCI ACWI said the number of female CEOs worldwide has doubled since 2019, and 18.8% of CFO roles are now held by women. However, pay disparities persist as in 2022, male CEOs earned an average of $6.5m compared to $6.3m for their female counterparts. The communications sector showed the starkest gap with men outearning women by nearly $10m, while in industrials, women out-earned men by $4.4m on average. South Africa's progress, though slow, is notable as a Stellenbosch University study highlights that in 2008, only 14.3% of JSE-listed company directors were women. By 2017, that figure had risen to 20.7%. Yet, it still lags far behind the demographic reality as women make up 51.2% of the population and 45% of the economically active population. Internationally, some countries have taken bolder measures. Norway enacted one of the world's first and strictest gender quota laws in 2003, mandating 40% female board representation. It became compulsory in 2006, with penalties for noncompliance. The result was fewer listed companies. with many delisting to avoid the law, but the move led to better qualified women in leadership and a reduced gender pay gap. Spain's 2007 Gender Equality Act took a softer approach. It set a 60/40 gender balance target but without strict enforcement. Instead, it used incentives such as preferential access to government contracts for compliant companies, encouraging voluntary change. Despite global shifts, gender parity is still a long way off. The MSCI projects that women will make up 40% of board members globally by 2033. Full gender parity (50:50) isn't expected until 2040. TimesLIVE
