AI will eventually lead to a more extreme society of haves and have-nots
This is leading many to believe that a bubble is forming. Such bubbles are not atypical. A 2018 paper published in Marketing Science titled Two Centuries of Innovations and Stock Market Bubbles shows that groundbreaking innovation tends to be linked to bubbles in the stock prices of companies commercializing innovation. Those investors who remain overallocated to an innovative company after the bubble has ended suffer the effects of long-term reversals.
My sense is that AI will not improve productivity as much as markets expect. I tend to agree with Nobel Prize winner Daron Acemoglu, who believes that the AI-related frenzy will eventually lead to a tech crash that will leave everyone disillusioned with the technology.
Historically, new technologies have been disappointing in terms of increasing productivity. There is no clear link between technological innovation and productivity growth, as defined by gross domestic product per worker. A recent example: Nobel Prize winner Robert Solow has written that the computer age was everywhere except in productivity statistics.
Editorial: A real reform mandate for the first federal AI minister
Here are three points to counter too much optimism about AI.
First, it is hard to see the big societal problem that AI will solve.
Second, AI may lower inflation but at the same time will increase demand for capital because of the huge investments and funding it will require in its early stages. This will push real interest rates up, leaving nominal interest rates little changed.
Finally, AI may be hurting more than helping society. For example, researchers at Microsoft published a paper recently arguing that while AI may improve efficiency, it can also reduce human critical thinking capabilities and diminish independent problem solving. 'Used improperly, technologies can and do result in the deterioration of cognitive faculties that ought to be preserved,' it found.
Despite all this, I do believe that AI needs to be embedded in our day-to-day lives, as it is not going away. Whether we like it or not, we are headed full speed toward an AI-powered future.
The key question is, will AI benefit and reach all people? Historically, that hasn't been the case when it comes to new technology, which is usually controlled by a few people. And it may be worse this time.
In my opinion, AI will most likely create a more rigid class-based society: the upper class, which will include people who are on top of AI knowledge and applications, and the lower class – those who are not, and who will be left behind without embedding AI into their everyday life.
A recent article in The Globe and Mail hit the nail on the head. Author Don Tapscott, who is co-founder of Blockchain Research Institute, said, 'AI will become a new social fault line. Those with intelligent agents [i.e., large language model-powered systems] will be superpowered; those without them will fall behind. A small class of enhanced individuals could dominate productivity, creativity and influence.'
An AI-powered future and an AI class-based society reminds me of the landlord-serf relationship in medieval Europe, which was a central feature of the feudal system and could end up being a central feature of the AI-powered future. 'Landlords' were typically those who controlled large estates, while 'serfs' were peasants bound to the land, obligated to work for the landlord and lacking many freedoms.
The land cultivated by serfs was owned by a landlord. A large portion of what serfs produced had to be given to their landlord. Serfs lacked freedom of movement; they could not permanently leave their village, marry, change occupation, or dispose of their property without their landlord's permission.
In the future, these landlords will be those in control of AI, and the serfs will be those without much knowledge about AI.
This looks like a scary dystopian future that should force us all to become sufficiently prepared ahead of time in AI and be in full command of AI agents, irrespective of whether we believe the technology will solve the society's productivity problems or not.
George Athanassakos is a professor of finance and holds the Ben Graham Chair in Value Investing at the Ivey Business School, Western University. His latest book is Value Investing: From Theory to Practice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
U.S. court upholds order blocking indiscriminate targeting by immigration patrols
A U.S. appeals court has upheld an order blocking immigration agents from carrying out patrols in California that led to indiscriminate detentions without reasonable grounds to suspect people of being undocumented. Article content The ruling late Friday by a three-judge panel denies the federal government's appeal to overturn a temporary July order to halt the 'roving patrols' in Los Angeles that immigration rights groups have described as illegally using racial profiling. Article content Article content Article content District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong had ordered an end to the arrests, arguing such actions by agents violate a person's constitutional rights that safeguard against unreasonable seizures by the government. Article content Article content She said the detentions were being made 'based upon race alone,' on whether a person was speaking Spanish or English with an accent or because of their place of work, and ordered them stopped. Article content Friday's ruling by the US court of appeals for the Ninth Circuit described the case of plaintiff Jason Gavidia, a U.S. citizen born and raised in East Los Angeles who was arrested outside a tow yard in Montebello on June 12 by agents carrying military-style rifles. Article content 'The agents repeatedly asked Gavidia whether he is American — and they repeatedly ignored his answer: 'I am an American,'' the ruling said. Article content Agents asked what hospital he was born in, and Gavidia responded he did not know, but said he was born in 'East LA.' Article content It said Gavidia told the agents he could show them his government-issued ID. 'The agents took Gavidia's ID and his phone and kept his phone for 20 minutes. They never returned his ID.' Article content Article content California residents and advocacy groups sued the Department of Homeland Security over the detentions. Article content Los Angeles and surrounding suburbs have been ground zero for President Donald Trump's aggressive immigration crackdown. Article content He ordered the U.S. military deployed there for weeks, and agents have rounded up migrants at car washes, bus stops, stores and farms. Article content The ruling said the government's defense team argued that 'certain types of businesses, including car washes, were selected for encounters because… they are likely to employ persons without legal documentation.' Article content Rights groups hailed the order as a victory for those seeking to bar the Department of Homeland Security and agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement from conducting such raids. Article content 'This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region,' said attorney Mohammad Tajsar of the ACLU Foundation of Southern California. Article content 'We look forward to holding the federal government accountable for these authoritarian horrors it unleashed in Southern California.' Article content
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
LeBlanc says he expects Carney, Trump to talk 'over the next couple of days'
Social Sharing Dominic LeBlanc says he expects Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump will have a conversation with each other "over the next couple of days" as Canada tries to find a way out of a 35 per cent blanket tariff on exports to the U.S. "We believe there's a great deal of common ground between the United States and Canada in terms of building two strong economies that work well together," said LeBlanc, the minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade, on CBS's Face The Nation. LeBlanc left Washington earlier this week without a deal, but he told host Margaret Brennan he came out of discussions "with a better understanding of the American concerns in the trading relationship…. So we're prepared to stick around and do the work needed." Few Canadian goods subject to new rate On Friday just after midnight, Canada's tariff rate rose to 35 per cent following a Trump executive order that criticized Canada's "lack of co-operation" in curbing the flow of fentanyl southward and for retaliating against Trump's existing tariffs. But only a very small number of Canadian products will actually be subjected to that rate — specifically goods not covered by the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, which governs trade between the three countries. WATCH | LeBlanc insists there wasn't a good deal before Trump's Aug. 1 deadline: No trade deal with U.S. better than a bad one, LeBlanc says 2 days ago LeBlanc told Brennan that Canada was "obviously disappointed" by Trump's decision to raise the tariff rate. In a separate interview on Face The Nation, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said Canada was the only country aside from China to retaliate against Trump's tariffs. "If the president is going to take an action and the Canadians retaliate, the United States needs to maintain the integrity of our action — the effectiveness — so we have to go up," Greer told Evans. Trump tariffs face legal challenge When asked whether Canada should drop its countertariffs, LeBlanc cited Ottawa's 25 per cent countertariff on U.S. steel and aluminum imports. "There's a 50 per cent tariff when we want to sell [steel] into the United States, so effectively we're blocked from doing that. But the national security interest of Canada requires we have a viable steel and aluminum sector." Trump invoked his 35 per cent levy using a law that allows the U.S. president to take emergency economic measures to "deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat" to national security. That tariff is facing a legal challenge that has now reached a federal appeals court, putting it further along in the U.S. court system than any other tariff lawsuit.
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
U.S. trade advisor says Trump tariff rates unlikely to change
New U.S. tariff rates are 'pretty much set' with little immediate room for negotiation, Donald Trump's trade advisor said in remarks aired Sunday, also defending the president's politically driven levies against Brazil. Article content Trump, who has wielded tariffs as a tool of American economic might, has set tariff rates for dozens of economies including the European Union at between 10 and 41 percent come August 7, his new hard deadline for the duties. Article content Article content Article content In a pre-taped interview broadcast Sunday on CBS's 'Face the Nation,' US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said 'the coming days' are not likely to see changes in the tariff rates. Article content Article content 'A lot of these are set rates pursuant to deals. Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country,' Greer said. Article content 'These tariff rates are pretty much set.' Article content Undoubtedly some trade ministers 'want to talk more and see how they can work in a different way with the United States,' he added. But 'we're seeing truly the contours of the president's tariff plan right now with these rates.' Article content Last Thursday, the former real estate developer announced hiked tariff rates on dozens of US trade partners. Article content They will kick in on August 7 instead of August 1, which had previously been touted as a hard deadline. Article content Among the countries facing steep new levies is Brazil. South America's largest economy is being hit with 50 percent tariffs on exports to the United States — albeit with significant exemptions for key products such as aircraft and orange juice. Article content Article content Trump has openly admitted he is punishing Brazil for prosecuting his political ally Jair Bolsonaro, the ex-president accused of plotting a coup in a bid to cling to power. The US president has described the case as a 'witch hunt.' Article content Greer said it was not unusual for Trump to use tariff tools for geopolitical purposes. Article content 'The president has seen in Brazil, like he's seen in other countries, a misuse of law, a misuse of democracy,' Greer told CBS. 'It is normal to use these tools for geopolitical issues.' Article content Trump was 'elected to assess the foreign affairs situation … and take appropriate action,' he added. Article content Meanwhile White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said that while talks are expected to continue over the next week with some US trade partners, he concurred with Greer's tariffs assessment in that the bulk of the rates 'are more or less locked in.' Article content Asked by the host of NBC's Sunday talk show 'Meet the Press with Kristen Welker' if Trump could change tariff rates should financial markets react negatively, Hassett said: 'I would rule it out, because these are the final deals.' Article content An appeals court panel on Thursday appeared skeptical of the government's arguments, though the case may be ultimately decided at the Supreme Court. Article content
