German court rejects landmark climate case, but enviros seen green lining
The case, Luciano Lliuya v. RWE AG, was filed in 2015, pitting Peruvian farmer and mountain guide Saúl Luciano Lliuya against RWE, Germany's largest electricity provider. The Hamm Higher Regional Court dismissed Lliuya's case, finding that the risk of flooding at his house was not enough for the case to proceed. It also ruled out the chance of appeal.
But in a legal first, Presiding Judge Rolf Meyer did find that under German law it is possible that a polluter may be ordered to cut emissions or bear the costs of climate damages.
Advertisement
That makes the verdict a 'milestone' that will provide a 'tailwind to climate lawsuits against fossil fuel companies,' said Lliuya's attorney, Roda Verheyen. 'For the first time in history,' Verheyen added, 'a high court in Europe has ruled that large emitters can be held responsible for the consequences of their greenhouse gas emissions.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Atos SE (AEXAF) (H1 2025) Earnings Call Highlights: Steady Revenue and Strategic Restructuring ...
Release Date: August 01, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Atos SE (AEXAF) reported a stabilization of revenues at approximately $2 billion per quarter, indicating a steady financial performance. The company achieved a 15% organic growth in operating margin compared to the previous year, showcasing improved operational efficiency. Atos SE (AEXAF) successfully renegotiated a significant contract with a German automotive OEM, turning a previously loss-making contract into a profitable one. The restructuring plan, known as Genesis, is progressing well, with expectations to complete two-thirds of the plan by the end of the year. The company has strengthened its governance with the addition of a new board member, enhancing leadership and oversight. Negative Points Atos SE (AEXAF) reported a net income group share of minus 696 million, indicating significant financial challenges. The company's net debt increased to 1.7 billion, reflecting a higher leverage ratio of 4.0 times. The book-to-bill ratio remains below 100%, raising concerns about future revenue growth and contract renewals. The company incurred reorganization and rationalization charges totaling 379 million, impacting overall profitability. Atos SE (AEXAF) faces ongoing challenges with loss-making contracts, particularly in the UK, which continue to affect cash flow. Q & A Highlights Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with AEXAF. Q: Can you discuss the revenue trajectory for the rest of the year and any specific assumptions regarding demand and seasonality? A: Unidentified_1: We expect Q3 revenues to stabilize around $2 billion, slightly less than previous quarters, with an increase anticipated in Q4. The revenue stabilization is crucial, and we have successfully renewed over 90% of contracts. The pipeline is increasing, indicating potential growth in H2. Q: What are your expectations for free cash flow and restructuring cash outflows for the second half of the year? A: Unidentified_2: We aim to maintain cash in advance at similar levels to last year, around the 300 million mark, despite not actively seeking advance payments. Restructuring cash outflows will accelerate, with most restructuring expected to be completed by summer 2026. Q: Do you expect a significant improvement in your book-to-bill ratio in H2, and how confident are you in achieving organic growth next year? A: Unidentified_1: We anticipate the book-to-bill ratio to exceed 80% and aim for around 100% by Q4. The pipeline is increasing, and we are confident in achieving organic growth next year, supported by a strong restructuring plan that will enhance profitability regardless of top-line growth. Q: Can you provide details on the renewed contract in the automotive sector and its impact on revenue and profit? A: Unidentified_1: The renewed contract with a German OEM was previously at a negative margin. We have renegotiated it to a positive margin of around 10%, improving both revenue and profitability. This reflects our strategy to address loss-making contracts. Q: Are there any expected cash outflows related to litigation or loss-making contracts in the future? A: Unidentified_1: We do not anticipate significant cash outflows from litigation in H2. For loss-making contracts, we are actively working to reduce cash outflows, with one major contract expected to stop bleeding next year, and another being negotiated for termination. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Kaul joins multistate suit claiming Trump has sought to deter care of transgender youths
Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul joined a multistate lawsuit Aug. 1 suing the Trump administration for "relentlessly, cruelly and unlawfully" targeting transgender people. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, comes six months after Kaul vowed to pursue legal actions should the federal government attempt to impede funding for gender-affirming health care. Recent federal actions have sought to deter health care providers from treating transgender patients under the age of 19, despite states like Wisconsin having laws in place that allow for medically appropriate procedures. President Donald Trump's Jan. 28 order oversteps its authority, the lawsuit states, by intimidating providers through threats of civil and criminal prosecution. The lawsuit emphasizes the order not only "has no basis in law" but is unconstitutional. Ultimately, the lawsuit is requesting the court to block the administration's actions and cease enforcing the order. 'The Trump administration shouldn't be interfering with the provision of health care,' Kaul said in a press release last week. 'The administration should be respecting individual liberty and equal rights, not shamefully targeting transgender people.' Trump's directive, signed early in his second term, aims to strip funds from medical institutions that provide gender-affirming care, and would require federal health programs like Medicaid and TRICARE (for military families) to exclude coverage of gender-affirming surgeries and hormone treatments for young people by 2026. Gender-affirming medical care supports people whose gender identity is out of sync with the sex they were assigned at birth. Health care may include the use of hormones to delay puberty in adolescents, behavioral health counseling to support and promote the gender identity with which a person aligns, and hormone replacement therapy. In very rare cases for young people, it may involve surgery. Access to gender-affirming services has been associated with lower suicide risks for transgender people. Research has also shown that people encountering anti-transgender bias and a denial of services had more than double the prevalence of suicide attempts than those who didn't have such experiences, according to the Williams Institute. The attorneys general warn the administration's tactics have had a chilling effect on states' ability to provide gender-affirming services. Despite protective laws being on the books, health care providers have already scaled back the services they offer to transgender youth. Other gender clinics have shuttered services completely in an attempt to avoid civil or criminal investigations and actions. Joining Kaul in filing this lawsuit are the attorneys general of California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawai'i, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, and the District of Columbia, as well as the Governor of Pennsylvania. Natalie Eilbert covers mental health issues for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. She welcomes story tips and feedback. You can reach her at neilbert@ or view her X (Twitter) profile at @natalie_eilbert. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Wisconsin AG Kaul joins suit claiming Trump deters transgender care Solve the daily Crossword
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Ph.D. Candidates Are Not Overqualified, They Are Underrated
'You're overqualified for this role.' It's a phrase far too familiar to Ph.D. holders navigating the job market. Despite their deep expertise, many find that corporate America often misunderstands, underestimates, or overlooks the value they can bring to businesses, especially when the preference leans toward more traditional credentials, such as the M.B.A. In an era of accelerated technological disruption and knowledge-based industries, companies can no longer afford to ignore the untapped potential of Ph.D. talent. Ph.D. is short for Doctor of Philosophy. Its roots trace back to 18th-century Germany, where the Prussian model of education was designed to train individuals to produce new knowledge, not just practice or regurgitate current knowledge. The U.S. adopted this model in the 19th and 20th centuries, and today the Ph.D. is a common offering at many universities, focused on pushing the boundaries of what we know. What separates a Ph.D. from other graduate degrees isn't just subject matter expertise, it's the process of their studies, which entails a long and rigorous journey. On average, earning a Ph.D. takes about five years, and can extend up to eleven. Candidates conduct original research, publish findings, and defend their dissertations in front of experts in their fields. The result is a scholar trained to solve problems no one has solved before. These are exactly the kinds of thinkers businesses need when thinking about new innovations and approaches to challenges. Historically, Ph.D.s were seen as a pipeline to the professoriate. But that narrative is changing. Nearly half (48%) of all Ph.D. recipients now pursue careers in industry, while just 33% remain in academia. In STEM fields, that number is even higher. Over half of Ph.D.s in science and engineering fields enter industry, and for engineers, it's closer to 79%. These shifts aren't just preferences—they reflect evolving professional ambitions. And there's a new variable reshaping the Ph.D. talent pool: government layoffs. Recent cuts in federal agencies have displaced over 51,000 federal workers. The result is a wave of highly trained Ph.D. researchers with policy insight, scientific rigor, and real-world experience entering the private job market. However, future supply of researchers may be a risk. Research universities (where most are trained) rely on government grants and have had to scale back due to federal cuts, meaning less funds for Ph.D. students. For employers, this is a talent acquisition opportunity hiding in plain sight. These professionals bring expertise in data analysis, project management, and scientific reasoning while working within tight budgets (i.e. government). These are skills that are increasingly vital as companies across industries seek to become more innovative and tech-forward. Whether in product design, Research & Development (R&D), sustainability, or strategy, Ph.D. holders can help companies not just compete, but innovate. Yet too often, Ph.D. applicants are dismissed as 'too academic' or 'overqualified.' This stems from outdated assumptions and an incomplete understanding of what Ph.D. training entails. Yes, Ph.D.s are highly educated—but many also bring real-world experience: managing budgets, writing grants, collaborating across institutions, and mentoring diverse teams. These are not your thought-of ivory tower theorists; they are applied thinkers ready to drive change. There's another aspect worth noting. Ph.D. pathways are difficult to access, especially for students without generational wealth or academic lineage. While federal numbers on graduate completion are limited, some research purports that only 56% of Ph.D. students actually complete their 3% of first-generation undergraduate students ever enroll in a Ph.D. program. That's a missed opportunity for both social mobility and corporate innovation. To tap into this hidden talent, employers must take action. That means building or supporting recruitment pipelines—like the McNair Scholars Program, Científico Latino, The Ph.D. Project, and Leadership Brainery. These initiatives are working to ensure that students from even the most challenging backgrounds can become the next generation of knowledge creators and innovators. If innovation is the lifeblood of 21st-century business, then Ph.D. talent is part of the circulatory system. These individuals know how to ask the right questions and pursue rigorous answers, skills that go far beyond academic settings. Companies that recognize and embrace this kind of thinking will be better positioned to lead in an increasingly complex and competitive world. So the next time a résumé crosses your desk bearing the letters 'Ph.D.,' don't ask whether the candidate is overqualified. Ask whether your company is ready to think bigger. Help us widen the pipeline. Support Leadership Brainery in creating equitable pathways to graduate education. Donate today! Interested in engaging with us or have an idea for a future topic? Submit this brief form.
