
Mouldy food and rat infestations: Children face 'almost-Dickensian' levels of poverty
Children spoke of food packages that were mouldy and out of date, rats biting through the walls and black mould making them ill, in a new report published on Tuesday which reveals the "real hardship" facing some families.
Launching the report, Children's Commissioner for England, Dame Rachel de Souza, said children spoke to her about the shame that comes from knowing you have less.
However, she pointed out that "as one of the richest societies in the world, it is decision makers who should be ashamed".
The latest official estimates, for the year to March 2024, suggest there were a record 4.45 million children living in poverty in the UK.
The government's child poverty unit commissioned the new research and will help shape its forthcoming child poverty strategy, which is expected in the autumn.
De Souza said that it is "very clear that any child poverty strategy must be built on the foundation of scrapping the two-child limit", following calls from a number of charities.
The cap, introduced in 2017, prevents parents claiming Universal Credit or child tax credits for a third child, except in very limited circumstances.
Youth organisations argue that 109 children across the UK are pulled into poverty by the two-child cap every day, and approximately 350,000 children would be lifted out of poverty at once if it were binned.
There are concerns that the r ecent welfare U-turn by the Government, which left them with a financial blackhole instead of over £5 billion in savings, means the two-child benefit cap may be here to stay.
Concerns have been stoked further by Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson's comments over the weekend, when she said spending decisions have been made "harder" since changes to welfare reform plans.
Estimates for the cost of scrapping the policy vary, from around £2.6 billion to £3.5 billion by 2030.
The new report, based on the experiences of 128 children across the country between January and March this year, noted a range of concerns, including lack of access to quality, healthy food and living in cramped and poor conditions.
One child spoke of receiving mouldy food packages, saying "I know I'm poor but I'm not going to eat mouldy food."
Another spoke of a mould problem that "was making me so ill", but it was not properly fixed by the council, leaving "a hole in our floor."
Dame Rachel de Souza said that "children shared harrowing accounts of hardship, with some in almost-Dickensian levels of poverty".
"They don't talk about 'poverty' as an abstract concept but about not having the things that most people would consider basic: a safe home that isn't mouldy or full or rats, with a bed big enough to stretch out in, 'luxury' food like bacon, a place to do homework, heating, privacy in the bathroom and being able to wash, having their friends over, and not having to travel hours to school," she said.
While commending "some positive steps by the Government to get more money into families' pockets", she urged "bold, practical measures that break the link between a child's background and their opportunities".
In addition to calling for the two-child benefit limit, Dame Rachel urged for a commitment to a "triple-lock" for uprating all child-related benefits.
She also called for additional proposals, including free bus travel for all school-age children in England, priority for housing to be given to children in low-income households, auto-enrolment for free school meals for all eligible children, improved communication and data-sharing between schools, GPs and local authorities.
A Government spokesperson said: "We are determined to bring down child poverty. We've just announced a new £1 billion package to reform crisis support, including funding to ensure the poorest children do not go hungry outside of term time.
"This comes alongside the expansion to free breakfast clubs, investing #39 billion in social and affordable housing, increasing the national minimum wage and supporting 700,000 of the poorest families by introducing a Fair Repayment Rate on Universal Credit deductions.
"As part of our plan for change, the Child Poverty Taskforce will publish an ambitious strategy later this year to ensure we deliver fully-funded measures that tackle the structural and root causes of child poverty across the country."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
19 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Investors stripping cash from water firms ‘criminal' says ex-Wessex Water chief
Colin Skellett, who helmed the south-west England utility from 1988 to 2024, argued against nationalising water companies because of the industry requiring 'continuous levels of investment'. He spoke as campaigners and experts urged the Government to explore public ownership during the UK River Summit in south London on Tuesday. Ministers have promised a 'fundamental reset' following years of companies paying out large dividend that diverted money away from infrastructure investment and maintenance, leading to sewage pollution and rising bills. However, they have ruled out nationalisation and instead are focusing efforts on tightening rules, increasing investment and strengthening penalties within the current system of regulated private firms. Minister Emma Hardy talking about tackling sewage with @RiverActionUK but the government is ignoring the reality: 7 European countries with highest average of 90%+ bathing sites achieving 'excellent' status – all are 90%+ publicly owned 🇨🇾🇦🇹🇬🇷🇲🇹🇭🇷🇩🇪🇩🇰 — Cat Hobbs (@CatHobbs) July 8, 2025 Speaking at the summit, Mr Skellett said he has seen the industry change since he joined it in 1974, saying it is one that 'requires continuous levels of investment'. 'The problem with public ownership is the Government always has other things it wants to spend its money on,' the former Wessex boss said. He argued that privatisation helped to get debt off the Government's balance sheet and boost investment but this changed when the 'wrong sort of investors' began stripping cash out of companies through high dividends. 'It was bloody criminal what happened – the amount of money that was stripped out of not just Thames (Water), but a number of companies,' he said. 'So we need that to change (in) the system. It's not so much about ownership, it's more about how you regulate it, how you control it, and how you make sure the investment continues.' It came as the Environment Department (Defra) announced an increase in funding for the Environment Agency from £114 million in 2022/23 to £189 million this current financial year, a sum which is understood to have been welcomed by the regulator. 🚨REVEALED: Over half of adults in England don't trust the Government to end the UK's sewage crisis. And who can blame them? 💩 158,000+ sewage spills already this year. 📣 We're in London today, demanding the radical change we need. Are you with us?✊➡️ Email your MP today and… — Surfers Against Sewage (@sascampaigns) July 2, 2025 Ministers are also currently awaiting the publication of the independent water commission's final report and recommendations, led by Sir Jon Cunliffe, which is expected in two weeks. The review is not exploring nationalisation as an option, with campaigners at the summit indicating they will continue to campaign on the issue following its publication. Ewan McGaughey, professor of law at King's College London, argued that the Government should take away licences from failing water companies and transition them into a long-term sustainable model of public ownership, calling privatisation in England a 'broken model'. Mr McGaughey said 90% of countries and cities around the world have water in public ownership and cited examples such as Berlin and Paris, which brought their sectors back into public ownership in 2013 and 2009 respectively after the privatised model failed. 'Bills go down. Water quality goes up. It's actually not really that controversial. You just have to look at the evidence, and you can see that public ownership works better,' he said. Cat Hobbs, founder and We Own It, which campaigns for public ownership of public services, said the Government's decision to not allow the independent review to explore nationalisation is a 'scandal'. 'That has to change. They still have time to change it,' she said, And Ashley Smith, founder of Windrush Against Sewage Pollution (WASP), called privatisation a 'ludicrous scam', arguing that there has never been a single year since the firms were privatised when shareholders put in more money than they took out of the firms. Later, water minister Emma Hardy defended the Government's approach to reforming the sector. 'There's been a lack of sustained investment in the industry for an incredibly long time,' she told the summit. 'We have taken immediate action, but there are some things that, of course, are going to take longer to fix. 'We want to listen to you and we can have difference of opinion – that is absolutely fine but I want to make sure that we try and bring as many people with us as possible because fundamentally we're all trying to get to the same place and that place is an effective water system with reduced pollution which is better for customers and better for the environment.' Ms Hardy called the Cunliffe report a 'once-in-a-generation opportunity to modernise (the sector)' and said the Government will give a top-level reaction to the review before looking at any potential further legislation.

Western Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
UK will take more measures against Israel if no Gaza ceasefire soon
Speaking at the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee on Tuesday, the Foreign Secretary admitted the impact of Government measures taken against Israel after a joint statement from the UK, France and Germany, was 'not sufficient'. The statement, released in May by the Prime Minister, French President Emmanuel Macron and Canadian premier Mark Carney, condemned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's 'egregious' actions in Gaza and called for a halt to its military offensive and an end to restrictions on humanitarian aid. The Foreign Secretary was asked by committee member Labour MP Alex Ballinger: 'If we do not get the ceasefire we're all praying for in the coming weeks…' 'No, we have to get the ceasefire,' Mr Lammy interjected. 'But if that is not the case and we see the abomination that you've described and the intolerable continuation of the situation in Gaza, will the Government go further to take measures against Israel?' Mr Ballinger asked. 'Yes, yes we will,' the Foreign Secretary replied. Mr Lammy defended the UK Government's actions against Israel, citing the suspension of arms sales to the country and sanctions against Israeli ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich. He also highlighted the UK's support for the Palestinian Authority and the signing of a memorandum of understanding with its prime minister Mohammad Mustafa. 'I am very, very comfortable that you would be hard pressed to find another G7 partner that's doing more than this country has done,' he added. Mr Lammy told the meeting Britain would oppose plans reportedly set out by by Israel's defence minister Israel Katz to move Palestinians in Gaza into a camp on the ruins of the city of Rafah. Smoke rises to the sky following an Israeli bombardment in the Gaza Strip, as seen from southern Israel (Leo Correa/AP) Labour MP Uma Kumaran said of the reported plan: 'They're calling it a so-called humanitarian transit area but there's no schools there, there's no medical provisions there, there are no other facilities, and there are plans for forced screening. 'Katz wants international partners to be involved in that. Will Britain oppose this and can you guarantee us in this committee that no British companies or NGOs will be involved in those plans?' Mr Lammy said: 'We've been very clear that we don't support the aid foundation that has been set up, it's not doing a good job, too many people are close to starvation, too many people have lost their lives.' He added that his understanding was that there had been better conversations between the UN agency system and Israel over the last few days, saying: 'So I'm surprised at the statements that I've seen from Mr Katz over the last 24 hours. 'And as I've indicated, they run contra to the proximity to a ceasefire that I thought we were heading towards, so I wonder if there's some politicking going on for those within the government that for some reason stand opposed to this.' Pressed on whether Britain would be opposing any such plans, he said: 'Yes.' At the meeting, Mr Lammy suggested Britain, France and Germany could snap back sanctions on Iran unless the country gets 'serious' about stepping back from its nuclear ambitions. The Foreign Secretary said: 'Iran faces even more pressure in the coming weeks because the E3 can snap back on our sanctions, and it's not just our sanctions, it's actually a UN mechanism that would impose dramatic sanctions on Iran across nearly every single front in its economy. 'So they have a choice to make. It's a choice for them to make. 'I'm very clear about the choice they should make, but I'm also clear that the UK has a decision to make that could lead to far greater pain for the Iranian regime unless they get serious about the international desire to see them step back from their nuclear ambitions at this time.'

South Wales Argus
35 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Investors stripping cash from water firms ‘criminal' says ex-Wessex Water chief
Colin Skellett, who helmed the south-west England utility from 1988 to 2024, argued against nationalising water companies because of the industry requiring 'continuous levels of investment'. He spoke as campaigners and experts urged the Government to explore public ownership during the UK River Summit in south London on Tuesday. Ministers have promised a 'fundamental reset' following years of companies paying out large dividend that diverted money away from infrastructure investment and maintenance, leading to sewage pollution and rising bills. However, they have ruled out nationalisation and instead are focusing efforts on tightening rules, increasing investment and strengthening penalties within the current system of regulated private firms. Minister Emma Hardy talking about tackling sewage with @RiverActionUK but the government is ignoring the reality: 7 European countries with highest average of 90%+ bathing sites achieving 'excellent' status – all are 90%+ publicly owned 🇨🇾🇦🇹🇬🇷🇲🇹🇭🇷🇩🇪🇩🇰 — Cat Hobbs (@CatHobbs) July 8, 2025 Speaking at the summit, Mr Skellett said he has seen the industry change since he joined it in 1974, saying it is one that 'requires continuous levels of investment'. 'The problem with public ownership is the Government always has other things it wants to spend its money on,' the former Wessex boss said. He argued that privatisation helped to get debt off the Government's balance sheet and boost investment but this changed when the 'wrong sort of investors' began stripping cash out of companies through high dividends. 'It was bloody criminal what happened – the amount of money that was stripped out of not just Thames (Water), but a number of companies,' he said. 'So we need that to change (in) the system. It's not so much about ownership, it's more about how you regulate it, how you control it, and how you make sure the investment continues.' It came as the Environment Department (Defra) announced an increase in funding for the Environment Agency from £114 million in 2022/23 to £189 million this current financial year, a sum which is understood to have been welcomed by the regulator. 🚨REVEALED: Over half of adults in England don't trust the Government to end the UK's sewage crisis. And who can blame them? 💩 158,000+ sewage spills already this year. 📣 We're in London today, demanding the radical change we need. Are you with us?✊➡️ Email your MP today and… — Surfers Against Sewage (@sascampaigns) July 2, 2025 Ministers are also currently awaiting the publication of the independent water commission's final report and recommendations, led by Sir Jon Cunliffe, which is expected in two weeks. The review is not exploring nationalisation as an option, with campaigners at the summit indicating they will continue to campaign on the issue following its publication. Ewan McGaughey, professor of law at King's College London, argued that the Government should take away licences from failing water companies and transition them into a long-term sustainable model of public ownership, calling privatisation in England a 'broken model'. Mr McGaughey said 90% of countries and cities around the world have water in public ownership and cited examples such as Berlin and Paris, which brought their sectors back into public ownership in 2013 and 2009 respectively after the privatised model failed. 'Bills go down. Water quality goes up. It's actually not really that controversial. You just have to look at the evidence, and you can see that public ownership works better,' he said. Cat Hobbs, founder and We Own It, which campaigns for public ownership of public services, said the Government's decision to not allow the independent review to explore nationalisation is a 'scandal'. 'That has to change. They still have time to change it,' she said, And Ashley Smith, founder of Windrush Against Sewage Pollution (WASP), called privatisation a 'ludicrous scam', arguing that there has never been a single year since the firms were privatised when shareholders put in more money than they took out of the firms. Environment minister Emma Hardy defended the Government's approach (House of Commons/UK Parliament) Later, water minister Emma Hardy defended the Government's approach to reforming the sector. 'There's been a lack of sustained investment in the industry for an incredibly long time,' she told the summit. 'We have taken immediate action, but there are some things that, of course, are going to take longer to fix. 'We want to listen to you and we can have difference of opinion – that is absolutely fine but I want to make sure that we try and bring as many people with us as possible because fundamentally we're all trying to get to the same place and that place is an effective water system with reduced pollution which is better for customers and better for the environment.' Ms Hardy called the Cunliffe report a 'once-in-a-generation opportunity to modernise (the sector)' and said the Government will give a top-level reaction to the review before looking at any potential further legislation.