Will not accept this intimidation: Zohran Mamdani reacts to Trump's arrest threat
Mamdani, the son of Ugandan-Indian filmmaker Mira Nair and a vocal critic of US immigration policy, made it clear he is not going anywhere. 'We will not accept this intimidation,' he wrote.advertisementMamdani rose to prominence through his outspoken support for Palestinian rights. He officially secured victory in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary, with a final vote count on Tuesday confirming his upset win over former Governor Andrew Cuomo. He now advances to the general election.TRUMP THREATENS TO ARREST MAMDANITrump has threatened to arrest Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for New York City mayor, if he defies federal immigration authorities.Speaking to reporters, Trump said Mamdani's refusal to allow ICE to arrest undocumented immigrants in the city could lead to legal consequences. "Well, then we'll have to arrest him," Trump said when asked about Mamdani. "We don't need a Communist in this country, but if we have one, I'm going to be watching over him very carefully on behalf of the nation."Trump added, "We send him money. We send him all the things that he needs to run a government. And by the way, they get already, they get about three times what you get, Ron. If you look at the per capita, Florida gets one-third of what New York gets in terms of the numbers."The Trump administration has also signalled a potential investigation into Mamdani's citizenship. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to Republican Congressman Andy Ogles, who suggested Mamdani's citizenship should be revoked, accusing him of hiding "terrorist" sympathies during his naturalisation process.- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
11 minutes ago
- Hans India
'Congress not concerned about country's pride': Jyotiraditya Scindia on Rahul's 'surrender' jibe
New Delhi: Union Minister for Communications and Development of the North Eastern Region, Jyotiraditya Scindia, launched a sharp attack on the Congress party on Wednesday in response to Rahul Gandhi's recent 'Narender Surrender' remark. Union Minister Scindia accused the Congress of undermining India's global standing and questioning the credibility of its armed forces. Speaking to IANS, he said, 'What else is left to say about a political party that has already been rejected by the people of the country? The dignity and respect of the nation should be paramount.' He alleged that the Congress has stooped to a level where it seeks to embarrass India on international platforms and cast doubt on the strength and professionalism of the Indian military. The minister's remarks came in the wake of Rahul Gandhi's criticism of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's foreign policy and national security approach. Rahul Gandhi had used the phrase 'Narender Surrender' in reference to the government's handling of border tensions with Pakistan—a phrase that has sparked political controversy in the past. Scindia also defended India's military actions, including the 2016 surgical strikes, the 2019 Balakot airstrikes, and the recent Operation Sindoor, which targeted terror infrastructure across the border. 'When there was a surgical strike or the Balakot operation, they asked for proof. When there is Operation Sindoor, they question how many (fighter) planes crashed,' he said. 'It has become clear that the people of India are not concerned about a party that is not concerned about the pride of India.' Operation Sindoor, a recent cross-border counter-terror operation, has been hailed by the government as a demonstration of India's strategic resolve. However, opposition leaders have raised questions about transparency and outcomes, prompting strong rebuttals from BJP leaders. Scindia also criticised Congress leaders for making statements abroad that, he claimed, tarnish India's image. 'Which patriot goes outside the country and brings it down?' he asked, without naming Gandhi directly. The BJP has intensified its counteroffensive against the Congress ahead of the upcoming state elections, framing national pride and security as central campaign themes.
Scroll.in
14 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
8 detained in Delhi as ‘illegal' migrants after opting for India in 2015 enclave exchange, released
Eight residents of West Bengal's Cooch Behar district, who were detained in Delhi on the suspicion of being 'illegal' Bangladesh migrants, were released on Tuesday. They were members of families who had relocated to India in the 2015 enclave exchange between India and Bangladesh. All eight were detained by the police on Monday from a brick kiln in Haryana during a drive against undocumented migrants, Deputy Commissioner of Police (Northwest Delhi) Bhisham Singh told The Indian Express. They were released on Tuesday, their family members told Scroll. The release came after the eight migrants produced their resident cards issued by the West Bengal government and other relevant documents, Singh added. Those who were detained were identified as Samsul Haque and his brother Rejaul Haque, Muhammad Rayhan Haque, Muhammad Rabiul Haque, and his wife Rashida Begum, the newspaper reported. Rabiul's three children were also detained. Their family members told The Indian Express that all eight are from Dashiar Chhara, a former Indian enclave in Bangladesh. They had moved to an apartment complex in Cooch Behar's Dinhata area made exclusively for enclave dwellers who had come to India after the exchange in 2015. Their release came the police in Cooch Behar district police contacted their counterparts in Delhi. Samirul Islam, chairperson of the West Bengal migrant welfare board, claimed that such detentions were happening daily to migrants from the state. He alleged that police in Bharatiya Janata Party-ruled states and in Delhi do not bother to inform the state government about such cases. 'We, on our own, have made verifications and sent them the requisite documents,' The Indian Express quoted Islam, also a Trinamool Congress MP, as having said. 'In this case, the district administration got in touch with the Delhi Police authorities.' He added that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee had welcomed the families to India after the enclave and exclave exchange in 2015. 'Now they are being detained as illegal Bangladeshi citizens,' he was quoted as saying. 'And that too in the national capital.' The exchange of enclaves and exclaves took place on August 1, 2015. Under this agreement, 111 Indian enclaves covering 17,160 acres inside Bangladesh were transferred to Bangladesh, while 51 Bangladeshi enclaves occupying 7,110 acres in India became part of India. The residents of these enclaves were given the option of accepting citizenship of either country. At least 921 residents opted to move to the Indian side. The incident came as Indian authorities have been pursuing a policy to force individuals claimed to be undocumented migrants into Bangladesh. In June, four men from West Bengal, who were forced into Bangladesh on allegations of being undocumented migrants, were brought back. India has pushed back more than 2,000 persons into Bangladesh since the country launched ' Operation Sindoor ', a military operation in May against terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. The legality of the 'push back' policy has been debated in India and internationally. Experts have told Scroll that the policy violated India's obligations under international law and customary international law.
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority strikes down 176-year-old abortion ban
The Wisconsin Supreme Court 's liberal majority struck down the state's 176-year-old abortion ban on Wednesday, ruling 4-3 that it was superseded by a newer state law that criminalizes abortions only after a fetus can survive outside the womb. State lawmakers adopted the ban in 1849, making it a felony when anyone other than the mother "intentionally destroys the life of an unborn child." It was in effect until 1973, when the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide nullified it. Legislators never officially repealed the ban, however, and conservatives argued that the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe reactivated it. Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul , a Democrat, filed a lawsuit that year arguing that the ban was trumped by abortion restrictions legislators enacted during the nearly half-century that Roe was in effect. Kaul specifically cited a 1985 law that essentially permits abortions until viability. Some babies can survive with medical help after 21 weeks of gestation. Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski, a Republican, defended the ban in court, arguing that the 1849 ban could coexist with the newer abortion restrictions, just as different penalties for the same crime coexist. Live Events Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper ruled in 2023 that the 1849 ban outlaws feticide - which she defined as the killing of a fetus without the mother's consent - but not consensual abortions. Abortions have been available in the state since that ruling but the state Supreme Court decision gives providers and patients more certainty that abortions will remain legal in Wisconsin. Urmanski asked the state Supreme Court to overturn Schlipper's ruling without waiting for a decision from a lower appellate court. It was expected as soon as the justices took the case that they would overturn the ban. Liberals hold a 4-3 majority on the court and one of them, Janet Protasiewicz, openly stated on the campaign trail that she supports abortion rights . Democratic-backed Susan Crawford defeated conservative Brad Schimel for an open seat on the court in April, ensuring liberals will maintain their 4-3 edge until at least 2028. Crawford has not been sworn in yet and was not part of Wednesday's ruling. She'll play pivotal role, though, in a separate Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin lawsuit challenging the 1849 ban's constitutionality. The high court decided last year to take that case. It's still pending.
