US applications for jobless benefits inch up for the first time in 7 weeks, but layoffs remain low
The total number of Americans collecting unemployment benefits for the previous week of July 19 was unchanged at 1.95 million.
WASHINGTON: The number of Americans filing for jobless benefits inched up modestly last week as business continue to retain staff despite economic uncertainty around U.S. trade policy. The Labor Department reported Thursday that jobless claims for the week ending July 26 ticked up by 1,000 to 218,000, less than the 225,000 new applications analysts forecast. It was the first time in seven weeks that benefit applications rose, although layoffs remain at historically low levels. Weekly applications for jobless benefits are seen as representative of U.S. layoffs and have mostly settled in a historically healthy range between 200,000 and 250,000 since COVID-19 throttled the economy in the spring of 2020, wiping out millions of jobs.
Earlier in July, the Labor Department reported that U.S. employers added a surprisingly strong 147,000 jobs in June, adding to evidence that the American labor market continues to show resilience despite uncertainty over President Donald Trump's economic policies. The job gains were much more than expected and the unemployment rate ticked down 4.1% from 4.2% in May.
The government issues its July jobs report on Friday. Though the top line numbers reflect a broadly healthy labor market by historical standards, some weakness has surfaced as employers contend with fallout from Trump's policies, especially his aggressive tariffs, which raise prices for businesses and consumers. If consumers continue to pull back on spending, a decline in demand could push businesses to freeze hiring or cut staff. This week, government data showed that employers posted 7.4 million job vacancies in June, down from 7.7 million in May. The number of people quitting their jobs - a sign of confidence in their prospects elsewhere - fell in June to the lowest level since December. Hiring also fell from May. The deadline on most of Trump's stiff proposed taxes on imports were extended again until Friday, though some deals have been made and other deadlines to negotiate have been extended. Unless Trump reaches deals with countries to lower the tariffs, economists fear they could act as a drag on the economy and spark another rise in inflation. Companies that have announced job cuts this year include Procter & Gamble, Dow, CNN, Starbucks, Southwest Airlines, Microsoft, Google and Facebook parent company Meta. Most recently, Intel and The Walt Disney Co. announced staff reductions. The Labor Department's report Thursday also said that the four-week average of claims, which evens out some of the week-to-week fluctuations, fell by 3,500 to 221,000.
The total number of Americans collecting unemployment benefits for the previous week of July 19 was unchanged at 1.95 million.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
20 minutes ago
- First Post
'Dividends to people, paying down debt': What Trump plans to do with tariff earnings
The financial impact of the tariffs is already evident. According to Treasury data, customs duties and certain excise taxes have generated $152 billion through July, nearly double the $78 billion collected during the same period last fiscal year. read more US President Donald Trump mimics a weightlifter while he speaks at a dinner he hosts for Republican Senators at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, US, February 7, 2025. File Image/Reuters In a bold move, US President Donald Trump has floated the idea of using revenue from additional tariffs on the USA's trading partners to distribute dividends among citizens from poor economic backgrounds. Speaking to reporters before boarding Air Force One after a visit to his New Jersey golf club, Trump hinted at the possibility. 'There could be a distribution or a dividend to the people of our country, I would say for people that would be middle income people and lower income people, we could do a dividend,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Will pay down debt' The president's remarks come as part of his broader defence of an aggressive tariff regime, which he insists is designed to promote fairness in global trade and reduce America's staggering national debt. 'We're going to pay down debt. We have a lot of money coming in—much more money than the country's ever seen,' Trump told reporters. 'One of the things we're going to be doing is reducing debt. We should've done this many years ago.' Trump's tariffs, which include rates as high as 50 per cent on imports from countries with which the US has trade deficits and a 10 per cent baseline tariff on nearly all others, mark the most significant trade realignment in modern US history. Citing a 1977 law, the president declared the trade imbalance a national emergency, paving the way for these measures. Just hours before an August 1 negotiation deadline, Trump signed an executive order imposing tariffs on 69 countries, with some of the steepest rates targeting Brazil (50 per cent), Syria (41 per cent), Switzerland (39 per cent), Canada (35 per cent), India (25 per cent), and Taiwan (20 per cent). In a rare exception, Pakistan saw its tariff rate reduced from 29 per cent to 19 per cent. The president stressed that his approach is about fairness, not political leverage. 'I'm not looking for leverage, I'm looking for fairness. We want to see reciprocal wherever we can and as much as possible,' he said, adding that the tariffs could generate 'hundreds of billions of dollars' for the US Treasury. Trump noted that he had begun a similar strategy during his first term with China but was derailed by the Covid-19 pandemic. 'I did this during my first term with China. We didn't get to the rest because Covid hit,' he explained. How much US is earning from tariffs? The financial impact of the tariffs is already evident. According to Treasury data, customs duties and certain excise taxes have generated $152 billion through July, nearly double the $78 billion collected during the same period last fiscal year. However, the tariffs come with significant risks. Economists warn that the increased costs are beginning to trickle down to consumers, with many companies signalling they will raise prices to offset the added burden. Analysts also predict that the tariffs could hamper overall economic performance, potentially reducing traditional income tax revenue in the long term. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As Trump's tariff policy unfolds, it remains a high-stakes gamble—one that could either bolster the US economy and deliver tangible benefits to Americans or strain consumers and global trade relationships.
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
A bad trade deal: US-EU pact offers a template, which India is keen to avoid
As US President Donald Trump's new set of tariffs takes effect from August 7, there is a question that is resonating in New Delhi's policy circles: What does a bad trade deal look like? The new trade deal signed by the United States with the European Union perhaps qualifies. Critics of this pact, including politicians in EU member countries such as France, are now openly lambasting the US-EU trade agreement, claiming that 'while one side got a deal, the other side got a bill!' There is a growing sense within sections of India's government that rushing in to sign a deal on Trump's terms has its perils, and could lead to such a lopsided trading arrangement. Also, in the Trumpian scheme of things, the countries that have been called 'friends' have gotten it worse than others. Being soft has been construed as a sign of weakness by the US administration. From New Delhi's perspective, it might also be better to wait out till China signs on the dotted line, to discern in comparative terms if India is getting something favourable out of the headline tariff numbers being offered as part of a deal. Lopsided EU deal What the EU deal effectively does is that it forces the 27-nation bloc to pay a 15 per cent baseline tariff on most of its exports to the US. In exchange, Washington DC gets more access to the EU market at far lower tariff rates, and has pretty much made no concessions for that access. On top of that, Brussels has promised to ramp up investment in the US to the tune of 600 billion Euros, alongside a promise to buy more energy from America to the tune of 750 billion Euros over the next three years. How did the EU end up with this deal? This surrender has a predictable build-up to it, which is typical of the tactic that the US administration has followed with most others who rushed in to sign up early, including South Korea and Vietnam. At the start of negotiations, Brussels was offering zero-for-zero tariffs, and then at some point, it looked like they sweetened the deal by pitching zero-for-10 per cent tariffs, with some exceptions for certain sectors such as automobiles. Then came the letter last weekend from Trump, threatening a 30 per cent tariff if there was no deal reached by August 1. That seems to have been the final trigger for this final deal, which Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission, said was the best agreement under the given circumstances. When Trump's tariff action started in March, it was widely believed that the US President had only had one thing in sight – a headline tariff number being thrashed out with each country. Progressively, the deals signed closer to the August 1 deadline have been broadbased to include investment commitments such as in the EU deal. Japan too has committed to invest $550 billion, and the UK has pledged to adopt a 'structured, negotiated approach' in investments, while South Korea has committed to investing $350 billion in the US in projects 'owned and controlled by the United States' and 'selected by President Donald Trump'. All this while agreeing to let in most American goods duty free into each of their countries, in return for the 15 per cent tariff. The build-up too has been predictable in all these cases – concessions being offered by the respective side, followed by a threat of a big tariff number as a deadline loomed, and eventual capitulation. According to Deborah Elms, Head of Trade Policy at the Hinrich Foundation in Singapore, while some 'napkin deals' were locked in headline rates of 15 per cent, others were less successful. Even with a deal, Vietnam got 20 per cent and an additional 20 per cent on trans-shipped goods, while others in ASEAN with no deal got 19. Switzerland had early agreement but got whacked with 39 per cent while the UK, despite its trade deficit with the US, got tariffed at 10 per cent. 'All rates can be changed at any point, so this doesn't really ensure stability'. What is striking is that those without a deal in ASEAN got a better tariff deal as compared to those who signed early, such as Vietnam. Then there is the practical aspect of these deals: beyond the headline tariff number, there are question marks over whether the other provisions included in the deals will ever come to fruition. The detailed text is not out for most of the deals signed so far. Even when the details trickle out, there is a chance that these terms will be fiddled with, tweaked and rewritten, to make them implementable. Trade deals typically run to thousands of pages and take months, if not years, to negotiate. This fast-tracked method of signing up multiple deals over a span of weeks is really mind boggling. The only deals where some degree of actual negotiations have taken place so far seem to be the one with China, and the extended talks with India. Implementation woes, legal challenges Then there is the question of the legality of what Washington DC is doing, and the implication for its trading partner too. The US threatening to, or imposing additional tariffs forcibly on goods from another country, are a violation of Article I of the General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade, apart from being in contravention of its own bound tariff commitments under Article II of GATT, which entails an assurance that tariffs will not exceed the rates mutually agreed upon by the two parties. On the other hand, the concessions that the EU has given to the US could be up for challenge from other countries, if these sops are not in line with the World Trade Organisation (WTO) trading rules. This is because under WTO rules, if the US has now been given some sort of preferential access to the EU market, Brussels needs to offer the same terms to others or could be deemed to be violating international trade laws. Then there is also the domestic legal challenge that Trump's trade-linked executive orders are facing in the US. Lastly, there is the practicality aspect. Do the EU member countries really have the scope to ramp up energy imports from the US by 750 billion Euros over the next three years? And, can the Commission guarantee that 650 billion Euros of investments into the US, given that much of this is not public spending, but private sector spending by individual companies. Then there is the big question mark over the ability of American customs department and trade officials being able to effectively monitor, police and implement these multiple country-specific provisions. The reason why the rollout of the July 31 tariffs have been delayed till August 7 was to ostensibly give time for the American Customs department to prepare for these new tariff rates. It is unlikely to be a smooth process at major US ports, given the short lead time. Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More
Economic Times
20 minutes ago
- Economic Times
After a global recovery, north Asian markets typically outperform with India catching up following year: Rahul Chadha
Rahul Chadha, Founder & CIO, Shikhara Investment Management, highlights investor concerns about India's economic slowdown. The expectation is for urban recovery by the third or fourth quarter. Rural recovery is underway, aided by earlier rate cuts. Unsecured lending's impact on household savings is a concern. Regional markets offer value due to corporate governance improvements and reforms. Market performance should improve with these recoveries. Chadha says historically, it was seen in 2016 or 2019 that when a global recovery happens, the north Asian markets typically outperform India and India catches up in the subsequent year. ADVERTISEMENT Nasdaq was lower by more than 2% on Friday. So, quite a knock coming in there. There is uncertainty about the authenticity of the jobs reports and lots of comments on that front. How are you seeing Wall Street shaping up and what exactly is spooking that market right now? Rahul Chadha: We have seen a sharp rally in the market in the last two months and some pullback was natural. August and September historically are not great months for markets and also now that the tariff negotiations are nearly done, the market is waiting for some clarity. What does it mean for the pressure on US consumers and the consumer earnings? What does it mean for business investment? Obviously, the payroll number spooked markets, but when you sit back and reflect, the last three months were most uncertain and typically in uncertain times, people freeze hiring. Also the AI-led productivity gains are coming through. Both these are working on the minds of business owners, managers, etc and so it was natural that payroll would be a bit off. We are also closely watching business investment. The new Trump bill, the infrastructure bill which the Trump administration has passed, reduces the tax outgo by close to 8% by front ending a lot of these exemptions. That should be positive for rekindling investment back in the US. Lots are happening in India as well. We are pretty much close to oversold. We have turned negative for July. Nifty has seen a 900-point fall from the recent highs and we have been declining for five consecutive weeks. There is still that question mark on what tariff gets slapped on us from the US, but do you sense that the case is building up for a recovery? Or don't you think there is such a case because there hasn't been any major upgrade domestically? Rahul Chadha: A couple of things are weighing on the minds of investors. First and foremost, the domestic slowdown. Does this slowdown get over by Diwali third quarter or fourth quarter? Our hope is we should see signs of urban recovery coming through. Rural recovery is coming. This is where some of the rate cuts which happened in the first half of the year would be a play through the economy. There is also a question on household balance sheets. There has been unsecured lending over the last two-and-a-half, three years. How much hole would that cause in savings and the household balance sheets has to be seen. But our base case still is a third or a fourth quarter urban recovery. Rural recovery is slowly happening and once that comes in the numbers, we should see the market perform. At the same time, the regional markets were a lot cheaper and there was a lot happening in those markets from value up corporate governance improvement, etc, reforms. ADVERTISEMENT We have seen historically whether it was 2016, or 2019 when a global recovery happens, the north Asian markets typically outperform India and India catches up in the subsequent year. What has been your reading so far on earnings? Are there any sectors where you are building hopes on the back of the earnings visibility? Now it seems it is only the defensives and maybe the domestic consumption plays that are doing well in this market. Rahul Chadha: A couple of things impacted the earnings. One was the India-Pakistan skirmish. Second is the consumer is still in the process of rebuilding his balance sheet, repairing his house balance sheets, etc. So, we continue to like largecap banks. The pressure on NIMs was expected. It is there in the price and now as the economy recovers, these banks should benefit from recovering credit growth and recovering NII growth. So, that is one space one has liked. ADVERTISEMENT Selectively, one may evaluate some capital market plays but that would be for financials. Outside that, if we look at infrastructure, in cement we have had a good set of numbers that should build up as housing demand picks up. We have continued to like real estate from a three-five years perspective. The sector is a buy on decline. Outside that, discretionary consumption is something one would look to add exposure to, the quick commerce stocks as well as the travel and tourism companies would be interesting here. (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
