Colorado universities brace for plunge in international students due to fears sparked by Trump policies
More than 10,360 international students attended colleges and universities in the Centennial State during the 2023-2024 school year, according to the most recent data available from the Colorado Department of Higher Education.
International students contribute more than $400 million to the state's economy and support more than 3,800 jobs, making education Colorado's sixth-largest export, the agency said.
Policy decisions since President Donald Trump returned to office in January - including the sudden revocation of student visas, threats of detention and deportation, social media monitoring and travel bans - have created an adversarial environment that higher education leaders fear will deter international students from studying here, damaging the nation's global competitiveness and research capabilities.
As a result, Colorado universities are budgeting for potentially sharp declines in their international student enrollment this fall, which could pose a significant financial hit to institutions and lead to across-the-board tuition increases, experts said.
The University of Colorado Boulder, home to the state's largest share of foreign students, predicts a nearly 25% drop in international undergraduate enrollment this fall.
International students aren't just a monetary boon for campuses. Higher education officials say they bring rich cultural diversity to Colorado campuses, along with fresh perspectives and specialized skills that are key to innovative research.
In addition to the drop in students, massive federal cuts to scientific research and grants in higher education mean professors and researchers in Colorado and nationwide are being recruited by foreign countries promising to fund their research, said Angie Paccione, the Colorado Department of Higher Education's executive director.
"I don't believe the recovery is going to be a quick recovery," Paccione said of Trump's impact on higher education. "If these policies persist for the remainder of this administration, it's going to take us decades to recover. It's alarming."
Tightening restrictions on foreign students
In April, the Trump administration revoked dozens of Colorado international students' visas along with thousands across the country, sowing chaos as foreign scholars questioned their status and safety in the U.S.
The visa revocations came as the administration cracked down on international students who expressed views opposing Israel's war on Hamas. Nationally, students linked to pro-Palestinian activism in multiple states were taken to detention centers by immigration officers with little information released as to why they were being held.
Impacted students in Colorado and elsewhere filed lawsuits over their legal status to study in the U.S., and the federal government ultimately reversed the termination of the students' legal status.
"When you see international students being snatched up off the street by people in masks with guns, then the uncertainty of whether or not your particular visa is going to be OK for the duration of your time here - that uncertainty makes people choose not to come here," Paccione said.
In May, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the U.S. would begin "aggressively" revoking the visas of some Chinese students, including those studying in "critical fields" and "those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party."
There are about 1,160 Chinese international students in Colorado, comprising about 11% of the state's international student population - the second most popular country of origin for the state's international scholars behind India, according to state data.
A few weeks ago, the State Department paused scheduling new visa interviews for foreign students wanting to study in America. On Wednesday, the State Department announced a restart to the suspended process, but said applicants will now be required to unlock their social media accounts for government review as federal officials look for posts and messages that could be considered hostile to the U.S., its government, culture, institutions or founding principles.
And earlier this month, the Trump administration imposed a travel ban and restrictions on 19 countries, blocking or limiting their citizens from entering the United States, saying it was necessary to protect the nation from "foreign terrorists."
"Even if these polices are rescinded, it creates this atmosphere where people feel like they don't want to go to the U.S. now," Paccione said.
'The whole university really values their presence'
CU Boulder hosts the most international students in Colorado, having served about 2,200 students this past spring and around 750 non-students, including professors and researchers.
"They bring different perspectives and life experiences and cultures to domestic students," said Diana Salazar, director of CU Boulder's International Student and Scholar Services. "They bring unique skill sets (that) the researchers here on campus really need. They move forward research that otherwise couldn't move forward. The whole university really values their presence on campus."
CU Boulder is projecting a 24.3% decline in undergraduate international student enrollment and a 14.7% decline in the number of international graduate students this fall in light of the political climate.
Non-resident tuition makes up 11.8% of CU Boulder's 2025-2026 revenue sources, totaling about $789.4 million of the school's $6.7 billion budget, according to university budget documents.
Tuition for international students at CU costs more than it does for in-state or out-of-state domestic students. Depending on the degree, an international student could expect to pay close to $70,000 per year for tuition, housing, meals and supplies this fall.
The university is still seeing an overall enrollment increase of 2.7%, but is budgeting for no increase in federal research money, despite seeing an 8.7% annual increase in such funding historically.
Ultimately, the sharp drop in international students could make college cost more for all students.
"International student tuition helps subsidize some of the tuition for in-state students," Paccione said. "If they don't have revenue coming in from international students … it puts more pressure on raising tuition in Colorado. This next budget cycle, institutions may have to ask for a higher tuition increase."
CU's Salazar said international students are reaching out to her office about the uncertainty of their futures. CU web pages contain a wealth of resources to inform international students about the rapidly changing federal policies and the university's position.
"We reassure them of what we do know, what we don't know, how much we really do value having them here," Salazar said.
Colorado State University has the second-highest international student population in the state with more than 1,200 foreign-born students from more than 100 countries on the Fort Collins campus.
The university did not make a representative available for an interview, but CSU's website addresses pressing questions for the vulnerable student population. CSU warns students that U.S. Customs and Border Protection may inspect their electronic devices and to be mindful of what they're posting on their social media accounts.
International students deferring start dates
Jane Borisova, interim executive director of global engagement at the University of Northern Colorado, knows better than most about international student resiliency.
She came to UNC in 2010 as an international student from Russia, working on her master's degree in linguistically diverse education and teaching English as a foreign language. The Greeley-based academic worked with teachers going into the field and was named the interim director of the entire Office of Global Engagement last year. She now oversees international student education.
"It wouldn't have been possible in any other country, and when I say that, I mean it," Borisova said. "This is what America is known for is offering opportunities that other countries are not. The community is so welcoming. Regardless of political changes, people are really nice and open and helpful. It pains me to see that the powers above us are somehow making this a lesser gift."
It's too early to know how many students will decide not to show up come fall, Borisova said, but UNC is already seeing international students defer to later terms or move to online education options. The Trump administration's potential expansion of its travel ban could hit UNC hard, she said, noting the school often welcomes international scholars from Ghana and Nigeria, two countries that may be targeted.
A selective Fulbright Program - one of the most widely recognized and prestigious scholarships in the world - hosted at UNC is facing difficulties with foreign participants unsure if they'll be able to travel to Colorado amid the political uncertainty, Borisova said.
"It's our strength as a country to be able to appeal to the most talented, most incredible students throughout the globe," Borisova said. "It would be such a travesty to lose this."
'Brain drain'
Uttiyo Raychaudhuri, vice provost for internationalization at the University of Denver, has worked in international education for almost 25 years. He is concerned about the direction it's headed in the U.S.
More than 1,000 international students call DU home each year. Raychaudhuri said it's too early to anticipate how many won't show up come fall, but he predicts a drop on the DU campus as well.
The administrative hurdles that prospective scholars are facing worry him, but what vexes him most is the disintegration of a globally heralded reputation of the U.S. as a place to learn, grow, discover and invent.
"The greatest strength international students bring is the diversity of ideas," Raychaudhuri said. "That makes us more human, it makes us more progressive, it makes us advance. This has been the foundation. It's why this land has continued to lead. We would not want to lose that. That's what I feel is under distress right now. There are other countries waiting to seize on this opportunity."
Paccione, the Colorado Department of Higher Education executive director, said she recently spoke with Colorado School of Mines president Paul Johnson, who also worried about the loss in global competitiveness.
The Trump administration terminated billions in federal research grants across the country - from science and health initiatives to arts funding to humanities programming.
At the Colorado School of Mines - a public research university based in Golden offering degrees in engineering, science and math - Johnson told Paccione professors and graduate students are being recruited outside the country because they no longer have the research dollars to do their work here.
Johnson declined an interview on the matter.
"I don't want to see the brain drain," Paccione said. "Professors are passionate about their research, and if they're unable to do their research, they will go to a place that's going to fund it. We are losing talent in all different industries."
According to the National Foundation for American Policy, immigrants have started more than half of America's startup companies valued at $1 billion or more.
"I sincerely hope this is just a blip that we will course-correct," said DU's Raychaudhuri. "Make no mistake, there is going to be an impact in numbers this year, but if you course-correct now, maybe you can stop this for the future. If not, this could be a declining trend in the long term, and that will add up. It will start becoming fairly devastating."
_____
(The Daily Camera contributed to this report.)
_____
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
17 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
EPA says President Donald Trump's big bill should help in its fight to take back billions in green bank funds
WASHINGTON — The sprawling tax and policy bill that passed Congress repeals a multibillion-dollar green bank for financing climate-friendly projects, and the Trump administration should be allowed to freeze its funding and cancel related contracts with nonprofits, federal officials said in a court filing. Climate United Fund and other nonprofits in March sued the Environmental Protection Agency, its administrator Lee Zeldin and Citibank, which held the program's money. The lawsuit argued the defendants had illegally denied the groups access to billions awarded last year through the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, commonly referred to as a 'green bank.' The program was created by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. But the bill that passed Congress on Thursday would repeal the part of the 2022 law that established the green bank and rescind money that hadn't already been obligated to its recipients. The EPA said the bill should hand them a victory in their court fight that is being heard by a federal appeals court in Washington. Now that Congress has rescinded funding, an earlier federal judge's decision forcing the EPA to release money to the groups should be reversed, the agency said in its Thursday court filing. Climate United Fund disagrees. It acknowledges that the bill in Congress is a 'significant policy setback' but argues that most of the money had been disbursed and is unaffected by the bill. And if the EPA wanted to take the money back, there's a different process the agency would need to follow. 'Our funds have already been obligated and disbursed. Any effort to claim otherwise is simply a lie to justify illegal attempts to claw back funds intended to benefit communities across the country,' CEO Beth Bafford said in a statement. According to the EPA, when the agency terminated the grants the funds 'became unobligated.' 'Grantees have desperately performed legal gymnastics to hold tens of billions of taxpayer dollars hostage. In the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill, Congress made their intent crystal clear in repealing the program entirely and returning those billions in unobligated funds to the U.S. Treasury,' EPA spokesperson Brigit Hirsch said in a statement. The green bank's goals run counter to the Trump administration's opposition to policies that address climate change and its embrace of fossil fuels. Zeldin quickly made the bank a target, characterizing the $20 billion in grants as a scheme marred by conflicts of interest and potential fraud. In February, Zeldin told Fox News that he suspected the green bank 'was a clear cut case of waste and abuse' that 'in my opinion, is criminal.' The following month, Zeldin terminated the grants. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan has previously said that when the federal government was asked for evidence of fraud, the agency didn't provide it and shifted its position. Chutkan decided the government can't terminate the contracts and that the groups should have access to some of their frozen money. That order was put on hold during the EPA's appeal. The agency argues the nonprofits are making constitutional and statutory arguments that don't apply in what it sees as a simple contract fight. If the government successfully argues the case is a contract dispute, then the EPA says it should be heard by a different court that can only award a lump sum – not force the government to keep the grants in place. Federal officials argue there is no law or provision in the Constitution that compels the EPA to make these grants to these groups. In its court filing, the EPA also pointed to comments by Republican Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, chair of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, as supportive of the agency's position. Capito said previously the bill intended to rescind billions in funding that had been frozen. 'This action reflects not only Congress's deep concern with reducing the deficit, but EPA's administration of the (green bank) under the Biden administration, the agency's selection of grant recipients, and the absence of meaningful program oversight,' the agency quotes the senator as saying.


Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
Elon Musk Suggests His New Political Party Will Target Key Senate, House Seats
Elon Musk suggested a third political party, which he's floated as the 'America Party,' will hold significant sway in the Senate and House under slim Republican margins, as he aspires to form a competing party after breaking with the GOP over President Donald Trump's signature policy bill. Elon Musk during a news conference with President Donald Trump on May 30, 2025 inside the Oval ... More Office at the White House in Washington. (Photo by Tom Brenner For The Washington Post via Getty Images) The Washington Post via Getty Images Musk tweeted a poll to his X followers Friday asking if they want 'independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system.' In a subsequent tweet, he said 'one way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts,' noting the party could have significant sway under a slim majority that 'would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people.' Friday's tweets are the latest threats from Musk this week to form a new political party, as he feuded with Republicans over Trump's signature policy bill that passed the House Thursday: 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day,' he wrote Monday. 55%. That's the share of Americans who have an unfavorable view of Musk, compared to 37% who hold a positive opinion, according to a dashboard from statistician Nate Silver's Silver Bulletin aggregating hundreds of polls on Musk. Key Background Musk and Trump have engaged in a heated back-and-forth over Musk's criticism of what's known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act that passed the House Thursday and now heads to Trump's desk for signage. Musk—who spearheaded cost-cutting measures at the Department of Government Efficiency—took issue with the bill over the estimated $3.3 trillion it would add to the deficit over the next 10 years. Trump has responded to Musk's threats by making veiled threats to revoke the government subsidies his companies receive and to 'look into' deporting him. House Passes Trump's Signature Spending Bill, Meeting July 4 Deadline (Forbes) Elon Musk (And Tesla) Became Much More Unpopular —As Unfavorability Soars To 55% (Forbes) Musk-Trump Feud Timeline: Trump Goes After Tesla CEO Over Bill Criticism (Forbes)


CNN
20 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump prepares to sign his agenda bill, with a flyover and fireworks to mark the occasion
It's the celebration President Donald Trump has been waiting for. After weeks of cajoling Republicans into backing his domestic mega-bill — despite lingering concerns about its Medicaid cuts, deficit expansion and political pitfalls — Trump will sign the measure into law on the White House South Lawn on Friday afternoon. He's turned the traditional July 4 picnic into a celebration of the country's independence and of his win in Congress, seizing upon the day's fanfare to salute the most decisive legislative victory of his second term. The festivities will include a bomber jet flyover – a nod to the military's recent strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities – and a fireworks show on the National Mall. It's all how Trump envisioned it when he first set the July 4 deadline to get the bill approved weeks ago. Even some of his own allies thought the timeline was overly ambitious. But Trump's iron grip on his own party, combined with what a White House official described as an 'omnipresent' effort by the president to get Republicans on board, culminated in the bill's passage in the House on Thursday with only two GOP defections in the chamber. In many ways, the event marks the payoff for weeks of effort by the president and his team to get the bill across the finish line. Trump invited members of Congress to come to the event, which will also be attended by military families who are the usual guests for the Independence Day picnic. In other ways, however, the moment is just the start of Trump's efforts to sell his bill to an American public that, according to polls, remains skeptical of its contents. The bill extends tax cuts Trump first approved in 2017 during his first term, along with creating new ones, totaling in cost of $4.5 trillion. It also boosts funding for immigration enforcement and defense. To pay for the new spending and declines in tax revenue, the measure cuts $1 trillion from Medicaid, along with cuts to food assistance. But it will still, according to an analysis from the Congressional Budget Office, add $3.3 trillion to the federal deficit, which does not include the cost of servicing the debt. Many Republicans had feared the bill's cuts to social safety net programs, like Medicaid and food stamps, could open them to political attacks ahead of next year's midterm elections. According to the CBO, almost 12 million Americans could lose health coverage as a result of the bill's changes to government programs. Other analyses put the number higher, taking into account new paperwork burdens on recipients to prove their eligibility. Democrats have already begun pointing to the bill's overwhelming tax rewards for wealthy Americans to accuse Trump of snatching away benefits from the poor to reward his rich backers. Some of Trump's allies have conceded they have some catching up to do in messaging what they view as the benefits of the bill, including eliminating taxes on tips and bolstering money for Trump's immigration enforcement agenda. Trump said Thursday that he wanted Republicans to message on it during the midterm campaign. 'Not one Democrat voted for us, and I think we use it in the campaign that's coming up the midterms, because we got to beat them,' Trump said. Recent history is littered with presidents who, after using congressional majorities to push through major legislation meant to burnish their legacy, later lamented not doing enough to sell the bill to the American public – after their party members paid the price at the ballot box. For Trump, however, the bill he'll sign into law Friday is less about helping Republicans win and more about his own legacy. He has framed the package as codifying the promises he made to voters on the campaign trail, and used it to punctuate what he's called the most successful start to any presidency in history. Friday's flyover of the B-2 bombers — used to drop bunker-busters on Iranian nuclear facilities last month — underscores the consequential stretch of days punctuated by passage of Trump's bill. Aside from the Iran strikes, Trump successfully convinced NATO allies to spend more on defense at a leaders' summit last week; secured a major victory at the Supreme Court that expands his executive powers; and generated new momentum toward a ceasefire in Gaza that could materialize in a matter of days. A day ahead of his July 4 celebration, Trump basked in the string of victories. 'This had to be the best two weeks,' he said. 'Has anybody ever had a better two weeks?'