Wall Street Fined in Asia's $3B Money-Laundering Bombshell
Warning! GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Sign with UBS.
At the heart of the issue: weak anti-money laundering controls. MAS pointed to poor or inconsistent implementation across the firms involved. Four individuals at Blue Ocean Invest were banned from regulated roles for up to six years, while several others received official reprimands. UBS, which absorbed Credit Suisse in 2023, said it fully cooperated with the review. Citi disclosed it has tightened onboarding and monitoring processes, while UOB and its brokerage arm UOB-Kay Hian also moved to close gaps. The regulator said it would monitor progress closely, signaling there's still more work to be done behind the scenes.
This could be the biggest compliance reckoning since MAS shut down BSI Bank's local unit in 2016 during the fallout from the 1MDB scandal. While Singapore remains a rising star in global wealth managementassets under management climbed 10% to S$5.41 trillion last yearthe case highlights a tension between growth and governance. Similar crackdowns abroad have cost banks billions, including TD Bank's US$3.1 billion AML settlement last year and Danske Bank's US$2 billion fine in 2022. For investors, the key takeaway is this: as capital flows into Singapore, regulators are under pressure to show they can keep the pipes clean.
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fed Quietly Removes Reputational Risk Rule That Kept Banks Away from Crypto—Industry Insiders Say This Changes Everything
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. The Federal Reserve just made a move that could quietly reshape crypto's relationship with traditional banking. The Fed announced on June 23 that it will drop reputational risk from its bank examination programs—a change that crypto advocates have been pushing for years and one that could finally open the floodgates for mainstream crypto banking Miss: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . While the Fed's announcement sounds like regulatory wonkery, it strikes at the heart of crypto's biggest problem: banking access. For years, crypto companies have struggled to maintain basic banking relationships, not because they posed financial risks, but because banks feared regulatory blowback over the industry's controversial reputation. 'Reputational risk' gave regulators a catch-all tool to pressure banks away from crypto clients. Even legally compliant crypto exchanges, custody providers, and blockchain startups often found themselves cut off from banking services simply because regulators deemed the industry too risky from a PR perspective. Now, with reputational risk officially removed from examinations, banks will be evaluated purely on measurable financial metrics—not on whether they serve industries that generate negative headlines. The crypto industry has long argued that regulatory hostility, not actual risk, kept banks at arm's length. Major crypto companies like Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN), Kraken, and Circle (NYSE:CRCL) have repeatedly highlighted how difficult it is to secure and maintain banking relationships, despite operating as regulated entities. Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. This change could fundamentally alter that dynamic. Here's what might happen: More Banking Partners: Crypto companies may finally gain access to mainstream banking services for payroll, business operations, and customer funds management. This could reduce costs and increase operational efficiency across the sector. Stablecoin Infrastructure: The move could accelerate adoption of dollar-backed stablecoins, as banks become more willing to hold reserves for compliant stablecoin issuers without fear of regulatory pressure. Institutional Adoption: Traditional banks might finally feel comfortable offering crypto custody, trading, or investment services to their wealthy clients and institutional customers. Payment Rails: We could see more integration between crypto payment systems and traditional banking infrastructure, making it easier to move money between crypto and traditional finance. If banks start treating crypto like any other legal industry, the implications extend far beyond just business operations. Increased banking access could drive significant changes in crypto valuations and adoption: Reduced Volatility: Better banking relationships could reduce the operational risks that contribute to crypto's price swings, potentially leading to more stable valuations. Institutional Inflows: Easier banking access might accelerate the flow of institutional money into crypto markets, similar to what we saw with Bitcoin ETF approvals. DeFi Integration: Traditional banks might become more willing to explore decentralized finance protocols, potentially bridging the gap between TradFi and DeFi. It's crucial to understand what this policy shift doesn't mean. Crypto companies still need to comply with all existing financial regulations, including anti-money laundering rules, know-your-customer requirements, and securities laws. The Fed emphasized that banks must still maintain 'strong risk management' and legal compliance. Banks also remain free to choose their clients based on actual business risks. They just can't be penalized by regulators for serving legal crypto businesses solely based on industry move comes as the crypto industry prepares for potentially friendlier regulatory treatment under the new administration. Combined with the approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, institutional adoption by companies like MicroStrategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) and Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), and growing clarity around crypto regulations, the Fed's decision removes another significant barrier to mainstream adoption. The timing isn't coincidental. As crypto markets have matured and institutional interest has grown, the argument for treating legally compliant crypto businesses differently from other industries has become harder to justify. For crypto investors, this regulatory shift could be a game-changer, but the effects will likely unfold over months, not days. Key indicators to monitor: Announcements from major banks about new crypto services Reduced operational costs for crypto companies as banking access improves Increased institutional adoption as traditional finance becomes more comfortable with crypto More stable crypto prices as operational risks decrease Growing integration between crypto and traditional financial systems While Bitcoin hitting new highs grabs headlines, regulatory changes like this often have more lasting impact on crypto's long-term trajectory. For an industry that's spent years fighting for basic banking access, the Fed's quiet policy shift might be the breakthrough that finally brings crypto fully into the mainstream financial system. Read Next: Named a TIME Best Invention and Backed by 5,000+ Users, Kara's Air-to-Water Pod Cuts Plastic and Costs — Image: Shutterstock This article Fed Quietly Removes Reputational Risk Rule That Kept Banks Away from Crypto—Industry Insiders Say This Changes Everything originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ally Bank Says This Is the Best Time To ‘Graduate' From Your Starter Bank
Millennial nostalgia is real — even when it comes to banking. That's the sentiment that Ally Bank is tapping into in their new campaign targeting millennials to 'graduate' from their starter banks to another bank account. Read Next: Find Out: The online bank worked with its agency, Anomaly, to create a marketing campaign that shows the generation can now 'Graduate Financially.' Ally found that nearly half of millennials still use their starter bank. The campaign features zany trends that dominated 2010 — from shutter shades to sepia filters. Ally partnered with millennial actor Taylor Lautner to spread the word. He recently shared how 'growth is part of the glow-up, in your style and your finances,' in a self-deprecating Instagram post featuring throwbacks to his 2011 style. As millennials move away from all the things they've outgrown, here's why a move towards a better bank should also be on the list. A new bank or banking account could be the natural segue for targeted budgeting, debt pay off or major life changes like marriage. Newer banks, especially neobanks (online only), may offer incentives to switch over or create an account. They also tend to offer higher interest rates. That means their account holders can earn more, faster. Switching banks may also save you money with little to no fees. For instance, the CapitalOne online, high-yield savings account has no fees, no minimums and a 3.60% annual percentage yield (APY). Millennials tend to be more socially conscious, which is in part reflected in their consuming habits, and banks take that seriously. If reducing your carbon footprint or impacting social justice mean a lot to you, switching banks could bring you closer to those goals while also building your financial future. When deciding whether or not to open a new bank account, millennials should consider what's personally important to them right now. This can include factors like ATM access, customer support and physical bank locations. Before making any change, millennials should also keep in mind the risk of losing any perks they already have with their current bank or account. More From GOBankingRates How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on Ally Bank Says This Is the Best Time To 'Graduate' From Your Starter Bank
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
US–China trade: 3 consumer sectors investors should focus on
Brendan Ahern, KraneShares chief investment officer, joins Market Domination Overtime with Josh Lipton to discuss trade tensions between China and the US, highlighting areas investors should be focused on right now. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here. Who do you think Brandon has the leverage here, US or China? I I had a policy guy on this week on the show who said, he argued with Xi because he could take a much more longer term look. He is not worried about polling. Uh but what do you think, Brandon? Yeah, I think there's no winner in a trade war. Certainly, US consumers are the biggest losers, uh US retailers. Um at the same time, China, it is a very big country, uh re you know, not just geographically, but economically. And so yeah, there's parts of China that are not geared to export manufacturing at all. You know, we estimate that less than 3% of China's GDP is geared to the United States today. That that percentage has come down uh pretty dramatically as uh Asian countries as well as the uh EU European Union now are bigger trade partners. But I think ultimately there is no winner. And and these two economies are highly intertwined with one another. Business people are getting along with one another just fine. Why can't these diplomats take a page from the corporate world? So given these trade tensions, Brandon, right? These trade tensions, which as you argue, um, hurting everybody to some respects. How does that then Brandon inform your investment decisions? What Chinese sectors, industry names, do you want exposure to? Yeah, I mean, I mean certainly we believe that the Chinese government will pivot to raise domestic consumption to offset um export driven manufacturing where it's going to face a little bit of a of a headwind. Uh certainly just with the reprove in the trade war, you've seen some of the China PMIs have been uh rebounded quite nicely. But but in general, I think this is an area where President Trump and President Xi agree that China needs to do more around domestic consumption. So they're doing a lot of consumer subsidies. Those subsidies have been geared to auto, which includes electric vehicle and hybrid. More recently, it's electronics. So things like iPhones and mobile phones, smart watches, as well as home appliances. So, so I think those are three areas around consumption that as an investor, you want to be focused on when it comes to China today. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
