Palestine Action blocks Israeli defence firm UK site ahead of proscription vote
The group also occupied the rooftop of UK subcontractor Guardtech Group in Suffolk, the spokesperson added.
The action comes as a draft order was laid before Parliament on Monday to amend the Terrorism Act 2000 to include Palestine Action as a proscribed organisation.
If approved, it would become a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to be a member of the direct action group or to support it.
MPs and peers are expected to debate the legislation on Wednesday and Thursday and, if approved, the ban could come into force by Friday.
A Palestine Action spokesperson said: 'While the Government is rushing through Parliament absurd legislation to proscribe Palestine Action, the real terrorism is being committed in Gaza.
'Palestine Action affirms that direct action is necessary in the face of Israel's ongoing crimes against humanity of genocide, apartheid, and occupation, and to end British facilitation of those crimes.'
A spokeswoman for Avon and Somerset Police said officers were called to the Bristol site of Elbit Systems at around 6.30am on Tuesday.
'Officers are responding to a protest involving two people at a premises at the Aztec West Business Park, in Almondsbury,' the spokeswoman said.
'We're committed to facilitating people's right to peaceful protest, but will not tolerate any criminal behaviour.'
Palestine Action is seeking a legal challenge against the Government's bid to proscribe it, with a hearing expected on Friday to decide whether the ban can be temporarily blocked, pending further proceedings to decide whether a legal challenge can be brought.
Commenting on the proscription on Monday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'The right to protest and the right to free speech are the cornerstone of our democracy and there are countless campaign groups that freely exercise those rights.
'Violence and serious criminal damage has no place in legitimate protests.'
Suffolk Police have been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
MPs back proscribing direct action group Palestine Action as terror organisation
MPs have backed the Government's move to ban direct action group Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, despite warnings it will have a 'chilling effect' on protest. Legislation passed in the Commons on Wednesday, as MPs voted 385 to 26, majority 359 in favour of proscribing the group under the Terrorism Act 2000. The motion is expected to be debated and voted on by the House of Lords on Thursday before it becomes law. If approved, it would become a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to be a member of the direct action group or to support it. Security minister Dan Jarvis told MPs that protesters expressing support for Palestine 'have always been able to, and can continue to do so' as he urged support to ban Palestine Action. He said: 'Palestine Action is not a legitimate protest group. ' People engaged in lawful protest don't need weapons. People engaged in lawful protest do not throw smoke bombs and fire pyrotechnics around innocent members of the public. 'And people engaged in lawful protest do not cause millions of pounds of damage to national security infrastructure, including submarines and defence equipment for Nato.' Palestine Action is seeking a legal challenge against the Government's bid to proscribe it, with a hearing expected on Friday to decide whether the ban can be temporarily blocked, pending further proceedings to decide whether a legal challenge can be brought. The Government's move comes after two planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton on June 20 in an action claimed by Palestine Action. Five people have since been arrested on suspicion of a terror offence in relation to the incident. Mr Jarvis said the attack at RAF Brize Norton 'was just the latest episode in Palestine Action's long history of harmful activity', adding: 'Palestine Action has orchestrated a nation-wide campaign of property damage featuring attacks that have resulted in serious damage to property and crossed the threshold from direct criminal action into terrorism.' But the minister faced backlash from some MPs who described the move as a 'draconian overreach' and likened the group to the Suffragettes. The United Nations also warned ahead of the vote for the UK not to proscribe Palestine Action, as experts are concerned at the 'unjustified labelling of a political protest movement as 'terrorist'.' Independent MP for Coventry South Zarah Sultana also told the Commons: 'To equate a spray can of paint with a suicide bomb isn't just absurd, it is grotesque. 'It is a deliberate distortion of the law to chill dissent, criminalise solidarity and suppress the truth.' Former soldier Clive Lewis, now the Labour MP for Norwich South, said: 'I understand what terrorism is. I was in London on July 7 in 2007 and I watched my community, this city, attacked by real terrorists. 'And at that point, rightly or wrongly, I decided I was going to Afghanistan to fight the terrorists. 'And I went because I love this country, and I love our democracy, and I want to see it protected. I think today's proscription order against Palestine Action undermines that and I wish my Government wouldn't do it.' A spokesperson for Palestine Action said: 'We are confident that this unlawful order will be overturned. 'As United Nations experts have made clear, spraying red paint and disrupting the British-based operations of Israel's largest weapons firm, Elbit Systems, is not terrorism.' Outside of Parliament, four protesters were arrested by the Metropolitan Police following a demonstration to oppose the move to ban Palestine Action. The police had imposed Public Order Act conditions aimed at limiting the protest to Richmond Terrace, off Whitehall. One woman, who identified herself as Emma Kamio to the PA news agency, appeared to use the protest technique known as 'locking on' to cause an obstruction outside of Carriage Gates, one of the entrances to the parliamentary estate. Her daughter Leona Kamio was among a group of pro-Palestine protesters who have appeared in court to deny breaking into the UK site of an Israel-based defence firm with sledgehammers, causing £1 million of damage. Police were seen speaking to Ms Kamio as she sat on the pavement outside Parliament with her arm inside what appeared to be a suitcase. Listing the four arrests, a Met spokesperson said a woman 'who locked herself onto a suitcase outside the gates of Parliament' was among them for 'breaching the conditions and for being in possession of articles intended for locking on'. Among those arrested was also a 'man who blocked the gates of Downing Street with his mobility scooter and refused to move to the conditioned area'. A larger than usual number of officers could be seen in the area around Parliament. The Met said the 'significant policing presence in the vicinity of Parliament' was because of its 'responsibility to take action to prevent serious disruption to the life of the community', including by ensuring MPs 'can go about their business free from intimidation or unreasonable interference'. The legislation approved by MPs also bans two white supremacist groups, Maniacs Murder Cult and Russian Imperial Movement, including its paramilitary arm Russian Imperial Legion. The Home Office describes the Maniacs Murder Cult as a neo-Nazi transnational and online organisation which has claimed a number of violent attacks around the world. Russian Imperial Movement is a ethno-nationalist group which aims to create a new Russian Imperial State. Its paramilitary unit fought alongside Russian forces in the invasion of Ukraine to advance its ideological cause. It also runs a paramilitary training programme to support attendees to carry out terror attacks, the Home Office added.
Leader Live
31 minutes ago
- Leader Live
MPs back foreign investors owning minority stakes in UK newspapers
The Commons voted overwhelmingly in favour of a change to the law by Labour which would allow foreign firms to buy minority stakes. It is the latest turn in a tumultuous two-year takeover process for the 170-year-old newspaper business. It comes after the previous Conservative government put a block in place amid fears the Telegraph could be bought by a majority-owned UAE company, RedBird IMI. The investment vehicle is a joint venture with US financiers. The regulation was approved by 338 votes to 79, majority 259. Labour was boosted in the voting lobbies by four Reform UK MPs, including its leader Nigel Farage (Clacton), and seven Independent MPs. Meanwhile former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith, a vocal critic of China, was among those to vote against it. The Liberal Democrats, who forced the vote over fears foreign ownership would compromise editorial independence, also opposed it. The result will give the green light to RedBird IMI, with the cap in place now being supported by MPs. RedBird Capital, the US junior partner in RedBird IMI, agreed a deal in May to buy a majority stake in the newspaper for £500 million. Abu-Dhabi's IMI will look to buy a minority stake as part of the consortium. RedBird has investments in AC Milan, film production giant Skydance and Liverpool FC owner Fenway Sports Group. It is also understood that the Daily Mail and General Trust (DMGT) – which owns the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday, the i, and the Metro – is also looking to buy a stake. This is in addition to Sir Len Blavatnik, who owns the Theatre Royal Haymarket in the West End, who is considering a minority stake, according to Sky News reports. The rules were introduced after RedBird IMI looked to buy the Telegraph Media Group (TMG) from the Barclay Brothers. Then-Conservative culture secretary Lucy Frazer told a Society of Editors Conference in April 2024: 'I had concerns about the potential impacts of this deal on free expression and accurate presentation of news and that's why I issued a public interest intervention.' Culture minister Stephanie Peacock told MPs last month that appropriate safeguards had been introduced. She said: 'Government need to balance the importance of creating certainty and sustainability for our newspaper industry with the need to protect against the risk of foreign state influence by setting a clear threshold for exceptions within the regime at 15%. We believe that we have done that effectively.' Speaking after the vote, the Liberal Democrats' spokesman on media Max Wilkinson said: 'Freedom of the press is an historic and inviolable cornerstone of our democracy. That the Government is pushing to sell off stakes in our British papers to foreign governments is astonishing. 'It's outrageous that Labour and the Conservative MPs failed to stand up, do their patriotic duty and block this legislation. The leader of the opposition sponsored the Bill that restricted foreign states owning British newspapers last year – yet even she failed to vote against the measure. 'Liberal Democrats have already successfully forced the Government to backtrack on their senseless plan to let multiple states club together to buy whatever sized stake in a British outlet they fancied. Now my colleagues in the Lords and I will deliver a showdown to overturn this Bill entirely – rallying Conservative and crossbench peers to defeat the Government on this misguided policy.' The Department for Culture, Media and Sport has been approached for comment.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
A performer was mean at Glastonbury? Well, cry me a river and the sea
The backlash has been swift and predictable. The duo has had their US visas revoked, been dropped by their agents, lost festival bookings, and now prosecution is on the table. But forgive me, and anyone else, if I don't care a jot what Bob Vylan happened to say on a festival stage. Read more: Kneecap's crimes of terror? Waving a flag while Britain arms a genocide On Monday, the IDF killed 74 people. With 30 left dead from a bomb dropped on a seaside café, and 23 Palestinians shot down while seeking food. The number of children killed by the IDF is over the 50,000 mark, not counting those children who have been maimed, displaced, lost family, or experienced life-ruining trauma. Just try to imagine 50,000 dead children for a second, it is not some abstract number untied to our reality. Words said on the Glastonbury stage, regardless of how inflammatory they are, become hilariously insignificant in the face of those facts. Israel's siege on Gaza is a situation so morbid, so catastrophic, so filled with horrors beyond our comprehension that grasping onto distraction after distraction is the only way for them to save face on any of it. Whatever happens on the Glastonbury stage simply cannot measure up to the immeasurable cruelty and devastation suffered by the Palestinians. Believe it or not, a crowd chanting at a British music festival does not actually result in the death of an IDF soldier. Sticks and stones. A café that was damaged in an Israeli airstrike, killing more than 30 people near the port in Gaza City (Image: PA) Glastonbury, the BBC, and any other organisation caught in the crossfire of platforming the performance, must be naïve or stupid if they were hoping to avoid such an incident. Their assumptions seem to rest on other performers witnessing the axe fall on Kneecap (whose set at the festival was banned from BBC broadcast and is also being sought for possible prosecution), and in turn becoming scared to rock any boats. But given the amount of attention and publicity that came Kneecap's way as a result, is it any wonder that those performing felt compelled to up their ante even more and speak out against a genocide we are all observing in real time? It scarcely matters how many festival bookings are cancelled or what industry ties vanish into the night. Bob Vylan, a niche act with a strong anti-establishment ethos, can forego the luxuries of the mainstream music industry, where there is space to survive and grow, and complete their artistic goals. If they don't find themselves in jail for speaking their minds, then they really have nothing to lose. Modern-day artists sink or swim in an attention economy. By speaking out and causing a rupture, it has generated more popularity for themselves than their music and festival appearances could ever do on their own. It's clear that the duo knows all this and are not just merchants of provocation. 'We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people. We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine,' they said. They added that 'we, like those in the spotlight before us, are not the story. We are a distraction from the story, and whatever sanctions we receive will be a distraction'. Read more: The First Minister does not get to decide who plays TRNSMT festival Anyone who genuinely feels up in arms over a festival crowd chanting death towards a military carrying out the actions of a genocidal government should really take a step back and consider what transgressions are truly being breached. Because it is a mindset stuffed with meaningless decorum, where words are always taken at face value, and considered with great seriousness, while actions are obfuscated and swept under the rug. It is too easy a game to shift the conversation towards words and their efficacy rather than to consider the horrible reality unfolding on the ground and in front of our eyes. And it is a wonderful opportunity for the condemnation class. Politicians, the police, and the media love to fan the flames of these distractions in cheap, cynical ploys to be seen as proactive and righteous. If these types truly cared about the death toll of war, then their silence wouldn't be so deafening on the part of dead Palestinians. Maybe, just maybe, the reports of the IDF meeting its end following Bob Vylan's incitement were missed in the headlines. Or perhaps it is currently quite busy increasing the shelling of Gaza before a possible Trump-enforced ceasefire. Go figures.
