
Dinosaur fossil found underneath a Denver museum's parking lot
The dinosaur bone came to light in January during a drilling project to study the layers of rock underneath the site, the museum announced on July 9. The team had planned to pull an Earth core sample, a long cylindrical piece of rock or sediment, and came across a partial fossil.
At about 2.5 inches (6.4 centimeters ) in diameter — the width of the extracted rock core — the disk-shaped specimen is the vertebra of a plant-eating dinosaur that roamed the region more than 67 million years ago. At a depth of about 760 feet (230 meters) below the surface, it is the oldest and deepest fossil ever found within Denver, according to the museum's release.
There is not enough of the fossil to determine its species, but this rare find helps fill in a picture of the ecosystem during the Cretaceous period in what's now Denver, said Dr. James Hagadorn, the museum's curator of geology. Scientists were able to narrow the fossil down to an herbivorous group of bipedal dinosaurs known as ornithopods, and it's the first ornithopod to be found in Denver's city limits.
'We knew those dinosaurs were (nearby in other parts of) Colorado or Wyoming, but we didn't know that they were in Denver, too … but we suspected it right at this time period,' Hagadorn said. 'Now, we have another plant eater that's been cruising around Denver munching on, who knows, gingers and palm leaves and other ferns and plants 67 million years ago.'
The unexpected addition is now on display at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science, which has around 115,000 dinosaur, plant and mammal fossils in its collection, according to its website. Since there are only two other instances in the world of a dinosaur bone having been uncovered in a core sample, Hagadorn said he believes the newly found vertebra is the first to be put on display.
More of the ornithopod fossil remains underground, but there are no plans to excavate the deeply buried specimen, Hagadorn said. 'Unfortunately, we can't excavate our entire parking lot. Parking is really important at the museum and in all cultural (centers ),' he said. 'But the bonus here is that people can now park right on top of a dinosaur.'
The drilling project's initial purpose was to investigate whether the museum could switch from natural gas to a geothermal energy system. Researchers still have about 1,000 feet of extracted rock core left to analyze — which could contain fossils, minerals or other structures that weren't visible on the core's exterior, Hagadorn said. Further study of the sample will also help experts at the museum better understand the region's geology and other environmental factors such as drinking water.
While studying the rock core has many purposes, finding a dinosaur fossil was not something the team expected, Hagadorn added. 'It's like the lucky strike. I mean, who would have figured? … It's like Robin Hood splitting an arrow in half, or an apple, from 2 ½ football fields away.'
Even without the full fossil available, the small bone allows scientists to better understand the diversity of dinosaurs that once roamed the Denver Basin near the end of the Cretaceous period, Hagadorn said. He likened it to a diorama that has one more confirmed character added to the picture.
The finding is a 'nice example of how dinosaur fossils are distributed around in our environment, even in … places that might seem unlikely, like in the middle of the city of Denver,' said Dr. Paul Olsen, a paleontologist and Arthur D. Storke Memorial Professor of Earth and Environmental Sciences at Columbia University. Olsen was not involved with the discovery.
'It's illustrative of how dinosaur bones and other fossils are really not terribly rare, and anytime you have a really good way of viewing the rock … you will run into fossils,' he added. 'And fairly often, if (the rock) is the right age, you'll run into dinosaur bones.'
Most often, rock coring is performed after a fossil has been discovered, because it can give scientists a better look at the layering within the rock and what the environment was like millions of years ago, Olsen said.
Colorado tends to be the sweet spot for Cretaceous fossils due to the number of rocks from that period near the surface that volcanoes haven't harmed or faults haven't broken up, Hagadorn said.
In light of the parking lot discovery, paleontologists were inspired to go back and look at available satellite and elevation data to date all other fossils previously found within the Denver metro area, including a Tyrannosaurus rex, Triceratops and Torosaurus, and other major fossil deposits. Before that analysis, the team only knew that the ornithopod vertebra was from the Late Cretaceous period. With the new data, which was published in June in the journal Rocky Mountain Geology, researchers were able to give the newly discovered fossil, as well as others included in the study, a more precise age.
'No one ever dated these things before,' Hagadorn said. 'It wasn't very feasible to do that in the past, but today, we were able to use some specialized maps, geologic maps, GIS (geographic information systems) and really precise elevations that you can now get from satellites to place all these things in space and then in time.'
While most fossils within the study were found in more rural areas, the ornithopod vertebra highlights remaining fossils yet to be discovered, particularly in untapped urban areas. Discovery of the bone within the core, and the use of more precise dating techniques to understand its place in time, allows for better understanding of the changing world, Columbia's Olsen said.
Discover your world
Go beyond the headlines and explore the latest scientific achievements and fascinating discoveries. Sign up for CNN's Wonder Theory science newsletter. 'These kinds of studies give humans context of where they fit in the history of the universe and the history of the world,' said Olsen, who also didn't participate in the new analysis.
'It documents the changes through time that occurred, and sometimes we learn really astounding things. … And at a much more granular level, it gives us ways of trying to understand how the world actually works, in terms of developing hypotheses of climate change (or) hypotheses of mass extinction,' he added. 'So all of this gives us context for understanding, and sort of a library of reality, to go compare our theories with.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kids who own smartphones before age 13 have worse mental health outcomes: Study
Children, especially girls, who own smartphones before they are 13 years old may have worse mental health outcomes when they're older, a new study suggests. The study, published Sunday in the Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, analyzed self-reported questionnaire results from more than 100,000 young adults between the ages of 18 and 24. The questionnaire asked respondents about mental health symptoms, such as having aggression, feelings of detachment, hallucinations and suicidal thoughts. Those who were given smartphones at an earlier age were associated with worse mental health outcomes for every year of smartphone ownership before the age of 13. Early smartphone ownership was associated with feelings of lower self-image and lower self-worth in both girls and boys. Girls reported lower emotional resilience and lower confidence, while boys reported feeling less calm, less stable and less empathetic. "The younger the child gets a smartphone, the more exposure to all this impacts them psychologically and shapes the way they think and view the world," Tara Thiagarajan, one of the study's authors, told ABC News in an emailed statement. About 48% of young women who had smartphones by 5 or 6 years old reported having severe suicidal thoughts, compared to 28% of females who had smartphones by 13 or older. In young men, 31% of those who had smartphones by 5 or 6 years old reported having severe suicidal thoughts and 20% of males who had smartphones by 13 or older reported having severe suicidal thoughts. Cellphone bans in schools take center stage amid mental health crisis Study authors attributed the differences between young women's and young men's mental health symptoms to social media usage. Other factors that seemed to impact mental health outcomes were cyberbullying, poor sleep and poor family relationships. The study's authors recommended restricting smartphone and social media access for kids under 13, promoting digital literacy education and corporate accountability. "Ideally, children should not have a smartphone until age 14, and when they do get a smartphone, parents should take the time to discuss with their children how to interact on the Internet and explain the consequences of doing various things," Thiagarajan added. ABC News' Dr. Tara Narula also said on "Good Morning America" Monday that limiting kids' access to social media appears to be a key step in protecting children and their mental health outcomes. "The longer we can push off allowing our kids to be on social media, we are learning, the better," Narula said. "I think lots of families are getting creative … landlines …. flip phones for kids [are] maybe an option so that they can have access to communicating without all the other things that come with smartphones." Social psychologist says kids shouldn't have smartphones before high school The study's findings come amid an effort led by social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, author of "Anxious Generation," to limit kids' smartphone use due to the impact on their mental health. Haidt has proposed setting nationwide "norms" or guidelines, including not giving children a smartphone before high school, no social media before age 16 and establishing schools as phone-free zones. Pediatrician Dr. Natasha Burgert also recommended that parents demonstrate to children how to use smartphones responsibly. "Children watch everything you do -- and that doesn't stop until they leave your house," Burgert told ABC News via email. "Connect authentically and meaningfully for a few minutes every day, and show your children that the humans we live with are more important and worthy of our attention than our phones." The American Academy of Pediatrics also recommends families follow the 5 C's of media use, including teaching kids and teens how to be safe online, since content and advertisements may be targeting an older audience. Child - Consider your child and their personality. What media are they drawn to and how do they react to it? Content - Consider the content of the media your child consumes. Encourage them to consider good media sources. Calm - Help your child learn how to manage their emotions, including without the help of media. Crowding out - Consider what your family would like to spend more quality time doing, besides consuming media. Communication - Discuss media with children early and often and encourage learning digital literacy. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NASA says a plane-sized asteroid will pass Earth next week. Here's what to know.
A plane-sized asteroid scheduled to pass Earth next week is making headlines, but NASA experts want the public to understand why this encounter is more routine than remarkable. The asteroid is named 2025 OW and measures approximately 210 feet in length, according to NASA. It is set to pass Earth on July 28 at a distance of approximately 393,000 miles -- about 1.6 times the average distance to the Moon, according to the space agency. While it's traveling at an impressive speed of 46,908 miles per hour, NASA scientists emphasize this is normal and nothing to lose sleep over. "This is very routine," Ian J. O'Neill, media relations specialist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), told ABC News. "If there was a threat, you would hear from us. We would always put out alerts on our planetary defense blog." MORE: Axiom private space mission could be glimpse of the future as ISS retirement looms Davide Farnocchia, an asteroid expert at NASA's Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS), explains that space rocks passing by Earth are just business as usual in our solar system. "Close approaches happen all the time -- it's just part of the fabric of the solar system," Farnocchia told ABC News. His team usually tracks several asteroids passing Earth each week -- as of Tuesday, they're watching five for next week alone. While 2025 OW is large enough to be of interest to NASA scientists, its well-understood orbit means it poses no danger. "We know exactly where it's going to be. We'll probably know where it's going to be for the next 100 years," O'Neill said. MORE: Chance of asteroid striking Earth in the next decade rises to 3.1%, NASA says For space enthusiasts hoping to catch a glimpse of 2025 OW, Farnocchia indicates it won't be visible with binoculars. However, he points to a more exciting upcoming event: the 2029 approach of asteroid Apophis. "Apophis will come within 38,000 kilometers of Earth in April 2029 -- closer than our geostationary satellites," Farnocchia said. Approximately 1,115 feet in length, and due to its exceptionally close approach, Apophis will be visible to the naked eye, offering a rare opportunity for public observation of an asteroid. Both Farnocchia and O'Neill emphasize that while Earth is struck by roughly 100 tons of space material daily, most of this is harmless dust. Larger, potentially hazardous impacts are extremely rare. "For an object the size of 2025 OW, while close approaches might happen yearly, an actual Earth impact would only occur roughly every 10,000 years," Farnocchia notes. NASA continues to monitor near-Earth objects through its planetary defense programs, maintaining public transparency about any potential risks while emphasizing that most asteroid headlines are more sensational than concerning.


Forbes
20 minutes ago
- Forbes
How President Kennedy's Vision Drove Apollo 11's Triumph
Nations, and organizations, can accomplish great things when guided by clarity of purpose. On July 24, the country celebrates the successful conclusion of the Apollo 11 lunar mission; perhaps the most significant technological triumph in American history. You don't need to be a senior citizen to recognize its relevance. The Apollo 11 triumph reflects the exceptional contributions of a disparate group of scientists, engineers, technicians, astronauts and test pilots. But it was very much born of the bold, clear vision of a young president, and of the extraordinary national commitment that vision generated. And there's a lesson in that for today's organizational leaders. Early in the John F. Kennedy presidency, the country's global prestige had been buffeted by the unanticipated achievements of the Soviet space program, which far outpaced similar efforts of the United States. Soviet spacecrafts were orbiting the earth while American rockets were exploding on the launch pad. The 'space gap' became an unexpected yet powerful weapon in the Cold War. In turn, President Kennedy viewed national leadership in space as critical to preserving the country's world leadership position. This, he felt, could be achieved by pursuing aggressive goals for space exploration. To that end, in a bold address to a joint session of Congress on May 25, 1961, he called for a national commitment 'to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth.' (Note Kennedy's reference to both 'landing' and 'returning'). In this call before Congress, he pulled no punches, articulating both the promise and the 'heavy burden' associated with his challenge. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind, or more important for the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish. Nations, and organizations, can accomplish great things when guided by clarity of purpose. Kennedy further galvanized public support for this vision with his famous September 12, 1962 speech at Rice University in Houston: We choose to go to the Moon. We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too. Of course, Kennedy did not live to see the success of Apollo 11. Yet his simple, clear and stirring vision for the nation was strong enough to sustain the public commitment and support the scientific effort through the challenges and tragedies of the intervening years. To address the continuing technical barriers of space flight. To confront the loss of confidence from a great tragedy ‒ the Apollo 1 fire. To overcome the significant distractions of an unpopular foreign war and growing national racial strife. Indeed, Apollo 11 returned safely to earth on July 24, 1969; 'in this decade', just as Kennedy had called for. Simply amazing. All of this is a reminder that words do indeed matter. That a thoughtful purpose can breed meaningful commitment. And that a clearly articulated vision can motivate an organization, just as a nation, to pursue and achieve noble goals. With that, the elements of vision-making become more apparent: it's the ability of leadership to succinctly express where the organization needs to go in the future, the reasons why it needs to go in that direction, how it expects to reach the specific destination, the plan for the organization when it gets there, and why the effort will ultimately be worth it. Easier said than done, of course. But President Kennedy's skill in formulating, presenting and advocating for his space exploration goals made it easier for the public to understand and support them. More broadly, it helped them become more acquainted with the young president, and the principles for which he stood. That's the force of an effective vision; a force should be attractive to all leaders ‒ no matter the industry sector.