logo
Trump Has A New Plan To Get Women To Have More Babies. What Could Go Wrong?

Trump Has A New Plan To Get Women To Have More Babies. What Could Go Wrong?

Yahoo19-06-2025
In an effort to get Americans to have more children, the Trump administration has proposed ideas such as a $5,000 'baby bonus' or a $1,000 tax-deferred investment account for children born between 2025 and 2029. It's as if we're suddenly in a game of Monopoly: Have a baby, pass go and collect cash!
Their concern is that declining birth rates may lead to a smaller workforce amid an aging population, potentially straining economic stability and the social safety net. But having children can be a swift way into debt. According to the Brookings Institution, a financial think tank, the average middle-income family with two children — median income $80,610 ―spends $310,605 on each child by the time they reach 17.
Additionally, having children in the U.S. comes with risks that go well beyond economics. Maternal morbidity is significantly higher in the U.S. than in other developed countries, and since abortion bans came into effect in some states, deaths have risen — inTexas, maternal death shot up 56%, according to the Gender Policy Equity Institute. For white women, the rate doubled from 20 per 100,000 to 39.1; for Black women, who are historically at greater risk, rates jumped from 31.6 to 43.6 per 100,000 live births.
And those are just the implications for mothers; there are risks to babies as well. I made it through birth without too many complications, but my second son nearly didn't. He was born with VACTERL syndrome, a birth defect which affects multiple body systems. In the U.S., birth defects affect 1 in 33 babies and are the leading cause of infant death, making up 1 in 5 of all infant deaths. Racial disparities persist here, too,Black infants are over twice as likely to die relative to those born to parents of other races according to KFF.
My son has a 'rare' disease — fewer than 200,000 people in the U.S. have it. Collectively, however, rare diseases aren't as 'rare' as they may seem. An estimated 25 to 30 million Americans have one, and birth defects like gastroschisis — a condition in which an infant is born with its intestines protruding outside the body — carry higher risk factors for younger women.
Having a child with serious medical issues is like having a bomb explode in the heart of your family. After my son's birth, I was stuck at a hospital in Greenwich, Connecticut — my doctor refused to release me — as my newborn was sent via ambulance to a hospital in New York City for surgery. Emotionally, this was devastating.
My family was lucky; my son survived. My spouse had insurance coverage through his job. Our boy got the immediate and ongoing medical attention he needed. But out-of-pocket copays for the three surgeries that marked my son's first 100 days of life came to $10,000 per month.
Instead of staring into our baby's eyes, we were staring into a dark abyss that foretold possible bankruptcy. As exhausted as I was nursing, pumping, tending to a very sick child and his older brother, I also lay awake at night, terrified at the possibility of losing our health insurance.
We made it through that first year by the skin of our teeth. Others aren't so fortunate. With high premiums and higher deductibles, health insurance becomes prohibitive to many if not most Americans. Today, 41% of adults in the US have health care debt, according to KFF.
Those without health care coverage, and possibly even those with it, are only one accident or unfortunate circumstance away from bankruptcy. The inequities in health care grow the gap between wealthy and poor.
According to the Center for American Progress,congressional Republicans' plans to slash Medicaid funding and allow Affordable Care Act tax credits to expire, ACA health insurance marketplace premiums may increase by thousands of dollars each year. If the GOP dismantles the ACA, those with preexisting conditions — like my son ― could be denied coverage.
The Trump administration suggests that individuals who need help are lazy; that they must earn their keep. But women and families are trying — and it's clearly not possible. Young families can't afford children. Yet conservatives insist women have them anyway. The Biden administration was criticized as elitist for forgiving student loan debt, butstudent loan debt actually delays fertility for women, especially at the higher levels.
Granted, it's easy for me to suggest not having children — I have two, both nearly grown. But women deserve to know the risks that can alter their lives. As a mother, I felt helpless watching my child endure so much suffering. More recently, I regret bringing my children into a world in which abundant resources are shared as if they were scant. It's terrifying to know my sons may not have access to the support they need when they need it.
In countrieslike Japan, parents get a child allowance.In Italy, working women with two or more children receive additional pension contributions.In Hungary, women below the age of 40 who marry for the first time are eligible to receive an interest-free general-purpose loan worth $36,000 — which is forgiven in full for those with three offspring. The program was so successful that 2,400 families applied for the loan within the first two weeks.
But offering financial incentives to having children has had lukewarm success over the long term. For example,Hungary's birth rate in 2019 was 1.55 babies per woman. In 2024, it was 1.38 and declining.
The underlying assumption these countries and the Trump administration make is that individuals — both women and men — inherently want children. For whatever reasons, we may not. We may have goals exclusive to family and babies. Just because a government or country 'needs' them, it doesn't mean individuals do; and just because women can biologically have them, it doesn't mean they aspire to.
If the Trump administration truly wants women to have children, it should support them in real and practical ways. Offer child care facilities, adequate financial aid and programs to help families and children. Provide affordable health care that's accessible to everyone. Reinstate Medicare funding. Protect the Affordable Care Act. Recognize abortion as a part of maternal health care.
Knowing it is safe to have a child, and that the child will be safe in the world it is coming into, would be much more effective and persuasive than any one-time bonus.
Do you have a compelling personal story you'd like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we're looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EDITORIAL: Justice system not above criticism
EDITORIAL: Justice system not above criticism

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

EDITORIAL: Justice system not above criticism

A country where the decisions of judges and prosecutors can never be criticized is a country that is not a democracy. Every Canadian citizen — not just politicians and media commentators — has the right to publicly agree or disagree with decisions made by judges and prosecutors. As long as they do not threaten their safety and are critical of their decisions, as opposed to personal attacks on those delivering them, they are legitimate forms of public expression and debate. Last week, the president of the Ontario Crown Attorneys' Association said 'attacks' by 'politicians, media and members of the public' in the context of two high-profile criminal cases were 'affronts to the rule of law.' This was in reference to the Crown's submissions for sentences for Freedom Convoy organizers Tamara Lich and Chris Barber on mischief charges, and the fallout from the acquittal of five former junior hockey players on charges of sexual assault. No doubt many agreed with Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, who tweeted on X in response to the Crown's submission to sentence Lich and Barber to seven and eight years respectively: 'Let's get this straight: while rampant violent offenders are released hours after their most recent charges and antisemitic rioters vandalize businesses, terrorize daycares and block traffic without consequences, the Crown wants seven years prison time for the charge of mischief for Lich and Barber.' Poilievre's tweet failed to note the final decision on sentencing will be made by a judge. Others will argue his argument is misguided. But it was hardly an attack on the rule of law. A similar controversy erupted in the wake of the decision by Ontario Superior Court Judge Maria Carroccia to acquit five former junior hockey plays of sexual assault in the Hockey Canada trial. Her ruling prompted public reactions from high praise to scathing criticism for the judge — much of it from lawyers — but all of it fair comment, as long as it did not stoop to threats or attacks on the judge's character. In our view, robust public debates about the decisions made in our courtrooms do not undermine the rule of law in Canada. To the contrary, they contribute to how our laws evolve over time and are a measure of our commitment to democracy. LILLEY: Crown seeks to make Convoy organizers political prisoners Conservative MPs publicly support 'Freedom Convoy' organizers ahead of sentencing GUNTER: Cancel culture dealt a blow with Hockey Canada sex assault trial verdict

Earn $1,000 a Month With E-Commerce Side Hustles and Work Toward Millionaire Status
Earn $1,000 a Month With E-Commerce Side Hustles and Work Toward Millionaire Status

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Earn $1,000 a Month With E-Commerce Side Hustles and Work Toward Millionaire Status

In uncertain economic times, it's hard to imagine anyone couldn't use an extra $12,000 a year — and more than one in ten side hustlers who pursued a specific niche have made that dream a reality. Get Paid To Watch Videos: Read More: A new study from e-commerce marketing platform Omnisend found that 12% of e-commerce side hustlers are pulling in $1,000 per month from their gigs alone — and a substantial plurality did it with just three-figure startup investments and single-digit hourly commitments per week. You Have To Put in the Hours — But Not Too Many The study, which surveyed 1,000 Americans with side gigs, found that 46% of e-commerce solopreneurs who earn four figures monthly spend just five to ten hours making their efforts pay. Another 25% contribute 11 to 20 hours. 'The fact that almost half of side hustlers are only dedicating five to ten hours a week shows how much can be achieved with the right focus,' said Marty Bauer, e-commerce expert at Omnisend. 'It's proof of how streamlined solutions like dropshipping and print-on-demand have become. You can launch and grow a store without sacrificing your full-time job or family life, but that also means you need to prioritize and be strategic about what you focus on.' Learn More: Success Takes Time, But Just a Few Months, in Many Cases One in three of the success stories has been at it for only between six months and a year. Another 21% have been plugging away for two to five years, and 29% have put in more than five years. 'The longevity of some of these stores is surprising,' said Bauer. 'It really highlights how many people are finding success on their own terms, even if it doesn't happen overnight. Consistency and a focus on organic growth channels seem to be key here. It's not a get-rich-quick scheme, but rather a way for people to turn a hobby or side interest into something more sustainable.' Profit Doesn't Have To Be Cost-Prohibitive One in three launched their business with an investment of just $500 to $1,000. For 46% of e-commerce side hustlers, the most significant cost was transportation. Equipment and supplies consumed the lion's share of expenditures for another 36%. At 29%, marketing finished third. 'Keeping expenses lean from the start lets side hustlers reinvest profit back into growth,' said Bauer. 'They're smart about what's essential and what's not, prioritizing what really matters to customers, like reliable shipping and quality materials. Success most often comes from consistency.' Good Advertising Isn't Always Expensive Advertising It might be surprising that advertising wasn't a top expense for fledgling operations trying to build name recognition — but not for Bauer. 'What they're doing makes a lot of sense,' he said. 'Building your own audience through channels you control is much more sustainable than relying on paid advertising. Retaining customers tends to be cheaper and more reliable than acquiring new ones, and when used well, tools like social media and email can make a significant difference.' The study found that 57% rely on owned social media to drive traffic, and 25% use digital ads. The old-fashioned way worked for 43%, who landed sales through word-of-mouth advertising. Exactly half relied on online marketplaces like Amazon, and e-mail marketing did the heavy lifting for another 32%. Dedicating Time is One Thing — Managing It Is Another Their biggest challenge of all was time management, which 53% struggled with — and any entrepreneur can understand why. 'It's not easy to juggle everything when you're doing it all yourself,' said Bauer. 'Prioritization becomes crucial. If you can focus on the channels and strategies that actually work, you can stretch your resources further.' More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 5 Types of Cars Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying 6 Hybrid Vehicles To Stay Away From in Retirement This article originally appeared on Earn $1,000 a Month With E-Commerce Side Hustles and Work Toward Millionaire Status

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store