DWP State Pension uplift could see people receive extra £657
State pensioners born after 1951 could be in for a financial boost, with a potential £657 increase on the cards under the Triple Lock proposal. For the 2025/26 tax year, anyone eligible for the full new State Pension can expect to pocket £11,973 annually or £230.25 each week.
Thanks to the Triple Lock being tied to an impressive 5.5% earnings growth, weekly state pension payments might see a spike to £242.90. That's nearly £972 over four weeks and leads to a favourable yearly sum of £12,630.80.
The Triple Lock scheme is DWP' s promise to uprate pensions yearly based off the highest of three measures: average annual pay bump observed from May to July, CPI come September, or a fixed rate of 2.5%. This comes amid the UK's economy facing a slight 0.1% dip in growth this past May, despite the Office for National Statistics (ONS) revealing positive signs, with GDP hopping up by 0.5% in the March to May 2025 quarter, just above the expected 0.4%.
Professor Joe Nellis, expert at MHA, said: "This is a far cry from the strong growth in the first quarter of the year when a surge in exports and a robust performance in the services sector placed the UK among the G7's top performers. Growth over the first half of the year is now expected to be modest.
"Despite a more positive outlook for the remainder of the year, this presents a challenge to the Chancellor - her fiscal headroom remains limited by high levels of public borrowing and debt and her spending plans are heavily reliant on kickstarting the economy.
"Just as last year, we now wait tentatively for the Autumn Budget to find out how the Chancellor aims to solve her fiscal problems."
Mr Nellis added: "Something must change - she must either cut spending, increase borrowing, or raise taxes. We expect a squeeze on unprotected Government budgets to cut spending, but the recent rebellion in the Labour Party against the welfare reform bill shows that major spending cuts may be too politically dangerous for the Government.
"The OBR's July report highlighted the intense burden that the triple lock on the state pension places on the UK economy - demographic and economic shifts have made this policy difficult to uphold, but any attempt to undo it would move the Government into treacherous waters."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
HMRC scam warning as thousands sent fake winter fuel message
Callous fraudsters have been targeting vulnerable people using texts and phishing websites. In June, HMRC acted to remove 4,600 fake websites linked to winter fuel payments. The revenue body is urging people to watch out for suspect communications and to report any suspect phone calls, emails or texts via An example of the scam texts that have been sent out (Image: Newsquest) How do I know if it's really HMRC contacting me? HMRC will never contact people by text to claim winter fuel payments or request personal information. Anyone who is eligible for winter fuel payments will receive them automatically without having to make a claim, it said. HMRC added that any recovery of the payment for pensioners whose total income is over £35,000 will be collected via pay as you earn (PAYE) or self-assessment, dependent on how the person pays tax on their income. We took down more than 4,600 Winter Fuel Payment scam websites in June, protecting taxpayers across the UK. ⛔ If you're unsure if the contact you've received from us is genuine, use our online guidance to learn how to recognise and report scams. ⬇️ — HM Revenue & Customs (@HMRCgovuk) July 11, 2025 Kelly Paterson, HMRC's chief security officer, said: 'Don't be fooled by these attempts by scammers to take your money or access your personal information. 'Never let yourself be rushed. If someone contacts you saying they're HMRC, wanting you to urgently transfer money or give personal information, be on your guard. If a phone call, text or email is suspicious or unexpected, don't give out private information or reply, and don't download attachments or click on links. 'I'm urging people to be alert to scams relating to winter fuel payments and to report any suspicious texts, phone calls or emails to HMRC.' Recommended reading: Winter fuel payments were previously linked to pension credit, with the Government arguing that this would help to balance a 'black hole' in public finances. But in June, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced that nine million pensioners will receive the payments this winter as pensioners in England and Wales with an income of £35,000 or less per year benefit. Ms Reeves said in June that the Government had 'listened to people's concerns' about the decision to limit the payment last winter.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Dollar rides Treasury yields higher as Trump's tariffs begin to bite
President Donald Trump on Tuesday said the U.S. would impose a 19% tariff on goods from Indonesia under a new agreement with the Southeast Asian country and more deals were coming, while offering fresh details on planned duties on pharmaceuticals.
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Look at increasing Scottish Government borrowing limits, MPs tell UK Government
Currently, the Government is limited to borrowing £600 million for day-to-day spending and £450 million for capital projects. But in a report from the Scottish Affairs Committee at Westminster on the fiscal arrangements north of the border, MPs pushed for the limits to be increased. The report said: 'At present, the Scottish Government's limited borrowing powers constrain its ability to manage fiscal shocks, as it is only able to borrow for resource purposes to cover forecast errors. 'Capital borrowing limits are currently linked to, and grow in line with, inflation, which may not necessarily be the highest metric of growth.' It added: 'We agree with the Secretary of State that borrowing limits should be linked to the measure which offers the Scottish Government the highest level of flexibility but, crucially, we note that which metric delivers this remains undetermined. 'The UK Government should therefore publish a transparent analysis of what borrowing limits would look like based on the different metrics advised in the evidence for this inquiry. 'At the next fiscal framework review, we encourage the UK Government to consider reforming the Scottish Government's capital borrowing powers, by automatically coupling borrowing to the metric which offers the highest limit.' The report comes at the end of an inquiry by the committee which sought to gauge the effectiveness of the Barnett Formula – the measure which dictates the level of funding the UK Government sends to Scotland every year. The MPs found the measure was 'fit for purpose', although it is 'imperfect'. The committee also rejected calls for the formula to shift and provide funding to Scotland based on need. Scotland, the report said, already receives more funding per head than any other country in the UK and a change in the framework could see funding cut. In written evidence to the committee, Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison reiterated the Scottish Government's support for full fiscal autonomy – an arrangement which would see powers over tax and spending devolved. But the committee dismissed such a move as not being a 'realistic prospect'. 'Fundamental questions remain about how full fiscal autonomy would work in practice, and whether it would be operable within the constraints of the UK's current devolution settlement,' the report said. 'Practicality aside, we do not believe that a compelling case has been made that such a change would automatically result in Scotland receiving a higher level of funding.' Ms Robison declined an invitation to appear before the committee, leading the MPs to say 'do not see how we can consider this a serious proposition, and we remain to be convinced that this proposal is desirable in principle, let alone workable in practice'. Responding to the report, Ms Robison said: 'This report rightly recognises that Scotland's finances remain largely dictated by the UK Government's spending decisions, irrespective of the impact on Scottish public services. 'That has meant Scotland has been left with a shortfall of £400 million to pay for the Chancellor's national insurance increase, and saw Scotland short-changed by more than a billion pounds over the next three years at the recent spending review. 'The decisions we have taken to ask higher earners to pay a little bit more – while most income tax payers pay less than in the rest of the UK – mean that we can support vital public services and provide free tuition, prescriptions and the Scottish child payment to help tackle child poverty.' Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said: 'The spending review provided the Scottish Government with an extra £9.1 billion, giving them a record settlement. 'People will expect that to deliver better outcomes for Scots – lower NHS waiting lists and better attainment in our schools. 'Spending per head in Scotland is around 20% higher than the rest of the UK thanks to the Barnett formula. This report confirms that it appears to be the position of the Scottish Government to scrap that formula that delivers higher funding – they should explain why they want less money for public services in Scotland. 'Their plans for full fiscal autonomy would mean a £12 billion cut in public spending for Scotland.'
