logo
‘How dare you': Alan Shatter criticised in committee on Israeli settlements bill

‘How dare you': Alan Shatter criticised in committee on Israeli settlements bill

BreakingNews.ie15-07-2025
Former justice minister Alan Shatter has been criticised for comparing a ban on trade with Israeli settlements to the TV show Father Ted.
Ex-Fine Gael TD Mr Shatter opposes the Government's draft law banning trade with Israeli settlements on Palestinian lands that have been deemed illegal by the UN's top court.
Advertisement
He repeatedly described it as a 'Father Ted' measure and compared it to Jews being targeted during the Second World War.
The bill banning the trade of goods with illegal Israeli settlements on Palestinian land is progressing through the Oireachtas.
The Government said there is a narrow legal basis, based on an advisory opinion from the UN's top court, to ban the trade of goods with illegal Israeli settlements.
The Government has said this is being done to comply with the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which said last year that countries should 'take steps to prevent trade or investment relations' that maintain illegal Israeli settlements on Palestinian land.
Advertisement
The bill is before the Foreign Affairs Committee for pre-legislative scrutiny, and is hearing evidence from expert witnesses.
Israeli, Palestinian and Jewish representatives, including Mr Shatter, appeared before TDs and senators on Tuesday.
Representing the Ireland Israel Alliance, Mr Shatter said the bill was 'based on falsehoods' and 'abandons all lessons learned in our own peace process'.
He said a lack of definition for 'originated' in the bill 'creates a myriad of difficulties'.
Advertisement
He suggested the bill could create 'potential chaos and bureaucracy' at airports and ports for tourists and residents arriving in Ireland, and suggested it could affect the free movement of goods with Northern Ireland.
'The bill is the first initiative of any European government to enact legislation to intentionally boycott and discriminate against Jews since the defeat of Nazi Germany in 1945,' he said.
Committee member Brian Brennan said that he had met seriously injured and orphaned Gazans as well as 'hardened' charities in Cairo at the weekend.
'I went and I sat on a bed with a young man that was in the prime of his life and has two months to live because of what's happening in Gaza,' the Fine Gael TD for Wexford-Wicklow said.
Advertisement
'I played football with teenage kids that are orphans because of what's happening in Gaza.
'I held the hand of a two-year-old child that had bullet wounds because of what's happening in Gaza.
'How dare you come in here and make such statements as 'a Father Ted bill'?'
Responding, Mr Shatter said the bill was 'a thing of complete irrelevance' to peace and did not deal 'with the lives of people'.
Advertisement
'What you're doing is trying to ban the importation of a small amount of olives and avocados from the West Bank of East Jerusalem, the total value of which, over five years, came to €685,000.'
Mr Shatter also said the 'antisemitic symbolism' of the bill was 'reinforced' by no other ban in place for other occupied territories, though there are EU economic restrictions in place for Russian-occupied Crimea.
Chairman of the committee John Lahart said that the Government's and committee members' position on Palestine was motivated by 'the descent by the Israeli government and the Israeli Defence Forces into the darkest of places'.
He rejected that it was coming from an 'antisemitic perspective' and called that suggestion 'hugely hurtful, hugely offensive and slanderous'.
He told Mr Shatter: 'You won't find antisemitism here, and you would do this country, which you love, and we all love – a great favour by promulgating that view as widely and as strongly as you possibly can.'
Mr Shatter responded and said this was 'the perception the bill internationally creates'.
Mr Lahart said: 'So what I'm saying to you, former member Mr Shatter, is this. You're influential.
'You haven't found that view here; you found a committee motivated by purely humanitarian motives.
'I can't influence you one way or the other, but as chair of the committee, I would implore you, if nothing else, to take that on board when you leave today.'
Earlier, Tánaiste Simon Harris responded to Mr Shatter's Father Ted reference by saying there was nothing humorous about the killing of children in Gaza.
Mr Harris told Newstalk radio that the Government can differentiate between a people and their government, and that the actions of the Israeli government are 'despicable'.
'I deplore antisemitism, so does everybody in this country, but you know what, I take views of one of the highest courts in the world much more seriously.'
He referred to the ICJ opinion and said the EU is recognising that member states can enact domestic legislation in relation to it.
'People in Ireland want to do everything we can to try and see a ceasefire, see humanitarian aid flow and see a two-state solution,' Mr Harris said.
'There's nothing funny or humorous about genocide, and there's nothing humorous or funny about children queuing in Gaza today for food and water who are at risk of being shot dead by the IDF.
'There's a genocide happening in (Gaza), references to Father Ted and the likes, they might be humorous soundbites, but there's nothing funny about the slaughter of children.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police unit in England to monitor online signs of anti-migrant disorder
Police unit in England to monitor online signs of anti-migrant disorder

The Guardian

time5 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Police unit in England to monitor online signs of anti-migrant disorder

A national police unit will monitor social media for signs of anti-migrant disorder amid fears of a repeat of last summer's riots across England. Detectives from across the country will flag up the early signs of civil unrest under a beefed-up National Police Coordination Centre (NPoCC) in Westminster. The new intelligence team is a response to the anti-migrant disorder across England and Northern Ireland after the murder of three young girls at a Taylor Swift-themed holiday club in Southport last July. A fresh wave of demonstrations spread this weekend to Leeds, Norwich and Nottinghamshire after violent scenes outside a hotel housing asylum seekers in Epping, Essex, last week. The plan for a new police unit to track signs of such disorder were revealed on Sunday in a letter to MPs by the policing minister, Diana Johnson. Johnson said the Home Office was 'carefully considering' building a 'national internet intelligence investigations team' as part of the NPoCC, which shares briefings on 'nationally significant' demonstrations with police forces across England and Wales. She said: 'This team will provide a national capability to monitor social media intelligence and advise on its use to inform local operational decision-making. 'This will be a dedicated function at a national level for exploiting internet intelligence to help local forces manage public safety threats and risks. 'Funding for this capability beyond 2025–26 will need to be considered in line with future funding priorities, but I am confident that as a first step, this new central team will help build capability across forces to maximise social media intelligence.' Critics claimed the new unit was an attempt to 'police opinions' that would turn Britain into a 'surveillance state'. Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, told the Sunday Telegraph: 'This is the beginning of the state controlling free speech. It is sinister, dangerous and must be fought.' However, the Home Office strongly denied police would be monitoring social media for anti-migrant sentiment. 'These claims are completely untrue,' a Home Office spokesperson said. 'This new capability is not about monitoring what people say on their social media feeds – it is about equipping our police forces to respond more rapidly to the needs of the communities they serve, and enabling them to react in an agile way to real-time information about incidents and emergencies affecting those communities.' Inspectors have warned police forces were overwhelmed by the volume of social media content as unrest spread last summer from Southport to London, Sunderland, Rotherham, Middlesbrough, Belfast and other areas in the most serious nationwide disorder since 2011. A report by the police inspectorate earlier this year concluded the approach to online intelligence was 'disjointed and fragmented' and must be urgently overhauled. The disorder last summer started when misinformation spread about the identity of the 17-year-old who murdered three young girls – six-year-old, Bebe King; Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine; and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven – and stabbed several others in Southport on 29 July. Within hours of the atrocity, false claims circulated widely that the attack was terror-related and perpetrated by an asylum seeker who had recently arrived in the UK on a small boat. A judge took the unprecedented step of attempting to quell the unrest by lifting an anonymity order allowing the attacker, Axel Rudakubana, to be named, while Merseyside police took the unusual step of confirming he was born in Cardiff, contrary to online claims. However, rioters targeted a mosque in Southport barely 24 hours after the murders before violent clashes, largely organised on apps such as Telegram, spread to other parts of England and Belfast. The small policing unit NPoCC took over responsibility for monitoring anti-migrant disorder from counter-terror policing in 2020, yet inspectors found it incorrectly assessed the threat of unrest last summer as 'low'. One intelligence officer said: 'We need to keep an eye on this [serious disorder] all the time. When we stop, we get bitten.'

Guess the TD quiz: Who said the country's housing situation is 'like The Hunger Games'?
Guess the TD quiz: Who said the country's housing situation is 'like The Hunger Games'?

BreakingNews.ie

time6 hours ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Guess the TD quiz: Who said the country's housing situation is 'like The Hunger Games'?

From fiery Dáil exchanges to passionate speeches on housing, climate, international affairs and more, Ireland's elected representatives have delivered their fair share of memorable (and sometimes controversial) quotes in recent years. Whether you're a political junkie, a casual news follower or just love a challenge, this quiz will test your knowledge of Ireland's TDs and their most recent reported-on quotes. Advertisement They make the laws, lead debates and dominate the headlines, but can you tell which TD said what? Take our quiz to find out!

Social Democrats continued to claim TD's allowance despite suspension
Social Democrats continued to claim TD's allowance despite suspension

Times

time7 hours ago

  • Times

Social Democrats continued to claim TD's allowance despite suspension

The Social Democrats continued to receive parliamentary allowances for Eoin Hayes, the Dublin Bay South TD, following his suspension from the party last December. Despite Hayes declaring that he would sit as an independent TD from December 18, the party has claimed payments for him under the parliamentary activities allowance (PAA) scheme since January 2025. Last Friday, the party lifted his suspension. The PAA is paid to parties to support parliamentary work, with funding based on their number of elected representatives to the Dail and Seanad. From January to June 2025, the Social Democrats received €424,696.10 for its 11 TDs and one senator. Had the party excluded Hayes from its PAA claims, its total funding for the year would have dropped by €60,189. A spokeswoman for the Social Democrats told The Sunday Times: 'Like all political parties, the Social Democrats are in receipt of state money which is allocated on the basis of electoral performance in the general election.' Hayes, who returned to the party on July 25 after donating $51,000 to three humanitarian organisations active in Gaza, confirmed that the PAA claim has not affected him personally. 'As a Social Democrats TD, despite my suspension, the party is entitled to claim the allowance,' he said. 'If I had formally left the party or was an independent, I would be entitled to a personal allowance of around €40,000 annually … I have never sought that.' Hayes was suspended after it was revealed he failed to sell shares in Palantir Technologies, a US firm that provides software to the Israeli military, until a month after he was elected as a city councillor in June 2024.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store