
Pub takes centre stage in presidential race as Polish voters go for another round
Poles
choose a new president on Sunday, many believe their country's political future has already been decided – in a pub three hours northwest of Warsaw.
Sunday's presidential run-off is a close race between two very different candidates: Rafal Trzaskowski, the capital's pro-EU, liberal mayor; and Karol Nawrocki, a national conservative historian with Maga-like ambitions.
The new head of state, with control of the defence forces and powers to veto legislation, will shape Poland's path in the EU and Nato. And supercharge – or hobble – prime minister
Donald Tusk
's efforts to deliver on political promises that took him back to power in December 2023.
With just one percentage point separating them, both presidential hopefuls are courting Slawomir Mentzen, a far-right libertarian politician and pub-owner.
READ MORE
The 38-year-old finished third in the presidential election first round almost a fortnight ago, making his 15 per cent voter bloc now the most valuable commodity in Polish politics.
Poland's conservative presidential candidate Karol Nawrocki. Photograph: Wojtek Radwanski/AFP via Getty Images
Govem Mentzen is by far the most popular candidate among younger voters – he took a third of the under-30 vote – and Poland's two presidential front-runners were quick to accept an invitation to his craft brewery and pub in the small town of Torun.
It is filled with political bric-a-brac and agitprop and operates a very public list of banned politicians. Metzen posted his conversations from here on his YouTube channel, where he has more than one million subscribers, simultaneously boosting both his political profile and craft beer brand.
He promised a candidate endorsement days later.
The trip to Torun paid off for Trzaskowski almost immediately when a post-conversation picture of him sharing a beer with Mentzen went viral on social media.
Warsaw's 53-year-old mayor needs all the help he can get – and the real prospect of defeat has set alarm bells ringing with Tusk.
The liberal prime minister has spent his first 18 months back in power battling on two fronts: a president allied with the opposition Law and Jusice (PiS) party who has vetoed judicial reforms and other legislation; and warring coalition allies who disagree on key election promises, including a more liberal
abortion
policy.
'I'm sorry, yes, you all expected us to do more, faster and be stronger,' said Tusk at a weekend rally. 'So I ask you: give us the strength, so that we can change Poland as we promised.'
As PiS-allied candidate Nawrocki is presenting himself as Poland's last defence against a looming Tusk 'coup'.
'I will be the president of your future, I won't allow our future and our childrens' future to be stolen by those who want the destruction of the Polish state,' he said.
Earlier this month Nawrocki was photographed in the White House with
Donald Trump
, who has promised further US military investment in Poland if Nawrocki wins.
Nawrocki has promised a strongly nationalist platform with another
migration
crackdown and presidential pushback against EU plans to achieve climate neutrality by 2050.
'We are for the Polish farmer, the Polish field and Polish bread at the Polish table,' he told a rally on Sunday in Warsaw.
But Nawrocki has struggled to maintain his message in the campaign amid a surge of scandals: over an undeclared second home; alleged links to organised crime and prostitution rings, which he denies; and revelations he participated, in the early 2000s, in organised football hooligan fights. He called them a form of 'noble, masculine combat' and, in the last days of campaigning, began dropping into rally speeches mentions of 'stolen elections'.
That has raised speculation that, if he loses, his PiS backers will challenge Sunday's vote as illegitimate.
Presidential candidate Rafal Trzaskowski is also mayor of Warsaw. Photograph: Sergei Gapon/AFP via Getty Images
Election analysts are predicting a tight result after polls close at 9pm. The first round attracted a record 67 per cent of voters and post-poll analysis revealed the usual Polish divide: Trzaskowski more popular in liberal western Poland and Nawrocki ahead in more conservative eastern regions.
Trzaskowski was also the favourite among Poles voting outside the country, on 37 per cent. However, the Trump-endorsed Nawrocki took 42 per cent of the sizeable US Polish diaspora vote. With such a tight race, polling agencies say the expat vote could swing the final outcome.
After stringing along both presidential candidates, on Wednesday Mentzen decided to endorse neither.
On a YouTube livestream he said he saw 'no reason' to vote for the 'slippery' Trzaskowski, accusing him of breaking promises and disowning failures.
Meanwhile, Nawrocki's life was a 'great cinematic tale', Mentzen said, but after a series of colourful campaign revelations, 'I wouldn't be surprised if there are more such episodes in his past'.
With all eyes on him, Mentzen promised to smash the liberal and national-conservative camps that have dominated Polish politics for two decades. His aim is to go mainstream with Confederation, his party that marries libertarian economics with far-right nationalism.
'I don't know what the future holds but it may turn out that, in two years, it'll be Confederation deciding who governs Poland,' said Mentzen to his YouTube audience. 'I intend to end this duopoly and finally bring change to Poland.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Focus turns to money as German political honeymoon ends
Berlin tourist guides like to tell visitor groups, as they float along the Spree river each day, that locals took one look at the adjacent modernist chancellery building – a boxy concrete form with several round windows – and dubbed it 'the washing machine'. Nearly two months after collecting the keys to the chancellery, however, Berlin political insiders have given the new workplace of chancellor Friedrich Merz a new name: Germany 's last-chance saloon. The 69-year-old's first term as leader is also the last opportunity, so the dominant narrative here, for Germany's political centre to hold. And those close to the new German leader say he began correcting his positions after a series of shocks that began five days after his election victory. READ MORE In his new book Democracy's Last Chance, German political writer Robin Alexander argues that Merz – a lifelong Atlanticist – was deeply shaken by Donald Trump's Oval Office dressing down of Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskiy. Alexander writes that, for Merz, something significant happened in Washington on February 28th: 'The Americans are not just threatening to hang out Ukraine to dry, but all its allies.' This was the final trigger for Merz to perform a radical U-turn and push to loosen restrictive debt rules – contrary to his campaign promises – that includes what is effectively a blank cheque on defence. Increasing Germany's pure defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP is, analysts agree, as historic and far-reaching moment as ex-ECB president Mario Draghi's 'whatever it takes' speech in the euro crisis or the 'Zeitenwende' (watershed) address of Olaf Scholz after Russia's invasion of Ukraine. But it is not just on defence, debt and the transatlantic relationship where Merz-led transformation is emerging: Israel's ongoing blockade of Gaza has seen a toughening of rhetoric from Berlin, previously unthinkable in the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), if not – as yet – matched by action. But elections are won or lost at home. After two months in a domestic political holding pattern, with an economy in its third year of recession, Merz is anxious to try some actual governing before the summer break. On Wednesday he will chair a key meeting with his centre-left Social Democratic Party (SPD) partners where coalition reform aspirations meet Berlin's new political reality. Expectations have been building since the centre-right CDU, along with its Bavarian CSU allies, won last February's snap election with 28.5 per cent support. The centre-left SPD finished third with a disastrous 16.4 per cent, just enough votes to return to power – this time as a junior partner. Berlin's political honeymoon, such as it was, ends on Wednesday when the coalition members meet to fill in the awkward detail of their vague shotgun coalition agreement. From tackling climate change to an ban on the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), many of the coalition's prickliest problems are unresolved issues where the CDU is more sceptical of government intervention. As always, though, the biggest coalition rows are building over money. SPD co-leader Lars Klingbeil has presented spending estimates for the new government term with total borrowing of a record €850 billion. Photograph: Filip Singer/EPA SPD co-leader Lars Klingbeil, also the federal finance minister, has already presented spending estimates for the new government term with total borrowing of a record €850 billion. That is over and above off-balance-sheet spending of at least €1 trillion agreed in March for infrastructure and defence investment. CDU and CSU politicians warn Berlin borrowing is 'out of control', and demand cuts to welfare budgets beloved of SPD leaders and delegates who gathered in Berlin for a weekend party conference. It was a first chance for many to let off steam at February's historic election disaster – and a party leadership many think is not listening to the grassroots. Even so, many were shocked at the body blow delegates delivered to Klingbeil. The 47-year-old, a pragmatic centrist, has moved quickly since February to establish himself as the SPD's new kingpin and deputy chancellor. Despite his success in securing considerable concessions from the CDU in the post-election scramble, his own party re-elected him as SPD co-leader with just 65 per cent support. Political analysts see growing tension in power as SPD grassroot demands for real leftist policies – on welfare, housing and pensions – collide with a right-wing coalition partner and an increasingly professional, and distant, SPD leadership. 'Lars wants power and has a centralised understanding of power, and is pushing a professional party along American lines,' said Gero Neugebauer, a Berlin-based political analyst. Despite SPD uncertainties, and unresolved trade and migration tensions, voter fury over the debt U-turn has evaporated and the CDU is back at its election level of support. Even with the AfD trailing by just five points, and the clock ticking down to the next election, the Merz message for Europe is that Germany is back. At a speech honouring European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen as recipient of this year's Charlemagne prize, Merz insisted Germany was once more 'placing itself at the service of a strong, united Europe'. 'We will not stand at the sidelines when it comes to defending freedom and democracy, rule of law and human dignity on the continent,' he said in Aachen. 'History doesn't just happen, politics is made by people and political decisions make history.'


Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Poland to start controls on borders with Germany, Lithuania over migration
Poland will introduce temporary controls along borders with Germany and Lithuania on July 7th, prime minister Donald Tusk said on Tuesday, echoing several other European Union countries in reimposing frontier checks to stem illegal migration. Belgium , the Netherlands and Germany have also brought back border controls, underlining a public backlash against undocumented migration that has strained the EU's Schengen passport-free travel zone. 'We consider the temporary reintroduction of controls necessary to reduce the uncontrolled flows of migrants across the Polish-German border to a minimum,' Mr Tusk told a meeting of his cabinet. Mr Tusk's liberal government has been accused by nationalist and far-right opposition parties of accepting numerous illegal migrants being sent back from Germany. The government had argued that the numbers were limited. READ MORE [ EU cannot ignore what's happening in Poland and The Netherlands Opens in new window ] Debate over migration in Poland has turned increasingly heated in recent weeks, with far-right activists starting to organise patrols along the border with Germany. Germany said in February that it was extending its temporary border controls for six months. Mr Tusk, who has previously called on Berlin to do more to help its neighbours protect the EU's external border, criticised Germany's approach to migrants at its frontier, saying it placed excessive pressure on Poland. 'Poland's patient position after Germany formally introduced unilateral border controls is wearing out,' Mr Tusk said. He said it had become difficult to determine whether migrants being sent from Germany to Poland should really be returned there under EU rules stating that migrants should apply for asylum in the first member state they enter. German chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Tuesday that Germany wants to preserve the Schengen system, which allows passport-free movement, but this could only work if it was not abused by criminals who smuggle migrants. 'We know that the Polish government also wants to impose border controls with Lithuania in order to limit illegal border crossings from Lithuania to Poland,' Mr Merz told a news conference. 'So, we have a common problem here that we want to solve together.' Knut Abraham, the German government's commissioner for Poland, was critical of the tilt towards border restrictions. 'The solution cannot lie in pushing migrants back and forth between Poland and Germany or in cementing border controls on both sides,' he was quoted by Die Welt newspaper as saying. Lithuanian foreign minister Kestutis Budrys told a news conference that the Polish government had informed him about its decision, BNS news agency reported. '[We need to see] what measures should be most effective, while maintaining the expectation that they will not violate our common interest in having free movement of persons, and will also contribute to our goal of firmly and solidly protecting the external border of the EU and Nato,' BNS quoted him as saying. Poland has been facing what it says is a migrant crisis orchestrated by Belarus and Russia on its eastern border since 2021. Both countries deny encouraging migrants to cross. – Reuters


Irish Times
3 days ago
- Irish Times
These five factors are how Zohran Mamdani took New York by storm
Zohran Mamdani's victory in the New York City Democratic mayoral primary is the outcome of a campaign that will be pored over, with elements replicated not just in America but anywhere left-wing politicians and movements are looking to break through. His surprise success vindicates the politics, message and strategies of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders , offering a blueprint for the Democratic Party on how to win. In a city seemingly allergic to progressive mayors, how did he do it? You can't spell campaigns without Camps, an acronym I use when describing effective contemporary political campaigning. Camps stands for consistent, authentic, motivational, positive and simple. [ This man could be just what the American left needs Opens in new window ] Consistent: Mamdani's political record may be short but it is consistent. His consistency is linked to his values. If you don't actually hold values, if they shift with the wind, if they're at the whim of market research and polling, then you are exposed as disingenuous. Mamdani didn't win despite his solidarity with Palestine , he won because of it. He has shown up for undocumented immigrants and the LGBTQ+ community when many Democrats are attempting to park progressive values because they're scared of the right or because – as is the case with Keir Starmer 's leadership in the UK – when you scratch centrism, right-wing positions emerge, betraying both substance and voter bases. Mamdani did not need to change who he was or dilute his message, because his consistency demonstrated his values and integrity. READ MORE Authentic: Mamdani did not seem fake, generic, awkward or detached. He came across as real. 'Outsiders', or just newcomers, are refreshing because they're novel. Voters want people they can relate to, who aren't focus-grouped into blandness, and who don't talk like ChatGPT. In contrast, the attacks against Mamdani were inauthentic, especially accusations of anti-Semitism, which he dismantled with patience and clarity. He also didn't shirk authentic emotion when expressing how upsetting the Islamophobic attacks on him were. Motivational: Mamdani's campaign was a masterclass in creativity, messaging, design, connection and energy. Above all, it was motivational. Motivational campaigning is about generating a sense of enthusiasm that tips over into inspiring people into active participation. In practical terms, he motivated tens of thousands of canvassers to knock on more than a million doors. Contemporary campaigning must nail both digital and old-school strategies. Mamdani's communication on social media was natural, and not forced or cringeworthy. But what was phenomenal was his campaign's capacity to build a highly-organised grassroots movement that was documented and broadcast online. This feedback loop built a motivational story. When you're seeing a compelling story unfold through your phone, when you're feeling momentum grow in a way that feels inspiring, you're more likely to get involved. When campaigns become movements, they take on an energy of their own. Everyone who participated in this grassroots movement can rightly claim to be part of the story. Positive: Positive campaigning isn't just about channelling a vibe or a message, it must be a demonstration. Mamdani didn't attack competitors with shared values. In fact, he moved to endorse them. This was mature, pragmatic and refreshing. A standout demonstration of positivity was collaborating with his competitor, Brad Lander. Left-wing unity over left-wing purity tests wins every time. Andrew Cuomo ran a negative, low-energy, entitled and fear-based campaign, gifting Mamdani the contrast of positivity. Mamdani constantly foregrounded people power. Simple: Simplicity is about policy. Mamdani's policies were easy to understand and memorable. He campaigned on affordability and the cost of living. His platform was simple: New York is too expensive; here are some policies that will lower costs and make life easier. His policies were tangible: city-owned stores to lower the cost of groceries; free buses (the majority of New Yorkers don't own cars); rent freezes for up to one million people; tripling the number of affordable housing units; free childcare. To fund much of this, he plans to raise corporate tax to 11.5 per cent, along with a millionaire tax of 2 per cent on the wealthiest 1 per cent. The latter drives many rich people crazy of course, but that doesn't matter in campaigning terms when you're drawing votes from the unaffected 99 per cent. [ 'The capital of capitalism': New York's old brigade plot how to stop the rise of Zohran Mamdani Opens in new window ] Ultimately, the so-called conventional wisdom collapsed. He has shown that money doesn't necessarily win campaigns; the billionaire class can be beaten; young people will get involved and vote when they're inspired; name recognition and dynastic power doesn't always matter, and scare tactics can fail. Traditional media narratives urging the status quo be maintained were ineffective because traditional media is no longer hegemonic, and most people under 40 get their information and analysis from ideologically partisan alternative media, which has become the new mainstream. [ Finn McRedmond: Ireland needs its own Joe Rogan, someone to question liberal orthodoxies Opens in new window ] The Democratic Party now has a choice. It can continue to double down on failed strategy, or take notes. Meek centrism cannot movement-build, coalition-build or counter right-wing authoritarianism. It can't engage working-class people and young people. That's just not a compelling story to tell or sell. What can be a compelling story is left-wing populism rooted in economic justice and communicated by interesting candidates.