Team USA athletes to receive $200K for Olympic, Paralympic Games participation
The plan, fueled by a $100 million donation by philanthropist Ross Stevens, will allow each Team USA athlete to receive a "Stevens Financial Security Award" consisting of two six-figure payments. Eligible athletes will be able to access $100,000 over a four-year period following the end of their Olympic or Paralympic careers − specifically, 20 years after their qualifying Games or when they turn 45 years old, whichever is later. Their families or beneficiaries will also receive $100,000 upon their death.
In a statement announcing the plan, the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee added that the benefits will multiply with each additional iteration of the Games in which the athlete competes − meaning a two-time Olympic athlete would receive $400,000, and a three-time Paralympian would be eligible to receive $600,000.
"Because of Ross' extraordinary generosity and philanthropic creativity, we can create more than a financial safety net," USOPC chairman Gene Sykes said in a statement. "We can build a springboard that will propel these athletes to even greater heights beyond their Olympic and Paralympic careers."
The USOPC said the $100-million "anchor funding gift" from Stevens, the CEO and founder of Stone Ridge Holdings Group, made the program possible. It is the largest single gift in the organization's history.
"Team USA athletes, extraordinary individuals, have proven they can achieve greatness and represent our incredible country with pride," Stevens said in a statement. "The Stevens Awards honor the sacrifices they have made on behalf of all Americans while inspiring the development of their dreams in the post-Games chapter of their lives."
The post-retirement support program offers a creative solution to one of the fundamental issues in Olympic and Paralympic sports.
Unlike in major professional team sports, where athletes have the security of a contract that pays out regardless of performance or injury, most Olympic and Paralympic athletes rely on sponsorship deals and appearance fees to make up the majority of their income. For big stars like gymnastics gold medalist Simone Biles and 100-meter champion Noah Lyles, those income streams are massive. But for the average Olympic athlete in a sport like table tennis or water polo, they are usually not available.
"The reality is that's only the top 5%," water polo player Kaleigh Gilchrist said last summer. "The rest of us are living paycheck by paycheck."
National governing bodies and international federations have offered various stipends to help fund athletes' training and support them during their careers. The USOPC also pays athletes who medal at the Olympic or Paralympic Games; In 2024, they received $37,500 for every gold medal, $22,500 for every silver and $15,000 for every bronze.
Yet because so much of the money is dependent on performance, many athletes feel it's not enough − especially for early-career Olympic athletes, who are trying to get a foothold as a professional. A 2020 survey of nearly 500 elite athletes across 48 countries by advocacy group Global Athlete found 58% of respondents didn't consider themselves financially stable.
The USOPC said the Stevens Awards will help address this issue by providing the sort of savings that Olympic and Paralympic athletes do not have a chance to accrue.
"Admiration of U.S. Olympians and Paralympians is uniquely bipartisan, uniting all Americans, and reminding us of our shared humanity," Stevens said.(This story has been updated to add a video.)
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Olympic athletes will get paid $200K after competing in Games
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Journals
an hour ago
- Business Journals
Stevens & Lee expands in New Jersey with acquisition of 8-lawyer firm
Stevens & Lee's latest acquisition marks its third expansion this summer, signaling an aggressive growth strategy for the Reading-based law firm.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Procter & Gamble Offers Modest Growth With Limited Upside Potential
Procter & Gamble is a leading consumer goods company specializing in daily-use products. Its business is organized into five segments covering ten categories: Beauty (Skin & Hair Care), Grooming (Gillette razors), Health Care (Oral and Personal Care), Fabric & Home Care (laundry and surface cleaners), and Baby/Feminine/Family Care (diapers, feminine hygiene, tissue). Fabric & Home Care is the largest division (~36% of sales) with brands like Tide, Ariel, and Dawn. Baby/Feminine/Family Care accounts for ~24% (Pampers, Always, Charmin). Many P&G brands are global market leaders with a strong share (often >25%) in their categories. Approximately 48% of sales are in the U.S. and 52% international. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with EGO. In Q3 FY2025, P&G reported net sales of $19.8 billion, down 2% from a year earlier. On an organic basis (excluding currency fluctuations and acquisitions/divestitures), sales increased by 1% year-over-year. Reported net earnings were $3.8 billion (implying roughly a 19.2% net profit margin), and GAAP diluted EPS was $1.54, up 1% from $1.52 a year ago. These results were roughly in line with analysts' expectations; consensus forecasts were for approximately $1.55 EPS on sales of around $20.36 billion. As a result, EPS essentially met the $1.55 consensus, while revenue came in about $580 million below estimates. After the release, P&G's stock fell ~4.5% pre-market on the modest revenue shortfall, but markets appeared to accept that EPS was essentially on-target. Despite the flat sales, P&G's operating efficiency improved. Core (non-GAAP) gross margin eased only slightly (~30 basis points lower than a year ago), and core operating margin actually expanded by about 90 basis points. This reflects productivity gains and cost controls that offset commodity cost pressures. For example, management cites ~$280 million of productivity savings in the quarter. As a result, operating cash flow was $3.7 billion, virtually matching net income, and free cash flow was very strong (adjusted cash-flow productivity ~75%). The company returned $3.8 billion of cash to shareholders in the quarter via dividends of $2.4 bn and buybacks of $1.4 bn, consistent with its long-term policy (notably, FY2025 guidance contemplates about $10 bn in dividends and $6-7 bn in buybacks). Year-over-year, the slight sales decline reflected mixed category performance. P&G's Beauty and Grooming segments saw modest gains, but Baby/Feminine/Family Care (which includes Pampers) had a low-single-digit organic decline due to volume weakness. The company notes that much of the top-line change was driven by pricing (+2% price impact), while volumes/mix were roughly neutral. The bottom line benefited from offsetting factors: cost discipline and pricing action supported earnings, but headwinds (notably currency and increased marketing spend in some segments) kept margin gains limited. P&G updated its guidance for FY2025 to reflect current market conditions. It now expects fiscal-year net sales to be roughly flat (all-in sales in line with FY2024) and organic sales growth of about +2%. For earnings, management raised its core EPS guidance to about $6.72$6.82 (versus $6.59 prior-year core EPS), implying only 24% core EPS growth year-over-year. (The FY2024 GAAP EPS was $6.02, so the 68% increase guidance on GAAP EPS translates to $6.38$6.50 if there are no charges.) These mid-single-digit projections represent a slight downward revision from earlier targets, reflecting known headwinds. Management cites a roughly $200 million FY2025 EBIT headwind from commodity costs, plus about a $200 million FX drag, and additional modest impacts from lost benefit of minor divestitures (together ~ $0.20 in EPS headwind). Moreover, ongoing U.S. tariffs on imported materials are expected to cost the company on the order of $600 million in FY2026 (roughly $0.15$0.20 per share) unless reversed. In light of these challenges, P&G is emphasizing cost cuts and reinvestment. Management reiterated that it will pull every leverpricing, productivity, and innovationto defend margins and support its brands. Notably, the company has announced an accelerated two-year restructuring plan (beginning FY2026) to cut about 7,000 jobs (~6% of its workforce) and exit low-growth brands and markets. Pre-tax charges for this spring cleaning program are expected to total $1.0$1.6 billion over two years. Management says the goal is to free up capital to turbo-charge core, high-value brands like Tide, Pampers, and Old Spice. In the very near term, P&G is focusing on tough market conditionsslowing consumer value growth in the U.S. and Europeand is guiding modestly below its earlier pace. Still, it is maintaining its long-term cash return policy and has reiterated a combined ~$1617 billion plan for dividends and buybacks this fiscal year, signaling confidence in its cash generation. P&G's long-term growth thesis rests on stable fundamentals plus targeted reinvestment. Over time, the company has consistently delivered about 2% core EPS growth annually (8 years in a row through FY2024) and 4% organic sales growth (six straight years), even through recessions. Management's strategy is to focus on share gains in developed markets and growth in emerging regions. The FY2025 guidance (low single-digit sales growth) is modest, but management emphasizes plenty of upside opportunities beyond that baseline. For example, in the U.S. and Europe, P&G estimates billions of dollars of incremental market potential by expanding penetration and consumption. The CFO noted roughly $5 billion of untapped sales in North America and $10 billion in Europe if consumption can be raised to best-in-class levels. Similarly, in its Enterprise emerging-market regions (e.g., China, India, Latin America), driving consumption up to the levels currently seen in Mexico alone represents a $1015 billion sales opportunity. These remarks underscore that despite near-term headwinds, P&G sees significant runway in core categories and geographies. P&G also plans to continue investing in product superiority and marketing to support its brand franchise. As CEO Jon Moeller said on the Q3 call, the company remains confident in the longer-term growth prospects for its brands and will keep funding innovation across all price tiers. In practice, this means maintaining R&D, trialing new products (e.g., premium skin care SK-II in China), and reinforcing leading brands even as the company trims lesser ones. P&G's consumer-centric model has proven durable: it has rewarded shareholders with consistent dividends and buybacks (over $13B returned YTD FY2025) and long-term EPS growth. The company targets roughly 90% free cash flow conversion and a capital returns rate near 90% (dividends plus buybacks) in the long run. Provided management executes the productivity initiatives without eroding brand equity, P&G should sustain low-to-mid-single-digit growth with high margins. One wildcard is the broader economic and regulatory environment. Trade tensions remain unpredictable. The CFO has noted that recent tariffs could shave a few cents per share by late FY2026, unless they are eased. Slower global GDP growth and any recession could dampen consumer spending on even basic goods. On the other hand, P&G's defensive categories tend to hold up well in downturns, and the firm still carries significant pricing power (as seen in the +1% organic growth this quarter despite volume softness). In short, barring major disruptions, we see P&G as a steady grower: modest near-term sales growth with margin headwinds, offset by strong cash flow and strategic cost savings, leading to stable EPS growth and shareholder returns over time. P&G shares trade at a premium valuation relative to typical consumer staples. The current forward P/E is around 2223 (mid-July 2025). This is roughly in line with P&G's recent history (its five-year median forward P/E is ~23.9 times) but well above the ~17 times median for the broader consumer-goods industry. In absolute terms, P&G's forward multiple is higher than most of its smaller peers. For example, Kimberly-Clark (NYSE: KMB) trades around 18 forward earnings and Clorox (NYSE: CLX) around 19x, both substantially lower. Even Church & Dwight (NYSE: CHD, not cited) and smaller personal-care names generally sit in the mid-to-high teens. The notable exception is Colgate-Palmolive (NYSE: CL), which currently trades near 25 forward earnings, slightly above P&G. Thus, P&G is valued near the high end of its peer group, reflecting its scale, dividend pedigree, and past growth record. Compared to its history, the stock is only modestly above its five-year average P/E, implying it is not dramatically stretched but not cheap either. On yield metrics, P&G yields around 2.4% on its dividend, roughly in line with its 5-year average of about 2.5%. That yield is below the ~3% yields of some consumer staples (e.g., KMB, WMT) but acceptable given P&G's growth. Share buybacks add a few tenths of a percent to returns. Overall, P&G's valuation reflects market expectations for only low single-digit top-line growth, which seems justified by current trends. Unless the company can reignite faster growth or dramatically improve margins, the stock's upside may be limited to a few percent annually (plus dividend). In contrast, a downside scenario might occur if volume declines accelerate or if macro pressures intensify. P&G remains a high-quality consumer staple with a leading portfolio, strong margins, and an exemplary dividend track record. Its Q3 FY2025 results showed modest organic growth and stable EPS despite challenging conditions, and the company has signaled only mid-single-digit growth ahead. The most significant near-term developments are the planned cost-reduction program, including 7,000 job cuts and brand exits, which should improve long-term profitability if executed well. However, these moves also carry execution risk (investors will watch if key brands suffer from underinvestment). The sizable shareholder returns (>$16B planned this year) continue to underpin the stock. From a valuation standpoint, P&G is not cheap: its forward P/E is near the high end of its historical and peer ranges. This implies the market expects only modest growth, essentially holding the stock as a defensive income play. In our view, a fair conclusion is that P&G is fairly valued: it offers dependable free cash flow and moderate EPS growth (24% annually as guided) with low risk but limited upside in the share price absent a positive catalyst. Key points to monitor will be whether the restructuring yields a sustainable margin lift and whether end-market consumption improves. If P&G can sustain its multi-year growth algorithm (e.g., ~4% organic, ~2%+ EPS growth) despite headwinds, then the current valuation is reasonable. Conversely, any surprise acceleration of volume growth or margin expansion could justify a higher multiple. For now, investors should view P&G as a stable core holding its brands and cash flows remain robust, but it is not a quick-growth story. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Charley Hull, Brooke Henderson, Lydia Ko qualify for LPGA team event International Crown
The new World Team for the LPGA's 2025 Hanwha Lifeplus International Crown has some of the game's most popular players on its four-person squad. Charley Hull's runner-up performance at the AIG Women's British Open qualified her for the team along with Lydia Ko, Brooke Henderson and Wei-Ling Hsu. The new World Team consists of the top-ranked player from each of the following four regions, not from a country already qualified: Europe, Asia and Africa/Oceania. "I'm excited. Obviously, I've never played the International Crown," said New Zealand's Ko, "so it's going to be a new one for me. I love team formats and it's kind of out of our comfort zone but I kind of love that. I think it's a great way to get to know my peers at the same time. For it to be in Korea, I think the fans are going to be very excited to see all of us there.' Two years ago when England qualified for the Crown as a team, both Hull and good friend Georgia Hall withdrew the weekend prior to the event, leaving officials to scramble at the last minute to replace them. Ladies European Tour players Alice Hewson and Liz Young flew from England to San Francisco to round out the four-player squad. Hull said at the time that she was suffering from a left foot injury sustained from running too much on concrete without warming up properly. The top 16 players in the world have qualified for the event, with golf's newest major champion, Miyu Yamashita, leading the way for Japan. The Japanese team has four players ranked inside the top 21 while Team USA, led by No. 2 Nelly Korda, has four players ranked inside the top 19. 'The International Crown is something I was aiming toward. I really, really wanted to be part of that team,' said Yamashita. 'So now that's a possibility I can really look forward to representing my country and doing the best I can.' All five major winners from 2025 are in the field, with both Japan and Australia having two each. Yealimi Noh, ranked 24th, was the first American left off the list. The event will be held in South Korea for a second time Oct. 23-26 at New Korea Country Club.
