A Baffling Signal Shot Up From Deep Within Earth's Ice—and No One Knows What Caused It
Anomalous radio signals detected in Antarctica by the ANITA experiment were coming upward from Earth rather than down from the sky.
Researchers used digital and mathematical simulations to test whether they could be subatomic particles known as neutrinos, but it is unlikely.
ANITA is retired, but the upcoming neutrino detector PUEO might finally identify what the signals are.
Strange signals from outer space are constantly reaching Earth, hailing from sources like pulsars, quasars, and supernovas. In Antarctica, a signal like this recently seemed to materialize out of nowhere, but it wasn't coming from the sky above—instead, it was coming from the depths of the ocean.
Two decades ago, far above the vast expanse of ice and snow, instruments aboard the Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA) experiment (now retired) were picking up radio waves from cosmic rays shooting through the atmosphere. When those rays collide with particles in said atmosphere, they scatter into secondary particles—a hundred of which pass right through our bodies every second without our realizing it. By detecting these particles, ANITA was giving insight into distant cosmic events. But then, things got weird.
ANITA detected anomalous signals coming from below the horizon, at unusually sharp angles some 30 degrees below the icy surface. What appeared to be radio pulses had to have somehow penetrated thousands of miles of rock that they should have been absorbed by. How these ultrahigh-energy cosmic ray (UHECR) pulses could have been detected at all was a mystery. Physicist Stephanie Wissel of Penn State University, who had been scouring ANITA data for signals from neutrinos (which are already mysterious subatomic particles) had never seen anything remotely like it.
'Given the difficulties in interpreting the anomalous ANITA events, they have attracted a lot of attention,' Wissel and her researcher team said in a study recently published in Physical Review Letters. 'Theoretical interpretations involving [exotic physics] have been put forward invoking new particles that induce upward-going showers in the atmosphere.'
The researchers thought it was possible that the signal could have been coming from those elusive neutrinos, which are blasted out by objects and phenomena that generate extreme amounts of energy. Most neutrinos interact with nothing, but tau neutrinos will interact with ice. This flavor of neutrino is associated with the tau lepton, another subatomic particle that starts to decay after it is released from ice, losing energy as it breaks down. Tau neutrino decay ends up giving off signals known as air showers, and the electromagnetic radiation released by these showers is detectable by a radio antenna such as ANITA's. But, despite that, the signal turned out not to be coming from neutrinos or tau neutrinos.
Whatever was creating these signals was incongruent with computer simulations and mathematical models of both cosmic rays and hypothetical upward air showers, and the signals themselves were unlike anything detectors similar to ANITA—such as the IceCube Neutrino Observatory and Pierre Auger Observatory—had ever seen. The signals didn't even fit into the Standard Model of Particle Physics, which describes how matter is made up of subatomic particles. They could only be called anomalous.
'The results of this search do not support the interpretation that the anomalous pulses detected […] were caused by air showers sourced from particle interactions or decays, such as by decays of upward-going taus, the latter being the basis of proposed explanations based on physics beyond the Standard Model,' the researchers said.
Could the signals be coming from particles previously unknown to physics? Possibly. They might also, however, be from neutrinos that went undetected. Wissel is now working on ANITA's successor—the larger and more sensitive PUEO neutrino detector. Maybe this anomaly will tell us something we would have never otherwise imagined.
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Verge
3 hours ago
- The Verge
Former X CEO Linda Yaccarino has a new job.
Posted Aug 5, 2025 at 4:09 PM UTC Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates. Jay Peters Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Jay Peters Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Health Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Science Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Twitter - X
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists just recreated the universe's first ever molecules — and the results challenge our understanding of the early cosmos
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. For the first time, researchers have recreated the universe's first ever molecules by mimicking the conditions of the early universe. The findings shake up our understanding of the origin of stars in the early universe and "calls for a reassessment of the helium chemistry in the early universe," the researchers wrote in the new study, published July 24 in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics. The first stars in the universe Just after the Big Bang 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was subject to extremely high temperatures. A few seconds later, though, temperatures decreased enough for hydrogen and helium to form as the first ever elements. Hundreds of thousands of years after those elements formed, temperatures became cool enough for their atoms to combine with electrons in a variety of different configurations, forging molecules. According to the researchers, a helium hydride ion — or HeH+ — became the first ever molecule. The ion is needed to form molecular hydrogen, now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Both helium hydride ions and molecular hydrogen were critical to the development of the first stars hundreds of millions of years later, the researchers said. For a protostar to begin fusion — the process that enables stars to create their own energy — atoms and molecules within it must collide with each other and release heat. This process is largely ineffective at temperatures under 18,000 degrees Fahrenheit (10,000 degrees Celsius). Related: Universe's First Molecule Detected in Space for the First Time Ever However, helium hydride ions are particularly good at continuing the process, even under cool temperatures, and are considered to be a potentially integral factor of star formation in the early universe. The amount of helium hydride ions in the universe may therefore have had significant bearing on the speed and efficacy of early star formation, the researchers said in a statement. Far more important than previously assumed In the new study, the researchers recreated early helium hydride reactions by storing the ions at minus 449 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 267 degrees Celsius) for up to 60 seconds to cool them down before forcing them to collide with heavy hydrogen. Researchers studied how the collisions — similar to those that kickstart fusion in a star — changed depending on the temperature of the particles. They found that reaction rates between these particles do not slow down at lower temperatures, which contradicts older assumptions. RELATED STORIES —2 stars covered in unusual elements have a puzzling origin story —'Immortal' stars at the Milky Way's center may have found an endless energy source, study suggests —The Milky Way's 'thick disk' is 2 billion years older than scientists thought "Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations," study co-author Holger Kreckel, who studies nuclear physics at the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics in Germany, said in the statement. This new finding of how helium hydride ions function challenges how physicists think stars formed in the early universe. Reactions between the ions and other atoms "appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed," Kreckel said. Periodic table of elements quiz: How many elements can you name in 10 minutes? Solve the daily Crossword


Fox News
4 hours ago
- Fox News
'Damning' details revealed in OceanGate submersible final report
Senior correspondent Mike Tobin discusses the final report on the deadly 'Titan' submersible that killed five in a Titanic exploration expedition.